Recently active topics

A correction invoice, Iis stuck in the printed status. Checked in Customer Invoices with Errors and it is showing up there, after pressing "Process Invoice" we get "Not Posted Invoices:" and returned Then looked at the Customer Invoice Postings Analysis page to see extra details. Every line has the same error: "ORA-20105: Invoice.ACCERROR1: Error (It is not allowed to modify a Sales Line after creating service invoice.) occurred while booking Invoice CR xxxx"This caused mean for some reason when the correction invoice is trying to modify the closed order? or is there any other reason?

HelloPurchase Order is sent through ProcurementIntegrationService which can be routed based on Application Message attributes (e.g. MESSAGE_FUNCTION).But is there any way to set full URL in the address dynamically? Something like System Parameter value or concept of Apps10 Context Substitution Variables? 

Hallo community!I am trying to configure IFS CLOUD to trigger a message when a Sales Part is not available that has a substitute part set up that is available.But so far, I have failed. What I found as the potential solution in the documentation is the following: But when I go to the Inventory Part Asse Classes page, there is no such parameter: Any ideas?Thanks,Gunther

Can someone point me in the direction of finding the 26R1 Product Catalog please?

Dear IFS ColleaguesIn our comparison between IFS Applications 10 and IFS Cloud, we noticed that the report PURCHASE_ORDER_RECEPTION_REP appears to no longer be used in IFS Cloud, while ARRIVAL_REPORT_REP seems to be triggered instead during the receipt process.In Apps10, the Register Arrival process was used specifically for Purchase Orders. In IFS Cloud, however, the goods receipt process has been expanded to support additional object types, such as:RMA Repair RMA Shipment Order etc.Our assumption is that, due to this broader and more generic receipt process in IFS Cloud, the dedicated Purchase Order report (PURCHASE_ORDER_RECEPTION_REP) may have been deprecated and replaced by a single generic report (ARRIVAL_REPORT_REP) for all arrival scenarios.Is our assumption correct? If yes - are there any official documents where such changes are documentedBest Regards,Nikola

Hi, In Apps 10 - adding custom fields to LEDGER_ITEM_CU_DET_QRY. Works ok as read only. We can add Persistent Fields but it will not let us enter data in the client.Any ideas on why this is and if there is any where we can add this in the client?Current alternative thinking is to use  a Custom LU to enter data which will be picked up by LEDGER_ITEM_CU_DET_QRY. This is for an invoice query management system - so need to be visible on the screen that Credit Control use,

hi CommunityDo you know the storage size limit using File Storage option (with azur)Regards

Hi, We have just upgraded from Apps10 to CLoud.  Cloud no longer has a sticky note feature, I am trying to find the best way to convert the data held in the table to readable text.  My hope is to create a custom field on the table and then populate it with the data.  However when I try to convert I am getting the following in the field. {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Trebuchet MS;}}\viewkind4\uc1\pard\lang2057\f0\fs20 new PO has been created\par\parplease see \fs20 E200049\lang1033\par} What is the best way to get the actual text ?

Does anyone have a clear-cut document that outlines each activity/step to perform during the Year-End Process and Month-End Process in both IFS Cloud and Apps 10?Are there any differences between Cloud and Apps10?

A. What is your idea? 1) Classification New concept or idea 2) Brief descriptionBackground:In IFS Cloud Tracks, revenues and costs that are excluded from capitalization (by excluding the relevant account from Periodical Capitalization) are incorrectly included in revenue recognition calculations for POC Method: Manual.Note that this issue is not there in POC Method: Actual. This is since “Include Cost Excluded from Capitalization for POC” has been auto disabled (set as “No”) from Project Group level for POC Method: Actual. But this option has been auto enabled (set as “Yes”) for POC Method: Manual.This was reported through Case: CS0532547.Issue:It is not possible to change the value in “Include Cost Excluded from Capitalization for POC” to ‘No’ for POC Method: Manual. Therefore this causes a situation where the excluded revenues and costs are always included in the revenue recognition calculations which is not right for the customers which are used to use Manual POC Method without reve

Is anyone in the community a UK business, with a registration for tax in Portugal but no permanent establishment, and how are you handling SAF-T reporting requirements?We don't have an IFS Company set up with Country = Portugal but we do have a Site that does.  We are transferring stock in (Shipments) and selling on to customers (Customer Orders).  We're low volume so handling reporting manually currently.  Just wondering if anyone has any potential solutions to look at?  Thanks!Linda

Hi All,I am currently working on an uplift to IFS cloud from APPS10, and having a requirement to uplift a functionality where additional field were added to the ‘ORDERS’ type incoming XML, in APPS10 I could see that this modification is done in a server package called ‘DistributionTransactionManagement’ in the ‘its’ module.However, in IFS cloud, the ‘its’ module is empty and I would like to know the technical details such asWith which API’s this functionality was replaced, How incoming XML payload is captured (from which API) How the connectivity inbox is populated.any lead is much Appreciated :). TIA

Hello IFS, The IFS Partner SharePoint page that contains IFS Cloud-related information has become inaccessible again.I previously reported this issue through a ticket in the Partner Portal, and access was restored. However, as of today, the page is no longer accessible once again. The information about this page can be found at the link below.  If this page has been replaced or moved due to a policy change, I would greatly appreciate it if partners could be informed in advance and provided with the replacement location. We rely on this page on a daily basis to carry out our work, so the lack of access has a significant impact.Thank you in advance for your assistance. I look forward to your update.Kind regards,Amila Fernando

HiI’m interested to have an understanding of the everyday life after the move to Cloud version and how you keep up with the IFS releases and upgrades.Many customers seems to go the “update once a year” route to get to the latest release. Much depends of course of the scope you are using the platform for and how are the borders of each customer’s ICT systems set and integrated with each other.Our IFS scope is pretty basic, mostly finance/ERP with purchasing and project related activities and HR master system, adn we have just moved from Apps9 to 10.I’m interested of you who have already moved from different Apps-versions to Cloud or even you who have moved directly from other system to IFS Cloud, and your views about the adaptation to the new everyday life.What has changed in areas of the amount of IFS/partner support needed, the amount of your own work needed to keep up with the releases and even the spend changes for doing all of this.I’m having doubts we can keep it running efficient

Regarding the IFS Service Center accounts:One: In a case of customer having a corporation structure with multiple companies that all share a common email address, there is a technical limitation with IFS Service Center / Customer Support Portal as the customer account is currently connected to only a single company or email address. This leads the customer only seeing the cases of this one company and not the others from the same corporation. The IFS agreement is also connected to a single company even if the contents apply to all companies in the corporation structure as mentioned on the agreement contents.The issue is currently hot as we are moving from Apps10 to Cloud.  Apps versions support cases with 10 year history are visible in one company’s account and the Cloud cases are visible to other company’s account. Currently I myself see only the new ones and our other portal users only the old ones, not vice versa. We’d need to see the contents of both companies old cases and be able

In the FSM you had the ability to update the Customer Information on a Work Task or Work Order. Does Service Management have the same capability? testing this out it seems if I update the Customer Order Type (SEO) and add a Customer Order No it will still create a new Customer Order from the Invoice Preview.We are on IFS Cloud 25.1.8

Hi everybody, when a user wants to re-print a customer invoice was originally ordered by another user. He receives the following error "the invoice has been printed by another user. He doesn't have access to this report (key report 9799)". I read two post on the community that said it’s a bug, is it true ? https://community.ifs.com/framework-experience-infrastructure-cloud-integration-dev-tools-50/re-print-original-from-archive-5034 or https://community.ifs.com/framework-and-experience-101/error-the-invoice-has-been-printed-by-another-user-you-do-not-have-access-to-this-report-6200.If you have a solution, I take.

I am looking for a better explanation of the settings for ‘Editable’ in Object Connection Transformations than what is provided in the F1 Help for Service Name = DocReferenceObject. Some examples would be beneficial also.Scenario: I have a Source LU ‘A’ and a Target LU ‘B’. I connect a document revision to source LU ‘A’.For each of the three possible values for ‘Editable’ (Source, Target, None):What am I able to do with documents at the Source, i.e., connect additional documents, detach documents, etc., and what effect does this have at the Target? What am I not able to do with documents at the Source? What am I able to do with documents at the Target, and what effect does this have at the Source? What am I not able to do with documents at the Target?My reason for asking this is the documentation provided on this attribute is provided below, with my additions entered in parentheses.None - This indicates that the inherited object connection is read only and no new connections can be mad

Customer would like to know if UK GAAP could be included as  an option in Accounting standard drop down .(see the image attached)Customer had informed a new regulations around UK GAAP come into place for Lease accounting, which is being used in place of IFRS, there are some differences between the two. We would like to know what are the differences are and if IFRS can support them in IFS or if we need to account for the differences in the system/whether IFS will be updating this in any of their releases. 

Hi All, Why do we need to grant the access for the projections used inside the workflow?If we dont grant the access for any projection which is being used inside the workflow the user is getting error stating insufficient privileges  Is there any workaround for this? In my case i was using the employee file,person and the users screen so i switched to use the custom event attributes and delete the relevant tasks in the workflow and grant only the custom page access for the user Although it worked and resolved my issue. I would like to know if its a limitation/drawback in the workflow or am i missing something ? Any inputs on this would be highly appreciated  Regards,Rakesh

A. What is your idea?1) ClassificationChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.Opportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionWhat happened, what is missing, or what could be better? Focus on the problem or opportunity (not the solution).Write here:When working in Project Transactions Review the user is missing a filter on Project Manager. If project manager is added the Project manager can easily search all his/her projects and create project invoice from thereB. Context and scope1) Who is affected?Choose ONE or MORE: keep the applicable options and delete the rest.Customers2) FrequencyChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.FrequentlyC. Value and impact1) What is the business outcome?Choose ONE or MORE: keep the applicable options and delete the rest.Improves productivity or efficiency Reduces cost or manual effort Enhances user experience2) Impact scaleChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.3 — Cross-functional 4 — Company-wid

Hi everyone,I am currently configuring Absence Management in IFS Cloud and I would like to understand whether the following scenario is supported by standard functionality.Configuration:Absence Type 01 = Annual Leave Annual entitlement = 26 working days Absence Type 05 = Carry Over Annual Leave is configured with: Limit Defined = Yes Carry Forward = Yes Carry Forward Absence Type = 05 (Carry Over) Business requirement:At the end of each year, any remaining Annual Leave balance should be transferred to the Carry Over absence type.The Carry Over balance should accumulate indefinitely over multiple years.Example:2026:Annual Leave entitlement = 26 days Employee uses 21 days Remaining balance = 5 daysBeginning of 2027:Carry Over balance = 5 days New Annual Leave entitlement = 26 days2027:Employee does not use any Annual Leave Remaining Annual Leave balance at year end = 26 daysBeginning of 2028:Expected Carry Over balance = 31 days (5 days carried over from 2026 + 26 days carried over fro

A. What is your Idear?1) ClassificationChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.Opportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionWhat happened, what is missing, or what could be better? Focus on the problem or opportunity (not the solution).Write here:When Reporting time as a Secondment Resource on Work Tasks you are limited to only report time directly on the work task itself, while MCPR time in Projects can be reported via My Time Registration.  In construction and energy companies a secondment resource will quite often be reporting time on both projects and work tasks. Due to the limitation of secondment work a worker will need to report time in two ways rather than just reporting all time via My Time Registration.B. Context and scope1) Who is affected?Choose ONE or MORE: keep the applicable options and delete the rest.Customers2) FrequencyChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.Daily or weeklyC. Value and impact1) What is the business outcome?Choo

Hi,I was wondering if there is anyone who has done Japan and Korea IFS Cloud implementation who is using the Customer and Collective Invoice reports as well as Customer Statement of Account? Has there been any complains about the translations and needed to be changed? or were they accepted by both local markets?Thanks in advance! 

Hi,I am looking to see if I can get a better idea of what values are expected to be passed against ‘StdNameId’ attribute when working with the Part Handling API please - (ifs.cloud/main/ifsapplications/projection/v1/PartHandling.svc).I believe that it requires a numerical value from 0 to 10, but I want to understand what outcomes are driven by each of these values please. Is there documentation that supports the API usage here other than the API Explorer?Thanks