Products (Manufacturing, Products, Engineering)

Hi all,When I run One level cost I got error but All level cost not. After run All level cost then One level cost works. Here is some details. It seems a bug.Title: One Level Part Cost Calculation fails with ORA-01858 on manufactured multi-level parts (column order mismatch in Insert_Roll_Up_Cost_One_Lvl___)Environment: IFS Cloud 25.2.4 SU4 (site BPM20, cost set 8)Symptom:Calling the CalculateOneLevel action (PartCostHandling projection) — or One LevelPart Cost Calculation in Aurena/IFSAPP — fails for manufactured parts whosecomponent is itself a rolled-up manufactured sub-assembly. Example: part 3068631(-> 306863101 -> 3045917). Calculate All Levels succeeds; a subsequent One Levelthen succeeds. Error returned to client:   ORA-01858: a non-numeric character was found where a numeric was expectedDiagnosis (root cause):Backtrace of the failing call:   ORA-01858 at IFSAPP.COST_CALCULATION_API line 9155 (FETCH ... BULK COLLECT)   <- COST_CALCULATION_API line 4970 (Insert_Roll_Up_

I am looking for a demo or specific information on IFS Cloud QM capabilities. I have a plant that is looking into an All-in-one QMS Platform by Octave formerly ETQ software (we have yet to implement IFS Cloud - go-live is 2028) and I am trying to avoid getting yet another application in here and having to integrate it into IFS. So I want to share the IFS Cloud capabilities with them. Can someone point me in the right direction?

Hello Together,We went live with a customer and currently face an issue:That costs does not appear on cost bucket detail after running the calculation for all articles (all part calculation) but you can see all results in the overview “part cost variances”: The Question is can rely on the results listed in this overview and just copy them to cost bucket 1?  If you run the calculation for all levels the cost appears in the cost bucket details again.Anyone has an idea on this one?Kind regards

Hello, I am wondering if there is anybody that can help me with a customer question in IFS 9. The request is as follows:A repair shop order used a part with condition code ‘UNREP’. Cost = 0,00 When the shop order is finalized the total cost of the labor setup time should be included in the unit cost of the finalized product (3 hours of 35,00 = 87,50) The unit cost of the finalized product must also include cost of components used during the repair (65,03 in our example) The unit cost of the serialized part with condition code ‘REP’ must be 152,53However, the fixed labor setup time is not added when reporting in shop floor workbench and is missing. But when using button Approve Op labor time is added. Customer wants to be able to use the normal functions of the Shop floor work bench. I do not have access to the environment and rely on copilot to help me analyze what the customer test. As it stands right now after testing, copilot is thinking IFS 9 supports fixed estimated setup cost via

Hi,One of our customer wants to upload a consolidated forecast into IFS so it can be expanded out to show the growth in raw material and component demand and allow the Purchasing Team to see the longer term requirements for several years.This is very top level rather than at customer level by which they normally enter forecasts.Ex: My question is can we upload this forecast into MS Level 1 and derive raw material/component demand for coming periods, with/without generating supplies (PRs, Shop Order Reqs etc?Also, would that be possible to register this forecast and calculate the demand for raw materials separate from the actual forecast register for this year using a different MS level set? I appreciate any feedback you can share.Thank you 

Hi All,Being new IFS9 user (not Cloud) ,How to learn Query or Report Creation? is there any Docs or guideline how to create Report with Zero Knowledge of SQL ?My Report requirement Find out Waiting time between two operations on Shop order which has status “ Started”. Actual Production time  “ reported” for Shop orders against the Routing hours. Part which has Routing with “X “ Work centre .. Thanks in Advance.

We have recently moved to a REST API connection with our EDI data in IFS. With this move, we have started to experience issues with Auto Approving Customers in the Incoming Customer Order screen. We have the Customer profile set up to be Automatic for the Incoming Order / Schedule Approval however it will stop in Incoming Customer Order screen with the Status of “RequiresApproval”. With this, there is no error message or stopped message error. Once you RMB click “Approve” it creates the order with no issues. Has anyone encountered this before or have solution to ensure our auto approving Customer’s truly come through IFS Incoming Customer Orders and automatically approve?

I am trying to add a custom field to the ‘Consists Of’ list in the Engineering Part Navigator window, however when I add a field to the LU EngPartStructure, the field does not display as available to add to the table.Does anyone know how to add a custom field to this table?

One of my customers is encountering errors of various types when they run the costing calculation and the encounter of the error shuts down the background job.  So they correct the error and rerun the process.  Now, if they run the process again and another error for another part is encountered, the second background job also fails.Does anyone know if there is a process that can pre-check the calculation for all the possible errors without actually writing the newly calculated costs to the part cost records? Thanks

We have tried to run the database task "Auto Processing Shop Order" as a scheduled task.  we have set the Offset from normal Time Span  at various days so it will only do specified weeks in advance.   Trouble is when we run it all Shop orders even those not within the specified time frame, get all their materials reserved.   is the task faulty or are we not setting the Task up correctly? 

Hi, The question I'm asking is not relevant only to CAPA objects, but also to a number of other objects as well. What we want is to configure approvals for each status of an object/line. In CAPA Actions, the line gets promoted through multiple statuses. The requirement is to set two persons as approvers (Person A and Person B) for the "Investigate" status. So, when a user clicks on "Investigate," the system should check whether Person A and Person B have provided their approval, and allow/disallow user accordingly.Similarly, for the other statuses shown in the image, there will be 2, 3, or more approvers set, with the same validation to be done before promoting the line to that status.It is true that this can be done through customization, but is there a standard/configuration way to do this more simply? Version: IFS Cloud 25R2 S. Already tried with attaching Approval Routings but no effect it seems.

I am trying to model a process called pre-staging in IFS Cloud where a manufactured part is tested together with several other parts, including both manufactured and purchased parts. The test itself does not consume the components, but I need to document which components were used for which test, including serial numbers.I also need to record the fact that this test takes time and money, so it would be important to document the test effort and related cost as well. Ideally, the solution should capture both the technical traceability and the business aspect of the test execution.Is there a standard IFS Cloud solution for this requirement? If yes, which standard process or standard object should I use to record test usage, serial number traceability, and test cost/time documentation without building a custom solution?

Hi Community I’m part of a new small data analyst team created within our company and we have been tasked with documenting all LOV’s in IFS 10 and the screens/fields they are used in.We are focusing on All Part types (Inventory, Sales, Maintenance etc), Customers and Suppliers to begin with, rather than going through each screen, tab and fields manually and writing them all down is there a way of extracting this info directly from IFS?I have it in my head there must be some links/tables in the background of IFS that show how everything is connected, I may be wrong, but anything has to be better than doing it all manually.Any help would be appreciated    

Will an outstanding control plan analysis prevent the shipment of a part?

Hello,We are evaluating Manufacturing Scheduling & Optimization (MSO, IC12816) and would like to clarify the differences between using MSO with and without IFS.ai.From the documentation, MSO appears to be available as a standalone product, while some references describe AI-powered scheduling, simulation, and scenario evaluation capabilities. However, it is not completely clear which functions require IFS.ai Activation Pass and which are available with standard MSO licensing.Could you please clarify the following?Can MSO (IC12816) be fully utilized without IFS.ai Activation Pass? What are the functional differences between: Standard MSO (without IFS.ai) MSO with IFS.ai Activation Pass Is there any official documentation or licensing guide describing the functional boundary between MSO and IFS.ai-related capabilities?Any clarification would be greatly appreciated.Thank you.

Hi,We are currently using IFS APP9 with the Backflush method for material issuing.We have noticed that, for some shop orders, the system issues more material than the required quantity. Upon investigation, we identified the following two issues:Required Material Quantity Calculation, The required material quantity is displayed incorrectly, as the system appears to ignore decimal values during the calculation. Backflush Material Issue, During the backflush process, the system issues excess material, again seemingly without considering the decimal values. As a result, the issued quantity is higher than the actual requirement. I checked the inventory part→ master data. qty round up is properly updated.The lot size is 18, Reported qty is 17.  Please help me on this. Regards, Tharakan                             83 0 85

Hi There,Does anyone know how MRP_HORIZON_IN_DAYS is calculated?or which date is used as the reference point for this calculation? I am following up the case below.CS0503047I found that there is a comment from IFS side on April 9th, but they would like to know more detail because they need to verify if this parameter changes will not impact on their business operation or not. Hence they were requesting us to provide the technical document and Shiromal-san is communicating to R&D team. I am not sure if we can get the document and able to share it but at least, they would like to know which date (the exact date) is utilized for the calculation. Since our customer is planning to have Golive on May 11th and the judgement meeting is next week (April 21th) hence. This MRP slow response is one oof the bottleneck of passing criteria even though it is customer matter.  I would appreciate it if we can get the answer asap. Regards,Chikako Yoshimura 

Hi all,We use IFS Applications 10 and schedule shop orders using APB.I’m trying to model a finite physical constraint: we have a limited number of trolleys, which we call banks, that carry material between operations.Example routing:Operation 10 — Work centre A01, fixed 2 hours Operation 20 — Work centre A02, 1 minute per unitMaterial is loaded onto a bank at Operation 10. The same bank then moves with the material to Operation 20 and is only free again once Operation 20 is complete.So the bank should be constrained from:Operation 10 start → Operation 20 finishnot just during each individual operation.For example, if we only have two banks, APB should not allow a third order to start Operation 10 until one of the first two banks has completed Operation 20.I tried modelling this as a tool:Tool ID: BANKInstances: B01, B02Required on Operation 10 and Operation 20But APB releases the tool after Operation 10, then allocates a tool again for Operation 20. It does not appear to hold the same

We have run into an issue where shop order operations were accidentally over reported and then subsequently cancelled. However after cancelling the reports, the Operation Qty has become negative, the remaining open operations were closed, and the outside operation purchase order was cancelled.  I was able to recreate this in our test environment. This issue occurs when the Adjust for Op Qty Deviation toggle is enabled and the over reported operation reports are cancelled in the incorrect order. Essentially what happened in the above screen shot was 141pc were completed through op 160. Then, 500pc were accidentally over reported on the same first 4 operations. Operator brought this to a supervisor to correct their mistake. The supervisor cancelled the operation reports, however they cancelled the report on op 50, then 75, then 110 and finally 160 which caused this compounding Deviation Qty, which in turn drove the Operation Quantities negative. If the reports get cancelled in the revers

Dears,  can anyone of you point me what might cause this error when I’m trying to load Shop Orders to APB ? IFS10 App  

Hi all,We are using the standard IFS Outside Operation / Subcontracting process and have a question regarding the creation and management of purchase requisitions and purchase orders.When a shop order is released, IFS automatically creates the related purchase requisitions or purchase orders for the outsourced operation, depending on the selected supply type. In practice, we often face situations where:Previous operations are delayed and the planned quantity is not yet available for outsourcing. Only part of the quantity can be shipped to the supplier due to transportation capacity constraints/ delays in previous operations.  The standard approach is to split the shop order, which updates the purchase requisitions/orders and creates new requisitions/orders with a later delivery date.However, managing these splits requires significant effort because it is difficult to determine exactly:How much quantity has already been reported as Ship WIP to Supplier. How much quantity is still waitin

Hello All!Does anyone use Project transfer Borrow-Payback functionality?We have a requirement for a lending project to temporarily transfer material to a borrowing project.The lending project has a special discount and gets material at a low price and when the borrowing project procures replacement material to send back to the lending project, the price will be higher.We would expect the variance between the original material cost vs. the replacement material cost to remain on the borrowing project and that the lending project gets material transferred back at the original cost.I see that there is a screen that shows Borrow Cost, Payback Cost and a Cost difference, but I don’t know how it works or how to test it out.Does anyone know how to do such a transaction and know whether the cost difference would somehow remain on the borrowing project in a situation like this?Thank you!Doug Slater

Is it possible to estimate when improvements to conditional formatting will be available in the IFS Cloud?The options for conditional formatting in the IFS Cloud are significantly more limited compared to APPS10.The number of available colors is considerably smaller. Only the background, not the text itself, can be formatted. Text styles (bold, italic) cannot be adjusted. The available operators are also significantly restricted. We particularly miss the ability to search for parts of labels (e.g., "~pipe" for "contains pipe"). We are currently unable to replicate all the formatting options used in APPS10.Conditional formatting is a valuable tool for ensuring readability and a quick overview of tables. We hope that the familiar functionality will soon be available in the IFS Cloud as well. Best regardsJakob

Hi All,.Do we have any inbuilt report in IFS which can tell what is the waiting tine between two operations.?(historic)  What I mean is it will provide detail of  SO no  Current operation Status ( When started) and Closed? and what is the next operation starting time so that we can see what is the waiting time between two operations?  or any useful report which can tell the which operations has delayed or which job has currently delayed? etc

I have a buildable manufacturing structure/routing and a buildable disassembly structure/routing for one part number, MW-M-103.The manufacturing structure uses these component parts:The disassembly structure produces these disassembly component parts (each inventory part type is Disassembly Component):I have calculated the standard manufacturing costs for MW-M-103 in Cost Set 2 and copied to Cost Set 1 using the standard template M-110.Each Disassembly Component has cost template D-110, with Use Distribution Cost 'on', attached in all Cost Sets.When I performed the Disassembly Cost Calculation for MW-M-103 in Cost Set 2, no material costs from bucket 110 were distributed to the components, only operation costs. Should these material costs have been distributed to the Disassembly Components?From the documentation:The disassembly cost calculation is performed by Disassembly Cost Calculation. Before calculation of disassembly cost it is important that the cost for the disassembled product