IFS Solutions

Hi Colleagues,In connection with testing the integration to Pagero,  encountered issues related to missing fields required for outbound invoices to Romania. Specifically, the fields “Seller Legal Information,” “Seller Country Code,” and “VAT Accounting Currency Code” do not appear to be included in the IFS_EINVOICE_TO_FINANCE transformer.Is IFS fully complies with the ANAF requirements for Romanian outbound e‑invoicing. Comparison of the transformers in IFS 10 and IFS Cloud does not indicate that these mandatory fields are being generated in either version. We received following error from Pagero sideThe document does not satisfy requirements for recipients format Romania EN16931 CIUS. The following errors were identified: [BR-RO-030]-Daca Codul monedei facturii (BT-5) este altul decat RON, atunci Codul monedei de contabilizare a TVA (BT-6) trebuie sa fie RON. #If the Invoice currency code (BT-5) is other than RON, then the VAT accounting currency code(BT-6) must be RON. /*:Invoice[1]

We have an internal process that dictates that customer orders received after a certain time cannot be processed and shipped until the next day. Is there a way to configure this is IFS? In specific, we want to see that the planned ship date lands on the following workday. So for example, any customer orders that land on Friday after the cutoff time will not be processed or shipped until Monday.

One of our IFS Cloud 25R1 customers has a somewhat unusual requirement. They would like to use the Shop Floor Workbench (or any other suitable functionality) solely to track the progress of Shop Order Operations — for example: Whether an operation has started If it has been interrupted Actual production start and end times Whether the operation is currently ongoing Similar status-related information typically tracked via the workbench However, they do not want to report quantities or scrap through the Shop Floor Workbench.In addition, they do not want the machine and labor times recorded through Shop Floor Clocking to be transferred to the actual cost of the Shop Order (they are using the weighted average valuation method). Instead, they prefer to report operation quantities and times directly through the Shop Order and want only those manually reported transactions to be considered for Labor and Operation postings.Is it possible to achieve this using the Shop Floor Workbench?A

We get a lot orders where customers do not indicated exactly when they want the product delivered because only really indicate they want the product shipped using the cheapest shipment code (i.e. Ground), so they just simply submit the order and the order is entered into IFS. These orders are either entered manually or done electronically. The issue is that we cannot have customer service reps go through every single order to determine what the Wanted Delivery should be for these orders, so IFS calculates the Wanted Delivery Date the same date as the Created Date. We don’t will call or do same day delivery, so the Wanted Delivery Date should never be the same as the Created Date.We have created pick and external transport leadtimes for all customer ship-to’s in the Customer Supply Chain Matrix. However, these only work if the Wanted Delivery is not the same same date as the Created Date. Some customers do indicate future Wanted Delivery Dates in which case the leadtimes in the Customer

Hi,I’d like to display the “Planned Cost and Sales” tab under the “Tasks” tab directly on the Request Management Page on a 24R1 environment.To do so, I understand that I need to configure the JtTask projection to bind it to the JtTaskPlanning entity.But I’m not able to create a configuration for the JtTask projection, it doesn’t appear on the list pf configurable projections :Would someone know why JtTask isn’t a configurable projection?Regards,Caroline

Hi All,I’m seeking assistance and ideas regarding an issue we are facing with ADFS Single Sign-On (SSO) for IFS Apps 10 IEE. Requirement is as below:The customer expects Windows Integrated Authentication (WIA) to log in to IFS automatically using the currently logged-in Windows user account (Domain account). They log into their domain-joined Windows machine. The same credentials should be passed automatically to IFS via ADFS. No username or password should be manually entered.

Hello everyone,when working in Forecast View in IFS Cloud, I receive the following warning message: I am trying to understand where these value should be filled in, because I cannot find any field for it in the usual locations.I already tries to find it in Sales Part and Inventory Part, but was unable to. So here is my question: Where exactly in IFS Cloud should the “Planned Sales Price” (used by Forecast View) be entered?I am interested in all the analitical views highlighed in red.If there you know of any source I could use to understand the values in yellow I would be greatfull as well.Any guidance or screenshots would also be greatly appreciated.Thank you in advance!

There does not appear to be any publicly available documentation confirming that IFS Cloud DB is supported on IBM AIX 7. Could someone please confirm whether IFS supports this platform? Since AIX is also a Unix-based operating system, we assume there should not be any issues, but it would be helpful to have confirmation or any supporting information.

Community, We realized that customer warranty is not being considered when doing retrospective work reporting SM.  Is it as-designed or a bug?  We are in APP10.

Hi everyone,Could anyone confirm if IFS provides any recommended minimum sizing specifications for IFSCloud Management servers? I’d appreciate any guidance or documentation references.Thanks in advance!

We recently encountered a failed transaction related to a Serial Object ID error, which led us to question how the list of Serial Objects are available for selection in Mobile Work Order is defined in IFS Cloud 24R2.We are trying to locate if this list is maintained or controlled in. Could someone point me in the right direction?

Hi Experts Is it possible to define a planning rule and use the assumption driver as an output? Best RegardsSophal

Hi all,Our employees sometimes register their absences also in the Time Card, usually they use Register Absences. This means their supervisor doesn’t get a warning/request and cannot approve those hours via Absence Calendar, because they are not visible there. But the absence limits are adjusted with this registration.Is it possible to remove special Wage Codes from the list in “Report Time”, so the user will be forced to use Register Absences?Do you have any other advice?We already checked the Absence Group but couldn’t find a solution there.Thank youP.S. we are working with IFS cloud 25.1.4

Hi everyone,I’m currently working with IFS workflows and E-Forms, and I’m trying to configure multiple triggers for a single work task. However, I’m seeing unexpected behavior and would appreciate some guidance. Questions Workflow Trigger Limitations Is it possible to configure multiple triggers for E-Forms on a single work task? Or is there a one-to-one limitation between a work task and workflow trigger? If multiple triggers are supported, are there any specific configuration requirements? Technical Functionality Can multiple workflows be triggered at different phases of a work task, such as: Before job start After job completion If this is supported, why would only one workflow trigger execute, even when multiple are configured? Best Practices What are the recommended best practices for workflow configuration when: Multiple E-Forms are required for a single work task Different triggers are needed at different phases  Testi

an employee with 2 active accounts in 2 different companies, when tried to connect the the company 01 MCPR record to the resource allocation only the company 02 MCPR gets populated, not the company 01. 

The application allows defining future valid‑from dates for tax codes only if the tax code is not a duplicate. While this behavior is understandable as the standard application logic, it becomes a limitation in scenarios where tax rates are expected to change in the future. In such cases, users are unable to maintain multiple future tax rates for the same tax code.Currently, the only possible workaround is to create a new tax code with a different ID, even though it represents the same tax code with a revised rate. This results in multiple tax codes being created in the application, as the system does not allow maintaining the same tax code with different rates across different validity periods.If the application could filter and identify valid tax codes based on their validity period dates in the tax codes window, it would be possible to define multiple tax codes with the same ID but different tax rates.For example, the tax code ST may have a rate of 25% valid from 01/01/2026 to 31/12

We are looking for a way to “take back” Work Assignments which have been transferred to the mobile app (MWO). Currently the only way open to us is by the App User to actively send it back.We have several cases now where going via the app is no longer possible.We have recently upgraded to 25R1 and I was hoping to use the DB Task Schedule "Remove completed/incomplete jobs” for exactly this case. But it seems to not removed the “transferred” as expected for incomplete jobsCan anyone give me the technical description? I cannot find this job in the usual place (https://docs.ifs.com/techdocs/25r1/030_administration/020_bckgrnd_processing/020_database_tasks/110_predef_db_tasks/) My current setup: I would have expected it to clean up any assignments older then 200 days.But for example this assignment remains “transferred”: Does anyone know of a different way to take back transferred work assignments?Thank you very much in advance. Any input on this subject is highly appreciated.BR, Catherine 

Hello,I want to start using a scrap factor for some purchase components. I’ve been testing  the two options.1)Inventory part, planning data , scrap factor field. This looks like it only applies the scrap factor to purchase requirements and PO’s qty. No demand is created, nor does it change the qty available in stock.  2)Change the product structure to include the scrap factor. Adding the scrap factor to the BOM looks like it will create additional demand, reduce the available inventory qty and require purchase action to satisfy the assembly + scrap factor.I don’t see any advantage to using #1 since it will not recalculate the current inventory available qty or shop order demands. I see the only change that will take place is on the purchase order level if a purchase order does exist. Is anyone using the scrap factor in the Inventory part screen with good results?  

Hi , We are working on one of the integration configuration where we created a shared folder on the application server but when we are keeping the files there to get it update in the ifs but the IFS is not picking the files as well as application messages got created for the same

Hi all,I am getting below error when migrating data to ORDER_QUOTATION_LINE using FNDMIG job.Even when there is a value assigned to the field ‘BASE_SALE_UNIT_PRICE’ i get this error.Have you experienced this before?Any ideas or thoughts on how to resolve this would be much appreciated!“ORA-01407: cannot update ("LORA1APP"."ORDER_QUOTATION_LINE_TAB"."BASE_SALE_UNIT_PRICE") to NULL” Thank you!Disna M.

Is something like  this possible? I know that the syntax I am using above doesn’t work but is there a way of substituting the NEW value?

When creating a Workflow Configuration for Configuration Type = Work Task & Configuration Subtype = New or Additional Work:Workflow ConfigurationIs it possible to apply to specific New Work options such as ‘Report a problem’, ‘Request work that needs to be done’ and ‘create work I will perform’:New Work - Report a ProblemI cannot see any obvious filters on the Apply to tab & no option against the Survey:Apply To Tab Survey Tab 

Import External Product Structure in IFS CLOUD it’s the best solution?IFS Cloud Documentation Prepare the file for import: The file should be in Excel format and contain the items you want to import. Ensure that the file is ready for import by removing any headers and saving it as a CSV file with semicolon as the delimiter.File without headersConfigure the external layout: Be sure to configure the external layout correctly by paying attention to the conversion of the file to CSV or TXT format.Open Import External Product StructureCreate a list of items: Create a list of items that you want to import.Configure External Layout with DelimiterCreate a construction item: If the construction item does not exist, create one.Are there existing parts?Connect to the construction item: Connect the imported items to the construction item.Check the import result: Check the import result to ensure that the import was successful.

Hi Report experts,I can see following in the IFS Cloud 25R1 Deprecation Log.Starting with IFS version 25R2, Monotype fonts (Arial, Arial Narrow, Courier, Garamond, Times New Roman) will no longer be included in IFS Report Designer and IFS Report Studio. To maintain consistency, Déjà Vu fonts will be used as the standard .My question is, what is the impact on custom Report Designer reports ( custom Report Designer reports built from scratch for customers prior to 25R2) in case customer will not have all these Monotype fonts after upgrading to 25R2?Is it just a matter of adding an entry to Report Fonts/Font Substitution ORAny manual Report Designer layout adjustments required for each custom Report Designer report? 

Today we use external voucher assistant, but our users find this to be a bit troublesome due to creation of excel, convert to .txt and then upload. I got a question about using a migration job instead, but before starting to build such file I want to know if someone else done this and if so, was it successful?  Thanks in advance./Tobias