Q&A Discussion of IFS Solutions for our IFS Employees, Partners and Customers
Recently active
!--startfragment>Issue Observed on work tasks:While assigning work, the Allocations / Direct Allocations section did not show the full list of resources. The “Apply Constraints” toggle was disabled to check if it affected visibility. Even after disabling it, resources from other resource groups were still not displayed.!--endfragment> Under Allocations Tab:In 24R1 Release: I was able to see all resources list under the allocations tab upon disabling the ‘Apply Constraints’ button. Whereas, in 25R1 version, even after disabling the toggle button, only the resources listed under the specific resource group/demand were displayed.Under the Direct Allocations tab:The resource list is empty. Not even a single resource id was displayed. So, currently, i cannot assign any specific resources to the work tasks and unable to transfer them to MWO.Has anyone else run into the same behavior or noticed similar missing resources?!--endfragment>!--startfragment>!--startfragment>Any guid
Hi Team, Iam using IFS cloud & PSOI have a query regarding the Slot Usage Rule configuration, specifically the difference between Maximum Utilization (%) and Maximum Slot Utilization (%).I tested both scenarios by setting the utilization to 10%, but in both cases I am getting the same output. I would like to understand how these two fields are expected to behave differently.Current ScenarioI have 4 FTs with the same skill, and each FT has 8 hours of availability:4 FTs × 8 hours = 32 FT-hours total availabilityWith a 10% utilization target:32 × 10% = 3.2 FT-hoursMy expectation is that the system should allow up to 3.2 FT-hours of booking utilization across the overall available capacity, irrespective of which slot the booking falls into.I have two slots:7:00 AM – 11:00 AM 11:00 AM – 3:00 PMCurrent BehaviorWhen the utilization reaches approximately 1.6 hours in the 7:00–11:00 AM slot, the system stops showing the first slot and only shows availability in the 11:00 AM–3:00 PM slot.Thi
Does anyone know what the message “There are some items which will be connected to an existing acknowledge payment object, which is Unacknowlegded, continue?” meansIt shows up when creating a new supplier payment proposal
The time registration has been confirmed and approved in the Time Registration screen. However, when I pull the report in the Project Transactions screen and filter by Approved = No, the approved time entries are still being displayed for a few employees.Based on the approval status in the Time Registration screen, these records should be marked as approved and should not appear when filtering by Approved = No in the Project Transactions screen. We have observed that when the manager removes the authorization and then re-authorizes the time entry, the record no longer appears in the Project Transactions screen when filtered by Approved = No. Could you help us to find the reason for this behavior?
Hello,I am performing "Calculate MS Level 1" job for a selected single part:However after processing I can see warning messages regarding many more other parts:Is the selective calculation running still for all parts by default and standard? Or is it just validating all of the parts?I am not sure if this is correct and affecting functionality as I would expect this job would validate only a single part that I run the job specifically for.Thank you in advance for help and explanation.Best regards,Kasia
I’d love to see Business Reporter be able handle the option to decide whether to include the hold table vouchers or stick with updated vouchers only.
Our entire business is set up as one inventory part set to Cost Per Configuration. Over the years, we now have 50,000+ configurations IDs on that one inventory part. How can I calculate and save standard cost? I know I can do it one-by-one using Interim Orders or Shop Orders, but I need a systemic solution for all 50,000. I’m looking for something similar to ‘All Parts Cost Calculation’. Any help would be appreciated!
Hi Community PO Authorizer gets the following message when trying to reject authorization. How to find the projection relevant ‘Reject Authorization Step’ popup screen in order to grant it to the necessary permission set? Thanks,Asela
Hello,Has anyone enabled Near-Zero Downtime in their IFS Cloud environments yet?We’re moving to 26R1 and have already uplifted our customizations to support the new framework. However, when we raised a case with IFS, we were informed that they’re currently unable to enable Near-Zero Downtime for us.I’d be interested to hear from anyone who has already enabled it:Have you experienced any issues so far? How long does a typical delivery take? What kind of downtime are you seeing in practice? Has anyone had a delivery where the application didn’t go down at all?Any real-world experience or lessons learned would be really helpful. IFS documentation mentions that Delivery Continuity is currently under controlled rollout, so I’m particularly interested in hearing from customers/partners who already have it enabled.
How to the Estimated Life of an object from 25Y to 10Y
Hi, I am trying to find a stock aging report for a customer that I am working with.Seems stock aging report does not come from the Native IFS. Thats what I saw in the community and I could not find anything similar in IFS.I think stock aging report is kind of a basic requirement for all manufacturing and retail customers.Can anyone of you all please share some insights if you made any report like that.Appreciate the help. ThanksChamath
Environment: IFS Apps 10Background We have a set of saved searches on Site on Purchase Requisition, that filter by site cluster, e.g.:contract IN (SELECT contract FROM &AO.site_cluster_node WHERE site_cluster_id = '<CLUSTER>')These saved searches are stored on a shared base profile that all user profiles inherit from. The business requirement isWhen a new Site is added to basic data (Site Cluster), a custom event should fire a custom PL/SQL block which builds the site-relevant saved-search condition and writes it as a new record into the base profile — so the new site automatically appears in everyone's saved searches without manual profile edits. What I've found so farSaved searches are stored in FNDRR_CLIENT_PROFILE_VALUE as a CLOB, but the PL/SQL condition is not stored as readable text — it's held in profile_binary_value as a serialized/encoded string. This query fetches the relevant records:SQL:SELECT Fndrr_Client_Profile_Api.Get_Owner(t.profile_id) PROFILE_ID, t.*
I’m trying to set up Segregation of Duties in Cloud. One of the things Finance wants controlled is who can add new Code Part Values. Read Only access is OK, but Full access should be controlled. There are no Projection Actions or Entity Actions associated with this projection.Is there a way to build this functional area such that Read Only access is ignored, but Full access is flagged?
Hello, I’m looking to set up VSCode IFS Developper Plugin but having some trobles. I have cloned the git repository threw copying the customer solution git link from the BuildPlace then in VSCode : The repo has correctly been imported IFS extension is working, the code generator target version is 25R2.4 and the Marble LSP server is working IFS File Explorer is detecting the repo : but when modifying a code and generating it i get the following error : === CODE GENERATION SUMMARY ===Generating code for PurchChgOrdLine-Cust.plsql----------------------------------------------------------Sending generateCode request to LSP server...ERROR: generateCode request failedError details: { "code": -32603, "data": "java.util.concurrent.CompletionException: java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke \"java.io.File.getParentFile()\" because the return value of \"java.io.File.getParentFile()\" is null\r\n\tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.wrapInCompletionException(Compl
We have a Code Part defined as a project code part - it is been suggested to repurpose it as a ‘normal’ code part. Obviously as it has been set up and active and used (sparingly) it is not letting me change it to ‘No Function.’I know using it as a normal code part will not be good - but would anyone be able to give me a list of limitations / issues we'll face? Thanks,MAtthew
I need to fetch the Calculated Revenue Recognized Accumulated value and display it at the Sub Project level. Is there any way to get the breakdown?
Hi Kindly propose Demand Time Fence and Planning Time Fence for below senarios, for the customer site and supplier sites seperately. Customer maintain a buffer stock to cover demand for 02 weeks Nom-stock item - no safety/buffer stocks Total supplier lead time - 74 days (time to complete production shop order 6 working days + Fixed production 12 days + transit lead time 56 days (calendar days).
Good afternoon!Guys, I need to use the functionality (Code Part Attibute Connection) does anyone have documentation or could explain the concept?
In IFS Cloud, the Build Place is used to build and create Delivery packages. As we continue using the Build Place for development and delivery activities, the source code and related tags are continuously updated and accumulated over time.I would like to know how we can reset or clear the existing Build Place and return it to a clean initial state, as if it had not previously been used and no delivery tags had been created.We would appreciate your guidance on the following options:1. Rebuild the Build Place using the Base Source CodeIs it possible to restore the Build Place to the initial state by importing/building the original Base Source Code again?If this is the recommended approach, we currently have multiple tags that have already been created for previous deliveries. In this case, how should we handle or remove these existing tags in order to return the Build Place to a clean state?2. Request IFS to create/reset a new Build PlaceAlternatively, is it possible to request IFS to cr
Hi,Anyone knows how to clear send error messages? This customer has been setup as internal customer to send e-invoices but company AS has a default Document Address with zip code and city. The vouchers of these invoices have already been posted to GL but still these errors do not clear.But error says:1) Company Document Address must have a value.2) Company Document Address Zip Code must have a value.3) Company Document Address City must have a value. Appreciate if anyone can advise? Thank you in advance!RegardsNimesh
Hi, I would like get some suggestions how to solve the following problem: In short:I want to convert an IFS generated PL/SQL defined complex type (record,array, etc) to JSON and back. The ’to’ direction is ok, IFS generated code does the job (a sample from Core): Example from Core - convert to JSON But I could not find a good way to do the opposite direction: JSON -> PL/SQL record type Context: We are upgrading a customer from App9 to Cloud.In App9 there were some webservices implemented in IFS.Some of their operations were too slow for online response, so the webservice just accepted the parameters in the request, returned a ’result id’ to the caller and started a background job to generate the results.The caller later periodically queried for the results (polling) with the ’result id’ and if the result was ready it was returned.The background job in App9 generated the result in XML format, saved it in a CLOB column in a result table from which it was returned to the caller later
We have the issue, that we use “Reserve an Bacflash” as settings for the issuing material from floor stock.Now we have connected the correct Locations to the Work Center and we produce normal.Operator has reserved 1 of the 2 reels, which are available on his floor stock. Now he has not so much qty on this reel to report the produced qty, but he has entered the fully produced qty. and the system has taken the difference from the unreserved material from his location. How we can fix this in the best way, that the system stopps and give a warning, you have not enough material reserved for this issuing.
Hello everyone, We’re running into occurrences where we make a minor change to a business report previously published in the database removes that report projection from all permission sets other than the permission set “BR_FULL_REPORT_ACCESS”. This is requiring permissions to be modified each version of the report to restore permissions back to where they were prior to unpublishing the active report. Is anyone else running into this issue? Would love to hear how others are managing permissions related to IFS Business Reporter around changes to existing reports. We’re working off the technical documentation here.
Hello,I have a requirement to print a barcode of type Code-128, and narrow bar width oof 0.025cm. Even though the barcode is printed, the scanners won’t pick the value properly. I have set the bar height as 0.4cm. This is to print maximum of 7 characters. This is to print serial number for parts that supposed to be sticker labels.Is there a limitation for this in IFS Report Designer?@ChanakaAmarasekara do you have any inputs on this?Thanks.
Hello community,I am here with a new issue. 😊In IFS Cloud, we can manually scan delivery notes.Now I want to automate this process using BPA Workflows.The first question is::Can we read or scan a PDF file with workflows? Thank you in advance.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.