Finance (Financials)

Hi,We want to look into this, but would like to know if any of IFS customers are running this and what are your experices so far? If you have anything to share with us, please reach out. 

Hello everybody,I get an error message when attempting to create a GDPdU file via the "Audit Interface Assistant" in IFS Cloud.Error message: Restricted file typeThe text file exported successfully, but the XML file did not.What is wrong and what can I do? Thank you.

I want to generate a Project invoice with Customer PO number and Customer PO date but its not reflecting in invoice pdf fiel .i have covered below mentioned steps :I created customer order and connected customer order line to activity . Release Customer order. Reserve the customer order Picked  Delivered the order. I have covered till 5 th steps Then i want to know next steps .

Hello,Is it possible to upload an external file (.CSV, .TXT, .XLS) in a supplier payment proposal? Thanking you.

Hello,I get an error message during creating a GDPdU file with the “Audit Interface Assistant” in IFS Cloud. Error message: For other companies it works. But not for this.What is wrong?

Hello, I’m hoping someone has experience with this issue. I’ve tried everything can think of. Issue:On my SI - the supplier/PO currency amount balances perfectly but there is a balance showing in Accounting Currency on the invoice.The PO Receipts and the SI are in the same accounting period and are using the currency rate. All the receipt transactions match the pricing on the SI exactly.If I do a Price Adjustment - it changes the Balance from $0 so the SI remains unbalanced. How do I clear this?    Thank you very much!

Hi ExpertsI would like to know if it is possible to join two fields when performing the external voucher assistant. i have a file with surname and name.i would like to join them into the Party_type_ID but i am not familiar with the “detail function” functionalitycan someone give me a guide how to setup the Detail functions? Best RegardsSophal

Hi,I would like to know if there is a way in IFS to create one invoice for multiple shipments.In our process, we sometimes have several shipments that need to be included in the same customer invoice, and we would like to understand if this is supported as standard functionality in IFS, or if there are any specific settings, processes, or workarounds that need to be configured.If possible, could you also share any documentation or best practices regarding this scenario?Thank you for your support.

Hi all,We would like to get in contact with, preferably scandinavian customers who run IFS.ai Copilot / digital workers etc.Anyone?

Hello All, Currently I am involved with IFS implementation for a Swiss company where it has mandatory QR bill payment for Swiss suppliers and customers. To record customer collections, my client currently uses CAMT 054 file in the legacy system. I have 2 questions.IFS country specific solution only mentioned CAMT 053 for QR payments. However, is there anyone already using CAMT 054 for Swiss clients or CAMT 054 not supported by IFS? Can CAMT files contain QR payments and non-QR payments from customers in the same file? eg: same institute is used to collect customer due amounts from QR based invoices (Swiss customers) and non-QR based invoices (foreign customers)

HiDoes IFS have any kind of approval process for changes to supplier bank accounts. We are searching for a method, where two users must approve a change of a bank account, before it is being valid to use.

Hello. Whenever we create an invoice on a delivered customer order, the posting does not happen and we get an error message saying that the activities related to the order should be in a Released state. We are using IFS Cloud. Is this normal?  To my knowledge we did not have this issue when we were using Apps 9. 

Why would this be? How can I create the invoice?How can I resolve to prevent this happening again?  

have an order, which is status received.  Is on the correct company/entity, receipt isn’t matched to another invoice and I cannot see an error on the posting lineWhat other possible reason would there be for this not to pull through?

Hi Team,We are currently testing the IFS Credit Card Interface and encountered an error while posting a customer credit card-connected invoice. According to the IFS user guide, an offset transaction should be created when the invoice is posted.  However, when posting the invoice, a background job is created with the description 'Create Offset Payment Transaction,' but it goes into a warning state with the error: 'ORA-20105: Payment.NOTRANS: Payment does not contain any transactions. Occurred when applying payment CUPOA 5 for Invoice 970000006. Offset unsuccessful. As a result, no offset transaction is created, and the CUPOA is matched with the customer check that was created at the time of delivery. Kindly help me figure out how to get the offset created in the system.Thank you. Best Regards,prabha

A. What is your idea?1) ClassificationOpportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionIn IFS Cloud , on the Invoices to Authorize page, users are unable to add additional posting lines and can only modify existing posting lines.<<Image1>>However, this functionality was available in IFS Applications 10 through Posting Proposal > Instant Authorization.<<Image2>>Due to the current behavior in IFS Cloud, users must be granted access to the Posting Proposal page to add additional posting lines. However, granting access to this page also enables users to perform broader related activities, such as posting invoices and purchasing etc. As a result, additional manual controls are required to ensure proper governance and compliance.<<Image3>>During the support case investigation, it was confirmed that this is the standard system behavior in IFS Cloud. The “Invoices to Authorize” page is architecturally designed as a review/approval-only view. It intentionall

We want to make a complaint for functionality removed from the super access role. We have had 2 authorizers (at least) per supplier invoice for years, and uptil 24R2, our accounting-department have had the opportunity to remove authorizations, make correction for example for VAT, and then authorize again, without sending the already approved invoiced on a second round to our endusers.The change made in this role, has made the control function for our accounting department, AND for our end users, much worse, since the invoices is now sent out TWICE!. I hope that IFS will reconsider the functionality in the super access role.

In collection process the customer is reminded for invoices based on a reminder template. When invoices are included to the reminder handling the Min Days to Next Reminder  is considered - and an invoice is NOT included to the reminder if the Min Days is  not met.This is good - when the system is escalating the invoices (raising the level to next level).I call the period Min Days to Next Reminder  as response period, here.But from the customer communication point of view, it would be good, if the invoices on response period could be included to the reminder - with their current reminder level. The motivation is that this way the next reminder would always have complete picture (information) to the customer - including all the invoices that are NOT YET paid, so that customer does not need to wonder - why is an invoice now missing from the reminder, though it was last time there.I suggest that a parameter is added to the template Include invoices on response period and if that is NOT mar

A. What is your idea?1) ClassificationChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.Opportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionWhat happened, what is missing, or what could be better? Focus on the problem or opportunity (not the solution).Write here:The cusotmer receives e-invoice file from their suppliers containing a prepaid amount without any advance invoice connected.One scenario is that the employee uses an app to order a new phone. They want to upgrade it and pays the difference with their own credit card. The supplier send the e-invoice for the full amount and deducts the prepaid amount in a separate tag. B. Context and scope1) Who is affected?Choose ONE or MORE: keep the applicable options and delete the rest.Customers2) FrequencyChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.FrequentlyC. Value and impact1) What is the business outcome?Choose ONE or MORE: keep the applicable options and delete the rest.Improves productivity or efficiency Reduces cos

Hi IFS Community,I have a question regarding the Authorization Parameters for Posting Proposal in the Supplier Invoice Workflow.Configuration in our company: Authorization Routing : Use Consecutive Authorization Two Authorizers Required : Enabled (Checked) Amount that requires two authorizers : 50,000.00 EXlude Posting Authorization : Not checked  Scenario:I am processing a supplier invoice with the following details: Invoice Amount: 12,000 Purchase Order Amount: 11,000 Difference (Variance): 1,000 The Issue:Since the invoice amount (15,000.00) is below the defined threshold of 50,000.00, I expected the system to require only one authorizer (following the consecutive sequence). However, the system is still forcing two authorizers to approve the posting proposal sequentially (the first authorizer approves, but the workflow does not finish and continues to request a second authorizer).Are there any other parameters missing to get the expected behavior ? Any insights or troubles

We’ve had 1 or 2 issues with invoice nos. being copied and pasted from PDF, but occasionally this has resulted in a blank space at beginning, leaving the possibility of processing an invoice twiceIs there anything can be set up to stop blank spaces at beginning of supplier invoice number?

Is there a way to incorporate customer id /supplier id into external file template  for mixed payment . 

Is IFS working on the new version 1.4 of the Norwegian SAF-T report required from Skatteetaten required from 01.01.2027? We need this for IFS APP10 update 27.

Hi,In IFS 25R1 SU13, we are importing external supplier payment and if we have several invoices with the same invoice no, it does not match the correct invoice.How can a payment be matched to the correct invoice when there are several invoices with the same no?Has anybody in the community encountered this problem ?We have created a case with IFS and we are waiting for a response from R&D.Thanks and Regards,Anne-Sophie