Solved

We are working on our Upgrade to Apps10 UPD9 (from Apps8). This post is related to mWO Service 10 - Aurena Native app and Mobile Surveys.We configured Surveys based on the very light documentation we were provided. Help Pages in Aurena don’t work, confirmed by IFS. If anyone has detailed documentation of any kind on this, it would be very much appreciated.The Survey and Workflow Config, as far as we can tell, is set up properly but reaching out for community input here, along with a formal, pending IFS support request. All Synchronized Entities syncs are up-to-date. I just filtered for anything with ‘Surv%’.  Survey Configuration:The Survey is PublishedSurvey Workflow Type selected “Work Start”; this means the Survey should pop up when the user presses Start Work on the MWO. I did try other statuses for testing, but none of them worked and ultimately this is what we need.The Work Task Assignment in the mWO App is in ‘Work Started’ status. This was a new WO/Task/Assignment created and a

Hello,I’m getting this error with two core environments. Is there a solution/work around for this?  

Hi!In version 10 is it possible to Override / Overtake a translation of an object that was created and translated in a lower layer? e.g., I want my Customization to change the name of an Navigator entry that was created in Core layer.The only way I could do that was changing the Core translation entry (in Text Translations screen) and exporting and then updating the core .trs file. Not a good practice as I will mess with the Core files and make the Coreupdates harder to be managed.Would it be possible to do that only using Cust layer (kind of overriding/overtaking the Core translation)? If yes, how? Regards!

Hi, I m looking for on IFS partner the IFS cloud 21R1  installation guide  on premise.I dont find it.For trainings, is it more interesting to install on premise or managed by IFS?Thanks a lot

Hello,When stepping over from IEE to Aurena we encounter the issue that there are customization fields in the tables of IFS. We recognize those as having a prefix of C_. For example in CUSTOMER_ORDER_TAB a customization was made to hold C_CHECKMARK.The field is maintainable in the Customer Order Misc Order Info tab in IEE. Nice.Now we want to move over to Aurena. The field is not part of the standard fields. Any idea how we can include the fields on an Aurena tab in the Customer Order.Hope that we don't need a custom field as that would remove all history as well, I would say.Regards,Steve

Site Hello, Is there quick settings to change this Default site on Purchase Order Module.  Would like to change this default site to another address.  Thanks for the reply. 

Over receipt of PO lines can be controlled at 2 levels of the Purchase Part ‘Over Tolerance% filed at the Purchase Group or ‘Over Delivery’ section highlighted below.    Either of those is enough  in the setup or are the both needed, say, when I need to control over receipt of PO lines? Does one of them override the other? I am asking because I tried with both the setups to receive several PO lines, the behavior is not consistent. Any confirmation from an IFS Supply Chain expert will be nice. 

Hi,  Anyone has experience using serial rule-automatic ? We tested, it's just sequential number.  Wondering whether it could be like manual serial,  we could set up prefix, length...somewhere in the system? Thank you. Ron 

We are using AD login in our V14.5 Alliance (14.0.0.24), which works well generally except if you get kicked out on a timeout or suchlike.  Then when you login again, instead of just logging in, it asks for your full username and password again.  If I just click in any field and press “Esc”, it will close it down again and next time when I login, it goes in right away.Is there any way to stop this behaviour so that the login page resets properly, as it does when you exit the right way, even when you get kicked out? So that regardless, every time you try to login, the AD will work properly?  Thanks.

Hi AllTook a procedure from newly created Utility package to show data in Crystal report. done configuration properly in crystal report file as followGranted the new Utility package to IFSSYS and IFSPRINT using GRANT EXECUTE ON DEPOT_ORDER_FORECAST_UTIL_API TO IFSPRINTGRANT EXECUTE ON DEPOT_ORDER_FORECAST_UTIL_API TO IFSSYS.when run the report in crystal lay out data load correctly.But when try to execute from the Application getting following error When check in report log errors can see as "6/15/2021 8:04:24 AM[IFSCRWebSetupDEV]-[SetTableLocation] Set appropriate post-fixes for XIT_DEPOT_ORDER_FORECAST_WEEK\6/15/2021 8:04:24 AM[IFSCRWebSetupDEV]-[SetDatabaseLocation] Generating fully qualified database object name for XIT_DEPOT_ORDER_FORECAST_WEEK\6/15/2021 8:04:28 AM[IFSCRWebSetupDEV]-ERROR in [ExportReportWithParametersAndlogonInfo] Error in exporting the report in rpt format.6/15/2021 8:04:28 AM[IFSCRWebSetupDEV]-The table 'XIT_DEPOT_ORDER_FORECAST_WEEK\' could not be found.Error

I was trying to create MRP (Perform Site MRP) and this is the error text mentioned in the background job.Environment: APP10 Regional TEST CMB  I tried the same in APP10 TECH CMB as well. But received the same error twice.Does this happen because of an issue with the Customer Order? Any thoughts/suggestions on how to resolve this/ complete MRP would be highly appreciated. (There is a similar question for “Perform Project MRP” which is posted 11 months ago but with no answer.)

Is it possible to move an inventory part to a Quality Assurance location if the part was not received on a PO?  Manufacturing would like to move non-conforming parts to a non-conformance location until final disposition is determined.

Is there a way of reallocating the balance of the account, not just the transactions.To continue with an example:Account 10201A will have multiple transaction, and at the end of the month will be at a debit or credit position, depending on this position; I would like it to allocate the balance to account 10201A or account 10202B. (Automatic Posting rules will reallocate each individual transaction, and it is required to reallocate a balance of the account )

Hello all, I have created several custom columns on Shop Floor Workbench. I have added them to the Base Profile and restarted the IFS sessions. However, I am finding that the columns are still not visible and oriented the way they were on the Base Profile. This behavior appears to be different for custom fields. When I create a custom field and apply it to the Base Profile, it is immediately visible to users after they restart their sessions. With custom columns, users have to RMB and select Column Chooser, then make the column visible. This becomes problematic because I have Shop Floor terminals where I prevent users from having these permissions. I was hoping to be able to simply use the Base Profile to make these new columns visible. I am not sure if I am incorrectly using the Base Profile to set these up or not. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Hi, in IFS we can see who is presently connected, but is there a way to list all the users who connected IFS within the last 4 weeks for statistics purpose and better license management ?

Hi i am currently using IFS APP10 and have never used the Production Line Management window before.The company I work for are a build to order manufacture and we do a lot of repeat order work and have a core product that is manufactured every day.would a product such as our core product benefit from being set up as a production line in IFS?could anyone provide a brief explanation as to what exactly the Production Line Management window can do and when to use it?  regardsJamie

We are in IFS10 UPD10.  I would like to set the Date for Approval to a date in the past. I can’t edit this field. I can’t tell from F1 HELP whether that is standard behavior or not. Thanks

Hi,We found a problem when adding attachments in web browser Chrome and extension Aurena Agent is enabled. The documents can be added but not downloaded and viewed. This error seems to be related to Aurena Agent. As a workaround we can suggest to disable and enable the Aurena agent extension from chrome. Once you have done that step, You won't get the issue again. But you will also get the issue when re-login to the system.  Thanks & Best Regards,Nipun

Dear all, is there any possibility to define a sequence / sorting order for teams based on which to display them on the schedule board? It seams that currently teams are always sorted in an alphabetical order on the schedule board and that this can’t be changed or handled differently. Of course there would be the workaround to just include a sorting number / alphabetical character into the team ID but I’m searching for a more flexible / user friendly solution. regards,Thomas

Hello,I am developing a quick report in IFS. I know that CR_WEB_INIT has to be added however I am not able to locate it. Please advise under which category it should be. I looked everywhere especially under shaw1app.  Thank you!

Hi,How can we find whether an IFS App8 application is SP1 or SP2, if it is not specifically mentioned in the landing page link ?Can it be determined based on the client version (see below pic) specified in the About information ? Or can it be found in somewhere in the application ? Thanks, 

I dont see any lines here, hence I doubt if I followed the right steps to see ‘Posting Proposals Awaiting Authorization’. Can someone fill me in with the steps from PO receipt till I am able to see actual lines in this form? Thank You so much.   

We have created a po with 6 ‘no part’ lines.  3 of the lines are coded to project 6120 and the other 3 lines are coded to project 4547.  The Purchase Authorization Routing template that was selected is connection to Purchase Order Authorization Rule 100-4111 which has the ‘Apply Regardless of Project’ flag checked off.  The po was acknowledged, approved, release and received in full The manual supplier invoice was received and entered to match at PO Header, so only one invoice line was entered.  The posting proposal was created and the po matching was done for each of the 6 po lines automatically, no lines were ‘modified manually’.  The Status Detail Info is “Posting proposal is in balance and awaiting authorization”The Authorize tab shows the Approval Rule Source is Purchase  and the Approval Rule is 100-4111 as above, however, the lines that were coded to Project 6120 are all showing the following error:The code part combination on posting line with row id 1 is invalid for authorizer

Hi,we have a question,in Part A, the serial rule is the In Inventory and/or At Receipt and Issue.  Before receiving Part A on shop order, a serial structure is required. question arise here, is it mandatory that all the sub components have to be serialized and/or lot controlled parts?Thank you.Ron

Hi Community, I’m currently facing a customer demand to handle authentification through OpenID with Keycloak with IFS APPS 10.I know current supported authentification method are AzurAD, Adfs, DB.However have anyone of you already implemented authentification with Keycloak (Kerberos is also an option)  ?Thank you