Assets (Asset Management)

What is the idea behind the possibility to set up object type structures (object type In object type). How can I use this structure in equipment object structures? 

The description of the relevant part from the Part screen is inherited as the description of the Serial Object when a Serial Object is created (Service > Equipment > Serial Object > Serial Object). Once the object is created, the description can be changed in the Part and Serial Object screens.If the description of the Part screen is changed for a Part then the Description(s) of the corresponding Serial Object(s) is/are changed accordingly. But not the other way round. The Description of the Serial Object can be changed. Lets say we amend a Serial Object with a different description and then for some reason we decided to change the description of the relevant part in the Part screen. Once the description is changed, the description of the Serial Objects (all connected to the specific part) will be overwritten.Therefore it feels like there is a gap in this function. 

IFS Cloud EnvironmentI am trying to assign multiple Resource Groups  to a Work TaskOn the Work Task>Resources tab, I create a new Demand line and  provide a Resource Group and a Planned Quantity of 2. Once the Work Task is Released, it shows up in the Unassigned section of the Maintenance Engineer screen for all Resources in the Resource Group.When someone Accepts the Task, the Work Task no longer appears in the Unassigned section of the Maintenance Engineer screen any other Resources in the Resource Group.I then tried to add another Demand line on the same Work Task. ​​​​The new Unassigned Task shows up in the Unassigned section o

Hi Experts. In App10, we are able to change the tax code in customer order lines that are originated from Service. Then if we check the same in latest Could 24R2 this cannot be done with the following error. We use 2 different tax codes for the same sales part and it is dependent on whether the order type is NO CO or SEO COThen how the Tax code can be changed under the current constraints as we need to identify how it can be changed otherwise. This Tax code is not available both in the “Invoice Preview” screen and at the “Work Task” level as well, further compounding the issue.This is a significant limitation in the cloud as it worked well in App10, and it introduces additional complexity into the process and severely impacts efficiency.

Hello,Maybe somebody could help to make clear such situation:We have two supplier agreements 1 and 2 for one supplier for the same purchase part. Supplier agreement 1 is created earlier than supplier agreement 2 (according to creation date). In the work order requisition line we provided the agreement 1 that is created earlier, because there are still enough money for buying that purchase part from that earlier created agreement. In agreement 2 is not enough money. When we try to create purchase order from that purchase requisition line, system provides error message, that maximum amount of agreement 2 has been exceeded for current period.Do we understand right, that when supplier agreement periods for the same purchase part overlaps, system automatically searches for the supplier agreement that is newer (cr

Hi,We’re on Cloud 23R2. I’ve noticed that when issuing parts directly using “direct issue” on the tech portal, the parts aren’t registered under the Material tab in the work task, but only registered as costs. This might be confusing as everyone looks at the Materials area on the work task to see what parts were issued, where the direct issued parts now don’t appear. What was the reasoning behind it? Is that a bug? 

In Work Task Template from there is Tab “Task Template is Used”, and contains several cards, which allows to jump to another form, i.e. PM actions where particular WTT is used. Client expects not to see some of cards-links. In Page designer under the Tabs cannot find how to make them invisible. 

Hello, maybe someone also met the problem, that in the same form number separators (number formats) differ. For example, I met such situation in the form Material Requisition. One is separated by point, other by comma:computer settings: 

Hi all, Direct issue from the Tech Portal require that the users first select a location and the system filters down the parts that are in stock in that location. This is not really helpful as the techs don’t know where the parts are located in their remote warehouse;instead, our techs would like to first select a part and then pick the location after. Is this doable? Is there a reason why the system asks a location first? We’re on Cloud 23R2.Thank you.  

Hello,Maybe someone could answer those questions:When did the statuses “Not Translated” and “Changed” appear for the attribute in the form “Text Translations”? For example, such attributes where never translated and never changed their translations in the environment, but they are seen with the status “Changed”: Why some attributes in statuses “Not Translated” and “Changed” exist in the form “Text Translations” and “Translatable Text” at the same time?

Greetings everyone, especially valued customers and partners,We are seeking your valuable insights and expertise regarding anomaly detection. Whether your approach relies on rule-based systems or machine learning models, we are eager to learn from your experiences.If you currently utilize anomaly detection in your business operations, we are interested in understanding how you leverage anomalies to enhance your business processes. Specifically, how do you integrate anomaly detection into your operational framework?Alternatively, if anomaly detection is not yet a part of your business strategy, we would like to know if there are specific business requirements driving the need for anomaly detection capabilities. What potential use cases do you foresee for integrating anomaly detection into your solution framework?We sincerely appreciate any responses you can provide.Thank you in advance.Warm regards, Mayura 

Tool A has been checked out, and Tool A can still be assigned on a work task, does the system not have a corresponding restriction or reminder. 

Hello,  My customer manufacture Serial Tracked Inventory Parts (with shop order).Within the  “Part Serial” screen, you can see the underling structure. Then, before shipping (via MMR), they want to maintain it with a work order/work task.So they have created the “Serial Object’s” with “Serial Maintenance Aware” screen. But when checking the “Equipment Object Navigator”, the underling structure is NOT created automatically. Is there anyway to make IFS create underling structure? without using Customer Orders. Many thanks! 

Hi, I’m thinking this is just how it is, but wanted to check. We upload inventory a lot that needs to be converted to Fixed Assets. Accounting goes to the Capex Preview screen, filters for the new items, and clicks “Create Fixed Assets”.   If they’ve selected more than 100 records, they get this error: ******FS Web Version: 24.1.10.20250305060220.0Date: 2025-04-22T14:41:01.756Z--------------------------------------------------------------------------BtdCapexPreview/CapexPreview (server error)Database error occurred. Contact administrator.Error details: [{"code":6502,"message":"ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error"}]Request Id: 331f778b-cb27-4665-b4da-b1be494bd16dUrl: <OUR URL> ******If they then choose less than 100 r

Hi Experts, Could someone let me know what is procedure of uploading multiple documents to the document revision page? Regards,Thilina. 

Hi,Question 1:If I have defined the Customer warranty at Inventory Part, why the same information cannot be found in Part Serial screen?Customer warranty defined in the Inventory part screen. Then I receive a Serial via a PO. Why this template is not automatically connecting to the Part Serial Record?In Part serial screen its Blank? Do we have to setup this for very individual part serial record manually? Ita very time taken job specially if we have like 1000 of parts? Question 2.Lets say I have setup a Customer waranty template into one selected Serial (Manually addded) 

We are currently on 24R1 SU6, and notice that the Property Name “FINISH_WITH_TASK” not is documented here or in 24R2. 🙄I changed the value from FALSE to TRUE in our test environment.I had a WO in status Work Done, and 2 work task where one was Finished and the other one Work Done.  The expected result was that the WO should change status to “Finished” when the last work task was changed to Finished. The actual result was that the WO changed to status Reported.I changed the value back to FALSE, and re-tested the same scenario again and got the same result. It seems like the the property not is used in any logic. Is there any planned changes related to the functionality for this object property to 25R1?     

Hi Experts, Could someone explain this?How to create tool/eqp for use checked in and checked out functionality What is the functionality for check out status How to use this functionality in work orders What is the meaning of checked out and checked in for a toolRegards,Thilina

We have a number of Work Task Templates that we have built up in Apps 10.  We recently started having the Asset Management techs using Tech Portal start creating their own work in certain situations.We informed them to utilize these Work Task Templates, specifically because it included the Work Task Steps.  However, when creating new work from the New Work button within the Maintenance Engineer lobby under the equipment section, then adding the Work Task Template.  The resulting work task does not contain any work task steps.Using the same work task templates, and objects, we can create new work from the back-office side of things and it all works exactly as expected.

We use the IFS for Oil & Gas, We are trying to implement a Lubrication Program, is there any specific module/Tool or way of work that can help with the lubrication Program?For example:What is the guidance to manage the greasing tasks? Although the task is the same we have different types of grease, quantity and frequency. Where can we populate this information in the IFS?Today we thought to use WTT/PM Actions but no easy way to put the grease quantity and type.Is there any documentation about this specific request that can support us? 

Today when we create a PM Action we use the “PRIMARY TASK”. Can someone share a way to use multiple tasks in the same PM Action, is there a “SECONDARY TASK”?Is there any supportive document about this?Can someone share an example and good practice how to use multiple tasks?

Hi IFS,We have a scenario, we perform some work for the customer then for additional work its required to get the customer approval. For this we create an additional task with planning lines where its required to create a service Quotation.However when I create a Quotation from the work order header, this includes all task but not the one we just need customer acceptence. How to handle this in Cloud?We dont need to create a service quotation for the first task as it has performed as per customer contract agreements within the accepted limit.How I can include just the one Task in the service qutation? Thanks,KM

Once a page is open, e.g. active work orders.How to see/count the number of line items in the actual page? 

Is it possible to connect the same Item Class twice in the same WTT revision?Example:For the WTT1.Can the Item class DREM exist twice in the “Prepare” tab?See the print  

We are trying to build a Fault Tree based on the FMEA built by our company. The configuration today is:ELECTRIC MOTOR (Item class)  CONVERT ELECTRIC ENERGY TO MECHANICAL ENERGY (Function)     BEARING FAILURE (Fault Type)           OHE - OVERHEATING (Symptom)           OIL CONTAMINATION (Cause) This is the standard IFS functionality, is someone using in a different way? Where you can put the effect of the Failure, or using the  “Failling component” inside the Cause?If someone can share how is the tree inside the FASN.