Solved

Hello, how can I change the general terms of the purchase order? I cannot find the current general terms in the report. Where Can I find them? thank you for your help. KR

Greetings, IFS Community. In accordance with these instructions, I have added a quick report to Aurena: https://docs.ifs.com/techdocs/foundation1/045_administration_aurena/220_Configuration/200_client_configurations/300_commands/default.htm#execute-quick-report-command The report was created successfully. The question is, however, how? and Where ? Users will be able to view and run the quick report.    Thanks,Juan Luis

Hello,When trying to cancel a Purchase Order Line (via Change Order or direct action) that is connected to a Work Order, IFS Cloud throws the following error:ORA-20110: PurchaseOrderLine.CANCELWOPEG: There are peggings connected to this purchase order line. Remove the pegging first, then cancel the purchase order line.    Could you please advise how to remove the pegging between the Purchase Order Line and the Work Order in IFS Cloud?Is this done from the Work Order, the Purchase Order Line, or via a specific supply/demand pegging view? Thanks in advance for your help.

Currently, it is only possible to define a single email address for all supplier and customer emails - statements, invoices, payment advices (remittances), CIS deduction statements, orders etc. However, in reality this varies on a supplier/customer basis and very often multiple email addresses are used for a single type of document.It is possible to define this through configurations, but this is done in all implementations and all new prospects ask for this. Hence, more flexibility should be allowed in the Comm Method tabs or in report rules to select multiple types of comm method lines. It is very typical for different customers and suppliers have different setup requirements. E.g. for some suppliers/customers, the statements will be sent to a single email address, but for others it will go to multiple email addresses.  The solution could be to introduce multiple generic checkboxes for “Report Type X” against the comm method tab:This allows for flexibility, because these can be renam

While changing the Disposition Line status to Part Identified, the following error message is displayed:“The value Of the inventory transaction may not be 0 for xxx on Site xx.”Test Steps;Open the Disposition Shop Order screen. Right-click (RMB) on the Disposition Line and choose Part Identified. The below error message will appear. 

We use the IFS for Oil and Gas company, we are trying to build a FMEA for our assets.1st Question.In the IFS Cloud, is the FMEA Module the same from IFS APP10?2nd QuestionIs there a way to create a FMEA against the Item Class in the IFS APP10 or Cloud?

Hey Guys,  I have a big Issue with define the Times for Picking our Items. I found a mask where i can build Tasks for the Warehouse but it is really hard to find a good running Solution.  My goal is to have the evaluation of times for all my orders, that i can decide how many People i need for which Part of our Company.  Sorry for my English.  

We are on 23R1.   We had a customer line on hold. The line was for a non-inventory part.  However, we were able to ship this line.  We assumed the Hold would prevent this from happening?  Is it because it is a Non-inventory part?

I am attempting to auto approve absence requests in IFS. When a absence request comes in it is set to “Confirmed” status. I would like for it to be changed to “Approved”. I set the “Selection” parameter that is required to change the absence request state to approved, but it seems like it is not accepting the “keyref” key for the selection value. To verify I concatenated my own “KeyRef” value that matches “keyref” shown in the screenshot below. Still I receive json invalid error message. Do you think I should raise a ticket with IFS support for this? How do you pass the keyref as the selection parameter? Dev tool capture of approved holiday request (absence request)ERROR in Workflow when passing my own concatenated KeyRef value matching keyref: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-40441: JSON syntax error ORA-06512: at "SYS.JDOM_T", line 4 ORA-06512: at "SYS.JSON_ARRAY_T", line 102 ORA-06512: at "IFSAPP.ABSENCE_MANAGER_HANDLING_SVC", line 13795 ORA-06512: at "IFSAPP.ABSENCE_MANAGER_HANDLING_SVC"

When creating a distribution order, is there a way of ensuring/transferring the price from the customer order (comes from price list) to the prucase order? Or is there a need to work with the supplier for purchase part and manually keeping the price updated when changes occur to the price list? Thanks,Adam

community, We are on APP10.I created a lobby and it is working well under my profile.I am trying to grant it to end user, but  end user does not load any data. i think i grant the permission set.  see below screenshots. any idea where I missed?end user lobby page Permission set granted to the end user 

Community,On work task line, you can see the current pre posting for cost center is set. if I changed the object ID, i would like the cost center in Pre Posting being changed automatically by a designated cost center value. my question would be, how to connect the cost center to object ID? Thank you. 

Hi, I’m pretty new here, just learning IFS.I created a workflow to validate the field “Alt Handling Unit Label ID” on Handling Units page. The idea is to not let the user enter a value that has been already used. The workflow seems to be validating correctly, but when the user try to remove any added value and leave it as null the operation is timing out. Any idea on what can it be? Thank you!Kind regards,Evelyn 

Hi, The automatic tolerance posting creation on the Posting Proposal when a PO is matched against an invoice with a different price doesn’t seem to work in Cloud 25.1. Or may be we are missing something. Could someone assist to verify what is missing? I have tested this for POs with an Inventory Part line, Non Inventory part line and a No part line as well. Non of the scenarios created automatic tolerance posting lines on the Posting Proposal. Here is an example from a No Part Line PO matched against an Invoice with a different price:The Tolerance is enabled on the Supplier for PO Matching on the Invoice tab:  On the company level too, the following setup is done:A PO with a no part line exists for 20000 sek in Closed status:The Invoice is Created for 20009 sek which is within the allowed tolerance amount. The Match PO Receipts per line is performed and the PO Receipt is matched. The Remaining amount is shown as 9 as below: However, no automatic tolerance posting is created using M93 e

Hi all,When I release a DOP order, a Shop Order is automatically created. However, in some cases, this Shop Order immediately gets the status “Completely Reported” .I’ve noticed that in the originating DOP order, all material lines have a required quantity of 0.Also: Netting is not used in this case The required quantity for the manufactured part is set to 1 in the upper level of the structure Has anyone experienced this before or knows which setting or condition could cause this behavior?And more importantly, how can this be prevented?Kind regards,WillemLevel 1  required qty for the part wherefor i expect a shop order is created= 1: Level 2 all materials lines for the sub assembly for which a shop order is created in the status completely reported:   

Hi,We are getting an Authentication Failure when we try to do a Test Transfer for the CIS Verification (from our Test IFS Cloud Database)We have double checked that the Tax Report details agree to the details we see if when we log onto the Government Gateway with the User Name and Password.Any ideas? WE are using our live HMRC Governemnt Gateway User Name and Password. Should we have a test User Name? There is no mention of that in the UK Country Solution Document 23R1.pdfCheers,Graham

When you activated Supplier Warranty on the Work Order before you book cost (time,material) on the Work Task the additional Sales Lines will be created and works fine.But when you want activated the Supplier Warranty, later into the proces when already cost are booked like time & material, there will be No additional Sales Lines created.Is there a possibilty to add Supplier Warranty when the Work Order/Work Task is on the status Work Done and aslo create the additional Sales Lines on IFS Cloud 24.2.3

Hi all,I have a question regarding internal logistics during Shop Order execution.In some cases, WIP needs to be physically moved by logistics between two Work Centers between two operations on the same Shop Order. Is there a standard functionality in IFS Cloud to: Trigger internal logistics that WIP is ready to be moved? Generate a transport task is not possible because it is WIP, but another signal or other notification to inform warehouse/logistics staff that something needs to be transferred between operations? Kind regards,Willem

I accidentally deleted the entry. How to restore it? 

Hi,I hope that you are well.We are going to rename some of base flow descriptions and just wondering what steps we shall follow when doing it?Do we just need to take the server down make the amendments and then reboot.  is there any scheduled job that we would need to run following renaming the description?Thank you for your time. Kind regards,Samiru

Hi,  I tried to call update for Reference_ActivityEstimate in ProjectScopeAndScheduleHandling. It works but the API document doesn’t support Update action.I tried to call another Reference_ReopenAccountingProjectRepost in FinancialProjectHandling. It didn’t work.I would like to know how to decide the update/create would work or not? Thank you,Emma

Hi,If we enable ‘Inherit Authorizer(s) From Purchase’ in the Company master, will posting proposals for advance supplier invoices be authorized automatically?

I got a question from a team member, who had made their Business Activity under a Sales Quotation. This Sales Quotation is connected to a Business Opportunity, but the Business Activity doesn’t show in the Business Opportunity - only on the Sales Quotation.Is this normal in IFS Cloud? We would like to see Business Activities made for Sales Quotations also to show under respective Business Opportunity. We strive to work mostly within the Business opportunity module, and now there is a risk the data regarding the Opportunity becomes fragmented and Activities must be searched for in different places. There might be several opportunities ongoing for each account simultaneously which adds to the risk of fragmented data in my opinion.

In the master part we are migrating 25.488 as the net weight for one of our parts. Somewhere along the line, it was changed to 25.488581893. Given the high number of decimal places, I suspect an automated calculation or a UOM conversion is at play.I tried to recreate this by creating a new part and going through all migration jobs but had no luck. I don’t believe this was changed manually by anyone although it's not off the table.I should note that this is only affecting a small portion of parts.Any ideas? 

Receiving the above error, but User group AC is connected to voucher type = I, function type = I for 2026:    What am I missing?Thanks.