IFS Solutions

All the permissions regarding the report is set up correctly.But only for a specific user - when running the report, the details are displayed for a second and then goes blank.Tried to generate the output excel but the generated excel file contains no data.It is working for the user in test environment but not in PROD.  

Hello, Hello, I would like to ask about the transactions that appeared in June—i need help with how to check  why they were created, what they relate to, and who initiated them? Regards, Kruthika

Hello Experts,Background:Purchase Component Method ‘Customer Order’ is not available for Project Deliverables in IFS Cloud. This has lead us to switch to ‘Supplier Material’ as the purchase component method.  Current Situation:We need to deal with many supplier component parts. If we take once scenario,Supplier material is connected to a project deliverables demand part. (project supply option is 'Purchase') We don't have neither the parent or the supplier material part in stock We receive the supplier material part We ship it to the supplier Supplier receives the part and we receive the parent part from supplierChallenges:Given the amount of supplier materials we have to deal with, the challenges we are having,How can we monitor whether the supplier material has arrived ? What standard functionalities of IFS we can use to ship the supplier material (we have been testing with shipment orders but can we set up the shipment orders/shipments to be created automatically by standard? ie: cr

Hello, I am looking into the Export control. As I remember in App9 or App10 version when I am trying to set up export control for Customer orders (Inventory Part type purchase) when connecting the license I had to create a supplier for purchase part and define the export control codes in there.In App9, in the connection log it shows the user that you need to create supplier for purchase part and define those export control basic data if you haven’t defined them. And in that version both Part catalog export control data and supplier for purchase part export control data required in order to fully connect the license.But in Cloud 23R1 version, even when I didn’t define any supplier for purchase part export control data, system allows me to connect the master part export control type and approve the entire license. In previous versions if we only connect one it appeared as “Partially connected”. Did something changed after moving to cloud? I assumed since my sales part type is purchased s

Hi Community Team,Does anyone know why a CTO Part does not display Costing Information on a Sales Quotation (UNLESS I reserve and/or Allocate when running Capability Check)? The scenario is that they are making a CTO Part, they enter it in a Sales Quotation, run Capability Check (without reserving or allocating), and want the costs to be displayed on the Line.       BUT - If I change my Capability Check to “Allocate Only”, then I get a cost.  See images below:   Best,

Hi all,We are using Apps10 update 23 and have been asked by compliance to store ECCN (Export Control Classification Number) for some products. I cannot find a field for this use so wanted to check if anyone who uses Apps10 knows where this would be?ThanksUmar

Hi,Has anyone used the ECCN identifier in IFS?  Currently there doesn’t seem to be a place for this in the Item Master or other supporting tables.  If you have, how did you work around this?   We need to have it appear on certain outbound documents.

Hi, all. We are currently in project for implementing IFS Cloud for Aviation Maintenance.We need to set up the ECCN(Export Control Classification Number) on part master and control on the system to comply US EAR regulation but we could not find the appropriate field to output on shipping document. Could somebody advise us if there is appropriate field for ECCN? Thanks,Tomoya

Dear community,I need your help regarding the export control module as something is not clear for me.If I well understood, each part that are export-controlled needs to be identified, classified and approved in the part catalog. In addition to this, for purchased parts, the classification must also be done in the supplier for purchased part.Why is this required ? because what is troubling me is that we must maintain manually the same information on 2 different windows. And so, it can generates discrepancies if we forget to update one value on one or the other screen.Am I wrong ? or I’ve been missing out on…Thanks for your help 

How can IFS process a DESADV message in Incoming Dispatch Advice that contains a full packing structure of handling units from a 3rd party external supplier? How do we create these handling units in the system and process them with the supplier's labels?We are implementing IFS Cloud 26R1 and have suppliers that send an Advance Ship Notice (ASN / DESADV) via EDI before the physical delivery. The DESADV includes a full packing hierarchy: individual parts are packed into boxes, boxes are stacked on pallets, and each level carries a barcode. We want IFS to:1. Read the packing hierarchy from the DESADV and create the corresponding handling units automatically (no manual HU creation at the dock).2. Retain the supplier's handling unit numbers on the handling units encoded in the barcode so we can scan them at the dock without any relabeling3. Process the receipt using those handling units.Is this supported natively in IFS Cloud 26R1, and what does the configuration and process look like? 

Accumulated Shop Order CostAccumulated Cost: 2,682,779.78 Operation Scrap (OPFEED-SCP): 112,416.11Remaining Cost after Scrap2,570,363.67Received Value (OOREC)1,627,376.20Calculation Variance942,987.47The variance exactly matches:2,570,363.67 - 1,627,376.20 = 942,987.47Transaction AnalysisThe transaction history shows:OORECQuantity Received: 50,371 pcs Total Value: 1,627,376.20 Approximate Unit Cost: 31.36OPFEED-SCPQuantity Scrapped: 2,203 pcs Total Value: 112,416.11 Approximate Unit Cost: 51.03When reviewing the remaining shop order cost after scrap:2,570,363.67 / 50,371 = 51.03 per unitwhile the receipt appears to be valued at:1,627,376.20 / 50,371 = 31.36 per unitThis suggests that the accumulated cost remaining on the shop order after scrap differs significantly from the valuation used for the inventory receipt. The parent part of the shop order is weighted average.So, if I understand the weighted average costing logic correctly, OOREC has taken the current inventory value of the pa

Need Inputs, once the 27R1 is introduced service related functionality are removed, functions removed like Service request can be handled in Prepare work order screen.Dispatch → which functionality to be continued in Work Management ?Appointment Booking -->which functionality to be continued in Work Management ?and also need to know when is the 27R1 is expected 

Hi everyone,I have some general questions regarding how MSO handles shop order and operation statuses.As far as I understand, MSO mainly considers shop orders in Planned status. However, the Planned status only exists on the shop order header level, while MSO schedules the individual operations. This is where I am currently a bit confused, especially regarding the interaction between the shop order status and the operation status.My questions are:When material is reserved, the shop order header status changes to Reserved. How does MSO handle these shop orders? Are they still considered for scheduling/rescheduling, or are they treated differently?When material is issued, the shop order header status changes to Started. What is the expected MSO behavior in this case?Also, what happens if an operation has already been started, but material has not yet been reserved or issued? How should MSO handle such a scenario?From my understanding, operations that have already been started should not

The Expression Builder and SQL Function Support in Query Designer, introduced with IFS Cloud 25R2, are game‑changers for anyone working with queries. Instead of writing custom SQL or depending on external tweaks, you can now build queries directly combining attributes, static values, operators, functions, and even groups all inside a simple drag‑and‑drop interface.Why You’ll Love ItBuild queries without coding. Mix and match attributes, static values, functions, and operators. Validate and preview your expressions instantly. Keep it simple with up to five operands/operators per expression. Organize smarter with groups to structure your logic. What You Can UseExpression Builder supports:Static Values → e.g., 'ACTIVE', 'BLOCKED', numeric thresholds. Attributes → like FirstName, LastName, Country, CreationDate. Functions → SUBSTR, ROUND, TRUNC, TO_CHAR, TO_NUMBER, SYSDATE. Operators →Concatenation ( ||), Addition (+), Subtraction (-), Division (/), Multiplication (*). Groups → to combine

We have come to discover that we have no meaningful way to manage the roll-out of the mobile app IFS MWO Maintenance. Since the iOS version comes from the Apple Store and the Windows version comes from the Microsoft App store, they just appear randomly on devices without any chance to vet the apps and keep all devices on the same version. Nor is there any mechanism in either store or from IFS directly to get any advance notification of upcoming version releases. There also appears to be no way of reviewing version releases with the associated release dates (not as important but still could be helpful if something breaks). I guess the assumption from all parties in this process is that newer is always better, but what if it is not? By the time we discover a bug, many of our devices will have the new release with no way to back-level the version. Does anyone else out there see this a potentially problematic? 

Attendance note are available in IFS APP10 as follows and they can be visible in time card as well.  How does this work in IFS Cloud? Is it still available?

Good morning. I have heard (but never experienced myself) that some french IFS users are not able to generate the FEC file required by french tax administration due to size issues, as if a size limit would be exceeded.(FEC = “Fichier des Ecritures Comptables” = full list of accounting vouchers for one year) Could someone tell me the truth about this issue in recent IFS Releases, 24R1 or newer ?(Is there a limit in size or number of rows for the FEC ? Or do the users face technical issues like a timeout when generating the FEC ? Are there possible IFS settings to optimize FEC generation ? other workaround possibilities ?)  Best regards.

 Receiving a fault message “It is not allowed to modify a Sales Line after creating service Invoice.”Is this standard functionality.  I could have swarn we were able to modify a sales line after creating service invoice.Message occurs when we select ‘New Credit Lines’. 

A customer in USA is trying to use ACH payment with Citi Bank. ISO20022 method is used in IFS Cloud 24R2.this is supported as per below post  When testing payment files bank has informed that both the 'Local Instrument-code' and 'Local Instrument- Proprietary' must be present in the xml file. However, in IFS Application only one value can be used at a given time.  See the below tags required. Tag 1. Local Instrument-code'<PmtTpInf>                    <LclInstrm>                        <Cd>CCD</Cd>                    </LclInstrm> </PmtTpInf> Tag 2 Local Instrument- Proprietary'<PmtTpInf>                <SvcLvl>                    <Cd>NURG</Cd>                </SvcLvl>                <LclInstrm>                    <Prtry>CITI996</Prtry>                </LclInstrm></PmtTpInf> Is it a known limitation or is there any other basic data that I have missed?

Hi all,Users are required to send E-Invoices including invoices images based on their custom layouts but when processing an e-invoice it always picks the default/standard print layout and generates the xml.There are layouts made based on different country requirements and need to set it up against each company print and currently when trying to send e-invoice there is no option to select it. Is there a way to achieve this or any alternative solutions?Appreciate your answers and suggestions.Thank you.

Hi Team, I am using the send email functionality from the custom projection(using the command_sys.send email) in the workflow and the email thing works fine but the body text alignment is showing everything in the same line Is there a way to control this alignement to include the spacing  ex: Hi XXXX, This is to inform regarding the new supplier creation. Please review the details below supplier id: XXXXcreated by: XXXXX The email it triggers shows like this and looks odd when reading the emailHi XXXX, This is to inform regarding the new supplier creation. Please review the details below supplier id: XXXX created by: XXXXX any inputs would be appreciated Regards,Rakesh  

A. What is your idea?1) ClassificationChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.Opportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionWhat happened, what is missing, or what could be better? Focus on the problem or opportunity (not the solution).In the standard QuickReport feature, there is a "SaveFilter" command available on the screen displayed after clicking "ViewReport."Although the command appears to be active after a filter is applied, clicking it does not trigger the display of a dialog box.According to IFS documentation, this functionality is currently unsupported due to system limitations.Since it is possible to save search and filter criteria on other screens, I would like to see improvements made so that this feature is also available within QuickReport reports. B. Context and scope1) Who is affected?Choose ONE or MORE: keep the applicable options and delete the rest.Customers2) FrequencyChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.DailyC. Value and i

We are analyzing the behavior of the “Include Structure” option in IFS Cloud, specifically in the following pages:New Miscellaneous Resource Allocation New Resource Relocation Generate Resource Schedules and CapacityDuring validation, we observed that enabling or disabling the “Include Structure” option changes the selection results and the number of records displayed in subsequent steps. However, the exact filtering logic and scope of this option are not clearly understood.IFS confirmed that this behavior is due to hierarchical expansion when “Include Structure” is enabled; however, detailed logic and scope remain unclear in these scenarios.Clarifications Required Hierarchy Definition How is the hierarchy derived when this option is enabled? What relationships are considered (e.g., parent-child resources, teams, organizational structure)? Behavior with Single Resource Selection In pages like Generate Resource Schedules and Capacity, where typically only a single resource is selecte

Need to offset one supplier invoice against a credit note. there was a value difference, where the supplier invoice value was higher by 40 than the credit invoice. Therefore, I raised another credit invoice to tally amounts. but still the system generated “ORA-20110: InstallmentUtility.PAYINSTAL30: Amount paid (33605.00) for installment 1 of Invoice 406 is bigger than open installment amount (33605.00)” error message.To test a different way, I lowered the invoice amount by doing a mix payment to tally amounts with the credit invoice, but the system generates the same error message.Any suggestions to sort out this issue?

One of our customers upgraded to 24R2 recently. The release upgrade started on 1/22/2025 and build place was updated on  3/7/2025.Now, in their Build place (DEV) environment, the application version and framework version are different.However, in the relevant TEST (useplace) environment both application and framework versions are the same. Could you please clarify,How something like this could have happened What is the impact this will have on future deliveries/fixes. What can be done to get the useplace and prod environments to the same framework version as dev.