Solved

Hello everyone In my organization, work orders will be used by many groups. Is it possible to restrict access to work orders? I would like everyone to be able to see only their own work orders.

The Projection Grant Screen allows you to individually report which Permission Sets a single Projection has been granted to.  However, I have a need to ringfence numerous Projections and would like to be able to report on X number of Projections at once and get a listing of the Permission sets each Projection is granted to (ideally would be usefully to exclude looking into Permission sets that I know are not relevant).  I can see this as being a frequent admin task to ensure the integrity of the permission sets\system.  This will also provide evidence of active management in the area to our auditors.   Does anyone know of a suitable report/solution for this requirement. 

Helllo,I am trying to sum all the raw(purchased) material (MATERIAL1, MATERIAL2) for my product. (According to qty_per_assembly) I just generated simple structure of L1 product. It looks like this: What i need to do is to sum the MATERIAL1 and MATERIAL2: MATERIAL1 (8,25kg) goes to part_no L4.1 (1 pcs) and component L4.1 (1 pcs) goes to part_no L3 (16 pcs) that means: 8,25 * 1 * 16 * 1 = 132 kg (level4 * level3 * level2 * level1) MATERIAL2 (0,75kg) goes to part_no L4.2 (2 pcs) and component L4.1 (1 pcs) goes to part_no L3 (16 pcs) that means: 0,75 * 2 * 16 * 1 = 24 kg (level4 * level3 * level2 * level1)  How to do it in oracle? Thank in advance.  MANUF_STRUCTURE view - basicwith data as (select 'L1' as part_no, 0 as eng_chg_level, '' as alternative_no, 'L2' as component_part, 1 as qty_per_assembly, 'PCS' as print_unit from dual union allselect 'L2' as part_no, 0 as eng_chg_level, '' as alternative_no, 'L3' as component_part, 16 as qty_per_assembly, 'PCS' as print_unit from dual

We are currently in the process to drive different eforms being presented to technicians based on specific criteria.  All of these workfows are “Work Task” configuration type.  This is currently working as intended.  However, we have come up with certain scenarios that require some items be mandatory that cannot be properly made mandatory utilizing current system capabilities. Workflow Configuration: We tried to trigger a survey for a specific work task (with Work Stage ID "H-2"), see the workflow configuration in the attached screenshot. However, we tested this and the outcome is that for all the work tasks created from the work task template, the survey was triggered (instead of only 1 with work stage id "H-2").    

One of our customers upgraded to 24R2 recently. The release upgrade started on 1/22/2025 and build place was updated on  3/7/2025.Now, in their Build place (DEV) environment, the application version and framework version are different.However, in the relevant TEST (useplace) environment both application and framework versions are the same. Could you please clarify,How something like this could have happened What is the impact this will have on future deliveries/fixes. What can be done to get the useplace and prod environments to the same framework version as dev.

Community,Anyone has experience below error? We are investigating how to use S&OP planning, when we start creating a new S&OP, this error prompts. we have fixed the inventory static period issue in Statistic Periods window. Thank you. 

Hello,I’m preparing a CREATE_TABLE_FROM_FILE migration job to upload data in EMPLOYEE_ACCESS_SUP.Looking at the proposed File Mapping, I was surprised by the column list which is pre-set : SUPERVISOR_BU_TYPE_DBVALID_FROMVALID_TOTRANS_FROMTRANS_TOGENERAL_ACCESSORG_CODERELATION_IDINCLUDE_SUBWhen I try the SQL command :select * from EMPLOYEE_ACCESS_SUPI get a list of columns that makes much more sens, 28 columns, such as :Org Bu IdSupervisor Person IdSupervisor Company IdSupervisor Emp NoSupervisor Bu Type DbSupervisor Bu TypeEmp Company IdEmp NoEmp Bu IdEmp Pos CodeAccess RoleValid FromValid ToTrans FromTrans ToGeneral AccessOrg Bu TypeOrg CodeEmployee GroupPerson GroupRelation IdSupervisor Relation IdSupervisor Pos CodeStructure IdStructure TypeOrig Bu IdInclude SubOrganization AssignmentWhy such a difference ?Should I manually add every missing row in the mapping ?Thank you for your help

 Over the last few days we have to got complains from several technicians saying, the MWO App is Offline time to time. They face this issue when trying to sync the application. In the Sync Monitor it says offline. According to them it comes back online after a while. I have checked the device logs and noticed below errors during this time E    3/11/2025 10:40:05 AM    <Ifs.Cloud.Client.Exceptions.CloudException><Message>Server is not reachable</Message><System.Net.Http.HttpRequestException><Message>The SSL connection could not be established, see inner exception.</Message><System.IO.IOException><Message>Unable to read data from the transport connection: Network subsystem is down.</Message><System.Net.Sockets.SocketException><Message>Network subsystem is down</Message></System.Net.Sockets.SocketException></System.IO.IOException></System.Net.Http.HttpRequestException></Ifs.Cloud.Client.Exceptions

Hi, When we try to access the Warehouse mobile app (http://localhost/AsteaMobileEdgeServices/), we have an error.  We have installed the Evaluation Licences, but still have the following error message :  In the Licence Module, I can see clearly we have 2 licences, and 0 used : What can be wrong ? Thanks

Hi,I would need your help to solve out Time Clock logic when clocking out with absence.I have clocked in with normal and then during the day the employee get sick and leave early from work so I do the Out Absence clocking. On time card the absence interval is still open, I assume it would clock me out for the rest of the day.    So my question is what is the logic when an employee clocks herself Out Absence and can I change the logic? And how does the open absence interval be closed (without manual work). BrEevastiina   

Hello, Our client is a Apps 9 customer using PSO version 6.9.0.18. They would like to upgrade to the latest PSO version or the PSO version 6.13.0.73 And my question is if this version is compatible for Apps9 and also for IFS Cloud.

Hi, I am using an external template for loading supplier invoices.The loading through the external template file assistant is sucessfull. But I cannot see anything in the external voucher load information screen.Thank you for your help. Christophe 

Hi,with request contract i don’t see the functionnality to link or add action PM on a service line. It exists with service contract.to generate workorder from contract . the only possibilty is it to use service contract ? Thanks Regards

We are excited about digitizing the purchase return process. Currently, I am familiar with two return types: return for rework and return for credit.My question is, what happens next when "return for credit" is selected as the return reason? Does the system automatically generate a supplier credit invoice, or must users manually create the credit and link it to the supplier shipment?If anyone has complete documentation on this process, sharing it would be greatly appreciated.

Good morning, The technicians' shifts are generally 5/7 from 7 am to 5 pm.However, every week, some technicians have a shift composed of standard shift + on-call-On-call: (from 00.00 to 7.00) + (from 17.00 to 00.00) (Monday/Friday)-On- call: Saturday and Sunday: on-call (00.00 to 00.00).Shifts must be split up and separated from standard shifts, while during on-call hours tasks can only be assigned manually. (MANUAL_SCHEDULING_ONLY)How can I manage this in PSO, as I have visibility of the shifts in DC/PSO? My understanding is that the on-call=yes function does not allow me to do this and I thought I could handle this by creating shift deviations. Doing this for each resource once a week seems very time-consuming and not very smart.Is there a better and faster way? Is it a correct way? 

Hello,As I understand, if I assign certain users to a certain warehouses in the form "Users Connected to Warehouses" for this user in the form “Inventory Parts in Stock” should only be visible inventory parts in stock related to those warehouses.But I still see all warehouses in “Inventory Parts in Stock”, even if assigned only some of them:What should I do to restrict visibility of certain warehouses information in the form “Inventory Parts in Stock”?Thank you beforehand:)

Which Tables populate the ‘Loose Inventory Due Tab’? Maintenix Version 8.3, SP5 u25.

Hello Experts,I want to navigate from an element which shows the assigned tasks to the subproject to which the task is connected. I have tried using, at firstpage/ProjectScopeAndSchedule/SubProjectLevel?$filter=ProjectId eq $[PROJECT_ID]&$filter=SubProjectId eq $[SUB_PROJECT_ID]and thenpage/SubProjects/SubProjects?$filter=(startswith(ProjectId,$[PROJECT_ID]))&$filter=(startswith(SubProjectId,$[SUB_PROJECT_ID])) However, in both scenarios, the system only sets the value for the subproject ID but not for the project ID in the target page.   The latter part of the url is like this. page/ProjectScopeAndSchedule/SubProjectLevel;$filter=SubProjectId%20eq%20'002';path=0.1656053651.1188772997.671078522.1492810231.eyJmIjoiL1BhZ2UiLCJnIjoiUHJvamVjdFNjb3BlQW5kU2NoZWR1bGUiLCJpIjoiU3ViUHJvamVjdExldmVsIiwiYSI6InZpcnR1YWwtMSIsImIiOiIxNDkyODEwMjMxIiwiZSI6IlN1YiBQcm9qZWN0IFNjb3BlIGFuZCBTY2hlZHVsZSIsImgiOiJTdWJQcm9qZWN0SWQgZXEgJzAwMiciLCIkZmlsdGVyIjoiU3ViUHJvamVjdElkIGVxICcwMDInIiwiZCI6dHJ1ZSwiY

I’ve got my Sales Contract (SC) revision set to Audit/Contract Change Order Required/Comment Required and it’s Frozen.  When I complete a Contract Change Order (CCO) the system updates the SC but doesn’t create a new revision.  It just updates the current revision.  Am I missing something or is is designed to work that way?Thank youPatrick

Hi, We are currently working on upgrading our IFS 10 version to IFS Cloud 24R1 version.It was noticed that Resource tab is not available under the Prepare Work Order> Tasks Tab  Resources can be planned under PM Actions’ Tasks.We would like to know whether this is the standard behaviour in IFS Cloud or are we missing the other tabs in Prepare Work Order page due to any set up issue. Thanks,Thilochana

We are using FSM SmartClient Release: 6 Update 29 Build: 8961to send scheduling tasks (activities) to PSO 6.13.0.62. FSM sends tasks to field ops via FSM Mobile. We have multiple datasets in PSO. We also use appointment booking in FSM. Things have been working relatively OK for some time now, however several days ago we suddenly lost visibility to the PSO Scheduling Resources Gantt view for one dataset and see that the FSM schedule nightly process PSO DAILY INITIALIZE has errored out for that dataset since this past Saturday. We’ve tried to do the initialize manually through Maintain Dataset but that doesn’t work either.At this point FSM is no longer able to generate the overnight LOAD file for that dataset to synch FSM and PSO. For that dataset we get this error on the Gantt screen (you can see that when we select that particular dataset from the Dataset drop down, the result displays as “No dataset”):That dataset is configured correctly in both Modelling and Scheduling Datasets confi

Hi,Is there a way to automatically approve only the advance supplier invoices ?Thanks.

Our users have recently had some issues with the “Update Revision” setting on doc object connections, and i wondered if any other IFS users have had similar issues... On Doc basic (page) > Doc Default Values (tab) we set the “Keep_Last_Doc_Rev” setting to “R” (i.e. latest released revision). For the doc class in question, we also applied this same setting via the Doc Class management (page) > Doc Default Values (tab).We expected these settings to ensure that all doc connections for this doc class would follow that setting (unless a user intentionally edits the “Update Revision” field). Under normal circumstances, releasing a new Rev causes the old rev to become obsolete, and also causes the object connections to be moved to the Latest Released Revision (as expected)However, after a few weeks of running our process we found that several doc connections were set to “Fixed” instead of “Latest Released Revision”, and didn't really understand how it had happened (our users did not man

Hello.In the multi level structure tab, we sometimes have a negative value on the qty per assembly field. What’s the meaning of this and is that possible to update the value to set a positive value?