Skip to main content

Testing use of Service Contract and Invoices from Work Tasks based on Cost Based Pricing  on our 24R1 SU12 version, and use of Merge By Sales Part does not work according to our expectations.

Is someone using a similar setup in newer versions?  

 

 

Invoice Preview with Invoice Scope Customer

My expected result here would be 1 line with the total quantity and amount for my 8 personell lines 

 

I get the same result if I create the Invoice Preview with Group Level Work Order (2 extra lines due to the date used as filter in the first scenario) 

 

Invoice Preview with Level Work Order

                                               Our Invoice Rule on the Service Line on the Service Contract

Our Invoice Rule 

 

Hi ​@HAFFRASVE ,
 

This behavior remains consistent in version 25R1as well and it aligns with the standard functionality as documented in the official IFS Cloud documentation.

“Merging will not occur

  • If Cost-based pricing is applied
  • If Manual price source is used
  • If Document text is present on the sales line”

 

Hope this helps!

Thanks,

Nethmini

Terms & ConditionsCookie settings