IFS Solutions

Hello,I am working with Configure‑to‑Order (CTO) in IFS Cloud and I am trying to dynamically calculate the quantity of a by‑product in the shop order, based on the quantity of the main product.The number of by‑products should depend on the produced quantity of the main product.For example:Main product quantity By‑product quantity 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 2 6 2 7 3 8 3 9 3 10 3 This logic is implemented using a CTO Configuration Structure Rule, where: A configuration formula is used to set the Quantity per Assembly Test formula gives the expected (positive) result When I release the Customer Order (Supply Type = Shop Order), I get the following error message:“Calculation of quantity required for produced part <by‑product> has resulted in a negative value”What is confusing is:The formula result is positive The same approach works for normal components The issue only occurs when the component is a by‑product Is it supported in IFS Cloud CTO to use a Configu

We have two different purchase prices from a few suppliers dependent on which lead time we use.Normal or Express.Do someone have a suggestion on if this is possible to solve somewhat automatically when creating a purchase order?(My thought is to maybe have two different Ship-Via codes in Supply Chain Matrix for Supplier with the Normal and Express lead times. And that Purchase order somehow could use the Ship-Via code as selector for different price lists)

The "DARP Summary for Work Order based Service capabilities" states that IFS is planning to deprecate the Work Order (WO) based Service Management processes and capabilities by November 2027.I would like to check if Service Contracts (Work Order based) exist. Could you please provide the SQL statement to extract the relevant entries?The version is IFS Cloud 24R1.

Large asset- and fleet-intensive organisations often operate the same type of assets across multiple sites and legal entities, while managing them through a common maintenance and fleet organisation. Today, FAM does not fully support this operating model, which makes it difficult to use FAM as an enterprise-wide solution for customers with complex organisational structures.FAM should support multiple companies and multiple sites within the same FAM implementation, aligned with the standard multi-company and multi-site capabilities available elsewhere in IFS Cloud.The capability should allow users to manage fleets/assets belonging to different companies and sites while maintaining the appropriate company/site ownership, financial context, security and user access. Users with the appropriate permissions should be able to work across those organisational boundaries without having to maintain separate FAM structures or duplicate configuration.This is particularly important for industries s

Hi!We’re trying to set up an object connection transformation to inventory part to the Shop Order Multilevel Repair Structure page. Our best guess would be to set upDocument Object Connection on LU ShopOrdUtil, view AS_BUILT_CONFIG_HEAD_SO or AS_BUILT_CONFIGURATION_SO.  Object Connection Transfer with InventoryPart as source and ShopOrdUtil as target.It is possible to set up, but the page shows no attachments at all. In fact, there is no paperclip symbol at all and no attachment panes, other than for the shop order at the very top. The rest of the page is connected to a tree. We’re guessing there is some limitation that makes the object connection transformation impossible to use here, or does someone know of a workaround?And, if you know it’s not possible, exactly why?

Hello community,If I process the "Terminate Employment" assistant, what does it do at the end?I mean, what data does it change? Thank you.

Hello, Recently I have seeing the sync issue between mobile application and Cloud, I try to start the Assignment and fill Time Entries from mobile but the status doesn’t updates on cloud. I checked the failed transactions and found the error - ORA-20105: ActiveSeparate.ACTSTARTISLATER: Actual Start is later than todays date for work order 694. Does anyone know why this is happening with few accounts while others work perfectly and what is the fix Thanks & Regards,Mani

Hi Alldoes anyone know of a quicker way of entering analysis results on a control plan on Shop Order in cloud. Looks like the change from APPS10 is too laborious having to enter and confirm line by line, especially when several lines to complete.  I know you can filter to view by Data Type on the Analysis Results window, but looks like your unable to enter results on that page.If you were able to enter results here it speed up the process.   Thanks in advance for any help!

We are about to begin our implementation journey to IFS Cloud. Does anyone know where I can find IFS’ detailed documentation methodology (phases, detailed definitions...)?

Hello everyone!We are implementing email notifications and willing to have the precise Node (object, document, line...) hyperlink in the body of the email notification.Please advise if possible and how.We are using IFS APP 10 (UPD17).Manyu Thanks in advance

Hi,We have an existing IFS Cloud 25.1.5 Remote Deployment environment that was originally installed using the Quick Installation.We are enabling SMB File Storage for the first time by following the official documentation.Current situation:The environment is already running. The ifs-storage namespace already exists. The csi-smb-controller and csi-smb-node pods are already running. SMB File Storage has not been configured before. We have updated ifscloud-values.yaml with the required SMB configuration (ifsStorageSmbCredentials, ifsfilestorage.fssEnabled, fssSmbSharePath, etc.).My question is:After updating ifscloud-values.yaml, what is the supported procedure to apply these configuration changes to the existing environment?Is there an additional deployment or configuration update step required after modifying the file?Thanks!

My problem is similar to this one:Except that it happens when I try to created an Activity in the Project Navigator. If I try the steps described in the link above, it is still not working. I also tried these steps below - very similar - without success: I ran that query in Oracle SQL Developer to find the incorrect indexes and I have 3.select index_name,index_type,status,domidx_status,domidx_opstatus from user_indexes where index_type like '%DOMAIN%' and (domidx_status <> 'VALID' or domidx_opstatus <> 'VALID'); Following the two procedures above on all three incorrect indexes solved nothing. In the Search Domain page of an incorrect index, trying to drop that index displays that error:internal error code, arguments: [12806], [kkdcdtc: missing object], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []Failed executing statement (ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12806], [kkdcdtc: missing object], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []) After that, I am able to complete the st

Hi,Our customer is experiencing issues with long-running online jobs, which fail after 10 minutes due to a timeout. The Network tab in DevTools shows a 504 Gateway Timeout error.Where can we configure or extend this timeout?  

Hello, I am looking on some help on an issue I am currently having with trying to setup a new requirement in our environment.Their expectation is that managers and supervisors will still be required to work a minimum of 45 hours each week. However, they would like the pay calculation to change so that once an employee reaches 45 total hours, they are paid for all hours worked over 40.For example, hours worked between 40.01 and 44.99 would remain unpaid unless the employee ultimately reaches 45 total hours for the week. Once the 45-hour threshold is met, the system would retroactively generate a paid wage code for all hours worked over 40.Right now we have it set up that if an Exempt Employee works for example 56hrs in a week, they will only get paid 51hrs, and 5 of those hours will be unpaid. But they also have to hit a minimum of 45 hours in a work week.I was trying to see if I could use Additional Result Calculation Setup for this, but I read in a different post that is only used for

 Hi all,My report LEFT JOINs proj_budget_control_rules to project, so projects with no budget rule at all still appear with combination_id null, and Get_Control_Total/Get_Consumed return 0 for them — same as a project with an actual $0 budget.Is there a clean way to tell "no budget rule exists" apart from "budget rule exists with $0 consumed"? E.g. filtering on NULL combination_id before calling the API, or a status field on proj_budget_control_rules I should be checking instead. I’ve also tried adding funds and it just wont update haha.Thanks!

hi IFS experts, My retention setup on the Sales Contract is like this. *Requirement from the customer is- Retention is 10% from each item with a maximum of 5% of the final contract sum (USD 50,540.63)I am on the last AFP where I want to release the final retention. All the other claims have been done. How do i do this? I tried to enable this and then enter an amount but the system is not letting me do that. Please help me process this.  Thanks,Ashani 

Hi Community, Inventory Part in Stock Balance is Not Matching with Ageing Report with totals , any probable reasons ?  Thankss in advance 

We are receiving an unhandled security checkpoint error.  This is on attached approval processes when using an approval template. So in the example below, it is on an Inventory part.  It also happens on a Supplier for Purchase part as another example.  However, it does not happen for any of our document approvals within the document revision screen.  I did see another post that recommended going to system parameters and turning the Security checkpoint framework available off and then on again….but this did not correct our issue.  

Does self billing work with partial receipts or will the invoice generated just be equal to the original PO?

Hi,I'm trying to understand whether the following behavior is standard or not.Create an Inventory Part. Create two Inventory Control Plan Templates. Apply both templates to the Inventory Part. Create a Control Plan from the first template and activate it. Create another Control Plan from the second template and activate it for the same Inventory Part.Both Control Plans can be activated successfully. They are active for the same Inventory Part with the same phase-in and phase-out date range.Next, repeat the same process with a new Inventory PartCreate another Inventory Part. Create two Control Plans using the same Inventory Control Plan Templates. This time, select a Part Revision in the Control Plan header for both Control Plans. Activate the first Control Plan successfully. When attempting to activate the second Control Plan, the following error is displayedThe customer's requirement is to have multiple active Inventory Control Plans for the same Inventory Part that are valid for the

Following 25R2 New Feature - Service Campaign - trying to try the process in IFS Cloud 25R2.Created the Service Campaign using Campaign Type “Repair RMA” to replicate a real life example where a repair is required for a newly built items under warranty   Added 2 lines (as in 2 objects   button “Create All RMA’s” Pop-up suggests a background job is posted to create the RMA’sAnd it says there’s an Error:  “Repair RMA for Service Campaign Line 1 for Service Campaign RJ001 was not successfully created.ORA-20124: Error.NULLVALUE: Field [RETURN_REASON] is mandatory for Depot Rma Line and requires a value.” Observation: There is nowhere in the lines or in the header of the Service Campaign where the Return Reason can be input. There is no pop-up that allows it when Create RMA is used.Question: How is Service Campaign supposed to be progressed?

We have quite a few Purchase Orders that will have multiple receipts.We assign purchase order charges in the form of freight and fuel surcharges.Our issue is the PO may come in over several receipts.  The fuel surcharges may change by the time the final receipts are registered.However, if you update the charge price, it updates any receipts that have not been matched and closed.Is there a way to schedule purchase order charge changes so they do not update previous receipts.I.EReceipt 10/30 - Surcharge was 10%Receipt 11/10 - Surcharge was 11%.If receipt from 10/30 is still open and we update the surcharge to 11%, it updates the 10/30 receipt to 11% also.

Hello All, Is there a way to set up an RMA with a disposition step (inspection requirement) to mimic the purchase orders?

Can you please  share  IFS Apps 10 SRM  related documents? ThanksGururaj 

Hi All,In IFS Cloud version, how to correct an incorrect code part value (came through incorrect Pre-posting) without cancelling the purchase receipt?Thank you.