Finance (Financials)

Des anyone have the specs on the credit card interface? I need to respond to a survey about PCI compliance.

Booking Control Supplier Partial Rollback: In the case of "Supplier Payment Rollback - Partial Payment", we already have the problem in IFS7.5 that the lump-sum partial payment is not posted back to the supplier, but to the company ID. The fault is the booking control PP9, because this is not can be set equal (according to supplier group) posting control IP1. Please advise on how this can be corrected.

We are unable to create an invoice which includes tax code with tax type set as ‘calculated tax’ and deductible % is different from 100%. Once the invoice is created, it was observed that posting information aren’t balanced. The invoice is in ‘preliminary’ status and it isn’t possible to add somewhere any amount to balance the invoice. When trying to perform the functionality, RMB > Post Invoice, the invoice status would update to PrelPosted. However, we couldn’t finally post the invoice as there is no way to balance the invoice.

Tax Code can be deleted from Tax Codes window, although the same Tax Code is added/defined in Posting Control Details. Please explain the functionality behind this, since as per my understanding it should not be possible to delete the Tax Code if used somewhere in the application?

Users have tried to run the ‘Cash Flow Exposure Report’, but no data is getting populated. What could be the reason?

Supplier invoices in which the due date is backdated (due date is set to a date prior to the voucher date) are not included in the Supplier Ledger Open Items report ordered for the due date, however included in the report order for the voucher date. Please explain the reason behind that.

Posting proposal authorizer summary contains two lines for the same authorizer when authorizer routing rules/assigning rules are involved. Is there any specific reason?

When you create an invoice in different currency other than Accounting currency and match with the Purchase Order Receipt, in the Cost Postings tab, for the variance postings M18,M19 and M20, the amounts in transaction currency is zero. Further, you can see no any amount in currency debit and credit columns for transaction code M18 and M20 in the voucher(J).

From Apps 9 onwards , outstanding Purchase orders will not auto populate in the Post from Purchase Order/ Manual supplier invoice window, when we have not entered a ‘PO Ref’ . What is the reason behind this functional change?

When users try to fetch tax ledger info in a company, an information message comes saying: Tax Ledger Info was fetched with errors. No error is shown in the debug console. Where can I see what the error is?

Combination rules are validated for the accounts that are entered in the “Budget year amount” window. What is the reason since this is not a voucher entry window?

We have service providers and services will be ordered by raising a Purchase Orderto the Service provider, But we do not get the service physicaly, instead our engineers will get the service from service stations and invoice will be issued at the time of delivering the service. Then our engineers submit the invoice to the Accounts department and get the claim in cash. Question: We have a need to match the invoice at the time of claim is submitted to the Accounts section rather than going to Purchasing department and receiving the Purchase order and then matching the invoice in Accounts devision.

We have an issue when trying to report an add investment through a PO. The fixed asset reference is provided. However, results in an error in the Accounting tab of the purchase transaction history “No further acquisition possible for object (Object ID). FA will not be updated” the PO is in the closed status. As a result, the period cannot be closed and transactions remain in the ‘distribution and manufacturing transactions’. Please advise on how this can be corrected.

It was noticed that in APP9 Core environment, the SEPA CT tag is missing for InitPty PstlAdr. Could you please let me know the validity of removing this fields is correct?