Skip to main content
Question

Object Connection Transformation to Shop Order Multilevel Repair Structure?

  • August 14, 2026
  • 2 replies
  • 39 views
KennethP
Sidekick (Customer)
Forum|alt.badge.img+5

Hi!

We’re trying to set up an object connection transformation to inventory part to the Shop Order Multilevel Repair Structure page. 

Our best guess would be to set up

  • Document Object Connection on LU ShopOrdUtil, view AS_BUILT_CONFIG_HEAD_SO or AS_BUILT_CONFIGURATION_SO. 
  • Object Connection Transfer with InventoryPart as source and ShopOrdUtil as target.

It is possible to set up, but the page shows no attachments at all. In fact, there is no paperclip symbol at all and no attachment panes, other than for the shop order at the very top. The rest of the page is connected to a tree. 

We’re guessing there is some limitation that makes the object connection transformation impossible to use here, or does someone know of a workaround?

And, if you know it’s not possible, exactly why?

2 replies

Abdul
Superhero (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+20
  • Abdul
  • Superhero (Partner)
  • August 15, 2026

Hi ​@KennethP,

I tried to configure Object Connection Transformation between Shop Order Multilevel Repair Structure Page and Inventory Part, however, system falling in some errors while transferring the document from Inventory Part page to Multilevel Repair Page.

  1. Created new record in Object Connection screen for Entity (LU) AsBuiltConfiguration to enable paperclip option for level 1 onwards.
  1. Configured Object Connection Transformation where Target LU is AsBuiltConfiguration while Source LU is InventoryPart. This Transformation ideally transfer document from Inventory Part to Multilevel Repair Page, however falling in error.

 

Not sure if it is a bug or some additional configuration needs to be done.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/abdul-rehman-ifscloudexpert/
KennethP
Sidekick (Customer)
Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • KennethP
  • Author
  • Sidekick (Customer)
  • August 17, 2026

Hi Abdul,

Thanks, we tried that alternative too with the same result. My guess is that we are dealing with a limitation here but it’s difficult to find ut exactly why. I think we’ll try our luck with IFS support on this one.

/ Kenneth

    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement