Finance (Financials)

APPS10 and going forward; who are the preferred payment processing partners for IFS? 

Hi All,  We have recently began having an issue when trying to process credit cards that they are being declined in IFS, however when processed directly in PayFlo Pro, they are approved and charged. We are not sure what could be causing this error. Has anyone experienced this before?   

Hi,where can I get the payment format fields mapping for BGFOR? Thanks   

I would like to create an invoice posting authorization rule for Person A and Person B.Person A - $1500 limitPerson B - No limitIf the invoice is under $1500, I only want it to go to Person A and ignore Person B.  If invoice is over $1500, I would like it authorized by both Person A and Person B.Cannot seem to get this to work as it is requiring both to authorize no matter the dollar amount.I have Person A set at a $1500 limit on the Authorizers page.  I have a Rule set for Seq 10 at Person A and Seq 20 as Person B.

Hi,i try to install the Supplier Invoice Workflow with posting proposal.The auto PO matching function isn’t working.Do anyone have a document how the process should work?Best regards,Claud

Hey peoples, I want to be able run reports via order report functionality and have the output in excel format rather than PDF. Is there anyway of doing this without having to use an excel plug in. We are using IFS AurenaI have tried changing the default layout type to excel reports in the report definition screen in EE but that didn’t workCheersGT

Hi there! We have a customer that has an account across two different companies (6201 & 6202). A payment was receipted to their 6202 account that was supposed to be for an invoice on their 6201 account.  Is there anyway within IFS to pick up the payment, now sitting as a CUPOA on 6202, and move it to their 6201 account? Appreciate your help! :) 

We have an SUPIA balance for a supplier in which half was matched on a supplier invoice.  The remaining credit is reflected on the Suppliers account.  When we go to apply the remaining amount, we receive a message saying the invoice is fully matched.  Steps taken:Created an advanced invoice connected to a payment schedule.Advanced invoice was paid.Applied 50% of the advanced invoice to the first payment.tried to apply the remaining 50% to the second invoice and receive the message.We have checked the Supplier analysis and it shows an available credit for the supplier. This is tied to a payment schedule and the payment schedule shows a fully matched.  Not sure where else to look.  we are on apps 9Any assistance would be appreciated. 

Hello,We created a PO from a WO to order services from the Supplier. We received the invoice and received the line and invoiced our client from the WO. Supplier has now sent us a credit. However, we cannot credit a negative amount in a PO. Any suggestions?Thanks!

Hello,we are new in iFS world so we would like to ask for help here. For Supplier Invoices we plan to use posting control M93 and control type C31 for automatic account number assignment. Everything is set-up and working properly but there not possibile to override assigned account if neccesary during Manual Invoice processing. "Override” selection doesn’t seems to allow that. Any sugestions how to achieve this except reopening and edditing of line of the PO? Thank you

We have found nothing in F1 Doc on how IFS customers should configure their current local DK business in regards to ISO2022 format that seems to be the current domestic payments / format according to an old Nordea pdf on the interwebs.  Are the DK supplier payment address configured as an IBAN address ? Or is trial and error the recommended  “moment of service” ?In addition we find no info on how IFS in regards to FI Kort payments vs domestic ISO20022 configuration for local IFS customers. The following link received no response from the by IFS promoted community:  

Hello all, I have a question related to Part Cost on an inactive part. I have a production part that was marked inactive two years ago. When this part is pulled into the Estimating module in IFS, the part cost calculated is different than that of the Part Cost screen in IFS for the PN. Given that it was marked inactive two years ago, would this be the reason that there is a difference in the costs? I have no found any documentation on how IFS behaves when part cost calculation is run against an inactive part. The estimate itself appears to be accurate, and Part Cost calculation has been run against the inactive part. Our labor class costs have changed since the part was marked inactive, and I am curious if there is some legacy cost values that would cause the difference?Any guidance would be greatly appreciated! 

I need instructions on how to do AR adjustments without going through mixed payments. I have invoices that were short paid or just bad invoices that need to be adjusted off, but not necessarily bad debt. Billing errors, etc.  

Error Message: Value is missing or has an invalid time interval for posting type PP38 control type AC7 code part A in company 6205We have an AC sitting on account that we are wanting to offset against an AD however are getting the above error message. We’ve also had the same error message come up when trying to receipt a payment against an invoice (same company number 6205 but different customer) Anyone know what we need to change?

I have accruals that I want to upload instead of manually enter. Can external vouchers auto-reverse? 

When we consolidate, a small balance remains on the parent’s account even if the subsidiary account balance is zero. This seems to be caused by the exchange rate and possibly the decimal places used. For example: Account 1456 in company CCIBU (base currency CAD) had a balance of CAD 2,001 at the end of Period 2. When this was consolidated to parent company CCICN (base currency USD) at the exchange rate of 1.239130, the balance in CCI is USD 1,564.01. In Period 3, this balance in CCIBU was cleared by a CAD (2,001) transaction, so at the end of Period 3 its balance is CAD 0.00 .  But when consolidated to CCICN at the exchange rate of 1.26465, IFS books USD (1,564.02) against the balance and USD 18.24 to a currency translation account. So in Period 3, there is a remaining balance of USD 1,564.01 - USD 1,564.02 = (0.01) . The balance should be zero instead.  So it seems like in the course of converting amounts when consolidating, IFS is mis

Hello @ allThis post proposes 2 ideas on supplier invoice workflow in Finance.IDEA 1 - Ability to define in the Authorize assigning rule that the project manager be included in the supplier invoice workflow without having to add them to an approver group (to difficult to handle).The principle is quite similar to the option: Invoice recipient as Acknoledger/Authorizer.IDEA 2 - It is possible to select, in the accounting code part, the project's dimension, and adding a project list, for an authorizer assigning rule.Like idea 1, the principle would be to include the project manager of the selected project(s) in the project's dimension, in the invoice workflow process.Thanks 

Dear All,Appreciate it if anyone could explain the ‘Customer check’ external file upload template. i.e. which records are needed to upload as per the template? 

Hi,Could you please share a standard documentation which outlines the requirements for Mexican localization of the IFS Cloud version for Finance product? Thanks in advance!Best Regards,Yoshini

What is the best way to match a PO receipt with a return when there is not invoice.  Currently we are entering a penny invoice, match the receipts and returns, code the penny to PPV and then have to do a Supplier offset to write off the invoice.   There must be an easier way.

 Hi,Does someone know what should be configured to Send Self-Billing Invoice that this function be enabled? 

Hello, Whenever my customer receives a supplier invoice, before registering, she checks that the unit price on the purchase order is the same as invoice; if not the case, then they reopen the article line on PO to change price and close it again so that the right price gets mapped on the invoice. She prefers to proceed in this way rather than registering price difference on invoice. But when the arrival of PO was registered, it has been done with the initial price of PO (and not the updated one), so the inventory transaction showing a debit of M1 and credit of M10 are created with initial price and then transferred to accounting/ finance with a daily task; their status is “transferred”, code 3.How can i proceed with an update of these transactions on ARRIVAL event (M1 and M10) after having changed the price on PO line, so that finance gets updated too? Thank youTanya

Hi When you have created a new Record in the form ‘Periodical capitalization and Revenue Recognition Project’, all relevant projects will be fetched at that time and it’s not possible to add new records afterwards as far as I can see? This is a problem because if a new project comes in late then you need to roll everything back, remove the record, re-create it and re-do all the capitalisation and revenue recognition all over again. Is there any way to add newly approved project once you’ve started?   

Hello, I have made an advance invoice for customer order and the advance is paid. When I try to make the final invoice for the order, I get this error message.We are running IFS APP 10 UPD 8. I read from another case “Error message during printing an instant invoice”, which also had something to do with advance invoice, that there might be a bug in UPD8 (151458). Is this a totally different case? Any solution? 

In June 2021 our UK plant switched from the BACS system to CHAPS.Prior to the switch the UK would upload details of their supplier payment runs to the bank via a file upload.Since the switch they have not been able to do so - no file being created to upload to the bankWe were advised that there was no difference between the two systems and that the setup currently in place for Payment Format BACS and Payment Method BACS OUT should remain in place for suppliers being paid through BACS and that processing would continue as normal.  This is not the case as this has become a manual effort in terms of sending the pay