Assets (Asset Management)

When creating a new fault report as an field technician,  it is possible to add media and/or document pictures to the fault report. Even from offline status.  This is one of the most important function when reporting a fault report. However this will not sync to ifs cloud, and just gives errors  “Illegal number value (−1) for attribute ACTIVE_SEPARATE.WO_NO” Tried to add picture as a document for a workaround, but same problem. I have found earlier post of the problem in the forum, but no solutions. Seems to me that the procedure for Media/document attachment dont wait for return of created values for WO/WO Task, so tem ID = -1. Anyone have som insight to this? I have found that the service app, kan do thi

When you activated Supplier Warranty on the Work Order before you book cost (time,material) on the Work Task the additional Sales Lines will be created and works fine.But when you want activated the Supplier Warranty, later into the proces when already cost are booked like time & material, there will be No additional Sales Lines created.Is there a possibilty to add Supplier Warranty when the Work Order/Work Task is on the status Work Done and aslo create the additional Sales Lines on IFS Cloud 24.2.3

According to earlier topic: Attach media file when creating fault report | IFS Community We are mainly using the wizard “New fault report” for regestring new work orders. Often we have a need to attach a picture to the fault report. But it is not possible to do it in the wizard. So today the user has to first create the fault report and later go to prepare work order and attach the picture.  I suggest these wizards to be configurable in a way there it would be possible to add elements for file/media attachments. If not, these elements  should be included in the standard wizard?

Product & VersionProduct Area: IFS Cloud – MRO & Fleet Operations Functional Areas: Serialized Configuration Modification Program Template Parts / Template Alternatives Complex Assembly MRO Test Environment: Regional Test (LKP 25.2.4)Problem SummaryWhile executing a modification flow involving Template Alternatives and MRO Interim Orders, users may encounter unexpected serial structure inconsistencies if the parameter “Configured In Separate Template” is not set correctly.Although the issue can be resolved by setting Configured In Separate Template = Yes, the system currently does not provide any validation, warning, or error message during the Final Conformance Check to guide users.This makes the behavior non‑intuitive and difficult to diagnose.Observed BehaviorModification flows complete without any system validation. Serial str

Hello All, We are having an issue with IFS objects and GIS connections. Hoping for a resolution.We have one base layer and one feature layer, and they have been added to a layer group and we can see the objects using the GIS MAP page. We want to see the “object” from the Functional Objects page, and we have followed the documentation ( Page name = Functional Object;  Label = View Map ; Page = page/GISMapClient/MapPage; NavigateFilter = { LuName = 'EquipmentFunctional', KeyRef = $[KeyRef]}                        KeyRef did not work well - so we tried using MchCode as well.                                                     With MChCode, the link has the correct object id (25057)        {page/GisMapClient/MapPage;$filter=LuName%20eq%20'EquipmentFunctional'%20and%20KeyRef%20eq%20'25057';path=0.1632440489.1043127562.1054673758}. The GIS map opens but it does not filter/highlight the object that we want to vie

Dear All,For one of the customer we are using the EAM functionality where we are trying to executed Multicompany time reporting scenario on Work Task. There is also usage of travel resource group on the resource.Without creating employee in the secondary companies and utilizing primary company employee id in the ‘Active Secondment Employee ID’ field on resource will pick work task resource group and set the cost to Zero. In this case application will not consider the travel resource group.If employee id is created in the secondary companies, the application will pick up the travel resource group for travel part and work task resource group for second time report record. Which is correct. This was tested from IFS cloud without use of MWo. Version details are below - Application service update: 25.1.8Framework service update: 25.1.10IFS Cloud Web version: 25.1.10.20260305022227.0IFS Client Services version: 25.1.10.20260305022228.0

The customer has been upgraded to version 25R1 and observed that several triggers in the Scheduling Optimization Triggers window are currently in a disabled state.In the core application, these triggers are available starting from version 24R1 and are also delivered in a disabled state.The customer’s concern is whether these triggers should remain as they are or if they need to be manually enabled.Additionally, they would like to understand if there is any impact in keeping these triggers disabled.Any information will be greatly appreciated.   Thank you,Madushani 

We are still processing this information:  Please confirm that we understand correctly the changes related to the removal of the Allocate Resource Gantt and Resource Monitoring Gantt tasks: The functionalities in the task will be fully preserved - Resource Management > Resource Analysis > Resource Analysis The functionalities in the task will be fully preserved  - project Management>Plan and Execute > Project Gantt These tasks will be removed:  Maintenance > Work Management > Execution > Resource Monitoring Gantt Maintenance > Work Management > Preparation and Plann

What are the consequences or risks if we hide certain field views from the global context via visible checkbox? Is that recommended way or do you have a better suggestion?We would like to hide certain fields from view so that page visitors do not see all the content on the page. 

We are in IFS Version 10We have user’s that are receiving shipped parts in the field.  We would like an Aurena screen that the user can go to a scan a barcode to look up the part and mark it received.Can this be done on an Aurena screen?Can we use the Scan It application via web browser in chrome or edge? 

Hello Everybody,have anybody tried to setup the FASN up to comply with ISO 14224 ??? we have made our own solution in IFS8 but enabled the Item class etc in IFS 10 for setting this up in accordance with IFS, but doesnt really seem to be able to make the ISO 14224 “Multilevel” reporting … ??

Hi All, I am trying to setup the "Enable Navigation from IFS to GIS Map" for Functional Objects but am having little joy. I have setup the button to the best of my abilities as per this document About GIS Map (ifs.com) However the instructions are not correct for NavigateFilter. I have used the tool to add the filter "LuName eq 'EquipmentFunctional', KeyRef eq $[KeyRef]" but when I click on the View M

Hi,Could you share a PowerShell script to adapt the following scenario:ITOM performs discovery/inventoryDetects: “machine without software X”Validates rule (compliance/baseline)Triggers automatic eventAssyst opens ticket automaticallyWorkflow executes:calls deployment tool (e.g., Intune)or automated scriptInstallation occursTicket is updated or closed automatically

Commonly known rules in PM actions are “If the actual object does not exist, and the task is connected to a PM Group, pre posting values are copied from the PM Group (if they exist). So, if an object exists the pre posting is taken from there.”In our case:Customer is using IFS version 24.2.10. They have code string B = Cost center and code string F = Object in Code Patr Info in Functional object.When calendar generating PM action, Work Task gets both code strings to the Work Task as Pre posting from Functional object. As it should.But if they have PM actions with PM Group (without Merge), work tasks Pre postings get only code string B = Cost center in calendar generation with PM group.So, it seems that other than code string F is not coming from Functional object to Work task, if PM action has PM group and it is used in calendar generation. If work order is generated direct from the Maintenance plan line (from one of the pm actions with grou

Hello,maybe someone can clarify for what purpose the tab “Work Orders” is needed in the form “Isolation Order”?Work orders there are attached only manually. If Work Order is connected to Isolation Order via Permit, the information of such Work Order doesn’t appear in this tab. Such connection is seen only in the form “Work Orders, Permits and Isolation Orders”, but not on Isolation Order.So I do not understand for what purpose this tab is needed in Isolation Order. Connections of Isolation Order and Work Orders that are made in this tab doesn’t apply any rules for Isolation Order and Work Orders dates too.

Hi All,We are using IFS MWo Maintenance app (and not the classic app) for one of the customer. We have created a custom field for barcode on IFS Cloud as well as on MWo app. Each functional object has a unique barcode associated with it. On the MWo app the barcode field is available on work task overview once we click on the ‘My Work’ tile. The customer we are implementing is into service industry where technician will visit their customer premises and will first scan the barcode affixed on the asset in MWo to filter out the work tasks associated with that specific asset.Our observation is that on the search functionality @ records in ‘My Work’ tile on the app version 26.4.3723.0 available on IOS app store has scanner icon, where as app version 26.4.3728.0 on android app store doesn't. Due to this we cant scan the barcode on the android device.Please advice is there is fix or app configuration for latest version 26.4.3728.0 on android as

Hi, I saw a new enhancement in the 25R1 release document regarding connecting work tasks to project activities rather than at work order level. However, I have tested this out and it does not appear in the work task screen. Have I missed anything? Thanks,George.

Hello,Currently, none of our Android users are able to utilize the IFS Trip Tracker application on their mobile devices. We would like to understand whether this is a known issue and if there is an expected timeline for when IFS plans to resolve it.Thank you for your assistance.

Community, I don’t see customer warranty does its job in work order when invocing, though object warranty is there, system default is Invoicable, and if you don’t manually change it to Not Invoicable, system will invoice the customer as normally we do. We are on APP10. Thank you.

Customer (25.1.4) gets following error when user tries to use material quick issue. It comes with all parts in customer. In our own demo environment (25.2.3) the same error does not come with all parts and it seems that the same part gives error and other times does not. Sites in work task and part are the same and user is connected to warehouse.Any idea what could case error? 

Environment: Cloud 25R2Background: A overhaul of a truck is performed and the engine (Inventory part / serial object) is removed for repair. Time and Material is consumed to repair the engine.  The cost of the repair should sit with repaired engine.How can this be achieved automatically?Currently when a Work Order is performed, it is possible to “Return to Inventory” and the “Inventory Value” has to be set manually. It does not use the time and material cost incurred on the work order.Is there any setting that can automate this.Regards, Malik

Community,How to fix below error?I am trying to connect a Repair Work Order to a superior work order which is connected to a project, i got below error message. Same error message is also prompted when I am trying to connect the same Repair Work Order to the project using Project Connections. see below error. 

We see the need to be able to modify operational loggings after serial numbers have been renamed. This happens quite a lot in our business that incorrect serial numbers get runs, and then are rebuilt before we have the possibility to correct the run. Can you please open up for this possibility? Pages: Correct Operationa Loggings, Report Operational Loggings

 I am trying to configure navigation from Prepare Work Order (Active Separate) screen to History Log screen and pass WO_NO as a filter. When navigating from Prepare Work Order, the History Log should show records only for that specific WO number. I tried using navigation filter like:startswith(tolower(Keys),'wo_no eq ($[WoNo])^')), Keys contains 'wo_no eq ($[WoNo])^'))But it is not returning the expected records. History Log stores WO number inside the KEYS field, so I am trying to filter based on that value.What is the correct navigation filter expression to pass WO_NO from Prepare Work Order to History Log?If anyone has implemented similar navigation filtering for KEYS field, please suggest the correct approach.Keys: WO_NO=2^Also, I need to filter History Log records where:LU Name = ApprovalRou

Hi all,I have a Lobby element that I am using in two lobby pages. It is based on a datasource that uses two parameters Category_ID and Group_ID. My datasource query is using the NVL statement, means when one of the parameters is empty it returns everything. To this regards it is working well. However, when I want to use the same methodolgy as a navigation link I get an error. My navigation link contains:(startswith(tolower(Cf_Group_Id_Eo),$GroupID$)) and (startswith(tolower(Cf_Category_Id_Eo),$OBJECT_CLASS$))When both parameters $GroupID$ and $OBJECT_CLASS$ are given everything works fine. But when only one parameter is given (e.g. $GroupID$) than the second statement of my navigation link gets rendered as:contains(,'')) So this is obviously throwing an error. Any suggestions on how to fix that? I would like to avoid to create two different widgets since I want to reuse the same widget on both lobby pages. Looking forward