IFS Solutions

I would like to request to consider development of an integration with Tagetik for financial consolidation.Tagetik (owned by Wolters Kluwer) is our global consolidation and reporting software. It is one of the major global providers of consolidation software. We rollup our country results in it for reporting. This is currently a semi-automated process. We have been advised to use IFS consolidation but we are a large global company and IFS cannot support consolidation requirements as we have them. 

Hello,Within the Service Management module, in the Request Contract screen we are able to define a periodic price when an invoice plan and sales part are selected. When a new service request is created and the request contract is linked to the request, the expectation is to view the periodic price added in the contract either in the request or associated task or invoice preview.But currently, the price added in the contract is not visible anywhere in the request, task or invoice preview generated. Is there a way or functionality to view this sales part periodic price added in the contract to be viewed from the linked request or invoice? Please let me know. 

I’m looking at the Received - Not Yet Invoiced report for multiple sites, with the current date as the To Date and the Part Type equal to Inventory Part. Can anyone tell me what would cause the Cost and Value columns to be sourced from the part’s estimated material cost for POs that were created up to a certain date and then to be sourced from the PO buy unit price after that date?  I’m working in a customer’s development instance and would like to understand what caused the change.

Hello IFS Community, I am struggling to figure out why I am getting one of my Operations with status “unscheduled” in APB. The operation 10 gives me the information: “Not enough materials available to schedule the operation”. However, the following subsequent Operations are successfully scheduled. How is it possible, that I don’t have enough materials for the first operation but I have it for the following operations!?   Any light on this issue will be greatly appreciated. 

Hello, I tried to add Custom Fields to the SourceLinesAvailableForShipment, “Available Lines for Shipments” in the navigator.Page InfoPreviously in Apps 10 the View for this LU was SOURCE_LINE_SHIPMENT_ALT and was associated to the LU CustomerOrderLine. My goal is to migrate the Custom Fields from Apps 10 to IFS Cloud. I could not find any other entity that has the SOURCE_LINE_SHIPMENT as an additional view.In the Entity Configuration there is no entry for SourceLinesAvailableForShipment. I also found that the name for this Entity is too long. How can this be? Is this a bug in IFS Cloud?Tried to define the searched entityIs there anyone

Hi,I recently got a new 25R1 repository in IFS Scope Tool and I downloaded the 25R1-Data Tracker Template File.What I found is that values are missing in Basic Data sheet - column K (Global/Company/Site). This is very valuable information for us since we are going to implement IFS to a multi Country/Company solution.Also we are also missing the entire Master Data Tracker sheet.My question is if there will be a second release of 25R1 Data Tracker Template including the missing values and the Master Data sheet?Kind Regards,Christian 

After installation of Kubernetes sertificate in our production environment IFS Cloud, dataload has stopped completely. We are not able to run reports due to lack of data in our tabular models

Hi,I hope that you are well.Does anyone have a presentation on “IFS Cloud - Export Control Functionality” or a document detailing functional improvements/changes from APP10 to Cloud, please? Thank youKind regards,Samiru

Hello IFS Community,I am trying to change an operation (Report Picking), and I am receiving the following error message:“There is no shipment location defined for site SC-CP.”    => IFS24 R2 

We want to add a filter and sort functionality in Mobile Device (iOS). We get the 2 statements from the previous entries:1. Says yes, we can do that : (community link below)  2.Says no, there is no such functionality which we can config.: (community link below) May, we know the official statement or comment on this topic? If possible, could you please inform us about the necessary steps how we can add the sort or filter option in any screen on mobile device? BR, Deepali Jain

Using FSM Release: 6 Update 29, when using FSM Response Code to create time commits to send to PSO, where there is a default value in the Response Code field “Calendar ID” set to 24BY7 and Customer Calendar” is also checked off, will the Response Code generate a time commit for PSO that follows the 24BY7 if the Place record (customer) doesn’t have a Calendar ID set under Place/Details? We have a mix of customers with availability calendars and many without and want to ensure that the time commits will use customer calendar availabilities when set in Place records but otherwise use 24BY7 if no Calendar ID set for a Place. Is this the case? ThanksFrom a Response Code:  Example: From Place record - no Calendar ID, does this default to 24BY7 with the above Response Code configuration?:

Hi,What is the ‘standard’ NGSM Archiving process once a Service Request has been Completed? Is it a case of moving it to Closed (assuming the tasks are Finished) and that’s it’s final state, or is there an Archiving process that can occur after this? Are there any DB Task relating to this process?Thanks 

We have a customer set up for Advance Invoices requiring prepayment before the order will process.  The order was created, the advance invoice created and the order blocked.  Then the scheduled task to Batch Create Invoices picked it up and invoiced for the full amount.  The customer master record has the “Advance Invoice Full Paid Check” turned on.  How can an order that is blocked be invoiced?

Hello everyone,I'm trying to migrate customer orders and customer order lines. Everything's working fine, no problem. However, I'm trying to migrate the CODE_C of the lines using another job for pre_accounting, and retrieving the pre_accounting_id of a line, but I get an error I don't understand: ORA-20111: Site.NOTEXIST2: The Site object does not exist.Strange, because in the job, this indication does not appear, and only the pre_accounting_id seems mandatory.  

 Hello we want to hidethe ‘+’ to prevent users to create a project without the Project Wizard. and the ++Is this possible I do not see the accès in the left hand page designer menu. 

For a lot controlled item with expiry configured how do you create a rule for allocating by FEFO ? 

I hope there is simple answer to this question that is escaping me due to Aurena being new.  In V9, we have a simple date search that is the equivalent of <#TODAY#+56 for the criteria.When doing this in Aurena, it is an In range function, so understand that, however, I can’t make the suggested values selection use within the basic search drop down.This should be translated the same as my criteria above, but it gives an invalid format error. However, knowing how JSON is supposed to work, it is case sensitive.  If I go to Advanced filter and modify the criteria just to change 56D to 56d, the filter works. (PartNoRef/PlannerBuyer = '#USER_ID#') AND PropStartDate >= '#TODAY#' AND PropStartDate <= '56d'But…..I don’t want to use this as a solution fo

In Finance, under Posting Proposal, there is currently a button “Copy Latest Posting”. This standard functionality copies the latest invoice postings manually entered for the invoicing supplier.We would like to propose an enhancement:Add a second option "Copy my latest postings", that do the same copies the latest invoice postings manually entered for the invoicing supplier but find the latest with the logged-in user as invoice receipient. We also would like the amounts automatically adjusted to match the new invoice. Our initial investigation indicates that this could be implemented relatively easily by adding a parameter to the existing method that performs the copy. Would this be useful for other IFS customers?I think also there is already an Idea made for this 4 years ago for IFS 10… did anything happen on that? 

Hi,Is anybody knows where i can parameter the url launched by the print of the sales contract ? For the moment it launch the wrong URL.   

  Is there a way to streamline the process of creating a instant invoice(DN/CN) with a large number of line items in IFS? The current process of inputting data individually is time-consuming, and I'm looking for a more efficient approach, such as any functionality or method that allows for efficient data input, such as bulk upload or data import, to save time when dealing with extensive line item details within a single invoice.  Please refer below image.Invoioce is linked to so many GLs   

In IFS Cloud 22R2 SU3 (and previous versions), there is an issue in the Sales Configurator.On Page Sales Rule for Part, when creating a new Action, e.g. of type ‘Attach Optional’, selecting Value Type ‘Order Info’ will give you the wrong List of Value (LOV) for column Value. Hence it is not possible to select any of the designated values, which should be:- Customer No- Delivery Country for the Customer- Latest Customer Value- Latest Order Value- Sales Group- Sales Part No- Sales Quantity- Sales Unit of Measure- User ID- Supply SiteIt seems like the LOV from Conditions is used instead.Please advise if there is any correction available for this issue.

Hi All, is there a way to filter the displayed Objects in the CRM Panel?The Opportunities with State “Closed” should not be shown , if I expand the list of Opportunities     Many Thanks for every hint.Regards, André

In Inventory financial control, after receiving the order the purchase order status changes to closed state and we have to select our site to perform periodic weighted average then it directs to the inventory part and then we have to select the unit cost . On the header there must be a tab ‘Remove Periodic WA Difference’ but in this it is missing.Can you provide solution for this.

Hi All, In Cloud 25R2 (we have also checked 24R1) we have raised a Protype Shop Order and on defining a Tentative “Manufacturing” Structure and Routing the system appears to be only pulling through the routing, the structure is left blank. We are putting this down to a bug, but thought i would see if others have experienced this issue. *Please note: this is a Structure Type = Manufacturing, which has a “Tentative” alternate.Its normal behavior for the standard manufacturing structure in tentative to not pull through to a standard manufacturing shop order, but it was my understanding that a “Prototype” Shop Order overrides this and is able to utilise a tentative manufactured structure. It’s like the system is only half applying the logic as it pulls through the “Tentative” manufacturing routing onto the shop order. Thank

Hello,I would like to confirm whether there is no automated logic behind the Proposed Location field on a manually created Production Schedule line.Is that correct?I am aware that, during automatic creation of Production Schedule lines, the system does assign a Proposed Location — most likely using the same logic applied to Shop Orders, namely: The production line’s outbound location, if the shop order is connected to a production line The outbound location of the last operation’s work center The inventory part’s default location I kindly ask for confirmation of the above, or clarification if my understanding is incorrect.Thank you!