This will include the questions related to Financials.
- 2,018 Topics
- 6,166 Replies
We are using IFS 7.5 and we are closing a shop order. Very simple shop order, issues only from received PO’s sitting in project inventory, no material burden, no labor, no standard plan parts. Assume the value of the purchases is 100, the cost of the bacflushed items is 100, but when the shop order is received and closes the OOREC transaction shows a cost of 110. The system then creates a negative & positive entry (SOMTRLV- & SODIFF+) to bring the cost back to 100 so in the end it self corrects. My question is where does the system get the cost of 110 from ? We had no unissuing, or unreceiving, or cost revaluations, and the costs of the components were the same when we received and closed the shop order as they were when we issued the component parts. To my knowledge we hadn’t fiddled around with the quantities of the components in the shop order. The system is finding an additional cost of 10 from somewhere, but I have no idea where. What costs does the shop order close cons
ORA-20105: Invoice.ACCERROR1: Error (Voucher date for payment cannot be earlier than voucher date (28-MAY-22) on which payment on account CUPIA 45 was posted.) occurred while booking Invoice CD
I get following error message when posting the final invoice which is created from the customer order.ORA-20105: Invoice.ACCERROR1: Error (Voucher date for payment cannot be earlier than voucher date (28-MAY-22) on which payment on account CUPIA 45 was posted.) occurred while booking Invoice CD ****The customer order has one advance invoice and settled through the mixed payment. But at the preliminary stage the final invoice has back dated the invoice date. Is that a problem? I tested all possible scenarios and at the final invoice level only forward day can be entered. Please suggest me solution.
System automatically authorized to the payment of supplier invoice after preliminary posting when first instalment amount = 0. Below is example of system behavior: Create invoice with payment plan with first instalment amount = 0 Preliminary post invoice First installment was automatic authorized and got status “Paid”, manual supplier invoice got status “PrelPostedAuth”: In my opinion invoice shouldn’t has status “PrelPostedAuth” because it wasn’t authorized to the payment.I asked about it RnD and this is the respond: System has been designed to authorized automatically if the first installment is Zero as there will not be any actual payment happen. In this case, the amount is zero and it is automatically marked as Paid. Then invoice will go to PrePostedAuth state. Likewise, one of several installments are authorized, the invoice will go to status %Auth, either PrelPostedAuth or PostedAuth depending on if you have postings. Furthermore, when you manually authorize the first i
We are using posting proposal with intersite set up. We used collective invoicing so each customer invoice - or shipment, contains multiple purchase orders. Each shipment can contain the same purchase orders. The problem we are having is when we run the auto matching function, the system is matching all receipts for the purchase order, not looking at the receipt reference on the PO receipt line.The supplier is set for PO matching at the PO Header Level, and Validation is PO Reference and Receipt Reference.This is the set up for supplier, and below a screen shot of the posting proposal. I need the invoice to be matched both on PO and Receipt reference. We are using APPS 10 update 13.
Hi, When we enable M102 - Pre accounting Purch Order Part Lines posting control for a particular code part on IFS with control type C58 - Mandatory Pre Posting, I expected the system to trigger a pop up at the point of saving the Purchase Order Lines to enter the pre postings. In my case, this did not happen, it worked as expected when the M108 - Pre accounting Purch Order No Part Lines is defined as mandatory - where at the point of saving a no part order line the system triggers the pop up window to define the pre postings. Can I know the reason behind this difference in behavior is and if there is anything additional that needs to be done to achieve similar behavior as the no part order lines instance. Thank you. Best RegardsAkila
Community, We have a request that the notes entered in Posting Proposals window would be able to open to all people which has the permission to use this window, but right now we realized, the notes entered in here is not open for everyone. user can enter their own notes, but can not be seen each other.wondering how we could make it open for everyone?Thank you.
Hi All,One of our customers raised the below concern, Where they are running applications 9 in production and it has Avalara defined and operational. However, during the Upgrade from apps 9 to apps 10 Vertex Q series was activated instead of Avalara in the Company Tax control window. They have made a change, but is this normal? Do we need to make other changes for Avalara?” Best Regards,Peshala
In one of my upgrade project (from Apps8 to Apps9) I see one difference in the postings coming out from expense sheet i.e it is divided into several lines each pertaining to different types of expense, for ex- One line from Mileage, one line from Compensation and one from expense tab, further if Expense tab has three lines for example two for NOK (currency) and one line for EUR then the postings in GL reflects two lines (one clubbed with NOK amount and the other one for EUR). The observation is though currency reflected is in EUR but the final amount is in NOK Earlier in apps8, under the same scenario only one line was posted with currency NOK. Is there anything that we can control on the Expense sheet or in Finance for this case?Observation from Finance-GL account will show all 3 currencies at all time. Transaction currency, accounting currency and parallel currency. Currency is not a control type because the postings in GL will be in NOK as well as currency.
Hi,How do i create a record as follows in supplier payment proposal An invoice of value 1000, pay for 750 using supplier payment proposal.The record should appear in payment proposal as‘Matched amount =1000’‘Paid amount = 750’’‘Withheld tax = 250”Is it possible to create a scenario as above? Do we have a set up for this Best regardsZuha
We are noticing that IFS is trying to authorize credit card transactions for customer orders in our development environment around 1am everyday - even for past orders that have already been charged. We have disabled the credit card type to prevent the transactions from going into “authorized” status.Does know how to stop IFS from scheduling these transactions for orders that have already been completed/paid for or why it keeps trying to authorize these orders? Thanks for your help.
Finance user in Apps9 is attempting to enter a negative customer offset and would like the Write-off Code list of values to be available when entering. Currently that list of values only appears when the amount is a positive offset. Only work around we have found is to create an instant invoice for the positive amount and then enter that offset against it. Does anyone know of a way to configure that Write-off codes to appear with negative offsets?
We have internally developed a customer statement of account using crystal reports , now we want to schedule it in a way that on every month , custom event should pick the list of customers from customer_info address tab where we will define the email. i know few people here used report rules , when i checked the F1 Doc but could not get it. Can anyone share the steps with screen shots.
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.