IFS Solutions

We are a large company with many employees paid by the hour and we need to be able to transfer hours to payroll multiple times during a payroll run is present.As it is today, it seems that the whole days are locked as transferred when we run this, so that hours that are added/corrected after we have transferred to payroll are not included in any file.We then have to use a quick report to get hours that have been added after we have taken out the first  transfer to payroll. This in turn means that the results are not updated on the employees' time cards.How have others solved this? Why is it not only the hours that are authorized on the actual day  that are "locked" but the entire day, is this something that can be developed or are there better solutions for it? This is a big problem as there is almost 150.000 hours entered for one payroll.

HiWe are using IFS FSM 6.27, I want to check the executed processes by users , something like background process of IFS 10 or cloud version.

Hi,When we create a new supplier payment proposal and then create a new payment order, we select a payment method and a payment date.After completing the process and paying the supplier, where can we find the payment method that was chosen?In the supplier payment analysis screen, the payment method field does not appear.Regards.

A new version of Perfidia v4.50.226 has been released. The actual version can be downloaded here:https://www.perfidia.de/downloads/psa/psasetup.exePerfidia Forum can also be accessed with GuestAccess (Gastzugang)https://www.perfidia.de/Perfidia?action=forum

I was wondering how to maximize capacity for resources on the Advanced Planning Board (APB) I’m seeing a situation where a finite resource has availability, but it isn’t being optimize when backward scheduling. For example. I have the tool and the labor class as finite and the work center as infinite. But what I’m seeing is the OP10 and OP20 are being scheduled correctly., but then when OP30 delays for 2 days later. But you can see that the tool and labor class still have availability.  Why isn’t trying to fill that void when there is availability? APB Load settings Also to note, I tried this with the Re-assign Resources and it gave similar results.

Hi, Im trying to pass a timestamp parameter into an IFS API call in a workflow. But keep getting the data type conversion error as below. I create the timestamp of sysdate in a javascript task(“Set Sysdate”) and then trying to set it into a variable which is then set into API payload. Could there be any other way to set the parameter other than like ${CurrDate} in this scenario?    Thanks,Regards,Methshika

HI,Is there an easy way to copy or Export/Import the CTO configurations for a configurable parts with all the Conditions & Action including the associated Combination tables & Formulae for the definedSales Rules, BOM Rules & Routing rulesWe have created the rules in One environment and need to copy the same to another environment after testing. Appreciate your help. Thanks in Advance Siva

Dear Community,  We have in issue with Apps10 Projections, and maybe some of you faced the same issue previously. We did the following tests:Boomi connection to int API (“…/int/ifsapplications/projection/v1/AllProjections.svc/Projections(ProjectionName='PurchaseOrderHandling'”) => works well Boomi connection to main API (“…/main/ifsapplications/projection/v1/AllProjections.svc/Projections(ProjectionName='PurchaseOrderHandling') => failed Postman connection to int API (“…/int/ifsapplications/projection/v1/AllProjections.svc/Projections(ProjectionName='PurchaseOrderHandling'”) => works well Postman connection to main API (“…/main/ifsapplications/projection/v1/AllProjections.svc/Projections(ProjectionName='PurchaseOrderHandling'”) => failed Worked with Postman: Failed in Boomi: Failed in Postman:  Previously we had an other test environment and we didn’t realize the same issue.  Do you have idea what could be the issue? Thank you very much in advance for all of your thoughts! 

When multi-level tracking is required on Lot/Batch enabled parts, there are scenarios where standard quantity of a component in the product structure is not truly required to complete the produced part, for example it would OK to issue 9.8 pounds of flour instead of 10.  Or perhaps the component quantities are not discrete, rather going out several decimal places in quantity required, for example a component UOM is pounds.  And as long as the actual amount issued is close to this it would be OK.  With Multi-level tracking turned on, none of these scenarios are possible, as the tracked structure requires all the required quantity to be reserved or issued, or the tracked structure is not complete.  Has anyone found work-arounds for this? I am thinking it might require a modfication to change the validations to allow some level of tolerance around quantity issued versus qty required.

Hi All,We are currently testing a Contract Change Order (CCO) scenario and have observed the following behavior: A Parent Contract Change Order has been created, with a connected Sales Contract Change Order and Subcontract Change Order as sub-orders. From the Sales Contract Change Order, revenue values are updated correctly in CCO Financials – This Order tab. From the Subcontract Change Order, cost values are updated correctly in CCO Financials – This Order tab. Profit is updated as expected in CCO Financials – This Order tab.  However, when the Parent Contract Change Order is connected to the Project Forecast, the updated revenue and cost values are not reflected in the Forecast Cost and Revenue tab. Ideally, the ETC Contract Change Order base values should be updated in both the Cost and Revenue sections of the Project Forecast.   Could you please advise if there are any additional steps, configurations, or best practices required to ensure these updated values flow correctly in

Hello,In IFS Cloud 25R2, when we remove the security group ‘ContactLists’ from the security grants by permission set for MWO permission, it should not display the ‘Contacts’ screen in MWO service. But even after removing the security group, the screen is still visible in MWO. This screen is unavailable in the Navigation designer. Is it a bug in 25R2, please let me know?  

  Hi All, I have an issue with adding Fixed Price sales parts to invoice preview after I adding them to a request scope.I’m using a fixed price price rule where everything related to request work task is charged with a fixed price sales part. Then, I need to add some additional sales parts to the scope via “Price Details” option in the request’s “Cost & Sales”.  However,  added sales parts are not appeared in the invoice preview. I tried with a different price rule and tried with adding sales parts in both Actual and Planning fixed prices. But, cannot get sales parts to invoice preview. Original sales part is only there. Any idea? I’m working in 25R2 environment. TIA.

My UK client has a small French office.  It is not a registered company in France, but is registered for VAT their and fits into the ‘Permanent Establishment’ rule .Which means they might need to create an FEC audit file.  But I have some questions:Does this mean we need to setup an entire Company in IFS just to support this one interface? If so, do we need to setup this company with the French government chart of accounts in code part A (I note from a related topic that the FEC file does not use the Internal Ledger)I had hoped to simply use a Code Part Value for the local office reporting, but suspect we are forced into a full blown company with Group Consolidation and account mapping just for this one audit function!I would be interested to hear from anyone with similar requirements and how or if they got around it? 

Hi everyone,I’m trying to skip the first row when uploading data into Budget Versions using an External File Template. I configured the Template Control as shown below, but the header row is still being processed instead of skipped.   Has anyone come across this before or have suggestions on what I might be missing?Thanks in advance! 

Hello All, If the Account is added in the Acquisiton account and for that account Code part demand for the FA_object (Code_E) is not a mandatory.Can we create a manual voucher for that account without providing the FA_Object(Code_E).Is it possible? 

When creating the External Payment Parameters for a Payment Method, it automatically load all the message codes connected to the payment format and issuer.If there are multiple issuers and messages codes, lot of records will get added.When dealing with many banks globally, there can be many Issuers.But there is no option to delete multiple records, which need to be done by one by one. Dealing with many banks globally and there can be many Issuers, which will create many unnecessarry records in this window and that needs deleting.

what could be the reason that the payment term of this supplier speglas 10 days in the posting proposal side when it has 30 days payment term? How can I fixt it? 

Please see attached file. 

Hi community!My customer is going to start using Internal trade between there companies A and B. Now er need to figure out how to fix the return of material as smooth as possible. Is there a nice setup or solution that anyone has for this issue? The standard process seems a bit “heavy”.  In this case company A takes material from Company B´s warehouse and sometimes the material is not consumed and returned. Can you somehow have a fast track where you just return the material and all the adminastrative work is handled automaically? Thanks for any input in this matter :) Best regardsEmma 

Hi, When I try to build transformer model file, I’m getting this below mentioned MAVEN dependency error. Transformer modelBUILD resultI tried adding repository to the POM.xml file as IFS documentation says (https://docs.ifs.com/techdocs/21r2/050_development/024_integration/015_connect/050_transformer/550_maven_http_deprecated/). But didn’t work. Can please let me know a solution for this? Is there some configuration which I have been missed? BR,Hasith

Using IFS Cloud version 25R1.We would like to have a custom action button on the Receive with Serials fly out window:We need to be able to assign a new internal serial number for a part that is coming in for repair and has never been assigned a Serial Number.It seems documentation is saying this flyout can’t be modified with form designer.  Any help would be appreciated.

Hi there IFS community!We want to manage both internal cost and potential sales price based on Time Type — without splitting the resource group? For example, electricians working during daytime cost the business $100/hour, but if they work at night, they cost $180/hour — all within the same resource group, but using different report code or Time Type? Is it possible to configure this in IFS Cloud without needing separate inventory parts or resource groups — just by using Time Type  and internal price configuration?  Thanks in advance!  

In IFS Cloud, we set up the customer order delivery lead time per customer adress with the customer supply chain matrix.But, when using single occurence adress; this delivery lead time is not updated.So, is there a way to create a supply chain matrix per county and not per customer adress??In others words, is there a way to set up lead time on higher level than the customer??Thanks in advancePhilippe

Hi, is there a way to search by Customer Address ID in IFS? I could not find and area to search by Customer address ID to see where and what Customer records the same address ID reside in. Look forward to help.

Hi ,I have created new committ  rule with rule type ”Commit overtask type”   our expectation is PSO should commit tasks based on  task types .but its not working for me could you please suggest.  Step:1 I have added  task types steps2: Created  2 commit rules and mapped with task types individually(ss1)Step:3 Created rule collection and mapped 2 rules under one rule collection. time horizon will be the difference  one is 4r and another one is 1hrStep:4  Mapped rule collection to a resources.Step4: mapped same rule collection at resource level  Thanks,Durga