Recently active topics

How can I subscribe to the Customer Office Newsletter?

You are not allowed to enter Project Time/Cost Reporting for Employee on project activity of company IFS CloudSupervisor (company A) is reporting time for an employee (company B) . both have project access and are team members for the project Supervisor receives error when saving time registrationYou are not allowed to enter Project Time/Cost Reporting for Employee on project activity of company IFS Cloud

Hi All,Last year there was mention that Android 16 was NOT certified to run Astea Mobile.Is there any update as to when it will be certified to run on Android 16??We have contractors buying new phones and then finding that they cannot use Astea Mobile on it, as it comes up with a message saying that the app was designed  for an older version of android. Cheersmark.

Is it possible to grant access to develop and view quick reports only, without granting the FND_ADMIN permission set?There is a standard permission set called FND_QUICK_REPORTS. If i grant only this to a user, i do not get access to the quick reports. How can we grant access to a user to use quick reports, without granting access to FND_ADMIN

All, can anyone tell me why this PM Action is not generating a maintenance plan even when I manually click generate plan. The user needs to see these dates in a plan for our auditors.PM Action is activePM Action is set to generatablePM Action is connected to Calendar 01-MAINTMaintenance Trigger is set to following:Start Unit - DayStart Date - 23/09/2028Interval unit - YearInterval - 2Current limit of plan is 203101-Maint Calendar is generated and end date is 31/12/2031 

Version 24.1.22 I saw an older post asking if there was a way to connect multiple documents to an object, which was eventually implemented as a feature.  I was curious if there was a similar feature that allowed users to connect multiple Objects, like Inventory Parts, to a Change Request. If so, was this also implemented in 24R2, or a later version?

Dear community,Is there a possibility to share the supplier evaluation results with the evaluated supplier ? Or any possibilities we can achieve this ?Thank you

Hican someone let me know when UPD31 will be released for app10 please? thanksGary 

Hi there.I enter a supplier code in Create Order Proposal (in this case supplier 10071)......then press finish. The results I get do thou include parts parts not from this supplier.Part 11318 has Primary supplier 10533.Part 11993 has no primary supplier.Do you have any ideas why I get results from other suppliers?

Hi,We are currently testing site-to-site shipments in IFS Cloud 26R1.We would like to confirm the standard behavior regarding Handling Units during Incoming Dispatch Advice receipt. Current scenario:Goods are shipped from Site A with Handling Units. An Incoming Dispatch Advice is created on Site B. Receipt is performed from Incoming Dispatch Advice Lines. The inventory is received together with the original Handling Unit structure and Handling Unit IDs from Site A.Based on our testing, the receiving site inherits the same Handling Unit IDs that were created on the shipping site.We would like to confirm whether this behavior is standard by design. In addition, we would like to know the following:Is inheriting the original Handling Unit IDs during Incoming Dispatch Advice receipt the standard behavior in IFS Cloud? Is there any standard functionality, parameter, receive case, or configuration that allows receipt without retaining the original Handling Unit IDs? Is there any option such a

How to enable turn on 

Hello ,As part of the France e-invoicing requirements, invoices may be received with the Billing Framework (BT-23) set to one of the following values:B2 – Goods Invoice Already Paid S2 – Services Invoice Already Paid M2 – Mixed Invoice Already PaidWhen any of these values are used for BT-23, the PrepaidAmount must be equal to the total invoice amount, and the Open Amount on the invoice in IFS should be 0, based on the following requirements:BT-112 (Invoice Total Amount Including VAT) = Total Invoice Amount (TaxInclusiveAmount) BT-113 (Amount Already Paid) = Total Invoice Amount (PrepaidAmount) BT-115 (Net Amount Due) = 0 (PayableAmount)Currently, when the Billing Framework is received as B2, S2, or M2, the PrepaidAmount tag is populated with the invoice amount. However, during processing in IFS External Supplier Invoices, invoice validation fails with the error:"Net amount is not equal to the installment open amount."As a result, invoices that have already been paid cannot be successfu

Hello Everyone,We have identified a potential issue with generation for Project e-invoices.According to Polish VAT/KSeF requirements, the exchange rate reported in the XML should be the VAT Exchange Rate (stored as Tax Currency Rate in IFS). However, the current XML generation process appears to populate the Currency Rate from the invoice rather than the Tax Currency Rate.Observed Behavior:XML generated for Project Invoices contains the standard Currency Rate. The Tax Currency Rate is available in IFS but is not being used in the XML. This may result in KSeF submissions that do not align with Polish VAT reporting requirements.Expected Behavior:The KSeF XML should report the Tax Currency Rate (VAT Exchange Rate) instead of the standard Currency Rate.Has anyone encountered a similar situation when generating KSeF XML for Project Invoices? If so:Is the current behavior expected? Are there any known fixes, localizations, or configuration settings available? Has anyone implemented a workaro

Hello Everyone,We're experiencing an issue related to split payments and recalculation for supplier e-invoice creationWhen a split payment is created manually and a recalculation is subsequently triggered, the system automatically overrides the manually defined payment terms. As a result, the invoice due dates are recalculated and no longer align with the expected payment terms from either the supplier master data or the purchase order.Has anyone encountered a similar scenario? Is this the expected system behavior, or could it be a product limitation/defect?We would appreciate insights on:How other customers are handling split payments in such cases. Any recommended configuration or workaround. Whether there are known fixes or best practices to prevent payment terms from being overwritten during recalculation.Thank you in advance for your feedback and experiences.

I’ve done the training where I built and configured a page through IFS Developer Studio. I’ve also done another training where I’ve built and configured a page through the Page Configuration and Page Designer option in the client. I am trying to understand the differences between the two:Which approach would be the best when building or editing a page? For example, is there a common scenario where I should be choosing to edit/build a page through IFS Developer Studio rather than doing it through Page Configuration/Page Designer? When I edit or build the page through Page Configuration or Page Designer and publish it, will the change reflect in my customer solution repository? (I am trying to understand how editing in the client affects my customer solution repository on editing screens) I’ve been told that there is a way to hide and show fields based on a value of a field on the page - I can’t seem to find documentation on this sort of customization, is there one out there?Any help wou

Hello,We have identified a scenario related to supplier invoices created through the E-Invoicing process.When an invoice is created from an external supplier invoice for e-invoicing, there is currently no possibility to enter or maintain the Payment Method and Payment Address on the resulting invoice.In addition, we have observed that one-time supplier information entered during the e-invoicing process is not carried over to the corresponding Manual Supplier Invoice created in the system.As a result:One-time supplier details entered in the incoming supplier invoice are not populated in the Manual Supplier Invoice. The one-time payment information is not reflected in the Installment Plan or Discount information. There is no option to enter or update the Payment Method and Payment Address after the invoice is created.This creates a business issue as the supplier invoice cannot be processed for payment using the required payment details.Do we have any experience with other customers proce

Does anyone transmit the 753 EDI document - Ready to Ship out of IFS?  If so - how are you setting it up and triggering the generation?

Hello,As per France e-invoicing requirements, a credit invoice must include a reference to the original invoice being credited.For project-related customer orders, creating a credit invoice directly from the original invoice correctly populates the original invoice reference and updates the Actual Revenue on the project. However, this approach does not impact the Planned Revenue.As the system does not allow the creation of customer order lines with negative quantities or amounts, the current process is to create a charge with a negative amount and associate it with a project-linked order line having a zero amount. This allows the Planned Revenue on the project to be adjusted correctly.When a credit invoice is generated using this approach, the credit invoice does not automatically retrieve the reference to the original invoice being credited. In addition, there is currently available field which is not getting updated automatically or fields are not non editable for manual action.From

Hello,As part of France e-invoicing requirements, a credit invoice must contain a reference to the original invoice being credited.We have identified a scenario with AFP-based invoicing (Sales Contract) where the original invoice reference is not always carried over to the generated credit invoice.Project invoices created from AFPs are based on the certified values entered in the AFP. We have observed that when a credit invoice is created directly against the most recent AFP invoice, the original invoice reference is correctly populated on the credit invoice.However, if a line has already been invoiced through a previous AFP and a new AFP is later created to generate a credit invoice for that same line, the generated credit invoice does not retrieve the reference of the original invoice being credited.Additionally, we could not find any field or functionality that allows users to manually enter or update the original invoice reference on the credit invoice.From a France e-invoicing com

Hello, As part of the France e-invoicing requirements, when payment has already been received and the invoice is issued subsequently, the Billing Framework (BT-23) must be set to one of the following values: B2 – Goods Invoice Already Paid S2 – Services Invoice Already Paid M2 – Mixed Invoice Already Paid  When any of these values are used for BT-23, the PrepaidAmount must be equal to the total invoice amount. Consequently: BT-112 (Invoice Total Amount Including VAT) = Total Invoice Amount BT-113 (Amount Already Paid) = Total Invoice Amount BT-115 (Net Amount Due) = 0  Currently, when the Billing Framework is set to B2, S2, or M2, the PrepaidAmount tag is not populated and is transmitted as empty in the generated invoice XML.As a result, the invoice validation fails and the document is rejected by “e-invoice solution platform” with the following validation rule:If the billing framework (BT-23) is B2, S2, or M2, then the amount already paid (BT-113) must be equal to the total amount inc

Hello,The Lifecycle Status field is expected to display value in the format <Status Code>-<Status Code Description>, while any additional comments should be captured separately in the Lifecycle Comment field.However, the current behavior is different. The status code is not displayed, and the Lifecycle Status field instead shows <Status Code Description>-<Comments>.For example, the current output is:Lifecycle Status: Accepted - TEST CommentThe expected output is:Lifecycle Status: 205-AcceptedLifecycle Comment: TEST CommentThis behavior is observed for all invoice types, including Instant Invoice, Project Invoice, and Customer Order Invoice on IFS Cloud 25.2.5.The current behavior does not align with the intended functionality of the Lifecycle Status field, as the status code is not displayed and comments are merged into the status value instead of being stored in the dedicated Lifecycle Comment field. Any insights, recommendations, or experiences from clients wh

An IT department representative from one of our IFS Cloud-implementing customers is interested in Maintenance Planning and Scheduling (MPS). They are aware that MPS is the successor to the Maintenance Planning Board (MPB). Does anyone know of any good resources to explain MPS to this person?

Is there a workaround for if a release update completely breaks page designer on specific pages? Most pages I can go in and rebase no problem, but some will not load at all, returning an error. The error only lets you reload the page or go home. The only way I’ve found to deal with this is to delete all customizations and add them back manually. This gets very very time consuming for pages with a lot of customizations. Hoping there is something that can be done to get around this.

Hello community, We are in IFS Cloud 24R2 and  we would like to upgrade to 25r2 Su9. I have a problem this yhe adjusted demand in forecast demand.The quantity in “adjusted demand” is changed by a process. I can't figure out why this happens or how to prevent it.I get the impression that these changes are related to the qualification task. Thanks for your help.

Given this code       select sys_connect_by_path(n.label, '>') "NAVIGATOR PATH",       level "LEVEL",       upper(n.entry_type) "TYPE",       g.role,       n.projection       from   fnd_navigator_all n       left join fnd_projection_grant g       on n.projection=g.projection       where n.projection like nvl('&Projection','%')       and g.role like upper(nvl('&Role','%'))       connect by prior n.id = n.parent_id      start with n.parent_id = 0      order siblings by n.sort_orderHow would I show the Access Level of each projection.Not really finding this as a selectable field on any view...