IFS Solutions

Hi Finance experts,I am trying to export an External File Template using External File Assistant but cannot see Parameter Set 2 which is probably the option for export.Any idea on how to set this up so that I can change file direction as ‘OutputFile’ and then export an External File Template?  

Good afternoon, We are trying to revoke project disconnection for purchase order lines.  User are allowed to connect to projects just not disconnect.How do I do this?Thanks! 

Following the upgrade of our IFS Cloud TEST environment to version 26.1.x, the following Oracle package bodies in the IFSAPP schema remain invalid: ORDER_SERVICE_END_CUSTOMER_SVC SERVICE_REQUEST_SVC The invalid objects were first reported during the deployment on 21 August 2026 (ORA-20105: Database.NEW_INVALIDS) and remain invalid after the upgrade to IFS Cloud 26.1.4 on 22 September 2026.Technical findingsWe have identified a change in the signature of Psc_Contr_Product_API.Get_Description between IFS Cloud 25.2.4 and 26.1.2.IFS Cloud 25.2.4 – two parameters:Get_Description(contract_id_, line_no_)IFS Cloud 26.1.2 and later installation files – three parameters:Get_Description(contract_id_, contract_rev_, line_no_)However, the SCBB source file OrderServiceEndCustomer.plsvc from the 25.2.4 installation package still contains calls using the old two-parameter signature at lines 242 and 332.The same incompatible calls are present in the currently invalid Oracle package body ORDER_SERVIC

There is a requirement from customer  that in they show upto 2months of Slots[400 Slots] on there portal for customer to choose from which means the best practice of 20 slots is not going to fulfill the requirement hence we need to understand to what maximum extent this value can be increased without impacting the PSO. Your timely suggestion will help me a lot

Hi Team,We are using Production Schedule reporting in IFS Cloud and have observed that some records in the Production Schedule Reports page remain in “Created” status. If a report remains in Created status, what configuration, background jobs, material transactions, or other processes should be checked? Is there any standard IFS process/job that should be executed to process such records further? How can we identify the exact reason why a particular report has remained in Created status? What subsequent process or event changes the status from Created to Backflush Complete?We would appreciate clarification on the complete status flow and the expected system behaviour.

In 26R1 has anyone successfully set up having one Shipment Type to handle the workflow for a Supplier Reject/Return and a different one to handle Supplier Material?  We manage Supp Matl using Purchase Component rather than Customer Order so are required to use Supplier Shipments in 26R1.   We’ve been using Shipment in our reject process for a while.  I say “use” - our reject process doesn’t need the multiple steps in a Shipment workflow so is currently set to get created and then skip directly to Closed.  Our Supplier Material process does need a pick to be generated, have someone report it, and create a ‘delivery note’ to accompany the parts.I have tried various combinations of Shipment defaults on Site/Supplier with no luck.Thanks in advance!

A specific requirement from a client is to involve the activated Authorization Assigning Rule in the Posting Proposal and the status of the same to be “AwaitAuth” where the Finance users will authorize the invoice postings based on the code part combinations in the assigning rule.However, the Posting Authorization is set to “Automatic Authorization” in the PO Matching in the company setup. Due to this, all the PO based invoices are receiving a status of “Auth” in the Posting Proposal and the assigning rule is not being considered.The reason for this requirement is to validate those invoices where expense accounts on which period allocation is required are reviewed by Finance Manager before approval and voucher creation and all other invoices to go directly in “Auth” status and can be posted by finance users without any authorizations.Is there a way to include the assigning rule in the Posting Proposal and the status of the same to be “AwaitAuth” by not changing the company setup?

Hi,I’m trying to cancel a PO line using a workflow, but the steps below are not working as expected. No errors are being displayed, but the PO line is not getting cancelled either.I’m adding the workflow as a command on the PO page.Many thanks for your inputs on this issue.Best regards,Uvini

 HelloWe have a customer requirement to have project pre-posting enabled on the M65 form.We would like to understand how project pre-posting can be included in the M65 form using the standard configuration. Is it possible to configure the standard settings so that the “Pre-posting” field is set to “Yes” by default for the M65 form? Could you please confirm whether this can be achieved through standard configuration, or if any customization is required? Thank you for your guidance. Pre posting for Project ID 80001  Purchase order with charges When I invoice a purchase order that includes charges, the project pre-posting does not appear on the M65 form Can you please help me?

We have built a Control Room Maintenance Lobby in IFS Cloud 25R2 SU8 (25.2.8) that we would like to display continuously on TVs in our maintenance control room.The Lobby shows PM and work order performance, is configured for auto-refresh, and works correctly when opened by a normal authenticated user in a browser.Our requirement is to display it as a shared, unattended operational screen, ideally without using an individual employee's IFS account or requiring users to regularly sign in.The TVs currently use a set-top box/media player to display rotating company images.We have not found IFS documentation covering this scenario. What is the IFS-recommended and supported method for displaying a Lobby continuously on an unattended/shared screen?We would particularly appreciate guidance around the supported authentication/session approach for this type of setup.There were community discussions related to this topic dating back to several years, but not 100% answering the concerns I have. 

When entering a new Note_Type record or try to edit an existing record I receive the following error:ff<perform_batch><sequential_dependent><update_note_type regex_validated="true"><note_type><insert is_initialized="false" /><note_type>RSD</note_type><active>Y</active><description>Red Site Details</description><package_extract_action>EXTRACT</package_extract_action><sequence>10</sequence><show_on_ui>N</show_on_ui><user_def1>N</user_def1></note_type></update_note_type></sequential_dependent><authentication><session_info><token_id>thCUsHX1tzriZiwWwdGYCT6pfOEFntffpg2lj3hj36KTJJohkbuiSlTktx54BYeb3SekpPGCXHb8V4HK8KBY9OaH/UczYCUaaLK3vRiye3wMHx08d+2ToR7w5rzEAscN</token_id><session_id>aXoU3fiWV0s+Af9tHe5xnmRdI5ghZ4/GrAOXYVVTqNqNCCAoKnzYHfidhUbqB2tiARmnL3uwQl/EVUkEICgxKw==f4+rP3Hg3YzcyEtxtEvETw==g3YW/QTPxrpcEtJ4CMAomQ==</session_id&

Trying setup to Email the PaymentAdvice , get this unusual error. Any one knows what this is about? 

Hi Experts,We have a specific requirements from customer. Does anyone faces such situation, your guidance is highly appreciated.Customer has an Appointment Window for 6 months in current legacy system. So they want the from IFS too. But as per IFS that long window is not allowed. Do you have any best practices for the Appointment Scheduling window. I have experience of having 42 days Scheduling window (3 days Dynamic Work Days + 39 Appointment Work Days) but not working with 6 months window. If IFS doesn’t handle such long window any workaround to handle 6 months appointment booking window.Your timely suggestion will help me a lot. Regards,RR