IFS Solutions

We are encountering the error "Internal error. Invalid server response, expected JSON" when attempting to check-in documents larger than 300 MB in Documents Revision. We are currently using IFS Cloud 23R1 SU14.  

Users are able to by-pass forms in a workflow if they make certain selections and end up having the ability to complete an order. Is there a particular field this selection is being identified with, in order to key off of this selection and build logic around for post-processing? Thank you. 

How can I add a No-cost, No-labor operation to a shop order? I want to keep track of issues like repainting a unit or clean or repairing an item before it is received into inventory, but adding an opertion with no costs linked to the operation?I need help.Thsnk you,

Hello everyone,I was excited when they announced that in 25R1 users can be granted permissions to execute workflows on projections they normally do not have access to - see here: However I don’t seem to be able to make it work. I have a very simple test workflow run by clicking a button just reading from a projection not normally accessible to the basic user, I granted Internal access (also tried Full access out of frustration) for the workflow for the relevant permission set and I still get the FndProjectionGrant.SRV_NOT_ACCESS error.Has anyone else experienced the same issue? Or were you able to make it work? I couldn’t find any posts on this topic, which suggests to me I might be doing something wrong...

Hello, We have two sites, Site A and Site B set up in a planning network. Both sites A and B can purchase Part 1 from an external supplier. The Site A internal supplier is setup as a multi-site planned supplier for Part 1 on the internal Supplier for Purchase Part on Site B. If Site B has demand for Part 1 and has no on-hand quantity, the planning network MRP is creating a purchase requisition from the external supplier even though we have sufficient on-hand quantity at Site A to fulfil the demand at Site B.Is this standard behavior? Is there a way to change this to have the planning network MRP recognize the available stock in Site A and create an internal distribution order instead of an external purchase requisition? The external supplier is the primary

I created an ACP on the MIG and put my workflow into this package.The workflow has 6 versions.Workflow with 6 versionsI’ve imported the ACP into TST, but it’s only showing me version 6.Why? I need the other versions also in my test envirmoment.

​We have created thousands of request with given PlannedStart and PlannedFinish.Via API-Call we want to clear these both fields and set the other fieldsjson = $"{{\n";                                                                     json += $" \"PlannedStart\" : \"\" , ";json += $" \"PlannedFinish\" : \"\" , ";json += $" \"EarliestStart\" : \"{EarliestStart}\" , ";json += $" \"LatestStart\" : \"{LatestStart}\" , ";json += $" \"LatestFinish\" : \"{LatestFinish}\" , ";json += $" \"Duration\" : {Duration} , ";json += $" \"Objsite\" : \"{Objsite}\" ";json += $"\n}}";endpoint = $"main/ifsapplications/projection/v1/WorkTaskServiceHandling.svc/JtTaskSet(TaskSeq={TaskSeq})";response = await Rest.PATCH(endpoint!, json, "", eTagTask); The response throws an error, because PlannedStart and PlannedFinish are not set.Example:

Hi All,With regards to the new CBAM requirements coming into affect from Oct 2023, is there presently, a  defined documented solution for this or is IFS planning to provide a solution (CBAM Reporting) for its customers?  

Hi Everyone, We have been told via BSI audit that we need to capture manufacturing tooling used (serialised and that it’s calibrated) per part used. We have tested configuratons in IFS and reporting tooling- but we’ve hit a couple of snags.Firstly- we can report an operation fully without reporting a tool used even though it assigned to an operation. Does anyone know of a way to make this mandatory? Secondly- It will allow us to use non-calibrated tools. It does give us a warning but we’d like for it stop the operator reporting using it. Is that possible? Any advice/ideas will be greatly appreciated! ThanksAlex

We’ve run into an issue where a cancelled holiday absence is still being counted in the employee’s Absence Limit Day usage. The system shows 19 days used, but it should be 11, because one of the absences was cancelled.I’ve checked the absence records and the API logic, and it looks like the usage isn’t being recalculated after the cancellation. Does anyone know how to trigger an absence recalculation in Apps 10, or how to correct the used‑days value?If I right click on the cancelled line Absence details it only seems to populate with some data but seems to be missing Period information? Screenshots below:

Hello Community,I have created some qualifications with an Expiring Qualification reminder template.I can see the expiring qualifications, but the system doesn’t send any notifications.Are you aware of an extra setup? Maybe an event?Thank you!  

I am intending to order a non inventory purchase part on the material requisition by using supply code as purchase. However I am not getting the option of purchase in the drop down.   

Hi All, I was trying to reserve a ‘Tool/Equipment’ to a Project acitivty that is still in ‘Planned’ phase (Project = ‘Initialized’).  Project: Project Activity with Resource Allocation: Resource Monitoring Gantt: So, allthough it seemed to have worked to allocate the resource 260113-001 to the project N-1245 ; activity = 100000533 starting from March 10, 2026 8am onwards. When I hover over the Resource Monitoring Gantt, the Project Allocation screen does not show me the project info. Is this a bug? Is ther

Hello IFS Community,I’ve encountered a scenario in IFS Cloud 25R2 (and previous versions) where Automatic Matching on Supplier Invoice does not trigger for approved Milestone Stage Payments of Purchase Orders.After some investigation, it appears this is a known product limitation rather than a configuration error. To get this working, a product enhancement is required to support fully automated matching for these specific payment types.Has anyone else found a creative workaround for this, or should we rally together to upvote this as a formal Idea/Enhancement request? IFS.AI Analysis  Summary of causeStage/milestone payments are handled as amount-only stage payments (they do not track receipt quantities), so supplier invoice matching does not use receipt quantity and therefore automatic matching against PO receipts won’t work as with normal (quantity-based) PO matc

Hello everyone, Does anyone know if it's possible to set a default Freight Payer ID for each site? A customer is using the same forwarder for multiple sites under the same company. Do they need to create separate accounts since the sites are part of the same company?  Thanks and regardsMaycon

Hi, I want to hide the Corrective and Preventive Actions section only for some users. I could not find any permission set that can be used to hide this. 

Hello Community, Can anyone tell me what's the functionally document transmittal feature when distribution method is Email/FTP?And Is there any setup guide available? With Best Regards,Jewel

Hi community, We want to make the supplier master  data payment terms as default on our supplier invoices. I understand that we need to tick the box “Recalculate due date” on supplier message defaults. Will that only works for E-invoices or will the payment terms on the supplier master data over rule the invoice payment terms on all kind of invoices (pdf….) or do we need add separate lines with different media codes to include all kind of invoice type?

Hello.We got reported an issue on splitting a shop order operation, the error message is :Field [ENG_CHG_LEVEL] in Shop order may not be modifiedWe are not trying to change the revision, we don’t know what to do to fix the issue.Do you have any idea? It’s a manufacturing type shop orderThanks.IFS APPS 10 UPD 5

Hello, if the purchase order is milestoned stage payment and invoice is also done but why we cannot see invoiced quantity and invoiced price in Purchase order lines screen

We have started testing MSO and many questions are coming up. One of the questions is whether MSO supports the scheduling of parallel operations. From the initial results, it seems that it does not. Is there a parameter that needs to be set somewhere to enable this? The testing was done in the 25R1 environment. 

We have come across a difference in how RoHS-related information is presented between IFS Cloud versions 24R2 and 25R2.In 24R2, RoHS information was available under the RoHS Directive section. However, in 25R2, this information appears to have been moved under Compliance Information, and there seem to be structural or functional changes.We are observing the following: Some RoHS-related data available in 24R2 is not directly visible or matching in 25R2 For Example: Data that was in the RoHS Directive in 24R2: 2011/65/EU+2015 - 2011/65/EU + 2015/863/EU amending Annex II was previously available but cannot be located in the same way It is unclear whether this data needs to be reconfigured, activated, or accessed differently in 25R2

Apps 9 included a toggle on the ‘Authorization’ screen re time authorisation - ‘Summarize Employee Data’ to condense employee lines into 1 where they are linked to more than one position/org code.Is there a way to replicate this in IFS Cloud? i.e. currently employees who are linked to more than one assignment/org code show up multiple times in a row..  

Is there a way in custom metadata to do calculations on 2 columns and spit out the results in a new column?In the PURCHASE_GNS Custom Metadata, is it possible to have PO_COST = PURCHASE_GNS.UNIT_COST * PURCHASE_GNS.QTY_ORDERED 

We are on IFS Cloud 25.1.2.  Microsoft just forced updated Office to 2507 (19029.20136) which broke our IFS Excel add-ins.  Users that stayed on 2506 are still OK.Issue is, when you click login, the add-in panel briefly flashes and does not bring up the login window for IFS cloud.Anyone else have this issue?