Q&A Discussion of IFS Solutions for our IFS Employees, Partners and Customers
Recently active
Currently we have Azure AD set up as the identity provider. Are we able to configure a second identity provider to work simultaneously for Apps 10?Product Version: UPD16
Hi all,After the latest Windows May update, some users are no longer able to log into IFS Apps 9. They are receiving an error stating that the login service is unavailable. After some investigation, we found that this is caused by Microsoft's hardening of Kerberos Authentication. We are currently in the process of migrating to IFS Cloud, but we still need to use Apps 9 until January 2027.We managed to temporarily resolve the issue by adding a registry key, but this workaround will only work until the June update. After that, we either have to find a permanent fix or stop installing updates.Has anyone else encountered this issue, and if so, how did you fix it? The only long-term solution we can think of is creating a new account and a new keytab file, and then reconfiguring IFS Apps 9 to use them. If anyone has an easier workaround, we would love to hear it!
Does anyone know if it's possible to link the IFS database to Microsoft Fabric?https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/database/mirrored-database/open-mirroringWe're currently using the self hosted bi, but I can't say that's a perfect solution so we're looking for better alternatives.
Cloud 24R1 : We would like to export/ import multiple user profiles in one action. When I select two user profiles I do not have the option to export both profiles into one export file?!Anyone in the community knows how I can export/ import multiple USER profiles in one go?
A new version of Perfidia v4.50.221 has been released. The actual version can be downloaded here:https://www.perfidia.de/downloads/psa/psasetup.exePerfidia Forum can also be accessed with GuestAccess (Gastzugang)https://www.perfidia.de/Perfidia?action=forum
Scheduling Demystified has been updated to 24R2. As usual, headlines are tagged with “24R2🌟” for new capabilities, “24R2 ↗” for improved features, and “🖊” for new chapters on existing functionality. Newcomers will find many new conceptual explanations and How-To’s.If you find this document helpful, please consider leaving a 👍 LIKE. And ⭐ SUBSCRIBE to get updates.232 pages cover:Preamble: Direct Assignment vs. Dispatch Console vs. PSO Work Order Management vs. Request Management Modelling Dataset vs. Scheduling Dataset Scheduling Dataset Parallel Background Processing Modelling Dataset and Basic Data Scheduling Optimization Dataset Scheduling Exceptions Communication between MWO, Dispatch Console and PSO Shift Templates The Supply Side of Scheduling: Resources Skill Management The Demand Side of Scheduling: Tasks Availability Patterns Appointment Booking Dispatch Console Direct Assignment Resource Management Integration APIs Appointment Booking Integration API Troubleshooting Don’t f
We have a Boomi integration that runs Shop Orders from MES to IFS that we are migrating from IFS APP10 to Cloud. The issue that we are having is from creating and completing the Manual Inventory Receive. Our Boomi integration worked correctly in APP10 but now shows that it is successful in Boomi while IFS does not receive any Inventory. Our IFS Connector in Boomi for creating the uses ReceiveShopOrderHandling as the projection and Reference_InventoryReceipt as the object. It seems that the Reference_InventoryReceipt object is outdated and I have been attempting to replace it with ReceiveShopOrderSet->InventoryReceiptArray as that is what I see being used in logs when going through the Manual Inventory Receive process in IFS Cloud. When trying to run the new Connector in Boomi, we get an error saying "Failed processing original documents i2i in the IFS Cloud Connection connector: java.lang.Exception: All the keys should be given as input parameters". The Objkey is being set using Bou
In IFS Cloud 24R2, when starting from a service quotation, the preposting can be added after quotation acceptance in the "Prepare Work Order" step.However, when using work task templates added in the service quotation, the tasks already exist in the flow, and the preposting from the work order header is not inherited by these tasks. As a result, preposting must be manually added to each individual task.Is there a way to resolve this issue or apply a workaround?
Hi,do you have any idea, how to implement OAuth2 Authorization Code Flow integration in IFS Aurena? We need to create integration with bank, where is only Authorization Code Flow possible (logging to account, approval in mobile app, configuration, granting priviledges, ...).At this point, I have no idea, how to prepare callbackUrl for accepting GET request with strictly defined URL parameters.Is there any manual how to prepare own SVC not depending on OData protocol?Or use something like /soapgateway to receive and store incomming GET request? Authorization Code Flow
Hello, I am hoping to find information about the add-on to Cloud for the Freight Interface and Credit Card Integration. We are currently on Apps 10 and have these extensions, but are in the first phase of Build and Verify to upgrade to Cloud (24R1) and have not yet applied them to our Cloud environments. Our partner needs additional details to support the upgrade and IFS Support has directed me to the community for answers. 1. What are the artifacts here, change to the solution set, new entities, utilities, etc under a new module, a new k8s container? From our current 24R1 solution set we don’t see anything that suggests that credit cards or freight integration is something that exists. As part of the technical upgrade process, we need to make sure that the database artifacts exist, so this is critical to the process.2. What are the supported IFS release versions? We are doing B&V on 24R1. We do plan to do a release update as part of the plan, but we need to know what the min
When we have defined some conditions in an Event action they work fine in the environment in which they were defined. But when they are exported and imported again as an ACP, (as xml files or a Zip file) we’ve noticed that the conditions stops getting evaluated and the Actions are run regardless what is in the conditions.For example, say we have below event action with below condition, and it was created by importing it from an ACP. Then despite what is in the condition it will execute what is in the Action Details.However, if you open this event Action in the application and do a fake modification to the Condition and do a re-save the issue is gone and the Events are only executed if the conditions are satisfied.When investigating further we realized that this is due to a discrepancy in the NEWLINE character when Event Conditions are saved in the database. When importing the ACPs through an xml it saves the newline characters in the Condition_type and Condition_Value fields as ‘\r\n’
Have you come across this error?Sorry, there was an unexpected server error Have you come across above generic error? If so how have your resolved it or is it still occurring intermittently? Let us know in the comments 😊 Note: This is a generic error message to which the cause could be in different product areas for which you need to analyze with further details. But here we want to understand how many of you faced it, resolved it or still undergoing with this error popup message. Related error messages: Database error occurred. Contact administrator. Url: Related KB Articles:
Hi everyone,In IFS, project budget control is enabled, but it appears that budget validation is performed at the cost-element level rather than the activity level.For example, an activity has an estimated cost of KWD 1,000 under BM-CIV, but a Project Supply Request using BM-MEC can still create commitments exceeding the total activity budget. My questions are:Is there a standard IFS configuration to enforce budget control at the activity level across all cost elements? If not, is a custom event or extension required to validate the total activity estimate when creating a Project Supply Request?Any guidance or experience with similar scenarios would be appreciated.Thanks!
My current installation has a single Print Agent installed on a Utility Server. This works fine. I would like to add a second Print Agent hosted on a second Utility Server to help with printing responsiveness and to serve as a backup. To do this, I installed a second Print Agent and assigned it a unique "ID". Additionally, the installation uses a second IAM Client entry using a unique "Client ID". Each Print Agent's printer mappings are unique as well. My installation is currently on IFS Cloud Release 24R2.The second Print Agent's service will not start successfully. The logs show the following:From IFSPAService_%.log:[006] 10/12/2026 2:52:07 PM: Starting REST Service...[006] 10/12/2026 2:52:07 PM: ******************************************ServicePointManager.DefaultConnectionLimit :- 2******************************************[006] 10/12/2026 2:52:07 PM: ******************************************Modifying default connection limit to :- 2[006] 10/12/2026 2:52:07 PM: ************
I am attempting to configure IFS Facts for extraction to our data lake. My goal is to have the facts incrementally load on a per day basis so that the resulting parquet files are created daily and the files have the date appended to the file name. It looks like most of the Facts only have datetime columns. Is there a way to add a date column to the OOTB facts for partitioning? I currently only have access to the IFS cloud user interface.
Hi, We're on IFS Cloud 25R1 (SU8). In this thread, a customer shared IFS's explanation of how Part Availability Controls behave: https://community.ifs.com/ideas/part-availability-control-set-on-a-location-is-not-carried-over-when-moving-into-qa-or-into-stock-66161 “Part Availability Controls follow a sort of hierarchy based on how they are applied:If applied via a default on an inventory location: The control is tied to the location, not the stock record. This means: Moving stock to a location without a default will remove the control Moving stock to a location with a default will apply that location’s control automatically If applied manually: The control is tied directly to the stock record and will move with it between locationsAccording to IFS, this behavior is intentional and designed to allow controls to adjust automatically based on location rules.” What I'd like to confirm: will a QC hold placed manually on stock keep that control when moved into a location with a different d
Hi,Is there any option to access SNOW cases through a REST API?Our team manages a large number of Unified Support cases, and we would like to automate some activities to make our work more efficient and process the cases faster.Has anyone implemented a similar integration or automation? If so, could you please share any available documentation or recommendations?Thank you.
Hello,I am looking for recommendations and best practices regarding software version tracking in IFS for manufactured products.We have a customer who produces devices (radars) where software is an integral part of the delivered product. The challenge is that Engineering often knows that software will be required, but the exact version is not known when the BOM is created. The final software version may only be decided during manufacturing, testing, or shortly before delivery.I would be interested to hear how other customers handle this scenario and which approach has proven most practical for maintaining software traceability throughout the product lifecycle.Thank you in advance for any recommendations and examples from real implementations.Pavel K.
Can someone kindly share some light on the purpose of the above page in ifs cloud .I cannot obtain any data in this page ,even when the advance invoice(AD) is paid posted (created from a customer order and paid from a mixed payment) and not matched with the final . Once paid it is Converted to CUPIA .Is it the reason ?Thank you Udanee
Hi,We recently completed a clone of a customer environment running IFS Cloud version 25.2.7.Since the clone, users are being prompted to change their password when logging into the cloned environment, and in some cases are unable to log in until the password has been updated.I have noticed that, for the affected users, the IAM User setting Required User Actions is set to:UPDATE_PASSWORDThis appears to be affecting all users in the cloned environment.Does anyone know what could cause this required action to be applied during or after a clone? We would like to understand the cause so that we can avoid the same issue in future environment refreshes.
Hi All, We are testing MRP before we jump to cloud 9. ( plan is to move from Apps 9 to Cloud)All looks good but we found some of the SO due dates in Apps9 and Cloud 9 varies,.Steps we took.mirror both base data inv/shop orders /customer orders and master data in both environment Apps9 and Colud. Run MRP with adding some new Customer orders (both identical in Apps 9 and Cloud) Check the MRP out put. 99% MRP out put same in both Apps 9and Cloud 1% Shop orders Due date in App9 is much than Cloud. ( some orders has 2 days some orders has 5 days etc)I am trying to look for a reason why there is a difference ?check master data for all the affected SO ( manufacturing lead time /Routing etc).. all same in both environment.No Luck So far , can anyone direct me to get the bottom of the issue int this case?
Does anyone know what ‘Microsoft Windows Azure’ section in the Apps 10 supported systems refers to? In terms of which part of our architecture. We don’t want to upgrade something that is not suitable etc.
Hello,We are running IFS Cloud 25R2SU07 with 120 users. The middel tier has 128 GB of memory, but only 25 GB is userd. We tried to downsize for cost reduction to 98 GB of memory, but IFS MT was not starting at all.Did you experience this kind of behaviour in your Remote Cloud deployment ?Your feedback is welcome.
Dear Team,I am new to IFS cloud deplyong the solution on-premises. Kindly recommend third-party tools that I can deploy to help me with managing user licenses and that can also be used on other platforms. Also if there are tools i can use for helping in administration and they are not part of the default delivery.
I am trying to model a process called pre-staging in IFS Cloud where a manufactured part is tested together with several other parts, including both manufactured and purchased parts. The test itself does not consume the components, but I need to document which components were used for which test, including serial numbers.I also need to record the fact that this test takes time and money, so it would be important to document the test effort and related cost as well. Ideally, the solution should capture both the technical traceability and the business aspect of the test execution.Is there a standard IFS Cloud solution for this requirement? If yes, which standard process or standard object should I use to record test usage, serial number traceability, and test cost/time documentation without building a custom solution?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.