Solved

I am trying to create an external search. The structure of the External Link is straightforward. However, The second search parameter does not work. I could not understand. What am I missing? In the first link, it searches just for BUYER_CODE not search for CURRENCY_CODE. In the second link, it searches just for CURRENCY_CODE not search for BUYER_CODE. What is wrong with the expression? First Linkifsapf:frmPurchaseOrder_Cust?EXTERNAL_SEARCH=BUYER_CODE=001945&CURRENCY_CODE=GBP Second Linkifsapf:frmPurchaseOrder_Cust?EXTERNAL_SEARCH=CURRENCY_CODE=GBP&BUYER_CODE=001945 First Link ResultSecond Link Result 

Consider the following example: Yes, I know I can use Find to filter on more attributes than are displayed here, but if I would like to see the Document Title in the LOV pulldown (instead of Description1 which is displayed by default) could I achieve this through Page Designer or would that require a modification?

Dear Experts,Appreciate it if anyone could elaborate the meaning of ‘ALLOCATION KEY’ of the Budget external file template and what are the data required to fill the record.  Thanks and Regards,Theja

Apps10 UPD12For a customer order line for which the Sales UoM = kg and the Customer ‘s UoM = lb, what controls the number of decimal places displayed for the Customer Sales Qty? In the order lines below, why is the Customer Sales Qty showing up to 25 decimal places? Is there any way possible to limit this to 1 decimal place?The Qty Calc Rounding for the inventory part connected to the sales part = 1.In the Sales Part Cross Reference, the Sales UoM = kg, the Conv Factor = 0.45359, the Invert Conv Factor = 1, and the Customer’s UoM = lb. 

Hello All,  APPS10  I would like a HR employee to be able to modify all other employees in their site absence records, and time clock registration records, however I would not like them to be able to modify their own time/absence records.  How do you exclude their own employee information when granting access with HR Access Roles?  Thanks. 

When you are in work task template there are two fields available that both are called “Created by” and gives different search results. When using advanced search i can see that one is connected to “CreatedById” and one to “DoneBy”. This makes me confused since i cant find information about “DoneBy”. I think this is difficult to understand and very confusing for customers.1. Using search condition “created By” that is connected to CreatedById2. Using search condition “created By” that is connected to DoneBy 

We created a composite field, analogous to the baseline address.full_address field. However, it does not appear on the object.In Custom metadata: Selecting (for example) the column in a hierarchy_select gives an error:<message>Table request_contact does not contain a column with name full_name as specified in the query.</message>What are we overlooking?

Hi All,Lobby overview is not visible in navigator panel.  It is not hidden in Navigator designer. Is this a permission issue?IFS_ALL is already granted./Malan Jayanka

Hello!Could you please explain me what are Code Parts, and What are code strings in IFS Financials? If possible kindly use a practical example for me to understand what do the Code Parts actually mean. Your support is greatly appreciated.Thank you!  

Hi, I am trying to achieve filtering person based on same access group of current-user logging in. E.g.User login: JSTECH Access group: 00301 User can only see persons who are in access-group = 00301 FYI, we don’t define access group in Role. Any thoughts on how to achieve the result?  

Dear Experts,I am trying to depreciate an object. However, I am getting the error below soon after ‘Post Depreciation’ action on the depreciation proposal. Can anyone of you assist me to resolve this issue?  

HelloNormally, we have end of life demand till year of 2050, which are not taken these demand into consideration by MRP calculation. We only want to take  365 days for daily MRP run. So where can we set up these time frame? please help advice.ThanksSusan

Good Day, Is there any expert here that can give me documentation on IFS Costing?99% of our clients use Manufacturing and it will really help me to get an understanding of how costing in IFS works.

A document revision is prepared. Once done, the actual document is connected to the IFS administrative part of the document. The document has been checked in. Status is preliminary. Up until now standard behavior. Document that is checked in, can be viewed. The document is stored in a FTP location using standard IFS settings (IFS9).Now that everyonne has seen the document, we want to set the status from Preliminary to Approved. RMB is used to set the status and then the following error message appears:I've used coding to determine the origin and it reveals that in DOC_ISSUE_API for an FTP stored file a check is done on the size of the file via Plsqlap_Server_API. Further into the details the actual error is a certificate problem.The FTP server has no certificates installed.See also:  My question: in the setup of haveing an IFS application server and a FTP server are there anymore servers in between? Why does the system come back with a missing/non valid certificate while there has not

Dears,We have a client on IFS10 UPD7. Can we only upgrade Foundation to UPD16 for the client so he gets latest foundation and middleware application.This will save me from doing complete application upgradePlease suggest Best RegardsPankaj 

hello Allhow to disable right click - properties option for permeation set or disable all tabs in properties window    thank you.

When a document is ready to be approved, one opens the document revision in IEE and uses RMB to Status > Approve the following message appears:Login of and on as a different user. Same error pops up.Created another document revision. Attached no document, just processed with Status > Approve. No problems.Problem occurs with other document revisions. For the doc revision shown, a pdf document is connected. I viewed the pdf, used save as. Created a new document revision (from scratch). Checked the pdf just saved in. Status is now Preliminary, File Status: Checked In.Same error message appears. Debug reveals the following:Looking into DOC_ISSUE_API, I learn that the file size is retrieved using:Plsqlap_Record_API.Get_Value(activity_rec_, 'FILE_SIZE'); in which activity_rec_ document class, document and other parameters are passed.This is going into a lot of details.Anybody seen something like this? I will keep digging.

Is the tolerance work different is non-posting proposal company to posting proposal company?Company type: Non posting proposalSupplier: Enabled with Tolerance  Purchase order value : Gross 120 Net 100Invoice Value: Gross 121.00 Net 100.83Tolerance posting is not created and supplier invoice shows a balance of -.83 in posting information.Is there any other configuration needs to be done?

Why I cannot see any field in my search window?The active view and the attribute I have selected are both related to Custom Logical Unit. But I have other attributes similar that work well on this custom view, and i don’t see what is special for them in the settings…  For reference, the attribute just above works well with the search window.

The header on the PLACE screen in FSM 6u19 allows changing to a different label expression, but when the label result is longer than about half the screen, it is truncated.Our configured screen has only one visible button in the header (Save), so there is still lots of room left over to the right side.Example of how it displays on screenAs a guess, I have tried inserting a <label_percent> tag in the screen XML <header_def>, by analogy to the <column_def>, but then FSM automatically removes that tag upon saving. Directly entering a width for the whole panel doesn’t affect the fraction of space given to the label versus the buttons. Is there a way to increase the horizontal percentage of this label?

Hello I have an object / asset , 2021-33 that was activated in October 2021.  In November 2021, a manual entry was entered to adjust the value of the asset.   After this, it stopped depreciating. When we run a depreciation proposal, we get this message in the log:  I would appreciate any help on how to correct this and get the object to depreciate again. Thank you.

Hi,Is “ZUGFeRD” format supported in IFS for customer e-invoicing ?Thanks,Yasanga 

Hi,Sorry if this is in the wrong place, I’m new!I am trying to create a Knowledge article in Knowledge Procedure and I want to link to places further in a text like a dynamic table of contents. It looks like I can do that because I can change the ‘Link Type’ to be ‘Link to an anchor in the text’. Nice, except, I can’t work out how to make something be an anchor in the text to link to. There’s nothing listed and I can’t find an option which is ‘I’m an anchor now’.I’m not sure what version of assyst we’re running though I could probably find out if necessary. Below is a screenshot of the markdown editor available to me.Anyone have any ideas?

Hello, We manage our Problems using a specific template process. This process start with a decision to validate whether or not the problem exists. If the problem exists, then a new task of the “Investigate issue” category is created. After its resolution then a new decision task is created to define if the problem will be accepted as is or if an RFC should be logged to remmediate the issue. I’d like to know if it’s possible to use task expressions to define the assigned service department for following decisions ans tasks based on the service department who lastly resolved the issue investigation task. As far as I’m concerned, EventDTO has only methods related to lastAction and lastActioningServDept. However, I need details about the resolution of the first task of a specific category. I wonder if there’s a way to use only task expressions or if I should use something like Action Processor to update problem’s additional fields and them reference those custom fields in the following Ser

Hello! We’re using assyst in our Problem Management process and the process owner asked us to make assyst notify him whenever new problems are logged, besides the affected user, which typically is someone else in the IT staff.Initially I had the idea of customizing the Lua script which is invoked for all assign actions and add that custom logic there. However, that felt very hacky-ish and not easily maintainable.After that, I tried to customize the Problem form and add one aditional user by default (the aforementioned process owner), but this does not seem to be possible with customizer. Any recommendations besides modifying the Lua script?