Recently active topics

I keep getting the error "SE_UNAUTHORIZED" message "Insufficient priviliges" Internal:2I have checked community articles "https://community.ifs.com/warehouse-data-collection-wadaco-252/ifs-cloud-scan-it-app-logging-error-54056?tid=54056&fid=252"and "https://community.ifs.com/ifs-cloud-mobile-apps-388/ifs-cloud-mobile-apps-for-ifs-cloud-25r2-ga-release-63966?tid=63966&fid=388" Checked following in general:Scanit is active and allows multiple devices. The wadaco_mobile_user is entered in Security Group and is under Security group "ScanIt". SiteVirtual is available with actions create, update and delete.In the projections Action Grant only the InitUserSession is on 'No'. The security cache was cleared. SiteVirtual error message pops-up when logging in with IFSAPP user. Checked by item: 1. Basic connection for login 2. ScanIt applicaiton 3. IAM authentication 4. Permission sets for user 5. ScanIt Security Group 6. Mobile App User 7. Device registration 8. Initialisa

Hi, As part of our open data migration, we are currently migrating supplier invoices using the standard External File Template (Template ID: STDSIN2).We have a number of supplier invoices in the legacy system that are currently on hold, and the client would like these invoices to be migrated with the same hold status in IFS.Could you please advise whether it is possible to apply invoice holds, along with the hold information, during the supplier invoice migration process using STDSIN2?If this is not feasible through the migration template, is there an alternative method to place a hold on a bulk set of migrated invoices in a single process or batch?We would appreciate your guidance and any recommended approach for handling this requirement.Thank you for your support.Note: We are currently using IFS Cloud 24R2.

How to send incoming dispatch advice in shipment order

Hi Everyone, for an implementation project at one of my customers, we have an USA site in scope.To support order delivery via Shipments we have to make use of SCAC codes, which are representing the service level of the transport company (like; FEDEX or UPS) This comes also with the configuration of Delivery Terms, Ship-Via Codes and Forwarders.  Can someone share a best practice with me how to deal with this? Especially because i cant find any ‘dedicated’ field to support SCAC codes.  Thank you. regards, Henk 

I have a question around Standard Cost and Inventory value per period.  We are using standard cost for our valuation method, and I would expect that the inventory value per period unit cost would equal cost set 1 for all parts, but I am seeing several parts that are not equal.  I have started to dig into the issue, but I have not had much luck understanding why the unit cost in inventory value per period keeps changing each month.  Any ideas?   I am thinking maybe it is a part or company setting that might have be reviewed.  Thanks in advance for your support.   Bob

Good afternoon,Does anyone, please, have a more up-to-date roadmap for IFS assyst and ITOM than the one available at the following link:https://community.ifs.com/product-strategy-and-roadmap-124/master-article-what-is-the-update-release-schedule-and-release-details-9818?tid=9818&fid=124#IFS+assyst%C2%A0I searched the community but could not find any.

Topic for reporting IFS Developer studio bugs

Hello,I am trying to create a count report for all parts in the warehouse for quarterly and annual physical counts. We use count reports for daily cycle counts so when I try to create a report for the quarterly where we will count everything, regardless of the last time the part was counted. When I try to create the quarterly/annual count reports, nothing populates because the parts were recently counted for cycle counts so they aren’t due to be counted. Has anyone found a way around this, and are able to create quarterly/annual count reports with all parts, on time of daily cycle counts, and if so, how? We are using cloud.

Hi All,We are experiencing an issue with the Aurena Agent when downloading attachments. When the Aurena Agent is enabled, users receive an error while downloading attachments.However, if the Aurena Agent is disabled, the download works without any issues.During our investigation, we found that the affected document revision had its file extension set to .pending instead of .PDF. We are unsure how this extension was changed, as newly created document revisions are not being created with the .pending extension and the issue cannot be reproduced.At this stage, we have not been able to identify the root cause. Has anyone encountered a similar issue before, or are there any known reasons why a document revision extension might be changed to .pending? Any leads or insights would be appreciated. Best Regards,Charuka

Our infrastructure team has inquired whether it is possible—or generally permitted by IFS—to install third-party software (Manage Engine Endpoint Central) on the CMIG middle-tier server.Are there any objections to this, particularly with regard to support?Product Version: 26.1.5Business Impact: The software would be helpful and supportive, but we do not want to lose our support entitlements.

Hello, our client is looking into a build in way how to stream data from IFS Cloud basically in real time. I have found in the official documentation of 26R1 that DSP (Data Services Platform) should enable you to sync selected data to organization's own data lake environment. This comes with a few catches, but the main starting points are these: In documentation it is written that the sync time is 30 minutes which doesn’t sound much like streaming. Is the limit really 30 minutes or it can be done for certain tables on the level minutes?  Does this functionality also work for custom tables in IFS Cloud which were not part of the OOTB solution? Thank you for any help. 

Hello,As I understand it, when I create and save a schedule using the Advanced Planning Board (APB), the updated planning dates are stored in the IFS database.However, it appears that when the planner opens IFS the following (next) day, the schedule that was saved in APB has been overwritten, as if the Infinite Scheduler has run and recalculated the planning dates.I would like to understand:Is there a way to freeze or firm the schedule created in APB so that it is not overwritten by the Infinite Scheduler? If no changes have been made to the affected shop orders overnight, what could trigger the Infinite Scheduler to reschedule them? Could this be caused by an MRP run, or are there any other background processes that can automatically trigger rescheduling?Any guidance on how APB schedules are protected from automatic rescheduling would be greatly appreciated.Thank you.

In AFP reversal of AFP3 &4 not happening after Invoice posting. We have a project invoice created and submitted to ZATCA. What we noticed is that, after posting the project invoice, it got into posted auth status after ZATCA clearance, but the reversal entry for AFP 3 & 4 of certified work is not happening. We are using IFS Cloud. Does anyone have any idea? what could be the reason? Any Intergration issue?

An IT department representative from one of our IFS Cloud-implementing customers is interested in Maintenance Planning and Scheduling (MPS). They are aware that MPS is the successor to the Maintenance Planning Board (MPB). Does anyone know of any good resources to explain MPS to this person?

Hello, Several of the Purchase Requisition Authorization Rule order codes at our site were created without an order code entered. As a result, they are being skipped when users attempt to authorize their purchase requisitions. The rest of our rules have the wildcard (%) as their order code. We have attempted to enter the wildcard into this field but there is no option in the LOV to do so, and the system will not accept any value that is not present in the LOV. Is there a way to add the wildcard after creating the authorization rule, or can this only be done during set-up? We are using IFS Cloud 26R1.   Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks,Ben

Hello, I would like to add the CF to retrieve the Buyer Code base on the ordernoselect Purchase_order_API.Get_Buyer_Code('F1011569') FROM DUAL;But I do not see the ReceivableObjectInfo entity in the entities

Hi all, We are currently implementing the Dispatch Console for one of our customers and are running into some limitations, particularly regarding layout and performance.So far, we haven't been able to identify any customers in the Benelux region who are actively using the Dispatch Console in their day-to-day service operations.Do any of you know of customers who are currently using the Dispatch Console for their service business? Additionally, it would be great to use this community to share experiences, discuss the challenges we are facing, and exchange ideas on possible improvements and best practices. Looking forward to hearing your experiences and thoughts!Best regards,

We are utilizing Shop Order split to create a new shop order to rework parts.  Does a prorated amount from the parent shop order move to the child shop order?  If not, does it make sense to receive the qty to be reworked from the Parent shop order and add the part to the BOM and issue the parts to the Child Shop order to bring in the cost?

Hi Community,I would like to use different tax codes on a manual supplier invoice based on the supplier invoice address ID.I’ve added separate address IDs and tax codes under Delivery Tax Information, and the “Use Supplier Address for Tax” option is enabled for both addresses. However, when creating a manual supplier invoice, the system always applies the tax codes from the address ID that is set as the default delivery address for the supplier.Does anyone know how to change this behavior?Thanks in advance.   

We have an issue with a issue with a customer that data mount is running out of space due to the high space usage of FND_AV_SCANNING_LOG_TAB.Is there a Cleanup job to remove these entries.Can someone assists to trouble shoot this issue 

- It happens with any task in IFS. On each job if there is a hazard they have to fill it out- Adds 4-5 hazards > they sync to the cloud > manager can see them > They don't sync to the desktop > then the user has to re-do the hazards on the computer againHazards selected on Mobile:Hazards not showing up on laptop: Workflow configurations:Push notifications enabled: What is the reason for the sync issue? What settings needs to be set up for the users to see the survey answers in their laptops?Thank you.

Hello.In our test environnement, we added some CF on the LU InventoryPart, but for a reason I can’t understand, the whole package is facing some compilation errors. Currently, the INVENTORY_PART_CFT table exists.The INVENTORY_PART_CFV view doesn’t exist, not even the INVENTORY_PART_CFP package

Hello,We use the Equipment Object Navigator pretty extensively to help identify the lowest object in the hierarchy and aid in searching for active work orders and tasks. We recently upgraded from Apps 10 to Cloud 25R1, and we’re running into a pain-point with this screen with our users. In Apps 10, the Equipment Object Navigator would load the entire structure so you could scroll to find the right object even if the expanded level had a lot of objects. In Cloud, it only loads 24 records and then you have to click Show More to load the next set. However, this only loads 24 more records. We have a level that groups all of our site locations that has 300+ objects in the level. If you want to get near the end of this level, it requires a lot of repeated click, scroll, click, scroll actions. I haven’t been able to find a way to increase the amount of records that can be expanded when clicking Show More. I know it other Table View modes you can increase the record count, but I can’t find a w

Is it possible to have the PM Action (and then Work Task) to pick up a Service Contract, if the service contract has a wild card as the Work Type?I am using Auto Find Service Contract on the PM and Auto Use On PM on the Service Contract. Still getting errors when the Work Type=% on the Service LineAs I am understanding the documentation, wildcard should be applicable to all Work Types on the PM Action. Anyone using this setup?

Hi,I would appreciate your insights on the following scenario and would like to understand whether this is expected system behavior or if there is a recommended IFS best practice to prevent it.Expense SetupThe Expense Rule is configured for a specific Employee Category. Employee A belongs to that Employee Category, so when an Expense Sheet is created, the system automatically assigns the Expense Rule. Employee B does not belong to that Employee Category, so the Expense Rule is not automatically assigned.Steps Leading to the IssueEmployee A creates an Expense Sheet. Employee A adds an Expense Lines. Before Confirm, the Expense Sheet header is edited, and the employee is changed from Employee A to Employee B. As a result: The previously assigned Expense Rule is no longer valid and is removed/not applicable. No Expense Rule is manually added. The existing Expense Lines remain on the Expense Sheet. The system allows the Expense Sheet to be saved and authorized.ResultThe Expense Sheet is