IFS Solutions

Is IFS working on the new version 1.4 of the Norwegian SAF-T report required from Skatteetaten required from 01.01.2027? We need this for IFS APP10 update 27.

Hi, We are looking for IFS Cloud standard solutions for the below requirements. Appreciate your inputs.IFS Cloud 25R2 MRB Quantity update Once we create a MRB the system is not allowing to modify the Qty to Disposition, even the MRB is still in Planned state. We receive PO through multiple receipts but to a same Lot/Batch No. it is required to update the already opened MRB with new quantities. This is not possible at the moment When creating a MRB for Shop Order or PO Receipt is it possible to temporarily transfer these quantities to a different location (something like a quarantine location)? so once the MRB process is done the Qtys can be scrapped or re-transfer to the original location. (We are aware about the Available Control ID setup but that is usable only when creating MRBs from Inventories in stocks) Any possibility to apply the “Scrap Verification” feature in MRBs created for PO Receipts and Inventories (IPIS) ? So the scrapping is enforced in the Receipt or IPIS. Or may

Hi,In IFS 25R1 SU13, we are importing external supplier payment and if we have several invoices with the same invoice no, it does not match the correct invoice.How can a payment be matched to the correct invoice when there are several invoices with the same no?Has anybody in the community encountered this problem ?We have created a case with IFS and we are waiting for a response from R&D.Thanks and Regards,Anne-Sophie

A new version of Perfidia v4.50.229 has been released. The actual version can be downloaded here:https://www.perfidia.de/downloads/psa/psasetup.exePerfidia Forum can also be accessed with GuestAccess (Gastzugang)https://www.perfidia.de/Perfidia?action=forumAdd as many details as possible, by providing details you’ll make it easier for others to reply

I have a placed Barrier along the River Thames, this is journey times that under the HTM travel, wont cross the river. For the below example, it has added the additional travel between the start location and the first job, despite the actual route not crossing the barrierAny ideas how I can stop this happening?

Hi,We have fixed Time, Fixed resource tasks and then its assigned to the engineer. Next after few second its noted the job is uncomitted.These engineers do not use Mobile and there is no Commit rule or any at the moment. Why PSO uncommit these manually allocated jobs?Is there a way atleast we ca get a reason for this behavior? First CommittedThen PSO uncommit it again.   ThanksKM

We are still processing this information:  Please confirm that we understand correctly the changes related to the removal of the Allocate Resource Gantt and Resource Monitoring Gantt tasks: The functionalities in the task will be fully preserved - Resource Management > Resource Analysis > Resource Analysis The functionalities in the task will be fully preserved  - project Management>Plan and Execute > Project Gantt These tasks will be removed:  Maintenance > Work Management > Execution > Resource Monitoring Gantt Maintenance > Work Management > Preparation and Planning > Allocate Resource

Hi Everyone, Is anyone able to successfully work through the Supersede button in IFS cloud?I think the only way is to go to Purcahse Order handling projection and remove the supersede from the Entity action grants > In action remove the supersedebut it works for few users and for remaining few it doesnt.

Hello,I am working with Configure‑to‑Order (CTO) in IFS Cloud and I am trying to dynamically calculate the quantity of a by‑product in the shop order, based on the quantity of the main product.The number of by‑products should depend on the produced quantity of the main product.For example:Main product quantity By‑product quantity 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 2 6 2 7 3 8 3 9 3 10 3 This logic is implemented using a CTO Configuration Structure Rule, where: A configuration formula is used to set the Quantity per Assembly Test formula gives the expected (positive) result When I release the Customer Order (Supply Type = Shop Order), I get the following error message:“Calculation of quantity required for produced part <by‑product> has resulted in a negative value”What is confusing is:The formula result is positive The same approach works for normal components The issue only occurs when the component is a by‑product Is it supported in IFS Cloud CTO to use a Configu

The "DARP Summary for Work Order based Service capabilities" states that IFS is planning to deprecate the Work Order (WO) based Service Management processes and capabilities by November 2027.I would like to check if Service Contracts (Work Order based) exist. Could you please provide the SQL statement to extract the relevant entries?The version is IFS Cloud 24R1.

Large asset- and fleet-intensive organisations often operate the same type of assets across multiple sites and legal entities, while managing them through a common maintenance and fleet organisation. Today, FAM does not fully support this operating model, which makes it difficult to use FAM as an enterprise-wide solution for customers with complex organisational structures.FAM should support multiple companies and multiple sites within the same FAM implementation, aligned with the standard multi-company and multi-site capabilities available elsewhere in IFS Cloud.The capability should allow users to manage fleets/assets belonging to different companies and sites while maintaining the appropriate company/site ownership, financial context, security and user access. Users with the appropriate permissions should be able to work across those organisational boundaries without having to maintain separate FAM structures or duplicate configuration.This is particularly important for industries s

Hi!We’re trying to set up an object connection transformation to inventory part to the Shop Order Multilevel Repair Structure page. Our best guess would be to set upDocument Object Connection on LU ShopOrdUtil, view AS_BUILT_CONFIG_HEAD_SO or AS_BUILT_CONFIGURATION_SO.  Object Connection Transfer with InventoryPart as source and ShopOrdUtil as target.It is possible to set up, but the page shows no attachments at all. In fact, there is no paperclip symbol at all and no attachment panes, other than for the shop order at the very top. The rest of the page is connected to a tree. We’re guessing there is some limitation that makes the object connection transformation impossible to use here, or does someone know of a workaround?And, if you know it’s not possible, exactly why?

Hi Alldoes anyone know of a quicker way of entering analysis results on a control plan on Shop Order in cloud. Looks like the change from APPS10 is too laborious having to enter and confirm line by line, especially when several lines to complete.  I know you can filter to view by Data Type on the Analysis Results window, but looks like your unable to enter results on that page.If you were able to enter results here it speed up the process.   Thanks in advance for any help!

We are about to begin our implementation journey to IFS Cloud. Does anyone know where I can find IFS’ detailed documentation methodology (phases, detailed definitions...)?

Hello everyone!We are implementing email notifications and willing to have the precise Node (object, document, line...) hyperlink in the body of the email notification.Please advise if possible and how.We are using IFS APP 10 (UPD17).Manyu Thanks in advance

Hi,We have an existing IFS Cloud 25.1.5 Remote Deployment environment that was originally installed using the Quick Installation.We are enabling SMB File Storage for the first time by following the official documentation.Current situation:The environment is already running. The ifs-storage namespace already exists. The csi-smb-controller and csi-smb-node pods are already running. SMB File Storage has not been configured before. We have updated ifscloud-values.yaml with the required SMB configuration (ifsStorageSmbCredentials, ifsfilestorage.fssEnabled, fssSmbSharePath, etc.).My question is:After updating ifscloud-values.yaml, what is the supported procedure to apply these configuration changes to the existing environment?Is there an additional deployment or configuration update step required after modifying the file?Thanks!

My problem is similar to this one:Except that it happens when I try to created an Activity in the Project Navigator. If I try the steps described in the link above, it is still not working. I also tried these steps below - very similar - without success: I ran that query in Oracle SQL Developer to find the incorrect indexes and I have 3.select index_name,index_type,status,domidx_status,domidx_opstatus from user_indexes where index_type like '%DOMAIN%' and (domidx_status <> 'VALID' or domidx_opstatus <> 'VALID'); Following the two procedures above on all three incorrect indexes solved nothing. In the Search Domain page of an incorrect index, trying to drop that index displays that error:internal error code, arguments: [12806], [kkdcdtc: missing object], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []Failed executing statement (ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12806], [kkdcdtc: missing object], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []) After that, I am able to complete the st

 Hi all,My report LEFT JOINs proj_budget_control_rules to project, so projects with no budget rule at all still appear with combination_id null, and Get_Control_Total/Get_Consumed return 0 for them — same as a project with an actual $0 budget.Is there a clean way to tell "no budget rule exists" apart from "budget rule exists with $0 consumed"? E.g. filtering on NULL combination_id before calling the API, or a status field on proj_budget_control_rules I should be checking instead. I’ve also tried adding funds and it just wont update haha.Thanks!

Hi Community, Inventory Part in Stock Balance is Not Matching with Ageing Report with totals , any probable reasons ?  Thankss in advance 

We are receiving an unhandled security checkpoint error.  This is on attached approval processes when using an approval template. So in the example below, it is on an Inventory part.  It also happens on a Supplier for Purchase part as another example.  However, it does not happen for any of our document approvals within the document revision screen.  I did see another post that recommended going to system parameters and turning the Security checkpoint framework available off and then on again….but this did not correct our issue.  

Does self billing work with partial receipts or will the invoice generated just be equal to the original PO?

Hi,I'm trying to understand whether the following behavior is standard or not.Create an Inventory Part. Create two Inventory Control Plan Templates. Apply both templates to the Inventory Part. Create a Control Plan from the first template and activate it. Create another Control Plan from the second template and activate it for the same Inventory Part.Both Control Plans can be activated successfully. They are active for the same Inventory Part with the same phase-in and phase-out date range.Next, repeat the same process with a new Inventory PartCreate another Inventory Part. Create two Control Plans using the same Inventory Control Plan Templates. This time, select a Part Revision in the Control Plan header for both Control Plans. Activate the first Control Plan successfully. When attempting to activate the second Control Plan, the following error is displayedThe customer's requirement is to have multiple active Inventory Control Plans for the same Inventory Part that are valid for the

Following 25R2 New Feature - Service Campaign - trying to try the process in IFS Cloud 25R2.Created the Service Campaign using Campaign Type “Repair RMA” to replicate a real life example where a repair is required for a newly built items under warranty   Added 2 lines (as in 2 objects   button “Create All RMA’s” Pop-up suggests a background job is posted to create the RMA’sAnd it says there’s an Error:  “Repair RMA for Service Campaign Line 1 for Service Campaign RJ001 was not successfully created.ORA-20124: Error.NULLVALUE: Field [RETURN_REASON] is mandatory for Depot Rma Line and requires a value.” Observation: There is nowhere in the lines or in the header of the Service Campaign where the Return Reason can be input. There is no pop-up that allows it when Create RMA is used.Question: How is Service Campaign supposed to be progressed?

We have quite a few Purchase Orders that will have multiple receipts.We assign purchase order charges in the form of freight and fuel surcharges.Our issue is the PO may come in over several receipts.  The fuel surcharges may change by the time the final receipts are registered.However, if you update the charge price, it updates any receipts that have not been matched and closed.Is there a way to schedule purchase order charge changes so they do not update previous receipts.I.EReceipt 10/30 - Surcharge was 10%Receipt 11/10 - Surcharge was 11%.If receipt from 10/30 is still open and we update the surcharge to 11%, it updates the 10/30 receipt to 11% also.

Hello All, Is there a way to set up an RMA with a disposition step (inspection requirement) to mimic the purchase orders?