Assets (Asset Management)

Hi, I saw a new enhancement in the 25R1 release document regarding connecting work tasks to project activities rather than at work order level. However, I have tested this out and it does not appear in the work task screen. Have I missed anything? Thanks,George.

Hello,Currently, none of our Android users are able to utilize the IFS Trip Tracker application on their mobile devices. We would like to understand whether this is a known issue and if there is an expected timeline for when IFS plans to resolve it.Thank you for your assistance.

Community, I don’t see customer warranty does its job in work order when invocing, though object warranty is there, system default is Invoicable, and if you don’t manually change it to Not Invoicable, system will invoice the customer as normally we do. We are on APP10. Thank you.

Customer (25.1.4) gets following error when user tries to use material quick issue. It comes with all parts in customer. In our own demo environment (25.2.3) the same error does not come with all parts and it seems that the same part gives error and other times does not. Sites in work task and part are the same and user is connected to warehouse.Any idea what could case error? 

Environment: Cloud 25R2Background: A overhaul of a truck is performed and the engine (Inventory part / serial object) is removed for repair. Time and Material is consumed to repair the engine.  The cost of the repair should sit with repaired engine.How can this be achieved automatically?Currently when a Work Order is performed, it is possible to “Return to Inventory” and the “Inventory Value” has to be set manually. It does not use the time and material cost incurred on the work order.Is there any setting that can automate this.Regards, Malik

Community,How to fix below error?I am trying to connect a Repair Work Order to a superior work order which is connected to a project, i got below error message. Same error message is also prompted when I am trying to connect the same Repair Work Order to the project using Project Connections. see below error. 

We see the need to be able to modify operational loggings after serial numbers have been renamed. This happens quite a lot in our business that incorrect serial numbers get runs, and then are rebuilt before we have the possibility to correct the run. Can you please open up for this possibility? Pages: Correct Operationa Loggings, Report Operational Loggings

We are still processing this information:  Please confirm that we understand correctly the changes related to the removal of the Allocate Resource Gantt and Resource Monitoring Gantt tasks: The functionalities in the task will be fully preserved - Resource Management > Resource Analysis > Resource Analysis The functionalities in the task will be fully preserved  - project Management>Plan and Execute > Project Gantt These tasks will be removed:  Maintenance > Work Management > Execution > Resource Monitoring Gantt Maintenance > Work Management > Preparation and Plann

 I am trying to configure navigation from Prepare Work Order (Active Separate) screen to History Log screen and pass WO_NO as a filter. When navigating from Prepare Work Order, the History Log should show records only for that specific WO number. I tried using navigation filter like:startswith(tolower(Keys),'wo_no eq ($[WoNo])^')), Keys contains 'wo_no eq ($[WoNo])^'))But it is not returning the expected records. History Log stores WO number inside the KEYS field, so I am trying to filter based on that value.What is the correct navigation filter expression to pass WO_NO from Prepare Work Order to History Log?If anyone has implemented similar navigation filtering for KEYS field, please suggest the correct approach.Keys: WO_NO=2^Also, I need to filter History Log records where:LU Name = ApprovalRou

Hi all,I have a Lobby element that I am using in two lobby pages. It is based on a datasource that uses two parameters Category_ID and Group_ID. My datasource query is using the NVL statement, means when one of the parameters is empty it returns everything. To this regards it is working well. However, when I want to use the same methodolgy as a navigation link I get an error. My navigation link contains:(startswith(tolower(Cf_Group_Id_Eo),$GroupID$)) and (startswith(tolower(Cf_Category_Id_Eo),$OBJECT_CLASS$))When both parameters $GroupID$ and $OBJECT_CLASS$ are given everything works fine. But when only one parameter is given (e.g. $GroupID$) than the second statement of my navigation link gets rendered as:contains(,'')) So this is obviously throwing an error. Any suggestions on how to fix that? I would like to avoid to create two different widgets since I want to reuse the same widget on both lobby pages. Looking forward

I am encountering an issue while attempting to send an outbound transaction from IFS to an external system (Maximo). The process fails with the following error:ExecutionException from Sender threadCaused by: ifs.fnd.connect.senders.ConnectSender$TemporaryFailureException: Exception while sending dataCaused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Remote host terminated the handshakeCaused by: java.io.EOFException: SSL peer shut down incorrectlyThis error occurs during the outbound integration from IFS to Maximo, indicating that the SSL handshake between the systems is not being successfully established.  

We have a customer running IFS Cloud 23R2 who encountered the following scenario.Their Preventive Maintenance (PM) plans are configured with Calendar + Criteria, where both Performed Date and Performed Value are considered.In one instance, an incorrect measurement was entered for an object. This triggered the Condition-Based PM plan line and generated a Work Order. The Work Order was subsequently cancelled, and the incorrect measurement was invalidated/marked as incorrect.However, the issue is that the PM plan continues to generate Work Orders, since the Generation Value on the PM Plan was not updated after correcting the measurement.The current workaround is to regenerate the PM plan, which resolves the issue.Although this is an infrequent

Hi, Could you please assist in identifying the correct process within IFS Service Management to address the following business requirement?Requirement:The business needs to initiate maintenance work only after receiving an advance payment (e.g., 50%) from the total quoted amount.Currently, we are using Service Quotation as the starting point. However, we do not see an option to create a Customer Order directly from the service quotation or from the early stages of associated Request / Request Work Task.While it is possible to create a Request from a Customer Order, we observed that:The Request Task sales lines and Customer Order lines do not appear to have a direct relationship This makes it difficult to manage advance payments and link them to the service execution and f

Hi All, I was trying to reserve a ‘Tool/Equipment’ to a Project acitivty that is still in ‘Planned’ phase (Project = ‘Initialized’).  Project: Project Activity with Resource Allocation: Resource Monitoring Gantt: So, allthough it seemed to have worked to allocate the resource 260113-001 to the project N-1245 ; activity = 100000533 starting from March 10, 2026 8am onwards. When I hover over the Resource Monitoring Gantt, the Project Allocation screen does not show me the project info. Is this a bug? Is ther

Community, do you know why SLA does not respond to work order planning? what is the mechanism behind it?kindly see below work Task Planning Schedule. 

To plan and schedule work tasks from a work order on Dispatch Console, I’m trying to get the scheduling dataset up and running. However, I’ve been unable to connect the Maintenance Organization Site to the Scheduling Dataset.Individually, I can see the options in the dropdown for both, but when I select a value for either the Maintenance Organization Site or the Scheduling Dataset, the other option disappears.Could I be missing a data setup that enables the connection between the Maintenance Organization Site and the Scheduling Dataset?   Thank you

I’m attempting to use the olingo library in java to integrate with IFS.  The main task I’m attempting to accomplish at first is to add multiply master parts in one REST request.  I’ve managed to navigate the api enough to get it to form a batch request and send it off to IFS however I get a weird error response that makes no sense and leads me nowhere.  Has anyone else seen this? Batch Request raw payload--batch_ad5ae8cb-87e6-4f1e-9660-72770abad95fContent-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary=changeset_a3c57785-5e5b-4771-9cc2-a57e779d77ff--changeset_a3c57785-5e5b-4771-9cc2-a57e779d77ffContent-Type: application/httpContent-Transfer-Encoding: binaryContent-ID:1POST https://{{ifsurl}}/main/ifsapplications/projection/v1/PartHandling.svc/PartCatalogSet HTTP/1.1Accept: application/json;odata.metadata=fullContent-Type: application/json;odata.metadata=fullOData-MaxVersion: 4.0OData-Version: 4.0Content-ID

IFS Cloud 25R1, IFS MwO Maintenance 25.3.1443.0Serial Parts added onto a material line and Reserved on a Work Task.The Work Task is assigned to a Resource and Trasferred to mobile.I am unable to issue the reserved material in the work task using MwO. When I try to Issue the materials for the Work Task on MWO, I get the following message : Part Reservation is not available to Issue. Use Planned Material to issue the part instead. On the Technician Portal , I am able to issue the reserved materials on the the work task. Has anyone faced this issue before ? 

Hi I am trying to activate the fixed asset but value is showing as 0, when I tried to troubleshoot found that the invoice value is getting null for FA account due to same account is getting debited and credited with same value. Please help in resolving this. I have also setup the FAP1,FAP5,FAP2 etc..   

In IFS Cloud 25R2, we are working with Service Requests and Request Work Tasks and have encountered an issue related to the Coordinator field.Currently, the system appears to require a Default Coordinator defined at the user level. If this is not set, we receive an error when generating the Invoice Preview.Our questions are: Where is the Coordinator officially defined and maintained for Service Requests / Request Work Tasks What is the recommended approach if we need to process a Service Request using a different Coordinator than the user’s default if we cannot specify a different other than the default? Any guidance or clarification on standard behavior vs recommended setup would be greatly appreciated.Thanks in advance!

We are in IFS 10 UPD 9.Our Maintenance supervisor added PM Group IDs to all of his PM actions thinking he could use it for sorting.  However, this grouped all of his PM actions into 2 work requests (as designed).He then removed all of the PM Group IDs and attempted Calendar Generation again.The result is the Work Request was cancelled, but no new PMs were created for the month. Is there a way to create the PMs for the month? 

We have a number of Work Task Templates that we have built up in Apps 10.  We recently started having the Asset Management techs using Tech Portal start creating their own work in certain situations.We informed them to utilize these Work Task Templates, specifically because it included the Work Task Steps.  However, when creating new work from the New Work button within the Maintenance Engineer lobby under the equipment section, then adding the Work Task Template.  The resulting work task does not contain any work task steps.Using the same work task templates, and objects, we can create new work from the back-office side of things and it all works exactly as expected.

In IFS Cloud PM Action Journals have following event types.  However we cant get any records under Modified option even though we have modified the PM Action by adding a customer or any other change. What could be the reason for this?   

Community, We realized that customer warranty is not being considered when doing retrospective work reporting SM.  Is it as-designed or a bug?  We are in APP10.

We recently encountered a failed transaction related to a Serial Object ID error, which led us to question how the list of Serial Objects are available for selection in Mobile Work Order is defined in IFS Cloud 24R2.We are trying to locate if this list is maintained or controlled in. Could someone point me in the right direction?