IFS Solutions

Dear Team,Please help in designing the logic for one report which is generating through report generator in IFS 9. In IFS Cloud 25R1 this report generator is not available. Hence how we can create the same report using IFS Business reporter.The name of the report is IFSR5 - COST CENTERS in IFS9 . This report provide trial balance data along with cost centersBelow screen shot of report generated through report generator from IFS9Thanks&Regard,Afrin Dobani

This is related to part cost-->Cost set 2- Estimated material cost.I migrated few part numbers to the system. When check the cost,I see that cost set two is not updated.I did the same few months back, but I didn’t have this issue. What could be the reason? I used to migrate part numbers.I’m using IFS app 9.  

How much HR access does a person need to assign maintenance surveys to employees in apps 10?

Community, do we have a report or window that will give the same info for window Average Issues/Receipts per Period? if there is a report or browsing widnow out of box that listed the parts in horizontal format that will be great. Thank you.

I found the module (machine learning) which enables predictive scoring for Business Opportunities. The product documentation says something, but leaves gaps in helping to understand how actually the predictive score is calculated.Does anyone have documentation or knowledge on how the predictive score is calculated?Are there lobbies or ready-made reports which uses the predicive score for forecasting? Does it take into account the BO probability also?

Hi everyone,I have a question regarding the material constraint in MSO.Our customer asked if there is a way to ensure that MSO checks whether enough input material for a shop order is available. The expectation is: If the required material is available → the shop order should be successfully scheduled (respecting other scheduling rules as well). If the material is not available → the shop order should not be scheduled. To test this, I performed the following steps: I selected an already successfully scheduled shop order in MSO with just one operation step. I went to the Inventory Part Planning Data and set the input material to Always Finite. I issued (consumed) the entire input material for this shop order, so there was no remaining supply. I ran MSO again, expecting that the shop order would no longer be scheduled due to missing material. However, the shop order was still scheduled. The only difference I noticed is that the flag indicating that the material constraint is acti

Hi everyone,I’m currently using IFS Developer Studio with the “FlatLaf Dark” profile, and I noticed that some keywords, especially in Entity and Report files, are quite hard to read due to their current colors in the editor.I have looked through the settings but couldn’t find an option to customize these keyword colors. Is there a way to adjust the color of specific keywords in IFS Developer Studio, or is it limited to the default color schemes?Here’s an example screenshot showing the issue:Any guidance or tips would be greatly appreciated!Thanks in advance!

Hello,We recently updated our internal IFS Cloud solution from 21R1 to 22R1. After applying the update in all our use place environments, we have noticed that some of the existing page configurations are set to Baseline Status = "Behind".   When we go inside the Application Configuration Package for these configurations, we noticed that all these configurations are not synced. As per the IFS documentation, we should click on "Publish” button to get these configurations synced, but clicking on the "Publish” button does not change anything.  Does anyone know how to get these configurations back to “Up-to-date” state? Thanks in advance, Ashan De Costa. 

Good Day,We have some accounts that uses database authentication and those users are getting the Server Error 500 intermittently when trying to log into IFS (users using AD authentication is fine). The MIddleware Server Admin Console doesn’t show anything wrong and I’ve even reset their oracle profile to default, but it keeps happening. Does anyone know what could have caused this or how I can try and find the problem?Ifs.Fnd.FndSystemException: Server Error    at Ifs.Fnd.AccessProvider.FndConnection.InvokeInternal(Object requestBody, Object responseBody, String intface, String operation, FndRequestContext requestContext, FndManualDecisionCollection decisions, Boolean forcedSync, Boolean integrationGateway)   at Ifs.Fnd.AccessProvider.FndConnection.InvokeInternal(String intface, String operation, Object requestBody, Object responseBody, FndRequestContext requestContext, Boolean forcedSync, Boolean integrationGateway)   at Ifs.Fnd.AccessProvider.Interactive.FndLoginDialog.AuthenticateCr

All, Myself as a user with all projections can see the the Edit document, as per below screen shot. When I trace the projection on clicking the Edit Document it is the DocumentRevisionHandling. Now all users with Document Management access have this FULL projection, but they can not see the Edit button. Is there another projection that is needed or is it in the access to the document? My users also has DocMan Administrator System Privileges if that makes a difference. My User View​​​​Standard Users View 

Hi all,We met one issue that every time updating the quantity for a Schedule work item details (one sub item),the cost rate is updated also. But we didn’t get the relationship or calculation rule.Any advice is appreciated.

HiThere is already a post with this question. Do you know in which release this issue will be resolved?Thanks a lot for your answerBRChristèle

Hi,we work in multisite environment. We have manufacturing sites A & B. Both sites uses components in production that the other site manufactures. Components are transferred between sites with distribution orders. We have defined in supplier for purchase part supplier manufacturing lead time and site to site parameters transport time. Can someone explain the logic of DO schedules?Case: Shop order is created on site B and it requires component from site A. MRP create first DO from site A to B and then shop order request on site A. It seems that MRP does not take into consideration supplier manufacturing lead time at all but only tries to fullfill site B shop order component need even if component is not available on site A and manufacturing would take X days. What’s the point of supplier manufacturing lead time in case MRP does not use it in calculation?

We are reviewing the current PO Authorization setup to minimize the need for complete re-approval whenever minor changes are made to a Purchase Order. At present, even after a PO has been authorized, any modification—such as changes to delivery dates, payment terms, or other non-financial details—requires full re-approval. This results in delays in the PO release and receipt process. There are certain conditions within the authorization setup that, if adjusted, can help reduce unnecessary re-approvals. Additionally, the addition of “charges” is a common requirement for import shipments and ideally should not trigger full authorization again.Below are a few scenarios where re-approval can potentially be avoided:If, after PO revision, the revised PO amount is lower than the previously approved amount If the changes made do not affect the PO amount If charges are added through the Purchase Order Change Order screen If the change in amount falls within an acceptable tolerance limit Impleme

Hi,I posted the above back in November and no replies.Since then we have upgraded to V6.8.3 and we’re still experiencing issues where the CE Browser refreshes and takes the user back to the start.Does anyone else have issues like this?

Can’t see Request visibility in the demo environment as shown in the courses on academy.  

I would like to request to consider development of an integration with Tagetik for financial consolidation.Tagetik (owned by Wolters Kluwer) is our global consolidation and reporting software. It is one of the major global providers of consolidation software. We rollup our country results in it for reporting. This is currently a semi-automated process. We have been advised to use IFS consolidation but we are a large global company and IFS cannot support consolidation requirements as we have them. 

Hello,Within the Service Management module, in the Request Contract screen we are able to define a periodic price when an invoice plan and sales part are selected. When a new service request is created and the request contract is linked to the request, the expectation is to view the periodic price added in the contract either in the request or associated task or invoice preview.But currently, the price added in the contract is not visible anywhere in the request, task or invoice preview generated. Is there a way or functionality to view this sales part periodic price added in the contract to be viewed from the linked request or invoice? Please let me know. 

I’m looking at the Received - Not Yet Invoiced report for multiple sites, with the current date as the To Date and the Part Type equal to Inventory Part. Can anyone tell me what would cause the Cost and Value columns to be sourced from the part’s estimated material cost for POs that were created up to a certain date and then to be sourced from the PO buy unit price after that date?  I’m working in a customer’s development instance and would like to understand what caused the change.

Hello IFS Community, I am struggling to figure out why I am getting one of my Operations with status “unscheduled” in APB. The operation 10 gives me the information: “Not enough materials available to schedule the operation”. However, the following subsequent Operations are successfully scheduled. How is it possible, that I don’t have enough materials for the first operation but I have it for the following operations!?   Any light on this issue will be greatly appreciated. 

Hello, I tried to add Custom Fields to the SourceLinesAvailableForShipment, “Available Lines for Shipments” in the navigator.Page InfoPreviously in Apps 10 the View for this LU was SOURCE_LINE_SHIPMENT_ALT and was associated to the LU CustomerOrderLine. My goal is to migrate the Custom Fields from Apps 10 to IFS Cloud. I could not find any other entity that has the SOURCE_LINE_SHIPMENT as an additional view.In the Entity Configuration there is no entry for SourceLinesAvailableForShipment. I also found that the name for this Entity is too long. How can this be? Is this a bug in IFS Cloud?Tried to define the searched entityIs there anyone else who has encountered this problem?Best regardsChristian

Hi,I recently got a new 25R1 repository in IFS Scope Tool and I downloaded the 25R1-Data Tracker Template File.What I found is that values are missing in Basic Data sheet - column K (Global/Company/Site). This is very valuable information for us since we are going to implement IFS to a multi Country/Company solution.Also we are also missing the entire Master Data Tracker sheet.My question is if there will be a second release of 25R1 Data Tracker Template including the missing values and the Master Data sheet?Kind Regards,Christian 

After installation of Kubernetes sertificate in our production environment IFS Cloud, dataload has stopped completely. We are not able to run reports due to lack of data in our tabular models

Hi,I hope that you are well.Does anyone have a presentation on “IFS Cloud - Export Control Functionality” or a document detailing functional improvements/changes from APP10 to Cloud, please? Thank youKind regards,Samiru

Hello IFS Community,I am trying to change an operation (Report Picking), and I am receiving the following error message:“There is no shipment location defined for site SC-CP.”    => IFS24 R2