Products (Manufacturing, Products, Engineering)

Hello,Is it possible to have IFS plan/issue in minimum unit quantities?  For instance, PartA has inventory UoM in mL and is issued in mL, and it is only available in 1 mL increments.  So, if a shop order calls for < 1 mL of material, we want planning to see demand for 1 mL.  For example, if we need 0.6 mL for the shop order, we are going to open one of the 1 mL packages, use 0.6 mL, and ‘scrap’ the remaining 0.4 mL because it can not be used after the package is opened.  We don’t want Planning to ‘see’ demand for 0.6 mL on one shop order and demand for 0.4 mL on a 2nd shop order and think that we have enough material when, in fact, we would need 2 mL (2 x 1mL packages).  Since we are going to use 1 mL increments no matter what, we want planning to see demand in 1 mL increments and we want to issue in 1 mL increments.  Defining the UoM as each would be the best way to handle this, but is there a way to handle it in another UoM.

Hi, We use the repair Shop order. Never has issues with it, untill now. If we want to receive to SO, We get the error: “Serial number XXX cannot be received because it was not issued or has allready been received to this repair order’ However, if i take a look at the part serial History of that part, the lates line created says under transaction Description: “Issued for Shop order YY” The shop order number is the same as the shop order giving a problem.On the shop order itself, the material line status of that part is also ‘Issued’The status of the shop order is ‘started’, all operations are closed. We just need to do the reception. In the Part serial history of that part, you can see:Part was manufuctured using SO Blue Part was issued to SO Red

Community, wondering there is a way to automatically split the shop order by qty 1 on each shop order. for example, if original shop order qty 10, after split, i should get 10 shop orders with Qty 1 each.  Thank you.

When I attach a file to a design part revision, the attached document also appears on the tree screen on the left side of Engineering part navigator screen.Is it possible to hide the attached document from this tree screen in IFS APP10 ?

In the setup of a master part one is able to connect the part to an assortment. In that form it is possible to include a Classification Part No. In IFS23R1, there is no help text on this.Anyone an idea what the functionality is behind this? 

HiWe are using ifs 10.8 on premise.I’m trying to use Control Plans and Create Shopfloor analysis from our mes system.I would like to create and fill out the analysis automaticly using the projections interface (rest) When I call … int/main/ifsapplications/projection/v1/ShopOrderHandling.svc/CreateAnalysiswith body{"AnalysisNo":null,"CtrlPlanNo":null,"OrderNo":"375979","ReleaseNo":"*","SequenceNo":"*","OperationNo":"40","LotBatchNo":"*","SerialNo":null,"ConsiderOpScrap":false}Data taken fra postman interceptor.I get internal server error. Where to look for what is wrong.If i call int//ifsapplications/projection/v1/ShopOrderHandling.svc/GetExistingAnalysisCount(OrderNo='375979',ReleaseNo='*',SequenceNo='*',OperationNo=40)I get the value 4, so the order and operation is understood. What to call to insert data.int/ifsapplications/projection/v1/AnalysisResultHandling.svc/ResultDataVirtualSet

We enable the Adjust on Op Qty Deviation on manufactured Inventory Parts. This is ensure the deviation is included when the prior operation in a shop order has been over or under reported. However, if the part is set to make-to-Order on MS Level 1, this cannot be enabled unless the Configuration usage is changed to “Variant” or “Option” (instead of “Common”).Whats the logic behind this? What systematic differences betwen using a configruation usage of “Variant” or “Option” instead of “Common”. This doesn’t appear to be documented anywhere. 

Community, I have a remote warehouse set up as a putaway location already. and I can see it in the inventory part operative Valuesafter run Refill Putaway Zone, PR, PO is created and released.but I still got this error message, no putaway zone can be found. May I know where I missed?   

Hi  first post - please be gentle!! we use IFS 10 - we have supplier 360; Customer 360 …. is there an “Inventory part 360” Nigel

What projection permission is needed to view only work task in Aurena IFS10 ?

Hi, if we use the standard Ship WIP to supplier, we only have the delivery note that can be printed. We would like to have more documents in some cases, comparable to the options we have in the shipment flow/ customer order flow. How can this be achieved? Thanks!

Hello,We are currently using IFS Aurena and I need to write a quick report which allows me to pull inventory part usage by date range and the following data points:Part NoQuantity UsedCostCode Part Values How can I do this?

The time in ship/date time on a customer order line defaults to 12:00 AM. How do we change the default time on a ship date to say, 3:00 PM? We run Master Schedule at 3:00 AM. Because it runs after the ship time of 12:00 AM, we get MS Action Proposals of Actual demand is past due (late shipment), even though the line is set to ship that day and not actually late. IFSAPP10Thanks, Eric

Looking for Shop Floor Employees to report time within Shop Floor Workbench.Not all employees have logins to the system so the supervisor will enter both time and number of team members.Reporting in real time not always possible so need the ability to easily modify times but would also like to have a timeline to ensure accuracy.Does anyone have suggestions on how to do this?

Hello all, I am hoping to understanding if the following functionality is possible in IFS Apps 10 UPD 15. Currently, I have a Lot/Batch tracked part where we define a Lot number upon receipt. Currently, the part is set to backflush. I know that if I change the consumption method (issuing), I can force the system to prompt for a Lot Number. Is the same possible for Backflushing? Ideally, when the user is reporting a Shop Order completed qty in SFWB, the system would prompt them to enter the Lot Number of the component part they are consuming. I have not seen anything in the help that would indicate if this is possible. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. 

Hello,We produce a single product by combining three different inventory materials, and then place it in a plastic bag before putting it into our stock. The plastic bag is not an item kept in stock. How can we reflect the cost of this plastic bag?Thank You for Your Insight..

PM Condition Based generations has stopped generating work orders. What might be the problem.

Hi,I have the following case in a Data Source condition:SOURCE_REF1 IS NOT NULLANDCASE WHEN TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'D') = 1 AND TRUNC(PLANNED_SHIP_DATE) > TRUNC(SYSDATE)-100AND TRUNC(PLANNED_SHIP_DATE) < TRUNC(SYSDATE)+2                      THEN                      1WHEN TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'D') = 2 AND TRUNC(PLANNED_SHIP_DATE) > TRUNC(SYSDATE)-100AND TRUNC(PLANNED_SHIP_DATE) < TRUNC(SYSDATE)+2                      THEN                      1WHEN TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'D') = 3 AND TRUNC(PLANNED_SHIP_DATE) > TRUNC(SYSDATE)-100AND TRUNC(PLANNED_SHIP_DATE) < TRUNC(SYSDATE)+2                      THEN                      1WHEN TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'D') = 4 AND TRUNC(PLANNED_SHIP_DATE) > TRUNC(SYSDATE)-100AND TRUNC(PLANNED_SHIP_DATE) < TRUNC(SYSDATE)+2                      THEN                      1WHEN TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'D') = 5 AND

Hi Community,One of IFS customer is experiencing an issue that when they perform site MRP, it does not create supplies for seval random parts. But when they re-perform site MRP without any changes, then the system will make supplies for those parts but without creating supplies for several other parts.But selective MRP for the part always creates supplies as expected.What can be the reason for this?Your suggestions would be really appreciated.Thank you,Nimesha

Hello, I’m trying to understand the functionality of MS Set 0. Supply Chain Planning>Master Scheduling>Master Schedule SetsI understand Set 1 is system generated and data here is used for MRP/CRP and also as a user I can create multiple user defined sets to use for forecasting, before copying over to Set 1. The field description tells me Set 1 is always “Current” and Set 0 is “Base”. However the help function only refers to MS Set1. Is anyone able to explain the purpose of MS Set 0 and what happens to the data in this set? Thanks!

Hi all, I need to schedule an IAL to run once a year on the 1st OCT.  Is this possible in APP10?Many thanks,Ben

Hi, is it possible to get a breakdown per component of the SOMTRLV material cost? We tried to run an internal report but there is always discrepancies when match to the figure on the inventory transaction history.

Hi, Are there any other planning programs which can used, besides the advanced planning board?Any programs with a proved integration? Thanks!

Hi,I am trying to generate HUs in Shop Order via packing Instructions. I understand this is inherited from Product Structure Alternate.However I cannot see to connect the Packing Instruction for the Product Structure. The existing Packing instructions are not fetched for the LoVwhat am I missing ? Kind RegardsYashodha

Can anyone share their experience using the part configurator but NOT using DOP? IFS documentation seems to pair these two functionalities but there is internal resistance to DOP as others would prefer to immediately generate an engineering part number from the configuration tool and skip using DOP. We have historically built an item and brought it into inventory and then picked it to the order and have used projects as a way to connect material/shop orders to customer orders. There is a mindset that there is no advantage to using DOP.  I’m hesitant to run with that idea given the documentation seems to point to DOP as being the “best” option in a CTO environment. I’m of the mindset that it would help decrease part proliferation as we have definitely had new part numbers created for essentially duplicate systems which is inefficient. I welcome any pros/cons regarding using DOP with the part configurator to aid in internal discussions.