Products (Manufacturing, Products, Engineering)

Is there a page with definitions of the MRP Messages?  There are so many of them and I need to be able to explain to my purchasing team what each one means.  Help!

Community,Our company inventory revision no is defaulted to starting from 1. Wondering where does it be defined in the system? Thank you. 

I have introduced new overhead cost and my posting controls are run on ‘Posting cost groups’. As the purchase arrival transaction went on to Erroneous status I have ‘modified’ posting cost group and rerun Erroneous distribution and manufacturing postings.I noticed that  inventory transaction does not pick the posting cost group even after run erroneous postings. My posting controls are dated back. New purchase receipts done after update of the modify posting cost groups works fine. Can somebody advise on how to fix the transaction happened before modifying the posting cost group?Thank you

is there in the system anything to solve this?  

We have a number of users experiencing this and similar errors when trying to access various screens in IFS. We have tried running the clean up scripts and deleting the contents of the 2.0 folder on their user profile but this has not resolved the issue. I have logged into IFS with their accounts on my PC and everything works correctly, but when I log onto their PC with my IFS account I also experience the same errors. Some of the errors include:Ifs.Fnd.FndSystemException: Explorer: An Unhandled Exception has occurred ---> System.ArgumentException: Unknown form template class: tbwMaterialAlloc. Ifs.Fnd.FndSystemException: Explorer: An Unhandled Exception has occurred ---> Ifs.Fnd.Explorer.Interfaces.FndFeatureNotFoundException: Navigation target i_hWndFrame is not to be found in the dictionaryThe current work around is for users to connect to a terminal server and run IFS from there.Has anyone else experienced this problem on screens including Shop Order > Materials tab, Activ

I have the functionality active, supplier for purchase part.I create the purchase order:Register arrivals:when registering the arrival it creates me handling units:When I see the detail of the HANDLING UNIT:Packaging Material Status: Not applicable.Should not be: ISSUED FROM STOCK?Regards.

Description:Hi,I have a question regarding a Costs Sets and Multilevel Structure.I'm trying to create a Quick Report/IAL that would show the same exact data that a user can see in the application, wieving a Part Cost -> Multilevel Structure on Cost Set 1.Why the SQL Query behing the table on Part Cost -> Multilevel structure Tab have some other Top Level Part bind into a query? Where this part is comming from?Also what role does a column "Bucket_Seq" have?I would like to have a column "Cummulated Qty Per Assembly" in my Quick Rep/IAL however on the tbwPartCostBucketMultiLevel the column is calculated and is being devided by ":Int.GetParent(i_hWndFrame).frmPartCost.nCummQtyPerAssembly" - can You please advise how to get this value?On the form populate, the application somehow knows what BUCKET_SEQ to use - and its being used on every single query later on.I can not see any hint in the debbuger console how is this BUCKET_SEQ being pulled.Best regards,FilipProduct Version: UPD21Busi

Issue Description: Hold Stock with availability control will be reserved to shop order with DOP ordersEnvironment: APPS10 RegionalDetails:Test Plan>> Log in to the environment using the credentials. >> Navigate to DOP Header with DOP ID 204678>> Release Shop Orders 220466 and 220467.>> Receive shop order of the component part (SO# 220466) to location no 207790.>> In the Inventory Part In Stock window, we will find the quantity will be held by availability control ID.>> But it has been auto reserved to the parent shop order 220467In the Inventory Part In Stock window, we will notice that the quantity will be hold by availability control ID but it has been auto reserve to the parent shop order. Related case - CS0293589 I would hope to suggest this as a potential functionality enhancement in the future release of the product.

Dear community,When a Control Plan is associated with a purchase order receipt, we do not know how to add specific data points like we can do on shop order for situations like one-off testing that we do not want in the standard Control Plan (IFS Cloud 23.2.9)In addition to this, is there a way to add tools in the Purchase order Control Plan > Tools tab ?We would like to connect a new Tool to the purchase order-specific data point, but there is no method available. 

24.1.3.I have a manufacturing tool enabled for control plan with three valid calibrated tool instances.In an Analysis Result for a data point that is connected to this tool ID, in the Enter and View Results dialog I am not able to select a tool instance in the dropdown list.In the Analysis Result page, though, using the ‘Select Tool’ command for the data point I am able to select a tool instance in the dropdown list.Could this be a bug?

24.1.3 and reported by customer in their 23R2.In the page Shop Order Operations, there used to be a command ‘Scheduling’ which would allow you to either Sequence Operations or Schedule Shop Orders. This command is no longer present in this page.I can sequence, though, in the page Visual Shop Order Operations Planning.Why is this command no longer available here? 

Hi, we would to add an approval step on the reported times of our employees using the shop floor workbench. Operators use the shop floor workbench to report time they spend on a operation. Can we add an ‘approval’ step to this? On the site level, we have the option ‘Authorisation required’ on shop floor reporting setting, but where can we approve this? In an ideal situation, i’d like to this in the screen ‘shop floor clockings’ or ‘shop floor reports’? Thanks!

Hello I have recently started a new data analyst role, we have been tasked with reviewing all the master data we have in our system looking for errors, missing data, etc. One of our new tasks is to identify all of the List of Value Fields in the Inventory Parts, Sales Parts, Purchase Parts, Engineering Parts and Master Parts screens.We are currently going through this one screen and all the associated tabs at a time listing out all the LOV’s manually.We are using IFSAPP10I came across the Target Table Definitions screen while looks through the IFS community help screens but it says this is for IFS Cloud, is an IFS10 version f the screen shot below as this would provide us with a lot of great information.    Any help would be appreciated

We have SO 1900014 linked to project 50301BU, item no. 17881467.We are trying to remove the part 185X48X25.4MM-125X6 from the BOM and replace it with 185X43X25.4MM-125X6, but we are unable to do so. The system is giving an error (see attached).I believe this error is in place to prevent directly deleting parts in the SO that are linked to a project. However, when we modify the part in the project item information, the same change is not reflected in the SO.As a result, the BOM in the project item info does not match the BOM in the SO, and we have no way of updating the SO. This discrepancy is preventing us from closing the SO due to the incorrect BOM.And getting the attached errorCould someone help with this?

Hello,When a expense sheet is authorized, for each line in the expense sheet, a project transaction line is created.The expense reference is copied to Internal Comment field in every project transaction generated, but I can’t find the traceability between the expense sheet lines and their corresponding project transactions lines.I would like to identify which project transaction line corresponds to each expense sheet line. Is it posible?.(We are working with IFS 9). Thanks in advance,Amaia

Hello All,Hoping someone can help me here.  We have a customer that apply material overhead to a work task.  I have set up the cost elements, buckets and templates and added the template to parts.  This process works and the OH is calculated on the work task as expected.  The issue we are faced with is the customer updates their OH rates on a quarterly bases.  When I run the update part specific overheads the system changes the rate even if the end date is specified.  I also noticed that I ran the update on Sept 12 but the date of the last activity did not change, although the field level details state it was the last time the record was updated.  Here is the issue.  Even if I add a new line and end date the first line when I run the update job it changes the rate for both lines, therefore losing historical rates.  Should this job not allow to end date previous rates and insert a new rate based on the date the update is performed?In the example below when the material is issued to the

Community,Our experience tell us, in window Engineering Revision Transfer Actions, the column PDM Preliminary Rev. Change will be updated to Changed status, and the column Proposed Start Date is not updated, it will still keep the date when the last transfer date took place. Our request is, if the column PDM Preliminary Rev. Change is updated from Not Changed to Changed, the Proposed Start Date should also be updated to the current system date.for example, below part is transferred to production on 9/6/2024, I updated the part structure today, i.e. 9/13/2024, can system also update the column Proposed Start Date to 9/13/2024?  

Hi!We have some new users in a new site where we have a problem that default lobby is always picking wrong site and company for the user. We save the right ones, do Save profile, exit right way and again next time same wrong settings are back. I checked that personal profile picks up the same wrong ones again. Also changing them there do not help. Other users sharing the same base profile do not have this same problem.  They have the right company saved on their personal profile. Lobby element have in this element #USER_DEFAULT_SITE# #DEFAULT_COMPANY#User have only one company and site defined.

I am starting to use operation blocks to optimize the schedule and I’m struggling to use the Manufacturing visualizer to represent what an operator will see in the shop floor work bench (SFWB).  The sequence I typically use is:Assign operation blocks in shop order operations. Determine sequence based on load and need dates. Schedule operation blocks in Operation Blocks overview using predecessor blocks and forward scheduling. Review in Operation blocks Manufacturing visualizer grouped by Operation block ID. Review in SFWB from an operator's perspective.Situation:  The scheduler has applied operation blocks to operations and has the work sequenced and scheduled.  In the manufacturing visualizer, with operation blocks don’t represent the sequence and therefore the user must use the operation block overview screen to review sequences (not graphically).  Any changes to shop order quantities via merge or updating the shop order lot size causes the shop order to change its dates and scheduli

We have a PO (A90081) linked to SO (1889644). The PO is for an external operation related to SO 1889644.Previously, the user over-received the SO and reported all items as received. They have since reversed the over-receipt for the part on the SO, but we are still encountering the error: "Cannot ship more than completed in previous operation" when trying to receive the PO. I believe this may be due to the need to reverse the operation report as well. However, I am unsure how to proceed.Could you please advise on how to resolve this error?

To me it looks like the material bottleneck settings have been swapped in the logic. “Always Finite” components will be scheduled in Shop Orders with planned goods receipts. If I switch to “Finite” the Shop Orders gets “Unscheduled”!? 

Morning,IFS Help on this utility is non-existent, and IFS Support once again refuse to help describing this as a training issue.All I want to understand is what logic the utility uses to re-classify parts.Thanks in advance if anyone has any documentation they can share.Chris.

Hi All,How to activate variables as a result of analysis? 

Is it possible to backflush from a location if the stock has a catch qty?

hello everyone,The issue arises when I try to link a particular shipment part (PO for that project) to a work order for the project—an error occurs. However, if the same part is attached to a work order for a different project, it functions correctly. The error consistently happens with all work orders for that specific project, and there are seven parts in that shipment.only one part is working properly ont hat specific project