Assets (Asset Management)

HiIn Equipment object form . Cost center and Code c not visisbleis there a permission set to set or configuration ?Regards

there is no grouping possibilty beside the protected slider (for HR) in persons. Person can be various data. Also we have custom person that does not belong to a customer that is in IFS. e.g. a collection of landlors or mayors or other person. we need to store their address and communication methods for contacting possibilities but thats all. And we want that not all person’s data can be seen by every user.We need a kind of grouping and access right admistration possibility in IFS, not only that simple slider :-)Does anyone else share this idea? BR Herbert

In IFS Application10/ IFSCLOUD you can add your resource demand under ‘Work List’ in the PM Action. Is there a switch or something that will automatically create the work assignment in the generated work order> work task when released?  It doesn’t make sense that it doesn’t.

Hello communityWhen entering an invoice with a purchase order in support for a fixed asset I get the following error message:I do have the object in the "Code Part Values"Does anyone know what might be missing? Regards

Hi I have a client who provides service work for multiple customers. All customers are linked to one common company/site. Engineers are fixed to a customer location.My question is, is there a way to filter the equipment objects linked to a customer location so that the engineers can only see the objects at that customer location? For example:Customer A - 1,000 functional objects - 3 engineers Customer B - 500 functional object - 2 engineers.I want to be able to prevent the engineers who work at customer A to see or create new or additional work against objects that belong to Customer B. The environemnt is Cloud 23R1 Update 2thanks Graham

Hi,My companyare currently using an instance of Apps10 Aurena but are wanting to scope the functionality/improvements of IFS Cloud around SM Object creation from a Customer Order. As I understand it, in Apps 10 it’s only possible to create a Serialised Object via a Customer Order (Sm Object Functionality). My question is, with IFS Cloud has this functionality been extended to also include Functional (Non-Serialised) Objects? The requirement is that the business would like create Serialised and Functional Objects after delivering a customer order. Currently, it is only possible to do this with serial objects. Any information, or further resources would be great appreciated. Thanks for reading.Tom

Hello ! My customer wants to sell package part on their work order (the package would contain inventory and non inventory parts). But when I try to create my work order, I got this message :  Tho, I cannot add package part in my service quote. The Services aren’t allowed to use package part ? Thanks

In IFS Apps 9 there was just a planned start date field and it persisted through the maintenance process in the Maintenance Plan.  Here’s PM No 14866 in Apps 9 showing completed work with a Planned Start Date.Finished work orders still show a planned date in IEE IFS Cloud drops the Planned Start value from the maintenance plan when the work task generates for some reason…All the lines with a Generation Date no longer have a planned start here in the Aurena thingyHowever the planned start is still in the database if you look at pm_calendar_plan.planned_date. What’s the difference between these fields?  Between the page designer and debug console I’m not even sure which field Due Date is. Is the Due Date pm_calendar_plan.base_date? As a pain point, this makes the user look at an additional column to review preventive maintenance history.  Right now I just need to make sure they’re supposed to be about the same thing for reporting.

Hope someone can help. My customer is currently implementing IFS Cloud 22R2. As we are migrating the historical data from the legacy system, we want to capture the due date on the calendar-based PM Action where the due date already passed. This is because not all equipment is being maintained on time and we need visibility on when it actually was due. The problem I encountered that despite the Start Date on the Maintenance Trigger shows in the past (e.g., 01/01/2020) the Maintenance Plan generates the future date only. What we want is the Maintenance Plan to show the line for 01/01/2020 otherwise according to the Maintenance Plan this asset is only due in a couple of years, instead of being due for a while. I selected Valid From Date on the Work Task Template 01//01/2017 to ensure that all dates are valid but that doesn't seem to make a difference.  

Hello! Please tell me, is it possible to limit the method of issue off material in an maintenance material order? It is necessary to prohibit the automatic issue of some inventory parts. Only manual issue should be available.Are there any special settings in the inventory part catalog?If you solve such a problem using a trigger, then how can you determine that there is an automatic issue and not a manual issue?The package shows that different methods are called to perform these actions, but in the end there are no parameters by which it could be determined that the material was issued off manually or automatically.

I need to add a order report to my Favorite folder. how can I do that 

What is wrong? 

Hello all, How can we hide the Dataset id and keep only the description, on PSO view?As you can see below we have 5 Datasets  where the first part “DATASET_TMHMATA” is the dataset id and the 2nd part after the : “TMHMATA” is the description. The question here is how we can depict only the description od dataset for example to change the view from “DATASET_TMHMATA:TMHMATA” to “TMHMATA”  

If the Status of the Work Task is Work Done, it allows to add Resource Demand, if it allows to add the Resource demand then the Work Task status still remains in Work Done.is this is the functionality or any set up needed for this status change automatically.Its in 23R1

Hi All!I’m creating a resource group under a structure group (Company structure) and everything is OK. When I try to add a person under the resource group, I get the alert (Capacity basis already exists).When I create directly a resource group connected to a company and site, I can add a person without difficulty (No alert).Can someone tell me exactly what trigger this alert please?Thank to All your advices 

hi,its not possible to reopen several workorder at once. IFS allows to reopen one by onehow could it be possible to reopen several workorder at once ?  

Hello all, We are trying to create a form for “check-list” that will automatically be attached to all newly created work orders. Current plan is to have it as a PDF file. However we cannot see any way of making this document automatic show up on all newly created work order? Is there someone who can assist? We are running Apps9 Thank you,Michael

Hi, I am trying to create a custom event to write  a history record when a contract is created However, when the record is created it only shows1. -281041 not the digits in frontAlso, I am not able to get the status from the variables ROWSTATE - the event does not like it.  What else can I use to record the status.Thanks 

Hi All, Serial Object is created via ‘Make Maintenance Aware’ screen and Operational Condition is ‘Operational’.Ownership is ‘Company Owned’.A requirement is to change ownership from ‘Company Owned’ to ‘Customer Owned’.How do I do that?

Hi,Which means parameter type Condition? What could be its use? 

Team,  How far is the session id valid ? and how often we need to send a new request to open a session in an ideal situation?

When defining a PM program, I can define the appropriate ITEM and PROCESS classes, and I can have multiple definitions in the same program. When PM Actions are generated for the programme, actions are generated for all objects and work task template connections - not just the ones linked by the process and item class.  In this example, I have one process class, but two item classes.  Class 1 is linked to device 1. Item Class 1 selected, Device 1 is applicableClass 2 is linked to Device 2. Item Class 2 selected, Device 2 is applicable. When I add the relevant work task templates into the PM Program, I can only select the correct WTT where the ITEM class has been selected as one of the item classes in the PM program. Work Task Template connection to the PM Action. Each Work Task template is configured for its own item class only.   In this scenario, for each object I will have two PM Actions, one that correctly links to the object via the item and process class, and one that is incorrect

Hi.I've looked through everything and I still get this message on the work order:Resource “xxcxxx” does not have valid Maintenence/Service specific Site Settings defined?

Hi All,I’ve created PM Action Calendar for 3 days interval and found out it wasn’t as expected. It calculated wrongly and the results shown inconsistent with the interval i wanted and i tried to change the start date and inconsistent calculation was starts in certain day.the calendar i use available only for weekdays so it will not calculate weekends, it works perfectly for another intervals.i know it will works if i used Performed-date based so it will recalculate based on last maintenance date, but for the forecast purpose i think it will not be a viable option.Thank You.

is - there any option in cloud to put the maintenance order and its related records on hold due to a incident?