Solved

Hello,As a system requirement, I want to create an email that works as follows: If wanted receipt date - today = 1, the system should read all order numbers and send an email to the requesters of the orders where this condition is met. However, I couldn’t figure out how to make the system read all order numbers. The second approach I tried was to create an email directly using the following code, but it still doesn’t read all order numbers:DECLARE text_ VARCHAR2(32767); subject_ VARCHAR2(2000) := 'Teslim Tarihi Yaklaşıyor'; attach_ VARCHAR2(2000); wanted_date_ DATE; diff_days_ NUMBER;BEGIN -- Safely convert the date wanted_date_ := TRUNC( TO_DATE(SUBSTR('&NEW:WANTED_RECEIPT_DATE',1,10),'YYYY-MM-DD') ); -- Calculate day difference diff_days_ := wanted_date_ - TRUNC(SYSDATE); -- If 1 day remains IF diff_days_ >= 1 THEN text_ := 'Sayın İlgili,'; text_ := text_ || '<br&g

HiI would like to consult with you all, in case customer have group company with company A, company B and company C with Equity Majority and ownership 100% for allI have defined the consolidation structure as the pictures below, I run consolidate balance with successfully, but it didn’t generate intercompany elimination for intercompany transactions.Could you please advise the structure or any basic data should be revise? Thank you in advance.Supaporn .   

Going the report in (complete assitant) on MWO to complete a request task. When marked as complete the data doesnt sync to IFS Cloud. There are failed transactions listed for the logged in user. See both in the screenshots below.This issue only happens with a user that has an employee record.Attempted the following so far:Admin permission set complete employment record make Time Clock User = True  

The customer wants to direct his share-point documents to IFS application through an BIZAPI integration (using an XML file). Like we can attach oracle path/local documents by just giving the file path (eg: C:/IFS/PROD/PDM/ABCDE123.pdf) through an object property , is there any method we can use in this scenario to attach those share-point documents? If there’s no any way, what is the best approach we can give to the customer as a solution?

We’ve identified an issue this morning affecting import/export actions in IFS, such as downloading document attachments from purchase orders. When users attempt to save a file to their local machine, the IFS client crashes and closes. We’ve tested this across multiple user devices, and the behaviour is consistent.Everything was functioning normally before the weekend, but as of this morning the feature is failing entirely in both our production and development environments.As an additional check, I tested the same actions directly on the server/VM hosting our middleware instance, and import/export works correctly there. This makes me suspect the issue may be related to something on the local Windows machines, possibly a recent update.Our application is accessed through an App Gateway, but this has been in place for some time without any issues, so it seems unlikely to be the cause.Has anyone else seen this?

Hello, is this a design of IFS or a bug. I am trying to add a person resource to another maintenance organization on the same site and I am getting an error message.This user is primarily responsible for mending and maintaining our production tools but they also have to record data on maintaining the machines they use in there. So we can easily differentiate on which work orders and tasks are for which area we have created separate Maintenance Organization, however it appears that I can not add an employee to multiple Maint Org for the same site.Is this a bug or the way the system is designed, we are currently using 24R2 SU4.  

Hi!I cannot get my head around where below setting is defined, the Grants-property of an command.Can anyone enlighten me how this work and were this code is added?See the yellow marking in below pic.  

Hi,I ran a database script with views in Quick Reports and it worked. However, when I try to run it through the table directly, it gives an insufficient privilege error. I think this can be handled by granting the appropriate permissions, but can anyone please let me know which exact permission set I need to assign?Thanks in advanceRegards 

Hi All,I tried to set a sort order on the FSM Repair Centre Screen in the usual way in Primary Table Constraints Editor and noticed it did not work (screen shown below). On loading the baseline screen I then noticed none of the column sorts work when you click each of the column headers. This will likely be why my sort configured in Primary Table Constraints Editor did not work. Have any of you come accross this before and is there a fix? We are on U27. Thanks,Barry

The following is stated in 25R2 release notes, I believe. But what does in mine in practice? Where can I do this configuration?Improved Integration with Custom Attributes in Outbound MessagesCustom attributes on business entities can now be included in outbound messages (e.g., Freight Booking, Dispatch Advice).Uses configuration over customization.Benefits:Enhanced flexibility.Cost savings.

Hi,Lets assume we are using MSO in automatic.We have shop orders outside of the planning horizon in the future.The planning is rolling and reaches the next day.The corresponding shop order are now within the planning horizon.Will the automatic MSO run consider them and plan them as soon we reach the next day?what happens in automatic mode?Kind regards 

Hi, It is possible in IFSCloud in the Business Activities view to close (completed) single activity. Is it possible to make the command available also when you choose several activities? 

Hello, We are working on an integration with one of our business partners using the BPA workflows offered by IFS Cloud (We are on 23R1). All the logic is in place and is working as intended, but the BPA fails for “large” datasets. We are using the REST Call Task to send a web request to our partner’s API. The request body/payload cannot be stored as a string because when there are many items, the requestBody would quickly exceed the 2000 character limit to be stored in the Oracle database as a string. If it were to be stored as a string, we would receive a persistence layer exception at the end of the workflow.Instead, we are storing it in a process variable called ‘requestBody’ as an object.The request body field of the REST Call Task requires a string, so we must convert the JSON object to a string using Camunda Spin: JSON(requestBody).toString() in the task.This works perfectly for “small“ payloads. However, even though I am not storing the “large” string, it still throws the same p

When uploading a large file to import Fixed assets, using the system generated ExtFAObject external file template, we are receiving the following error:  “The depreciation (14695.69) for book INTERNAL is greater than the acquisition value 14500.”This is the same error for all assets, regardless of the actual acquisition value included in the upload.  Can anyone assist with this error?  Here is an example of the data being uploaded - you can see in this case the asset acquisition value is actually 24291.26.  Would appreciate any assistance.  This is happening on all the assets in the file   

Planning Method E+F uses Order Overhead in the MRP calculation. Can someone explain in detail how the Order Overhead is calculated? Is it related to Cost Buckets/Elements. It seems that the Ordering Costs in Inventory Part are also will be considered for manufactured Parts. 

All,When I set up the employees to the resource Customer Support Tooling Work (Person Group) I had no issues with seeing these employees to be seen in the Maintenance Organizations, however when I have set up a new resource of Maintenance (Person Group) I can not see these employees in the Maintenance Organizations.I have noticed that when I look at the employee on the person resource the Maintenance/Service tab where you add the company once expanded the Employemnt is blank for the new set up, what have I missed? I can’t see any difference in set up and I am not aware that we have applied a SU since the first was set up.Original set up New Set Up 

Hello.A user reported to us an issue by trying to make a credit invoice from a customer invoice. IFS showed no error, just, the new document is not created.Customer order :Order no : E10000006421Wanted delivery date : 01/12/2023State : partially deliveredTotal amount : 7279.76 €Line 1 : Qty : 4, Qty delivered : 4, sale price total : 218.16 €Line 2 : Qty : 5, Qty delivered : 4, sale price total : 7061.60 €++++++++++++++++Invoice 1 : Number CD240000871State : PostedAuthCreated : 10/02/2023Total amount : 218,16 € (line 1 on the customer order)++++++++++++++++Invoice 2 : Number CD250001104State : PostedAuthCreated : 10/02/2023Total amount : 1412,32 € (line 2 on the customer order)++++++++++++++++Invoice 3 (credit type) :Number : CR250000104Credit on the invoice number CD250001104State : PostedAuthCreated : 10/02/2023Total amount : -1412,32€++++++++++++++++Invoice 4 Number : CD250002453State : PostedAuthCreated : 10/02/2023Total amount : 1412,32 € (line 2 on the customer order)+++++++++++++

Hi! We user IFS8. Is it possible to forbidden creating purchase order with a certain supplier? We have terminated our cooperation with a certain supplier. But buyer can create PO with this supplier still. Then made some error order. We want to avoid it happen again.

Hi All, I experience that Selection Rules for Service Delivery Unit is not working in 25R2.I have set three selection rules for the service TK-AZN as below. Objective is getting a different delivery unit as per different regions. But when I creating a service, the default delivery unit for the service organization is always fetched even if I use different regions.As I remeber these rules worked fine before.Are there any workarounds other than setting selection rule to fetch the correct delivery unit? Or is it same for others?TIA:

We implemented a modification where triggering an action creates a background job executed by the IFSAPP user to update certain data.We also have an event configured to prevent modifications to this data when the user is IFSAPP. How can we adjust this event so that it is not triggered when the user is IFSAPP and the action is executed through a background job? is it possible? Thank you in advance DECLAREcf$_userid VARCHAR2(100);BEGIN -- Récupérer l'utilisateur IFS cf$_userid := ifsapp.fnd_session_api.get_fnd_user(); -- Interdire l'utilisateur IFSAPP IF cf$_userid = 'IFSAPP' THEN Error_sys.Appl_General( 'SepaPaymentAddress', 'IFSAPPMODIFYRIB: IFSAPP n''est pas autorisé à modifier les RIBs' ); END IF;END;  

 Hi All, I am generating Wo’s from my Service Contract through PM actions. But I noticed that trhe field ‘Contract Id’, ‘Line No’ and ‘Customer No’ are not defined when creating the WO from that Service Contract. That strikes me as odd since that info is easily obtained. Adding the info after creatin is also not possible - IFS will give an error that the Contract ID cannot be edited for WO generated from PM actions. So somewhere in the background, IFS knows the WO was generated from a PM Action/Service Contract ID - but it does not provide the info. Is this a bug of an inconsistency from the application? It seems very strange and I can’t think of any good reason why this info should be missing. Best RegardsRoel  Background info:Create Contract ID ‘3’Create PM plan for preventive maintenance for contract ID and generate WO ‘12’ from PM plan Check WO 12 - notice that Customer No, Contract ID and Line No are empty   

I have an alternate component set up and the product structure has the Alternate Exist checkbox checked on the component line.  There is no inventory of the original part and there is inventory of the alternate component part.  But when I try to process a shop order the Alternate Exist checkbox is not checked on the shop order and when I right mouse on the line and choose Alternate component/replace, I get an error that No alternate component is defined or component qty required is zero, but that is not true, what am I missing? 

how to remove Approve button from page designer 

Hi,  Unlike PM Actions in FSM when a Request is generated from an Recurring Service Program it is created into Status Released automatically.Below I’ve created 4 scopes from an Recurring Service Program (Object Based). As you can see these Requests and Scopes have automatically been Released. I do not want this to be the case I’d like to keep them in “New” status for them to be reviewed by a Scheduler (just like PM Actions). Is it possible to configure this behaviour (within the application) without a customisation?   

Hi,I'm working on 23.2.19 ifs cloud environment.  I need to create a distribution order from purchase requisition. Is there standard process to automatically create Dustribution Order from purchase requisition. Please let me know the steps to follow. Best Regards,Hasini