Solved

Hi all, Can someone tell me what the ‘Remaining Planned Hours’ in Project Resource Planning is? My expectation is that the remaining planned hours = Planned Hours -/- Employee Allocated Hours. So far it looks like it is the same as Planned Hours. Thanks, Robert

Hi, If I’m not mistaken, pPreviously PSO was only installed on premise. Is it possible to install PSO in SaaS, the hosting should manager by the current hosting provider of the customer (not in IFS Cloud)The installation is stand alone, not with IFS cloud. Thanks and Regards

To plan and schedule work tasks from a work order on Dispatch Console, I’m trying to get the scheduling dataset up and running. However, I’ve been unable to connect the Maintenance Organization Site to the Scheduling Dataset. Individually, I can see the options in the dropdown for both, but when I select a value for either the Maintenance Organization Site or the Scheduling Dataset, the other option disappears. Could I be missing a data setup that enables the connection between the Maintenance Organization Site and the Scheduling Dataset? Thank you

In EAM Solution for IFS Cloud 24R2, one of our customer is looking for Multi Company Work Order Execution Solution. Work order will be created in company A and work task will be created under same or different company site combination. Financials will on the individual task site and their posting control set ups based on site. Below is how requirement looks like - Work Order No: 55 Company A - Site A1 Work Task No: 122 Company A - Site A1 Resources - Person, Material and Tools @ Site A1 will be used Work Task No: 123 Company A - Site A2 Resources - Person, Material and Tools @ Site A2 will be used Work Task No: 124 Company B - Site B2 Resources - Person, Material and Tools @ Site B2 will be used Thanks in advance for your reply.

I was wondering if anyone in this community is informed about the IFS vision for the roadmap regarding the old Silverlight interface of PSO? My best guess is that it will completly disappear, because Microsoft no longer supports Silverlight. If thats the case, then I wonder what will happen with the Automatic Planning feature which the Silverlight client has but the new UI does not have. At least not yet. Is it also coming to the new UI of PSO? The features ‘Rules’ and ‘Rule Collections’ are allready available in the new UI, which were constraints for the Automatic Planning feature. However in the last Relase Enhancements document, it is said that for example the 'Requirements’ feature will not be implemented in the new UI, which could also be defined as contraints for the Automatic Planning feature. So this suggest that Automatic Planning might not come back to the new UI. Is that the case? The Automatic Planning feature looks quit valuable for the overal solution. Also I actually do

Can someone help me to understand where decode value is actually being stored? Let’s use the following function as example: When we pass the value to Decode function. for example ‘N’, then the fuction return ‘Not Cyclic Counting’ Inventory_Part_Count_Type_API.Decode(cycle_code) cycle_code I found that this function called Domain_SYS.Decode_(Domain_SYS.Get_Translated_Values(lu_name_), Get_Db_Values___, db_value_); FUNCTION Decode ( db_value_ IN VARCHAR2 ) RETURN VARCHAR2IS FUNCTION Base ( db_value_ IN VARCHAR2 ) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS BEGIN RETURN Domain_SYS.Decode_(Domain_SYS.Get_Translated_Values(lu_name_), Get_Db_Values___, db_value_); END Base; BEGIN RETURN Base(db_value_);END Decode; As i further dig into it, it called Domain_SYS.Get_Translated_Values: FUNCTION Get_Translated_Values ( domain_ IN VARCHAR2, lang_code_ IN VARCHAR2 DEFAULT Fnd_Session_API.Get_Language) RETURN VARCHAR2ISBEGIN RETURN(coalesce(Get_Ctx_Values___(domain_, lang_code_), Get_Client_Values___(domain_)));END Get_Tra

Where in IFS would I go to modify how shop orders get released so that I can force a “Customer Owned” Ownership on certain parts? Is this even possible? We have an issue where when the shop order gets released the parts from below get wrongly marked as Company Owned and they need to be manually changed to Customer Owned.

Hi All, For IFS Cloud Remote installations (specially air gapped) from which version onwards does IFS Installer support OCI repositories for Helm Charts?

Question to the configuration and framework gurus: Is it possible to configure hierarchical LoVs using custom fields? We often see this use case in failure trees, where up to 5 fields are populated to categorize a problem (and potentially present suggested solutions). For example, in Field1 you can choose 1, 2, 3. When you select 1, Field2 offers 1.1, 1.2, 1.3. When you select 1.3, Field3 offers 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 1.3.3, etc. You get the idea. 😁 In Structured Failure Management we have a 3-level tree, so somehow it seems to be possible, but ideally I’m looking for a solution that works in Page Designer. Appreciate your help.

Hi all, Some say the first day of the week is Sunday (Mainly in US & Canada), other say the first day of the week is Monday So how is it defined in IFS, what the #First Day of Next Week# is?

Each time we register arrivals, we need to copy PO number and paste it in register arrivals search. It is inefficient and time consuming. Is there a way to directly move to the relevnat record in register arrivals from PO?

Version : 23.1.4 External file template STDFRBNKSTAT is used to import standard external CFONB file (file template issued by French banking society) External File Template​​​​ A dedicated external file template STATFRANCE has been created by copying standard template STDFRBNKSTAT Banking file import has been done based on STDFRBNKSTAT template External File Transactions However lines starting with 04 have not been imported Error statement ‘Unpack error’ : “Format de valeur ou symbole décimal non valide dans le fichier chargé.” Meaning format not appropriate Possible root cause: Standard banking file incorporate alphanumeric values in amounts (eg E on below screenshot). These values are used to determine signs and others information. Below matrix to interprete these values I need some assistance to resolve this issue.

Hi All, I added a persistent custom field to the entity CroHead as follows. And then added it to ‘Component Repair Order’ page with below LOV filter. But this does not filter ‘Cf Crm Contact’ using ‘Customer ID’ value. It’s ‘1000’ here. But it filters correctly if I change the filter as follows. Is there a way to get this filtered dynamically using the ‘Customer’ value? I went through previous community posts and F1 documentation as well but could not find a solution. It seems syntax has been changed in new cloud versions. I checked with below syntax but still no luck. contains(Cf_DisplayText, '$CUSTOMER_ID')contains(Cf_DisplayText, '$[Customer_Id]')contains(Cf_DisplayText, '$[CUSTOMER_ID]')contains(Cf_DisplayText, '$[CustomerId]') Thanks & Best Regards, Randini

Hi, I want to create a new external file type, but I can , there is no action avalaible on the page, is it possible? Thanks

Hi, In the sale quotation, there is a State field and a Status field. The State field corresponds to CLOSED_STATUS/CLOSED_STATUS_DB in the database.accepted values : won / lost / no decision / null I can't find the Status information in the database, and I need it for data migration. Does anyone have any information on this subject?

Hello, I am trying to amend the description of a GL code via code part values. I can amend it and then save it however no-one else can see the change when they run a GL download - it still shows the old description. Am I missing a step somewhere? Thanks

Hello everyone In my organization, work orders will be used by many groups. Is it possible to restrict access to work orders? I would like everyone to be able to see only their own work orders.

Helllo, I am trying to sum all the raw(purchased) material (MATERIAL1, MATERIAL2) for my product. (According to qty_per_assembly) I just generated simple structure of L1 product. It looks like this: What i need to do is to sum the MATERIAL1 and MATERIAL2: MATERIAL1 (8,25kg) goes to part_no L4.1 (1 pcs) and component L4.1 (1 pcs) goes to part_no L3 (16 pcs) that means: 8,25 * 1 * 16 * 1 = 132 kg (level4 * level3 * level2 * level1) MATERIAL2 (0,75kg) goes to part_no L4.2 (2 pcs) and component L4.1 (1 pcs) goes to part_no L3 (16 pcs) that means: 0,75 * 2 * 16 * 1 = 24 kg (level4 * level3 * level2 * level1) How to do it in oracle? Thank in advance. MANUF_STRUCTURE view - basic with data as ( select 'L1' as part_no, 0 as eng_chg_level, '' as alternative_no, 'L2' as component_part, 1 as qty_per_assembly, 'PCS' as print_unit from dual union all select 'L2' as part_no, 0 as eng_chg_level, '' as alternative_no, 'L3' as component_part, 16 as qty_per_assembly, 'PCS' as print_unit from dual union

We are currently in the process to drive different eforms being presented to technicians based on specific criteria. All of these workfows are “Work Task” configuration type. This is currently working as intended. However, we have come up with certain scenarios that require some items be mandatory that cannot be properly made mandatory utilizing current system capabilities. Workflow Configuration: We tried to trigger a survey for a specific work task (with Work Stage ID "H-2"), see the workflow configuration in the attached screenshot. However, we tested this and the outcome is that for all the work tasks created from the work task template, the survey was triggered (instead of only 1 with work stage id "H-2").

One of our customers upgraded to 24R2 recently. The release upgrade started on 1/22/2025 and build place was updated on 3/7/2025. Now, in their Build place (DEV) environment, the application version and framework version are different. However, in the relevant TEST (useplace) environment both application and framework versions are the same. Could you please clarify, How something like this could have happened What is the impact this will have on future deliveries/fixes. What can be done to get the useplace and prod environments to the same framework version as dev.

We are looking to upgrade to Cloud from Apps 10 in the near future. Is it possible to search the content within documents in Cloud (24R2 or greater)?

Community, Anyone has experience below error? We are investigating how to use S&OP planning, when we start creating a new S&OP, this error prompts. we have fixed the inventory static period issue in Statistic Periods window. Thank you.

Hello, I’m preparing a CREATE_TABLE_FROM_FILE migration job to upload data in EMPLOYEE_ACCESS_SUP. Looking at the proposed File Mapping, I was surprised by the column list which is pre-set : SUPERVISOR_BU_TYPE_DBVALID_FROMVALID_TOTRANS_FROMTRANS_TOGENERAL_ACCESSORG_CODERELATION_IDINCLUDE_SUB When I try the SQL command : select * from EMPLOYEE_ACCESS_SUP I get a list of columns that makes much more sens, 28 columns, such as : Org Bu IdSupervisor Person IdSupervisor Company IdSupervisor Emp NoSupervisor Bu Type DbSupervisor Bu TypeEmp Company IdEmp NoEmp Bu IdEmp Pos CodeAccess RoleValid FromValid ToTrans FromTrans ToGeneral AccessOrg Bu TypeOrg CodeEmployee GroupPerson GroupRelation IdSupervisor Relation IdSupervisor Pos CodeStructure IdStructure TypeOrig Bu IdInclude SubOrganization Assignment Why such a difference ?Should I manually add every missing row in the mapping ? Thank you for your help

Over the last few days we have to got complains from several technicians saying, the MWO App is Offline time to time. They face this issue when trying to sync the application. In the Sync Monitor it says offline. According to them it comes back online after a while. I have checked the device logs and noticed below errors during this time E 3/11/2025 10:40:05 AM <Ifs.Cloud.Client.Exceptions.CloudException><Message>Server is not reachable</Message><System.Net.Http.HttpRequestException><Message>The SSL connection could not be established, see inner exception.</Message><System.IO.IOException><Message>Unable to read data from the transport connection: Network subsystem is down.</Message><System.Net.Sockets.SocketException><Message>Network subsystem is down</Message></System.Net.Sockets.SocketException></System.IO.IOException></System.Net.Http.HttpRequestException></Ifs.Cloud.Client.Exceptions.CloudException> E 3/11/2025 10:40:06 AM <Ifs.Cloud.Client.Exceptions.CloudException><Message>Server

Hi, When we try to access the Warehouse mobile app (http://localhost/AsteaMobileEdgeServices/), we have an error. We have installed the Evaluation Licences, but still have the following error message : In the Licence Module, I can see clearly we have 2 licences, and 0 used : What can be wrong ? Thanks