Q&A Discussion of IFS Solutions for our IFS Employees, Partners and Customers
Recently active
Hi all,After the latest Windows May update, some users are no longer able to log into IFS Apps 9. They are receiving an error stating that the login service is unavailable. After some investigation, we found that this is caused by Microsoft's hardening of Kerberos Authentication. We are currently in the process of migrating to IFS Cloud, but we still need to use Apps 9 until January 2027.We managed to temporarily resolve the issue by adding a registry key, but this workaround will only work until the June update. After that, we either have to find a permanent fix or stop installing updates.Has anyone else encountered this issue, and if so, how did you fix it? The only long-term solution we can think of is creating a new account and a new keytab file, and then reconfiguring IFS Apps 9 to use them. If anyone has an easier workaround, we would love to hear it!
Does anyone know if it's possible to link the IFS database to Microsoft Fabric?https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/database/mirrored-database/open-mirroringWe're currently using the self hosted bi, but I can't say that's a perfect solution so we're looking for better alternatives.
Cloud 24R1 : We would like to export/ import multiple user profiles in one action. When I select two user profiles I do not have the option to export both profiles into one export file?!Anyone in the community knows how I can export/ import multiple USER profiles in one go?
A new version of Perfidia v4.50.221 has been released. The actual version can be downloaded here:https://www.perfidia.de/downloads/psa/psasetup.exePerfidia Forum can also be accessed with GuestAccess (Gastzugang)https://www.perfidia.de/Perfidia?action=forum
Scheduling Demystified has been updated to 24R2. As usual, headlines are tagged with “24R2🌟” for new capabilities, “24R2 ↗” for improved features, and “🖊” for new chapters on existing functionality. Newcomers will find many new conceptual explanations and How-To’s.If you find this document helpful, please consider leaving a 👍 LIKE. And ⭐ SUBSCRIBE to get updates.232 pages cover:Preamble: Direct Assignment vs. Dispatch Console vs. PSO Work Order Management vs. Request Management Modelling Dataset vs. Scheduling Dataset Scheduling Dataset Parallel Background Processing Modelling Dataset and Basic Data Scheduling Optimization Dataset Scheduling Exceptions Communication between MWO, Dispatch Console and PSO Shift Templates The Supply Side of Scheduling: Resources Skill Management The Demand Side of Scheduling: Tasks Availability Patterns Appointment Booking Dispatch Console Direct Assignment Resource Management Integration APIs Appointment Booking Integration API Troubleshooting Don’t f
We have a Boomi integration that runs Shop Orders from MES to IFS that we are migrating from IFS APP10 to Cloud. The issue that we are having is from creating and completing the Manual Inventory Receive. Our Boomi integration worked correctly in APP10 but now shows that it is successful in Boomi while IFS does not receive any Inventory. Our IFS Connector in Boomi for creating the uses ReceiveShopOrderHandling as the projection and Reference_InventoryReceipt as the object. It seems that the Reference_InventoryReceipt object is outdated and I have been attempting to replace it with ReceiveShopOrderSet->InventoryReceiptArray as that is what I see being used in logs when going through the Manual Inventory Receive process in IFS Cloud. When trying to run the new Connector in Boomi, we get an error saying "Failed processing original documents i2i in the IFS Cloud Connection connector: java.lang.Exception: All the keys should be given as input parameters". The Objkey is being set using Bou
In IFS Cloud 24R2, when starting from a service quotation, the preposting can be added after quotation acceptance in the "Prepare Work Order" step.However, when using work task templates added in the service quotation, the tasks already exist in the flow, and the preposting from the work order header is not inherited by these tasks. As a result, preposting must be manually added to each individual task.Is there a way to resolve this issue or apply a workaround?
Hi,do you have any idea, how to implement OAuth2 Authorization Code Flow integration in IFS Aurena? We need to create integration with bank, where is only Authorization Code Flow possible (logging to account, approval in mobile app, configuration, granting priviledges, ...).At this point, I have no idea, how to prepare callbackUrl for accepting GET request with strictly defined URL parameters.Is there any manual how to prepare own SVC not depending on OData protocol?Or use something like /soapgateway to receive and store incomming GET request? Authorization Code Flow
Hello, I am hoping to find information about the add-on to Cloud for the Freight Interface and Credit Card Integration. We are currently on Apps 10 and have these extensions, but are in the first phase of Build and Verify to upgrade to Cloud (24R1) and have not yet applied them to our Cloud environments. Our partner needs additional details to support the upgrade and IFS Support has directed me to the community for answers. 1. What are the artifacts here, change to the solution set, new entities, utilities, etc under a new module, a new k8s container? From our current 24R1 solution set we don’t see anything that suggests that credit cards or freight integration is something that exists. As part of the technical upgrade process, we need to make sure that the database artifacts exist, so this is critical to the process.2. What are the supported IFS release versions? We are doing B&V on 24R1. We do plan to do a release update as part of the plan, but we need to know what the min
When we have defined some conditions in an Event action they work fine in the environment in which they were defined. But when they are exported and imported again as an ACP, (as xml files or a Zip file) we’ve noticed that the conditions stops getting evaluated and the Actions are run regardless what is in the conditions.For example, say we have below event action with below condition, and it was created by importing it from an ACP. Then despite what is in the condition it will execute what is in the Action Details.However, if you open this event Action in the application and do a fake modification to the Condition and do a re-save the issue is gone and the Events are only executed if the conditions are satisfied.When investigating further we realized that this is due to a discrepancy in the NEWLINE character when Event Conditions are saved in the database. When importing the ACPs through an xml it saves the newline characters in the Condition_type and Condition_Value fields as ‘\r\n’
Currently we have Azure AD set up as the identity provider. Are we able to configure a second identity provider to work simultaneously for Apps 10?Product Version: UPD16
Have you come across this error?Sorry, there was an unexpected server error Have you come across above generic error? If so how have your resolved it or is it still occurring intermittently? Let us know in the comments 😊 Note: This is a generic error message to which the cause could be in different product areas for which you need to analyze with further details. But here we want to understand how many of you faced it, resolved it or still undergoing with this error popup message. Related error messages: Database error occurred. Contact administrator. Url: Related KB Articles:
I’m trying to navigate from a lobby element to the Document revisions tab. I’m getting an error calling out invalid date format. This is my SQL that works great for the lobby element, but won’t allow navigation to the document revisions. DOC_CLASS in ('NDA SUPPLIER', 'SUCONTRACT', 'SUISO', 'SULIABIL', 'SUPRICE') and OBJSTATE <> (select &AO.DOC_ISSUE_API.FINITE_STATE_ENCODE__('Obsolete') from dual) and (DT_PLANNED_FINISH < trunc(to_date( '#TODAY#', 'YYYY-MM-DD-HH24:MI:SS' ))+ 90 or DT_PLANNED_FINISH is null) Does anyone know how to code this so I can use the navigation?
We have a list of documents attached to customer invoice and when the invoice is printed, we would like to t the invoice and all the attached documents should get printed after the invoice as annexures (in a certain sequence).We have configured reporting rule for this with the following parameters:However, the output is a little random. sometimes the annexures get printed after the invoice, but there are times when half the annexures come before the report, and half of them after. The need is multiple documents getting printed after the report as annexures. Can someone provide help here.
When an application messages addresses gets fail status, the framework has a mechanism to create a “one-time scheduled task” to re-execute the same message/address within a short time. At my customer environment, this sometimes fails. It is not the actual “Retry application message” that is the problem. The problem as I understands it, is the logic that catches the exception of the application message and then fails to add the “one-time scheduled task”. The error is shown on the application message with the error text “Next execution date must be between start date and stop date”. The reason to this error is that when the scheduled task is to be created, the logic fails to calculate a correct execution date. There is an logic checking that the execution date must be betweenCode if from Batch_Schedule_API.Insert___-- Check date intervalsIF newrec_.next_execution_date IS NOT NULL THEN IF newrec_.next_execution_date NOT BETWEEN nvl(newrec_.start_date, newrec_.next_execution_date - 1) AN
Hello Community,I am currently working on the setup of cost and revenue elements in IFS and I would like to clarify the best practice between two possible approaches: Marking the "Account" dimension as basCost/Revenue Element In this case, the general ledger account itself is used directly as a cost or revenue element Creating a dedicated Analytical Segment for Cost/Revenue Elemen My question is : From your experience, what are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach in IFS?Any guidance or lessons learned from your implementations would be highly appreciated.Thank you!
Hi All,Technical documentation for 26R1 - discribes a feature to show Autocad drawings in IFS pages.Has anyone tried it ? kindly share experiencehttps://docs.ifs.com/techdocs/26r1/060_development/022_user_interface/030_aurena_dev/130_aurena_component_reference/120_client_controls/xd_viewer/ “The XD Viewer is a reusable Angular component designed to integrate Autodesk Forge Viewer for seamless 3D model visualization within the application. This component is part of the EXPFW client control set, making it easily embeddable within IFS cloud pages using the marble syntax.”Thanks and regardsSaman
Hi Everyone,In supplier agreement what is used to control which supplier contract IFS Cloud uses for the quantity?We have 2 contracts, the old one still has some quantity (14) left and new one is fully (200) unutilized. Our PO is taking new contract since the quantity from old is not sufficient. Is the validity date or the contract number the decisive point here?What can be the case if we are able to use old contract first and then new one.Thank you.
I am using Cloud 25R1 and Customer Statements of Account are not sending, I think because the “Created From” account is set to IFSPRINT. It should be IFSCONNECT (see screencap). I don’t know how to change that, hopefully someone can help.
I want to have a Suppliers order email as default selected when press Share on a Purchase order.Is it possible to add a order email on supplier somehow without having to create a person named “Order”?(Today my own email adress gets pre-selected when press share on Purchase order).(Order@supplier.com is not quite a person which seems wrong to create as a person).Guidance of how to setup an order email on a supplier that gets pre-selected on purchase order is welcomed. IFS Cloud
Hi,When I am trying to schedule an IAL in IFS10, the background job is showing error details as “Table not found. Redeploy the scripts manually ORA-20105: IalObject.REPTABNOTEXIST”When the same IAL is configured as Live data, then there is no issue in fetching data.Could anyone help in resolving this error? Thanks in advance!
Hi, As mentioned in the title, I had tested the eform termination for a configured workflow where when you fill in the survey, the work should be incomplete.The filters were added for planning information: This setup worked as expected. The incomplete prompt came up after completing the survey. Then I was testing with setting the Filters based on the object information: The action flow was added with termination eform similar to above: This did not prompt the incomplete after completing the eform. Could this be a bug? I also tested the same with the WF that worked (11) by removing the planning information and adding object information as filters which confirmed the termination only applied for planning information. Thank you!
Our customer has a requirement to define rebates as following:• Invoicing over €1M → credit 2% (from the whole Invoicing sum)• Invoicing over €2M → credit 3% on the amount exceeding €1MHow this can be defined in IFS Cloud?
Hello all,We are using Project Deliverables integrated with Project MRP (PMRP) for planning manufactured and purchased parts.The deliverable structure contains multiple levels of manufactured and purchased components.Example:Final manufactured part (top-level deliverable item) Intermediate manufactured part 1 Purchased component 1 Intermediate manufactured part 2 Purchased component 2 ScenarioThe Project Deliverable is initially scheduled. PMRP is executed. PMRP creates supply proposals: Shop Order Requests Purchase Requisition Requests The customer approves the planning. Supply proposals are converted into: Shop Orders (SOs) Purchase Orders (POs) At a later stage, the customer requests a change to the project schedule.Issue ObservedThe project activity date is modified. The activity is linked to the entire Project Deliverable structure. We run Calculate Schedule on the Project Deliverable. The required date of the top-level part is updated correctly. We run PMRP again.Howeve
Hello experts,Please see screenshot below. The resource CHA is not getting more jobs committed today, because he has jobs downloaded in his device for next week, and the week after, so it seems that max committed jobs allocated in the rule, which is 5, is stopping more jobs getting allocated today. We have modified the rule parameters, please second screenshot, but the change in the Rule Window (1 day) has not worked to limit the rule to a validation of only the current day. Could you please advise?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.