IFS Solutions

What does this error mean - “Only 0 of the requested sales part - XXXXXX is available.  Part cannot be added to customer order due to priority reservation usage.”

There is a  problem manifests when users attempt to accept or start a Pool Task assigned to a Resource Group. The system raises an internal error (Utility<CreateAssignmentInState>: Failed to read expression value from AllTaskRec.TaskSeq) during assignment creation, preventing the task from being accepted or started.Product Version: 25.2.2  

Hi TeamIs it possible to disable the fields user and password in ifs aurena login dialog.To force only SSO or Azure login

Hello, I’m hoping someone has experience with this issue. I’ve tried everything can think of. Issue:On my SI - the supplier/PO currency amount balances perfectly but there is a balance showing in Accounting Currency on the invoice.The PO Receipts and the SI are in the same accounting period and are using the currency rate. All the receipt transactions match the pricing on the SI exactly.If I do a Price Adjustment - it changes the Balance from $0 so the SI remains unbalanced. How do I clear this?    Thank you very much!

Hi,I have created a permission set in Aurena and I gave the access level as full for all the selected projections. But I noticed that access levels for some projections have automatically set into custom and readonly. for the projections with custom access, I was managed to change access levels into full. But I was unable to change the access level readonly into full. When I’m trying to change it, it just stays as it is and not showing any change. How can I fix this and set readonly access level into full.Thank you!

We want to be able to email the invoice for an order to a different email than the one used for the order confirmation. Typically one would need to set a different Invoice customer to achieve this, but in many cases that is infeasible.It turns out that the Invoice Customer field isn’t strictly restricted to setting a different customer, but actually permits setting it to the ordering customer itself. Doing that, it’s then possible to change either the Reference field of the order and/or the Invoice Reference to a different contact, effectively resulting in essentially the behaviour we want, without any modifications to the system:The order confirmation is sent to the Reference of the order. The customer invoice uses the Invoice Customer Reference of the order.The one major issue we’ve found with this method is that when setting the Invoice Customer to itself, we get a notification warning that “Payer is same as the ordering customer”. That is of course literally what we want to do, but

Hi,I would like to know if there is a way in IFS to create one invoice for multiple shipments.In our process, we sometimes have several shipments that need to be included in the same customer invoice, and we would like to understand if this is supported as standard functionality in IFS, or if there are any specific settings, processes, or workarounds that need to be configured.If possible, could you also share any documentation or best practices regarding this scenario?Thank you for your support.

Hello,We are testing our first data archive objects but to deploy to production , we need to know if in cloud IFS want knew tablespace for the new tables create. For know , we are testing with the ifsapp_data (and ifs app_index) tablespace but is it the good way ? Is it possible that IFS create specific tablespace on every environment to store the archives tables ?BRFranck 

Hi All, in 25.2.2 I’m trying to use the Scan Delivery Note functionality.https://docs.ifs.com/ifsclouddocs/25r2/lang/en/?openpage=https://docs.ifs.com/ifsclouddocs/25r2/lang/en/Receipt/AboutScanDeliveryNote.htmIt all goes well until I try to finish the process when I get the error message that DOC_CLASS is mandatory. There is no field to set Doc_Class. I also looked into Document Default Values / Object Properties / System Params looking for a  way to define a default doc_class for the scan delivery note functionality.​@Mathias Dahl do you have hints on this? Could this be a bug?Below are the steps to reproduce this:Step 1 - attach a PDF - delivery note - there is no field for DOC_CLASS that can be filled Step2 - The data is read correctly from the PDF: Step3 - Finish - error message:error comes from below projection call:projection/v1/ScanDeliveryNote.svc/CreateAndConnectDocPayload:LuName: "ExtDispatchAdvice"KeyRef: "DELNOTE_NO=test^MESSAGE_ID=737^"PL/SQL function:Scan_Delivery_Note_S

Hi all,We would like to get in contact with, preferably scandinavian customers who run IFS.ai Copilot / digital workers etc.Anyone?

Has anyone added a lobby page as a navigation from a page in cloud 22r2?I am trying to add Customer360 as a custom button from case but I do not see the customer 360 page in the navigation link drop down  

A. What is your idea?1) ClassificationNew concept or idea2) Brief descriptionWhen proceeding Return Material Authorization credits; in the IFS core environment it is possible to “Create Credit Invoice” only when user proceed “Approve for Credit” option. However, users have shared concern to allow them to proceed both the options same time which will save time on proceeding with many RMA’s at same time. At the current state even, users have changed the condition; allowing users to proceed the “Approve for Credit” and “Create Credit Invoice” same time, even setting both conditions “YES”, it does not create the Customer Credit Invoice.B. Context and scope1) Who is affected?Customer2) FrequencyDailyC. Value and impact1) What is the business outcome?Improves productivity or efficiency Reduces manual effort Enhances user experience Enables new capability2) Impact scaleTeam / department3) Workaround To proceed “Approve for Credit” first and then “Create Credit Invoice”D. Evidence and examples

Please can you let us know the process to downgrade service update from latest version to old version in Use place

Hi IFS Community,with the 25R1 release, the Selection Rules functionality was extended (e.g. rule types and weighting), which is a very welcome improvement. However, the current solution leaves some gaps and we are unclear if these are supposed to be filled in future releases.Our Use Case We use Selection Rules to distribute Service Requests into the correct delivery units. For our setup, Region and Model criteria are essential. The Service criteria, however, is largely irrelevant, as the organizational structure is the same for most services.Current LimitationAt the moment, the Service criteria is mandatory, which forces us to duplicate the entire Selection Rule set for each service (≈ 50 services) leading to a huge data volume in the table and the maintenance effort coming with it.Observation in the UI / Page DesignerIn both the UI and the Page Designer, it appears that:Criteria might be configurable as mandatory vs. optional Criteria might support individual weightingThese settings

Hello all,We have a scenario when it would be useful to attach a Work Task to another Work Task to provide traceability of related work done.It does not seem to be possible using the Attachment Panel. Is there any other way?Thanks in advance!Best regardsAnna-LenaPS: We are still on Apps10 upd27 😁

In 22R1 there is a new concept introduced to identify equipment object, key will be “Equipment Object Sequence”. Object can be moved from one site to another, also to another company. What appears to be not possible is to change Object ID. I am currently in project where the Object ID itself tells in which process facility etc. the object is located and therefore they are constantly (in their legacy system) changing the Object Identification. The object ID could change from e.g. 10-22-45-67-11 => 10-22-44-67-11. There is of course a unique ID in the background, similar to Equipment Object Sequence.  Once we now have a new key, Equipment Object Sequence, does it make easier or even practically possible to make modification that would allow to change the Object ID?  Is that kind of functionality in the requirements backlog? Viewing the location in functional hierarchy in equipment object navigator has been proposed, but the problem is that it does not show the parent structure of give

Hello All, Currently I am involved with IFS implementation for a Swiss company where it has mandatory QR bill payment for Swiss suppliers and customers. To record customer collections, my client currently uses CAMT 054 file in the legacy system. I have 2 questions.IFS country specific solution only mentioned CAMT 053 for QR payments. However, is there anyone already using CAMT 054 for Swiss clients or CAMT 054 not supported by IFS? Can CAMT files contain QR payments and non-QR payments from customers in the same file? eg: same institute is used to collect customer due amounts from QR based invoices (Swiss customers) and non-QR based invoices (foreign customers)

When can we expect to see the functionality changes in Cloud21R1?

Hi, I have a question regarding the Pool Work option in MWO. Is it possible to transfer Crew work as a Pool Task when multiple Crews are expected to work on the same job? 

The product in this question is IFS Applications 10 UPD16. A vulnerability scan (Nessus) performed by our infrastructure team flagged CVE-2026-21992 (OIM/OWSM) as "Critical" on our IFS middleware servers (in both test and production environments).Upon investigation, I found an article stating that "IFS Cloud" is not affected by this vulnerability:https://community.ifs.com/information-security-431/security-awareness-oracle-critical-rce-vulnerability-66302?tid=66302&fid=431The article states the following:"IFS solutions are not impacted by CVE-2026-21992, as they do not depend on the affected Oracle Fusion Middleware components."Based on this, I would like to ask two questions:1. Is it correct to assume that the information in this article applies equally to "IFS Applications 10" on-premises deployments?2. Is it correct to understand that the OIM/OWSM components detected by the scan are actually unused/inactive on the IFS Middleware Server, and that IFS does not rely on the vulnerabl

Hi All.Does anyone know if there is some issue with 26R1 SU3 not sync MWO Maintenance?I’ve just updated to this version and not able to sync mobile. Application service update: 26.1.3Framework service update: 261.3.0IFS Cloud Web version: 26.1.3.20260806092549.0IFS Client Services version: 26.1.3.20260806072751.0IFS Client Notification version: 26.1.3.20260806074026.0IFS Chat version: 26.1.3.20260806071359.0IFS OData provider version: 26.1.3.20260805101151.0 

WHen we go to add records to a spare parts forecast, do I need to turn on the online consumption flag on the inventory part?

Hi Everyone.We’re about to upgrade from IFSAPPS10 to IFS Cloud and I’m looking forward for this functionality ASAP. I created this topic below 2 years ago using the Aurena apps and I hope we may have now in IFS Cloud.  @Bandula , please give me good news about it, have you guys already implemented it or is there another way like custom page option to use it? The buttons inside the work task step to navegate from one to another. example from the mWorkOrder apps. WorkTask Step navegation buttons. Tks.Lopes

Hi All.Does anyone know why the WorkTask "Remark" filed is not available in MWO Maintenance page designer?I need to add this field in the MaintEngAppUsing: 25R2Remark field in worktask additional info Tks

I’ve created a Repair Work Order for a Serial Part with Repair and Return to Inventory option. This generates a work order with one work task. I then issue the repair part to the material tab, which automatically creates the return line.I then perform reporting of the Work Order and Work Task, and both are now sitting in Work Done state. I then want to return the repaired part to inventory. However when I try to return, I’m told that the Serial Part is issued on a Work Task that is not Finished. But I can’t finish the work task without returning the part. I can’t unissue or modify the return line. So I’m now stuck with a serial part issued against the work task, but no way of continuing the work task.I must be missing something… What have I not done? Work Task in Work Done state with Material Line showing Repair PartWork Task Execute pageReturn to inventory dialogReturn Error