Finance (Financials)

Hi,We setup a new customer. I've checked and to me the customer and tax code set up is all correctAlthough they have been set up with S1 Tax code, correct price including tax hasn't been pulled through properly while creating customer agreement.  The problem is Tax code which should "add" 10% to the total price seems not to be applied properly to the particular account although setup has been done."Price" and "Price incl. Tax" should be different (+10%), but for some reason they remain the same when I try to set up the Pricing Agreement It can be because of baseline price, that is 0.00 over sales part base price. But I can see that all customers have actually 0.00e Price, but for them Tax code worked fine. Base Price is 0, but Price including Tax is 10% higher that Sales Price. Request your suggestions, what can be the issue and how to resolve it.

Hi All.Please help me,  I would like to set up the withholding tax on APP 8, as in Italy this needs to be handled separately. Could someone help me with this from the very beginning? The Italian equivalent is Ritenuta d'acconto, which can be applied at different percentages. What basic data settings are required? This should appear during the payment process, and is it controlled by transaction PP49?

Dears, can you advise what steps should be done in order to change accounting currency in IFS v8. Our country is shifting to EUR we need to implement such change. Thanks

Hi,We are starting the e-invoice project with Pagero now and I wonder if we have the right invoice xml format in IFS with all the tags needed if we are on IFS10 and UPD26? Do you know if there are some new needed tags added in later updates? Regards,Marika

HiI want to move/offset a parked payment (on company) to a supplier (Generating a payment on account). So I am creating a Mixed Payment (Suplier Payment) on 0 amount linked to a supplier. Then chose/match the Parked Payment from the list. The payment is now not balanced. When trying to approve, the system does ask if I want to create a Payment on account for the Supplier. Saying Yes to that.   Then I do approve the payment. But it does fail, saying:  “The matched amount is bigger than the payment amount in lumb sum”.  How can this be done?  I believe it worked in APPS 10.

Hi Community, I have created a Template Customer, and filled in info in Invoice and Payment sections, after connecting the template customer to a company.eg:Then I use the template customer in the Quick Register Customer screen: On the Misc Info step, IFS allows me to change info such as Payment Term [which connects to the Invoice section of the customer]. However, when Finish is clicked, and the new customer gets created, none of the sections where company connection is present [eg: invoice, payment] get filled in the new customer record. Is this the expected behavior? Isn’t Quick Register Customer able to fill in sections where company connection is present? Note that if “Copy Customer” is done from the Customer screen, these sections also get copied in. Thanks in advance for your input!

What exactly do the scheduled jobs, Transfer Purchase Transactions, Get Tax Ledger Updates and General ledger Updates do. I need to test the jobs to ensure all will work in the Cloud as we move from Apps10 and need to understand the functions. I am non finance so not familiar with the details of such. Thanks

Hello everyone,I have a question regarding simulation vouchers. When a simulation voucher is entered manually, it is automatically reversed in the following period. A specific voucher type (function group R) is dedicated for the reversalBelow is the parameters of the two vouchers types : However, when importing an external file (STDVOU), this automatic reversal does not happen.Do you know if this is normal? Or could it be a mistake on my part ?Thank you in advance for your help."

When we made payment with EBF the payment was grouped for one supplier. Which means that all the invoices to a supplier with the same due date were payed in one transactionNow when we make payment via ISO20022, it doesn’t group them. Which means that it makes one transaction for each invoice. Is there a way to group the invoice payments and payed in one amount in ISO20022?

Hello everyone,I have a question regarding supplier payment proposals.When there is a payment proposal for the same supplier, is it possible to configure the system to generate a separate transfer for each invoice instead of a single transfer that consolidates all the invoices ?Thank you in advance for your help

Hi All,After loading the CAMT053 file to the IN Folder, IFS (Apps 10) picks up the xml file and creates an application message. However, no details are shown in the external payments window.External payment parameters and message codes have been defined.What could be the reasons for this behavior?Your assistance is much appreciated. Thank you.NishaF

Hello all,How can I see by which functions and packages filling the fields exported ISO20022 payment file? Fex: payment reference has been sent only unstructured payments but not placed in structured file. I could only review xsl file which is exported with but could not find there which fields being referred to where.Thanks,Umran

I would like to create separate top nodes within the same accounting structure in IFS Cloud, so that the same code part value (e.g. for code part C) can be placed under different top nodes for different groupings (e.g. one group with topnod for “Budget” and another with topnod “Segment” reporting).The problem is that in the IFS Cloud interface, I cannot "deselect" an existing node in order to create a truly separate top node. When I try to add a new top node, it always ends up under the already existing one, instead of creating two independent hierarchies within the same structure.My requirement is to have two parallel groupings (two top nodes) in the same accounting structure, both using the same code part values.This is how it looks when I created two topnodes since I cannot “deselect” the any of them to create a new one.   

Problem:   Customer master indicated as customer has WHT implications (say 2%)  When funds received from customer, user use mixed payment for recording payment received.  User notice that this particular transaction did not have WHT implications as this transaction is solely for purchase of goods.  User proceed to delete WHT tax record on invoice details under mixed payment.  However, system did not update change, still restricted amount received at 98%. (net of 2%)  User can proceed to post if user indicate amount received at 98%  The extra 2% will be reflected as a CUPOA (over payment) in the customer ageing account. But when we do this in IFS Apps 10, it works as expected and no CUPOA is created. However, in IFS Cloud, a CUPOA (over-payment) . is created — why does this behavior occur?”

Problem:There is a setting in Company\Invoice\General called “Based discount on Gross amount” meaning that the payment discount is either calculated over the Gross amount (ON) or over the invoice amount ex. tax (OFF). However, this applies to both customer invoices as well as supplier invoices. Currently we have the situation where we have some suppliers calculating the payment discount over the invoice Gross amount and some which calculate it over Nett invoice amount. Needless to say this should be a setting on the payment terms, not a single setting set for an entire company.  Does anyone else have issues with this?

Hi,I am trying to write off a manual supplier invoice with the payment reference added, using the Single Write-Off function in the Supplier Offset Proposal. However, when attempting to approve the offset, I encounter the following error:ORA-20105: Invoice.NCFREFMAN: For supplier XXXX it is mandatory to enter a Payment ReferenceI was able to successfully write off the same invoice using the Mixed Payment window. Is there any reason why the same invoice triggers this error when attempting to write it off through the Supplier Offset Proposal window?

Hello,is there any way to upgrade reports from IFS Report Generator to IFS Business reporter as IFS Report generator is not in IFS Cloud.Please suggest RegardsPankaj

Hi, This is regarding the Swedish Rule for reporting VAT on Foreign Currency invoices of Swedish Suppliers. Would like to know your ideas on the best possible way to handle this. The customer receives the VAT amount in Domestic currency from the Supplier and that amount must be used by the customer for VAT reporting. For example: for a EUR ccy invoice, supplier sends the VAT in SEK amount as well. The customer only calculates the Gross Amount in SEK using the rates in IFS. However, the customer does not know which date the Supplier used to arrive at the VAT in SEK when they send the preliminary invoice. Therefor, there are differences in VAT which the customer today moves into a currency account. Example:Amounts on Invoice from the SupplierGross in EUR        100VAT in EUR              25Total in EUR          125VAT in SEK            250SEK Amounts Calculated by Customer at Booking DateGross                    1000VAT                          275​How the invoice is handled in SEK curre

I have uploaded XML supplier invoices with attached path to image (PDF)Yet system fails to retrieve the file with below error when load invoice image job is executed Have any of you successfully able to fetch the image from file share location ? if so where file share is defined and was it required any repository setup .

Hi experts,I refer to a dialog the user goes trough to get a PDF (View or Print) for one or more customers. I could make up 4 of the 5 figures.But I could not make any sense with the Debit. That should be “new invoices” in the given period - here 08 and 09 2025I only could see 3 “new” invoices - the red ones but they summ up to 57595,62.Far from the 107,840.28I tried different logic but don’t come near the figure shown in the PDF.Any ideas?The data coming from INVOICE_TAB and LEDGER_ITEM_TAB Thank you very much.BRMichael 

Does anyone know the problem with reading customer payments via CAMT054C if the sender has sent payment for more than one invoice? DnB (bank) converts outgoing structured payments to incoming unstructured payments in the file. This means that multiple payment references (KID/OCR) comes in the same XML tag and IFS is unable to match these automatically. This causes a lot of work for our customers. The problem has been discovered in Sweden. I do not know if this also applies in other countries and/or for other banks.?

Hi,IFS Cloud Application service update: 24.1.9We have a company set up with Inherit Authorizers from PurchaseIf we create a Purchase Order with No Part Order line for Qty 10 Unit Price GBP 100.00. Release and receive the Purchase Order.If we enter a Supplier Invoice for GBP 1000.00 it automatically matches to the PO and Authorizes the Payment Proposal - All good. We just final post the Invoice.If we are invoiced for Qty 1 and a second invoice Qty 9 the Supplier Invoices do not automatically get authorized.We enter a Supplier Invoice for GBP 100.00 it automatically fetches the PO Receipt and goes to Status Unbalanced > Excess Value. Invoice matched Status Message ID = Excess Value. Invoice GBP 100.00 PO Receipts Value = GBP 1,000.00Amend the Posting Line to Qty = 1 instead of Qty = 10 Change Receipt Qty = 1Supplier Invoice goes to Await AuthIs there a way to make this automatically authorize?We do not want to have to manually authorize (there can be up to 3 Authorizer Steps inherite

Hi, Has anyone implemented Pagero Customer Invoice Integration? If Yes do you have any Intergration Material that could be shared please (Apps 10 or Cloud) Thank You

We have recently tested the toggle on a subproject and activity which excludes it from the Progress Calculation.Our scenario for this is we have a subproject with revenue but no cost - there is estimated revenue, planned revenue and posted revenue.  Currently, it would include this in the Periodical Cap process and consider this an overbilling as this subproject is basically 0% complete since there is not estimated or actual cost. In testing, I toggled this option on both the activity and the sub project and then approved the project so the Financial Project was created at that point.  The Financial project does not reflect the estimated revenue for this subproject - which I believe is correct. I ran the Periodical Cap process and the total estimated revenue does NOT include this subproject. However, I’ve got two issues. When the PPC is executed, the total pay app value is reversed, including the sub project which is marked as Excluded from Progress Calculation.  I don’t think this sho