Q&A Discussion of IFS Solutions for our IFS Employees, Partners and Customers
Recently active
hello, I want to link to the Aurena “Equipment Object Navigator” with an expanded view of a structure and store that URL on the objects in our BIM.It almost works, however, the Aurena ÙRL’s become extremely long and cryptic! like 1700 characters! IFS Aurena client version: 10.24.*How can we understand and simplify and calculate the Aurena URL for objects and the Equipment Object Navigator?Thanks!
Question for you all. The help videos in the scope tool tell you how to manually add CRIM items but how do we manually add customer requirements? The scope tool manual doesn't tell you either. I am welcome to all ideas! Thanks!
Manual Supplier Invoice ScreenHi, everybodyHow can I retrieve the fields displayed on the manual supplier invoice screen from the database?"SQL Column" field is disable and not available in “LOV Reference” field.
Greetings!Trying to create a structure of a DOP but get the following error. What does this mean? How do I fix it?IFS APPS 10
Hi Team,I believe above jobs are connected with external supplier invoices and images of those external supplier invoices.Can any of you advice what is usage of each job and whether it is used with XML or STDSIN3 ? May be how to use it too ?
Implementation Overview – Statutory Holidays & PM Action AdjustmentWe have successfully integrated statutory holiday dates into the weekday calendar. Consequently, the PM action now accurately recognizes the following holidays: Friday, August 1, 2025 Monday, August 4, 2025 Tuesday, August 5, 2025 As a result, the system automatically adjusted the task due dates to account for these holidays. Although the original due date was set for August 5, 2025, the system deferred it to Tuesday, August 12, 2025, in alignment with the configured business rules.However, we have observed an unexpected behavior: the system is skipping July 30 (Wednesday) and July 31 (Thursday), which causes the next available due date to fall on Friday, August 8, 2025, rather than the expected Tuesday, August 12. This suggests that the date-skipping logic is being applied beyond the defined holiday dates.Request:Could you please confirm whether we can refine the configuration to: Exclude only the statutory hol
Hello,In IFS Cloud 23R2, we have a scenario to create condition-based PM action to generate Work Orders for objects based on run hours. We are using Accumulated parameter for this scenario. When we update either the ‘New Reading Value’ or the ‘New Delta Value’, the last recorded value is not updated automatically. When we regenerate the plan, it sometimes gets updated and sometimes it does not update. The ‘Plan out of sync’ is set to True in this scenario and doesn’t allow to generate the work order. Do we need to Regenerate the Plan every time a measurement is entered for an object? Is there a reason, even after regenerating the last measurement value is not being updated? Any inputs would be appreciated.Thank you!
Our PM Plans were setup wrong during implementation and have caused a headache with demand planning. This is going to be a very large project to clean up.However, we still want to us Min/Max order points. However, the demand is throwing off the reorders.Is there a way to ignore demand and just use the Min/Max just based on what we have on the shelf.So, I want a part to have a 2/4 min/max. When we hit 2 on the shelf, initiate a purchase requisition to get back up to 4. Ignoring all demand out there on work orders, etc.
I'm currently facing an error message while trying to install INGRESS: 'Error: Kubernetes cluster unreachable: Get "https://153.113.208.253:16443/version": context deadline exceeded'. I would greatly appreciate your assistance in resolving this issue "ifscloud" has been added to your repositoriesHang tight while we grab the latest from your chart repositories......Successfully got an update from the "ifscloud" chart repositoryUpdate Complete. ⎈Happy Helming!⎈2024-04-29 04:46:03.41 RSEXIFS-91 IfsIngress downloaded successfully2024-04-29 04:46:03.41 RSEXIFS-91 Stop Download-IfsIngress2024-04-29 04:46:03.41 RSEXIFS-91 Start ImagePullSecret-IfsIngress2024-04-29 04:46:03.41 RSEXIFS-91 Creating ImagePullSecret ifs-ingress namespace......."ifscloud" has been added to your repositoriesHang tight while we grab the latest from your chart repositories......Successfully got an update from the "ifscloud" chart repositoryUpdate Complete. ⎈Happy Helming!⎈Error: Kubernetes cluster unreachable:
Hi, We have serialized shop orders (for Lot Size = 1), but one operation may take a few days to complete. With Shop Floor Workbench, we are trying with daily reporting of labour time and quantity. However, the system is not allowing to report a partial quantity reported when it is serialized. Not sure why as we’re not receiving fractional quantities - but merely reporting it so that the system knows the labour time and quantity each day (main objective is so that MSO will adjust the schedule).How does IFS expect to report daily quantity complete when the operations take days to complete and the part is serialized? TIA
I'm on APP10. In the Resource Analysis view, the bars in the stacked bar chart are divided into 2 parts: the chosen project and everything else combined. So, if you select ≥3 projects, you won't be able to distinguish all projects by colour coding.Is it possible to show the resource allocation of all projects associated with a resource group in APP10? How about Cloud?
Absence Registration Type Can you tell the difference between Generated and Manual Absence Registration Type
Has anyone come across the scenario where deletion of a Shop Order operation has been allowed where there are existing Labour and/or Operation hours Transactions - albeit that those transactions were at zero cost value so no actual cost incurred or transacted and not GL voucher created? Just wondering what thoughts are whether this should or should not be allowed? We were surprised it was allowed …We’re on Cloud now but it’s also allowed in Apps9. Thanks!Linda
I have a customer case looking in IFS Cloud to find a functionality/solution to replace Support Issue that exists in App 10. As far as I understand, Support Issue has been replaced by Call Center - however the quick and easy workflow has somewhat disappeared.Even if Call Center has some good processes, its too complex and admin heavy when just wanting to create a quick issue that requires a swift and easy solution and just keeping a log of what has been done.I have looked at perhaps using Change Request - but then the application moves into Engineering which is not really the correct scope.So, my question is:Will Support Issue be re-implemented in Cloud? If not, what options are there to be close to the Support Issue functionality but instead in Cloud?Kindest regards,Johanna
Hello,Can the charges of the customer order be calculated based on the weight of the part?Thank you in advance.Sincerely, Lina
Hello,in upcoming legal updates (IFS Cloud) there is one record for Japan (Support for Consolidated Invoice) which is not supported by any documentation. We need to know what it is to ensure that our processes in Japan are alligned with this update.Link for upcoming legal updates: https://community.ifs.com/localizations-upcoming-news-442/upcoming-legal-updates-as-of-may-2025-50388Please where I can found any information regarding this modification/update?ThanksTomas
Hi,Would like to understand if more time clock types are carddriven in IFS Coud compared to IFS 10.Is it possible in Cloud to have FUTURE ABSENCE and ABSENCE REQUEST set as carddriven?Much appreciated if someone can confirm
I'm trying to configure a Report Rule that only triggers when an operational report is executed from a specific Command button I've added via Page Designer.Setup:Added Command button that executes ExecuteOperationalReport Created ParameterMapping setting REPORT_RULE_ID = 1 for this button Configured Report Rule with condition to check this parameter Issue: The Report Rule should only trigger when the report is requested from my custom action button created in Page Designer, not from other sources. However, the condition is not working.What I've tried:Various parameter formats in the Report Rule condition: [@REPORT_RULE_ID], [REPORT_RULE_ID], etc. Verified ParameterMapping is correctly set to pass REPORT_RULE_ID = 1. From developer console, I can see that the parameter is being passed to the report request (it’s part of the generated URL).The Report Rule still doesn't recognize the parameter condition and does not trigger at all. Question: Is there a way to trigger a Report Rule only w
Hi All,I want to automatically copy or clone image attachments from a Place to its associated Task. For example, if an image is attached to the Place (in the Attachment tab), I want that image to be included in the Task (in the attchment tab) whenever a new Task is created in the Place’s Service History.It would be great if you help me with this issue.Best Regards,Akshay.
Hello, I know that It is possible to create consolidated pick list for shop orders in two ways:use the Create Pick List(s) for Shop Order(s). Select the relevant shop orders from page Shop Orders and click to create Pick List Report. Is there a way to create a pick list per WO ? I can’t find any. Thank you !
Hi,The user is getting the error ‘’No invoices/payment on account selected into the payment order’’ while creating payment order from supplier payment proposal.
Hi everyone,In our IFS environment, we want to prevent users from creating direct purchase orders that exceed a specific limit without first going through a quotation process.Specifically, if a user tries to create a purchase order (without a preceding quotation) with a total amount greater than 20,000, the system should block this action when they attempt to release the order and show an appropriate error message.I’m considering implementing this via a custom event, but I’m looking for best practices or recommendations from the community: Has anyone implemented a similar validation for order limits? Would a custom event tied to the PurchaseOrderHeader and triggered before release be the right approach? Is there a preferred way to check if the order is linked to a quotation or not? Any advice or examples would be much appreciated!Thanks in advance.
Hi,I'm trying to automatically set the “Price Freeze” flag on a customer order line to “Frozen” via BPA, but without positive result.My Workflow is very simple, I just have an IFS API script with code execution.setVariable('PriceFreeze','Frozen').I tried to use several call type triggers combined with CustomerOrderHandling projection, with no result.At first I tried calling Workflow on CustomerOrderLine_Default, with the execution parameters: type- Process Enrichment, timing- After.The response was correct, but during process enrichment an ETag is added so that the record is not handled as new by the page (for example, there is no way to enter an item number).I then tried calling Workflow on CalculateAndFetchSalesLineTotalWithHeaderParams, also with the execution parameters: type- Process Enrichment, timing- After. Unfortunately, the value “PriceFreze” was returned as “Free” because this variable from the record is not accessible from the Workflow execution, but is passed in the backgr
Using IFS Cloud, is there a way to keep company owned and consignment stock in the same inventory location? There is a toggle under site/warehouse management to allow multiple owners for inventory part, but this does not seem to work as stated
Hello I have a question about Configuration Usage. Changing the configuration usage to Variant or Option has any effect on system?I have learned that the master schedule does not work for a special configuration id. So i want to understand the reason of using configuration usage option. Thanks,Fatih YILDIRIM
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.