IFS Solutions

We are integrating IFS Cloud 25R2 with the Vertex O series OnPrem application.As per the doc, IFS mainly provides out-of-the-box support for the cloud-based Vertex O Series integration.Could someone help me out in understanding whether the on-premise Vertex O Series integration also works using the out-of-the-box functionality from IFS, or would it still require custom integration through IFS Connect​@Thomas Peterson ​@Asela Munasinghe ​@Manoj Ruwanhewa ​@Marcel.Ausan ​@dsj 

In the 25R2 release, the FAI (First Article Inspection) functionality was introduced under the Quality Management module. However, this functionality is not available in our 25R2 environment. How to enable this? Also, MRP Simulation functionality as well.

Hi EveryoneOn the Page “AD User Mappings for Financial Models” one can Generate Access for General Ledger Code Combinations. In some Cases not all Combinations get generated namely.GL Authority Combinations (We only use it on Account and Cost Center, all other Elements are %)MAX: Account = %, Cost Center = %Voucher Row:Account = 24790, Cost Center = nullThis Combination is Missing in the [CODESTRING_COMBINATION_RLS_BI_TAB] and therefore RLS is not working properly in GL Analysis Model.The Generate Access Procedure must include null combinations. Currently it only takes combinations into account where the code part exists in code part values, but a combination of account without any other posting element ist very viable. 

We are trying to set up an object connection transformation from the Multi-Company Customer Invoices Analysis screen to the Customer Invoice screen.We have configured the following using the standard transformation method.  However, this doesn’t seem to work.Does anybody have any ideas on how to make this work?Thanks,Monique

Hi All,Could you please outline the formal procedure for deleting a company that has existing transactions within an IFS Applications environment?Regards,MalinG.

Has the issue been reported and is there a fix?Cloud 25.2.3Create Quicksight reports.  Report Definitions now exists.Run Refresh Server Cache/ReportALL Quicksight reports are deleted.  There is nothing in IFS Cloud or the report_defintion or the report_sys_tab.  

Community,We have a request needs to download all the objects and their structure from Business Object Explorer window. any idea how to download into Excel? Thank you. 

I can create a Query using Query Designer with a parameter.  I can then create a Quicksight report based on the published Query.  I can go to Order Report and am prompted for a value for my parameter.  All is well with the world.  If I want to add another parameter to my Query in Query Designer, I can do that and Synchronize the Query.  If I then go to Order Report and refresh the screen, my new parameter appears.  If I give the new parameter a value, I get an error.P1Rep/QsrParameters (server error)Malformed Request.Error details: [{"code":"UNKNOWN_CONTENT","message":"'ParamAbcClass' can not be mapped as a property or an annotation."}]Server stack trace error(s):  Tree should be empty but still has content left: ParamAbcClassI’ve tried Unpublish/Republish too.  I’ve also tried unpublishing my Quicksight report and republishing.  The only thing that works, is to recreate the Quicksight report based on the updated Query.  Surely this can’t be the solution?  

Hello IFS’s Experts,I am facing a behavior in IFS Cloud 24R2 that I would like to better understand and fix.ContextModule: Procurement / Register Arrival Scenario: Non-inventory purchase order receipt Company / Site: XXX User Group: RECEP Accounting period involved: 5 (may 2026)  User Group (RECEP) period status = Closed Voucher Type : 0 (The only one group related to is RECEP) In a context of periodical closing, we have decided to close the periods for the user group in charge to perform all the Register Arrival transactions.If we select a date within the closed period with is not today’s date → Transaction is blocked (expected behavior).If we do NOT change the default date (system date) the transaction is successfully completed (unexpected behavior).Both dates (26/05 or 27/05 in this case) are within the same accounting period (May 2026), which is closed for the user group RECEP. Has anyone experienced this behavior in IFS Cloud and how can we fix this unexpected behavior ? Is it pos

Hi All,Is there any possibility that we can exclude the Shipment Order from MRP Planning.My business scenario is where, my customer maintain their demands inside the project as project demands. Supplies are generated based on the project demand and then I need to move this stock to a off site location (Cross borders). But when I create a shipment order and add the part to a shipment order, that relect in “Inventory part availability planning” page.And when I run the PMRP and MRP supplies are created for both project demand and shipment order. Ideally its an inventory movement. Is there a way that I can exclude the shipment orders from MRP planning?Thanks,Chamath

Hi everyone,I wanted to reach out to the community to get some clarity and perspective on a topic that recently came up in a discussion with IFS.During a recent conversation, I heard a statement that “Nexus Black Resolve is intended to be the long-term replacement for MWO.” But i did not hear any specifics - it sounded bit vague, however it could just be me and plans may be in place. I’m Seeking some Clarifications as this raised a few important questions, and I’m hoping the community can help me to clarify these: Has this direction been formally defined? Is Nexus Black Resolve officially positioned as the successor / replacement for MWO, or is this still early-stage direction or regional guidance? Is Resolve included in the official roadmap? If so, where can we find formal roadmap visibility or release plans? Is there any official positioning or documentation available? Product strategy Sales positioning Target use cases compared to MWO Where can we learn m

Hi All!When printing Work Instruction for ShopOrder, we use the function “Print Attached Documents”.IFS finds the attached documents well, e.g. a document which is attached to workinstruction guidelines of a operation. In our current situation it's kind of a suprise for the one who print's whether there are connected documents. Therefore we would like to have insight in all the attached documents from the ShopOrder itself(in Screen ShopOrder).I guessed that “Object Connection Transformations” would be the solution, but i could not manage to set it so that we saw the attachements in screen ShopOrder.Does anyone managed to do this? Or does anyone have other ideas on how to configure this?Thanks! 

Community,we are looking for the best practice for below scenarioWhen supplier invoicing, if any discrepancies between supplier invoice and PO, our AP team will change the purchase price direct on the purchase order line in order to meet the amount on supplier invoice.  unbalanced amount which is matched by auto job will generate the unbalanced amount, but AP team we will remove the current match and redo the matching, the unbalanced problem will be temporarily fixed. then AP team will do final posting.Above operation will result in huge variance at GL side.Would like to hear from you, what is the best practice for this issue? Thank you. 

Hi guys,We received a demand for one client in Spain. They must receive the e-invoice on the format XSIG and signed electronically.Is it possible in IFS Cloud? We are using version 25R2 SU6 Thanks, Gianni Neves

Hi,We have imported several thousand Request Contracts using DMM. They are at status ‘Planned’ and we want them to be Active. Is there any way that we can automate making these Active? Presumably we need to update objstate and/or state fields on sc_service_contract but these fields don’t seem to be able in the mapping. 

Could someone please advise how to add the company footer in Report Designer for instant invoice for example please?Do we need to create a custom field to retrieve the value, or is there another way to access it directly ? if so may i have guidance on the how to please?  

https://community.ifs.com/ifs-cloud-26r1-updates-ea-employees-partners-only-508/ifs-cloud-26r1-deprecation-log-66886?tid=66886&fid=508With related to Depreciation post above Customers are no longer possible to schedule resources for for Work Order connected work task using dispatch console. In previous releases it also depreciation Allocate resource Gantt. Now customers only have Assigned work to plan resources. For customers with considerable amount of maintenance staff it’s difficult to plan without visible support of technicians schedule. ​​​​​​For Resource planning and assignments in maintenance will there be coming a new solution for this?

Should I assume that the .REP layout files, that are created in Report Studio, are to be placed into the customer’s solution repository, just like any other layout that is created? I don’t see any guidance in the tech docs on this process - other than the idea of export/import between instances.Does IFS have anything indicating best-practice for the new Report Studio layouts?  Should we advise our clients to follow the same practice as when a new RDL layout is created ie: put it in the proper server/reports/layouts folder and PR it into the customer solution master?   

In Cloud has anyone accomplished this and if so, how?  What is the transformation method? Thanks!  

Hi,I am looking for the following options in MWO - Service Classic but they do not appear. I have added all the security grants for ServiceEngApp 25 but it only gives me view to add new service request which is linked the request management. Is there anything I am missing? Thanks,George.

The customer has requested modifications to the standard report layouts, specifically to include the company’s webpage, email address and organization no in the report footers. Since these are common company details, I created custom fields to store this information. However, there is currently no option to add such fields unless they are tied directly to the relevant entity.As a result, I had to add the two fields separately to the PurchaseOrder entity for the Purchase Order report, and to the CustomerOrder entity for the Invoice report. If similar requirements arise for other reports, I will need to repeat this process for each respective entity.Given that these are basic, common company details used across multiple reports, it would be more efficient to have a shared/common entity where such report-related fields can be maintained centrally. This would reduce duplication and simplify maintenance. ​@IFS RD Product Management 

Hello, We are currently reviewing a supplier invoice matching scenario in IFS Cloud and would appreciate recommendations regarding the most suitable matching setup.Current scenario:One Purchase Order: PO P1097Approximately 172 PO linesMultiple receipts created against the same POMultiple supplier invoices are received gradually against the same POEach supplier invoice represents only a subset of the delivered receipts/itemsExample:Total received amount on PO: 338,655.22 EURSupplier invoice amount: 59,128.65 EURAround 15 supplier invoices are expected for the same POThe issue is that during supplier invoice matching, users retrieve a large number of receipt lines and cannot easily identify which receipts belong to a particular invoice.   Questions:Which matching option would you recommend for this scenario?Has anyone implemented a similar process with multiple receipts and multiple invoices against a single PO?Is Receipt Reference considered the preferred approach in such cases?Are ther

New workcenter that is a manual labor work center,  Each person is set up as a person resource.  How do I assign specific people resources to a work center???

Hello,Could you please advise on how to use the Language_Sys.Translate_Constant() function?Also, could you explain where to find the translation and the constant in aurena please? Thank you.

Hi!I have a customer where we recently installed the IFS Solution ID 312399 which is supposed to contain security patches for IFS10 middleware.Now when they run their security scanning software, it still finds old versions of log4j.jar and commons-text-1.1.jar that is know to have vulnerabilities. Aren’t these supposed to have been replaced withIFS Solution ID 312399?