Recently active topics

HelloThere are some new features in task planning in Demand Plan in IFS Cloud 25R2.I want schedule Rfresh IPR data. There are some new fields to fill out, but I haven't found any documentation on this topic.Can you help me please? Thanks.

IFS Cloud 25R1 SU12, on-prem, Manufacturing. No Constraint-Based Scheduling.We have an existing Work Center 1 (a press). We are adding Work Center 2 (a kitting station) that will physically sit inside Work Center 1's operating area. Both take machine and labor clocking. They are separate work centers for costing and capacity reporting, but because they share the same floor space they cannot run shop orders at the same time. Initially Work Center 2 will run on the opposite shift. Later they may be physically separated.Standard infinite and finite scheduling treat each work center as its own capacity pool, so nothing stops a planner or the scheduler from placing an operation on each at the same time. Today the only control is the planner watching for it.What we are testing: separate work time calendars per work center covering only their shift, with Finite capacity on both, so the scheduler cannot overlap them. Fallback is a Quick Report that flags overlapping open operations on the two

I’m getting these errors in assystServer log and can’t figure out what is missing. I didn’t have CSG enabled, this field in the incident form I’m using doesn’t have this field set up and in Import Profile we don’t have this fields to be imported… WARN2026-09-14 14:46:04,790 WARN  [org.apache.jasper] (default task-382) base == com.axiossystems.assyst.services.base.eventConfiguration.ImportProfile@2(2;AI_IP_INCIDENTE-GERAL;PERFIL DE IMPORTAÇÃO GERAL PARA INCIDENTE) , property == csg: jakarta.el.PropertyNotFoundException: The class 'com.axiossystems.assyst.services.base.eventConfiguration.ImportProfile' does not have the property 'csg'.    at jakarta.el.api@4.0.1.Final//jakarta.el.BeanELResolver.getBeanProperty(BeanELResolver.java:478)    at jakarta.el.api@4.0.1.Final//jakarta.el.BeanELResolver.getValue(BeanELResolver.java:190)    at io.undertow.jsp@2.2.8.Final//org.apache.jasper.el.JasperELResolver.getValue(JasperELResolver.java:123)    at org.glassfish.expressly@5.0.0//org.glassfish.exp

Hello community, We are in IFS Cloud 24R2 and  we would like to upgrade to 25r2 Su9. I have a problem this yhe adjusted demand in forecast demand.The quantity in “adjusted demand” is changed by a process. I can't figure out why this happens or how to prevent it.I get the impression that these changes are related to the qualification task. Thanks for your help.

We have a customer facing an issue after a change in the company structure. As part of the reorganization, document access rules were changed for individual users. The result is that newly assigned users can access newly created documents, but they do not automatically gain access to older documents that were created before the organizational change.Questions:What is the recommended way to handle this situation in IFS Document Management? Is there a standard approach to grant newly assigned users access to historical documents without manually updating existing document access records? For a new implementation, would it be considered a best practice to assign document access through groups/roles rather than individual users, so that future organizational changes do not create the same issue and new group members automatically gain access to both existing and future documents?Any experience or recommendations would be appreciated.

Has anyone encountered the following error when creating an Invoice Preview from a Request Work Task that contains an alternate customer on one of the sales lines?My expectation is that the system should generate two invoice previews, one for each customer, using the corresponding delivery address ID for each invoice.Interestingly, when following the same process through a Work Order -Work Task, the system successfully creates two invoice previews without any errors for the same customers.Due to this error, when a Supplier Warranty exists and the supplier is added as an alternate customer, it becomes impossible to create the invoice preview.Is this a known bug, or could I be missing a configuration or setup step related to alternate customers and customer order addresses in the Request Work Task process?Thanks

Hi,During an investigation, I came across a scenario where a Customer Order was created for a Phantom Part, and a Shop Order was also manually created for the same Phantom Part. Both orders were connected to a Project. After executing PMRP, I noticed that an MRP Action Proposal was generated with the message "Need Orders".What I find confusing is that the manually created Shop Order has a finish date earlier than the Customer Order need date, meaning it should be able to satisfy the demand. However, the MRP Action Proposal still indicates "Need Orders".Is this because the supply from the Phantom Part Shop Order itself is not considered by PMRP/MRP? I can see that supply has been generated for the component parts beneath the Phantom Part structure, which suggests that the Phantom Part is being exploded and planned at the component level.My question is: Why does the MRP Action Proposal display the message "Need Orders" even though there is a Shop Order for the Phantom Part that appears c

Hi,When modifying an Outside Operation in Routing, entering a new non-existing Outside Operation Item (OOI) no longer triggers the "Create Outside Operation Item" dialog. Instead, it throws an error.Work around solution as below:Temporarily change the Work Center from the Outside Operation Work Center to a different Work Center. Close the "Create Outside Operation Item", because the wrong center is selected. Change the Work Center back to the original Outside Operation Work Center. The "Create Outside Operation Item" dialog is then triggered. Continue editing and save the routing. However, this option was available in APPS10.Outside Op Item is modified and tried to save. Is there any straightforward method in cloud as well?A window will be popped up requesting to create a new Part Number.Once proceeded with selecting Yes, it will direct to another window where the user is able to create a new Part.After required data is given, the Outside Op Item will be available in the routing operat

Hello everyone,I would like to know what these two types of Quick Report in IFS Cloud correspond to : I believe they were present in IFS Applications 10... are they now deprecated?Thank you.

Hello,We are manufacturing continuously a mesh.To produce this I am using a wire (part set up with kg), from which I am cutting it into pieces and further welding those pieces together to obtain a final product.Current BOM:Wire [kg] → assigned to cutting operation   At this level we are providing at the custom field number of pieces that shall be cutted from the wire Current Routing:Cutting WeldingWe would like to display on the Shop Order Work Instruction Report an assignment of the materials to the operation so the operators know how many pieces of the wire go into the welding operation. So ideally:Cutting - display of wire  Welding - display of wire (but no consumption and no costs, as the same wire was already processed in the operation above).As currently wire is assigned to the cutting operation, I am not able to reassign the same wire at the operation of welding displaying the same information as at the cutting.I had tried to set up a separate material line using the same wire p

We have an audit requirement which requires to report the last login date and time for a user in IFS. In APPS8 we could get this information from the SERVER_LOG_TAB using the log category “IFS Sessions’. However, IFS cloud does not have this category as a server log parameter.There are some details in the IAM_LOGIN_EVENT_DETAIL_TAB but seems like it does not keep the long-term history of sessions.Can you advise how to get this data recorded and retrieved on demand?

I was trying to create a “Case” using My Call Center > New Case in IFS Cloud 26R1 environment. I observed a confusing behavior. I’ve added the test steps as below. Could you please look into them and let me know how can I solve this issue?Functional StepsI’ve used below steps to create a new case.Go to New Case using My Call Center (Relationship Management > My Call Center > New Case) added a Customer. For “Caller” section, “Caller Type” External is selected. External caller is selected from the LOV.  Make the toggle “Connect Object” TRUE, selected the “Customer Order” as the object.  I couldn’t enter the “Customer Order No”. The field “Customer Order” is not visible.  After, I’ve done below steps. Changed the “Caller Type” to “Internal”.  Selected the Customer Order as the object. Then “Customer Order” field is visible. Customer Order No is selected. At this point, the value in the “Caller” is not removed (refer below figure).After I changed the “Caller Type” value to “Extern

Hi All, I just wanna bring some awareness on an IFS Cloud extension I built that brings back the much beloved Sticky Notes functionality in IFS Cloud.Besides creating notes attached to any ‘Form’ record in IFS Cloud, it also offers the possibility to tag (@) other users and notify them by email and Stream notification (bell icon).The extension is free and open source. ACP packages to make this work included in the Chrome Store. Feel free to check it out.Leave your comments on improvements and I’ll consider them for a future release. Install: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ifs-sticky-notes-%E2%80%94-free-o/diafnecnokmhoenknpmgkcldigkgghmfSource Code: https://github.com/marcel-ausan/IFS_Stickies

We are using IFS Cloud. The report Received - Not invoiced is only provides output in the Pdf format. I have Excel pulgin with Customer Ledger Age Analysis. I have download it and added to the Received -Not invoiced report definition. I have also deleted few columns which are coming from age analysis report. But the report columns not allowing me to adjust the name of the column headers and also the sequence of the columns also. How can I achieve it. 

Dear All,For one of the customer on 25R1 we have added additional filters on ‘Task Measurement’ like Parameter, Parameter Description and Test Point ID in MWo Service App.We are facing issue with Sorting values using these filters. The values will not sort in ascending or descending order how usually sorting funtionality works on the records of ‘My Work’ tile. For example, if I have 10 work task with me and when i use My Work tile to navigate to list of records there if I use work task field as filter the list gets sorted based on work task number. But same is not happening here.Any leads on this will help. Below is the screenshot showing the button to sort. ​​Thanks in advance for your valuable suggestions.Regards,Srinivas

We have been using Resource Capacity Calculation on IFS apps 10.It took about 21 minutes to calculate for 2 years horisont.After upgrading to IFS cloud, we have serious problems in executing the job.The executing time is between 2 hours and 21 hours for calculating 6 month horizon. (only 25 %)We have been working with setting up statistic in database on the temporary tables used in the job, but it seems to be very sensitive, so its difficult  to hit the right levels. Anyone have solved this?/JE 

Currently, payment advice is generated when a supplier order proposal is validated.The PDF is generated and stored in the Report Archive.We would like to add this PDF to Docman so that it can be accessed directly through the Supplier Payment Analysis. However, we have been unable to determine how to achieve this.Any guidance or advice on how this could be implemented would be greatly appreciated. Report Définition :  how can we enrich the ConnectedLU to add PaymentPerCurrency for exemple please? Kind regards,

Dear community,We are using Call Center Cases and are frequently handing over to Work Orders.We have recently started using the Service Quotations, and would like to handover cases to Service Quotations, but can not find this option in the case handover possibilities.What is the process to handover case task to service quotation?Thanks,Robbert

HiI We are currently testing the migration from pain.001.001.03 to pain.001.001.09 in IFS Applications 10 using the standard system-defined transformer: IFS_ISO20022_TO_CORE_09_ISO20022. During testing with Nordea we identified two questions regarding the generated XML.1. Regulatory ReportingIn the generated file we see the following mapping:<RgltryRptg> <DbtCdtRptgInd>DEBT</DbtCdtRptgInd> <Dtls> <Cd>14</Cd> <Inf>Message to Valutaregisteret</Inf> </Dtls></RgltryRptg> After reviewing the transformer, I can see:NATIONAL_BANK_CODE        RgltryRptg/Dtls/CdNATURE_OF_BUSINESS        RgltryRptg/Dtls/Inf However, I cannot find any mapping that generates:  <Tp>PURP</Tp>. Nordea has pointed out that the Type element (Tp) is missing:My questions are:Which IFS field should generate RgltryRptg/Dtls/Tp? Is there a standard setup required in IFS? Is this a known limitation in the standard transformer? Has anyone successfully gen

IFS Cloud 移行ジョブのメソッド一覧のメソッド一覧属性の実行順序20に固定値に設定したORDER_NO@10の値が取れないとき（実行順序10が実行されないとき）規定値のSQLの結果を参照したいが固定値に設定があるとソースマッピングの規定値を見に行かない PL/SQLで解決できるでしょうか？メソッド一覧のカラム名HEADER_CHECKの値が1のとき実行順序10が実行されORDER_NO@10の値が取得される

Hi,We have a use case according to followingCustomer order is released for a high volume of COL, for example 2000 products. The product is ETO but all has the same BOM revision. The COL’s are connected to project for financial and other reasons and qty for each line is 1. This results in 2000 COL and 2000 DOP Headers and the delivery time for the lines are spread over 12-24 month.  Challenge/Problem:The Customer Order is released and lines connected to project activities. MS Level 1 cannot be used to create supply for non-DOP parts.The DOP structure must be created for all DOP’s, if not created = no demand for non-DOP parts. Please confirm that this is correct, I might missed something:1. Unreleased CO is a demand and MRP create supply for non-DOP parts (Released for Mtrl Planning enabled)2. Released CO, DOP Header created, this is a demand but MRP doesn’t create supply for non-DOP Parts3. Released CO, DOP Header created and Top DOP Created, this is a demand but MRP doesn’t create supp

Our users report the following: In IFS, when an advance payment is managed via the PO by inserting the advance payment, and the PO is still in the draft / unauthorized status, the advance payment can simply be processed by AP. Why does IFS allow payment against a not authorized PO? Are we doing something wrong? Who can advice?

hiIs there a way to give access to a page to a user/role with some fields restricted? Ex.If i need to disable the assign work button for some roles, is it possible? I know that this page can be made visible/not, can be made read only/update but at field level on a page, can we restrict for some roles?  

Background:From the beginning of IFS Cloud (in Aurena ) , there were concerns of not being able to upload multiple document files into the Attachment section of a single Business Object. Having understood the requirements around the user experience, a fix has been delivered to all IFS Cloud tracks except 21R1 version.RnD Solution:The possibility to call “Create Documents”  was brought back when standing on an Attachment section of a business object. “Create Documents” page supports to Drag/Drop or Select single or multiple files and crate document accordingly attaching to the respective business object. This is handled by adjusting the  Document Default Value for “ATTACH_CREATE_NEW_FORM”  in the Document Management Basic Data setting.( Document Management > Basic Data > Document Default Values > ATTACH_CREATE_NEW_FORM)NOTE: It is still possible to set either “Create Documents” for multiple uploads or “Create Document Assistant” for a single upload as it was existed previously.

How do we determine the file size of documents that have been uploaded into Cloud?We are using the DocMan module, and the Document Revisions. But I can't see an easy way to determine the size of files uploaded.