Recently active topics

I’m getting these errors in assystServer log and can’t figure out what is missing. I didn’t have CSG enabled, this field in the incident form I’m using doesn’t have this field set up and in Import Profile we don’t have this fields to be imported… WARN2026-09-14 14:46:04,790 WARN  [org.apache.jasper] (default task-382) base == com.axiossystems.assyst.services.base.eventConfiguration.ImportProfile@2(2;AI_IP_INCIDENTE-GERAL;PERFIL DE IMPORTAÇÃO GERAL PARA INCIDENTE) , property == csg: jakarta.el.PropertyNotFoundException: The class 'com.axiossystems.assyst.services.base.eventConfiguration.ImportProfile' does not have the property 'csg'.    at jakarta.el.api@4.0.1.Final//jakarta.el.BeanELResolver.getBeanProperty(BeanELResolver.java:478)    at jakarta.el.api@4.0.1.Final//jakarta.el.BeanELResolver.getValue(BeanELResolver.java:190)    at io.undertow.jsp@2.2.8.Final//org.apache.jasper.el.JasperELResolver.getValue(JasperELResolver.java:123)    at org.glassfish.expressly@5.0.0//org.glassfish.exp

Has anyone encountered the following error when creating an Invoice Preview from a Request Work Task that contains an alternate customer on one of the sales lines?My expectation is that the system should generate two invoice previews, one for each customer, using the corresponding delivery address ID for each invoice.Interestingly, when following the same process through a Work Order -Work Task, the system successfully creates two invoice previews without any errors for the same customers.Due to this error, when a Supplier Warranty exists and the supplier is added as an alternate customer, it becomes impossible to create the invoice preview.Is this a known bug, or could I be missing a configuration or setup step related to alternate customers and customer order addresses in the Request Work Task process?Thanks

Hello everyone,I would like to know what these two types of Quick Report in IFS Cloud correspond to : I believe they were present in IFS Applications 10... are they now deprecated?Thank you.

Hello,We are manufacturing continuously a mesh.To produce this I am using a wire (part set up with kg), from which I am cutting it into pieces and further welding those pieces together to obtain a final product.Current BOM:Wire [kg] → assigned to cutting operation   At this level we are providing at the custom field number of pieces that shall be cutted from the wire Current Routing:Cutting WeldingWe would like to display on the Shop Order Work Instruction Report an assignment of the materials to the operation so the operators know how many pieces of the wire go into the welding operation. So ideally:Cutting - display of wire  Welding - display of wire (but no consumption and no costs, as the same wire was already processed in the operation above).As currently wire is assigned to the cutting operation, I am not able to reassign the same wire at the operation of welding displaying the same information as at the cutting.I had tried to set up a separate material line using the same wire p

Hi All, I just wanna bring some awareness on an IFS Cloud extension I built that brings back the much beloved Sticky Notes functionality in IFS Cloud.Besides creating notes attached to any ‘Form’ record in IFS Cloud, it also offers the possibility to tag (@) other users and notify them by email and Stream notification (bell icon).The extension is free and open source. ACP packages to make this work included in the Chrome Store. Feel free to check it out.Leave your comments on improvements and I’ll consider them for a future release. Install: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ifs-sticky-notes-%E2%80%94-free-o/diafnecnokmhoenknpmgkcldigkgghmfSource Code: https://github.com/marcel-ausan/IFS_Stickies

Apple has announced iOS 27 and it is generally available to public from 14th Sept. 2026 onwards.Initial testing of recent iOS 27 beta releases with current MWM Mobile applications has not identified any significant issues. However, IFS recommends that customers do not immediately upgrade their devices to iOS 27 until our Product team has completed validation of the final public release.IFS strongly recommends that customers avoid installing major iOS updates as soon as they are released by Apple.​​Each major iOS release requires compatibility testing with MWM Mobile to ensure that all product functionality continues to operate as expected. This validation process may take up to 90 days following the public release of the operating system.For best results, customers planning to deploy iOS 27 should ensure that: Their MWM Mobile application version is already compatible on iOS 26. They are running the latest available service release for their MWM version whenever possible. Please note

We have been using Resource Capacity Calculation on IFS apps 10.It took about 21 minutes to calculate for 2 years horisont.After upgrading to IFS cloud, we have serious problems in executing the job.The executing time is between 2 hours and 21 hours for calculating 6 month horizon. (only 25 %)We have been working with setting up statistic in database on the temporary tables used in the job, but it seems to be very sensitive, so its difficult  to hit the right levels. Anyone have solved this?/JE 

HiI We are currently testing the migration from pain.001.001.03 to pain.001.001.09 in IFS Applications 10 using the standard system-defined transformer: IFS_ISO20022_TO_CORE_09_ISO20022. During testing with Nordea we identified two questions regarding the generated XML.1. Regulatory ReportingIn the generated file we see the following mapping:<RgltryRptg> <DbtCdtRptgInd>DEBT</DbtCdtRptgInd> <Dtls> <Cd>14</Cd> <Inf>Message to Valutaregisteret</Inf> </Dtls></RgltryRptg> After reviewing the transformer, I can see:NATIONAL_BANK_CODE        RgltryRptg/Dtls/CdNATURE_OF_BUSINESS        RgltryRptg/Dtls/Inf However, I cannot find any mapping that generates:  <Tp>PURP</Tp>. Nordea has pointed out that the Type element (Tp) is missing:My questions are:Which IFS field should generate RgltryRptg/Dtls/Tp? Is there a standard setup required in IFS? Is this a known limitation in the standard transformer? Has anyone successfully gen

Hi,We have a use case according to followingCustomer order is released for a high volume of COL, for example 2000 products. The product is ETO but all has the same BOM revision. The COL’s are connected to project for financial and other reasons and qty for each line is 1. This results in 2000 COL and 2000 DOP Headers and the delivery time for the lines are spread over 12-24 month.  Challenge/Problem:The Customer Order is released and lines connected to project activities. MS Level 1 cannot be used to create supply for non-DOP parts.The DOP structure must be created for all DOP’s, if not created = no demand for non-DOP parts. Please confirm that this is correct, I might missed something:1. Unreleased CO is a demand and MRP create supply for non-DOP parts (Released for Mtrl Planning enabled)2. Released CO, DOP Header created, this is a demand but MRP doesn’t create supply for non-DOP Parts3. Released CO, DOP Header created and Top DOP Created, this is a demand but MRP doesn’t create supp

Our users report the following: In IFS, when an advance payment is managed via the PO by inserting the advance payment, and the PO is still in the draft / unauthorized status, the advance payment can simply be processed by AP. Why does IFS allow payment against a not authorized PO? Are we doing something wrong? Who can advice?

hiIs there a way to give access to a page to a user/role with some fields restricted? Ex.If i need to disable the assign work button for some roles, is it possible? I know that this page can be made visible/not, can be made read only/update but at field level on a page, can we restrict for some roles?  

Hi All, I need to create a lobby element which shows not cerated external customer invoice load IDs per company in last 10 days. I started with a Projection type datasource.Projection: ExternalCustomerInvoiceLoadInformationHandlingFilter: (LoadDate gt #TODAY#-10) and ExtOutInvLoadState ne IfsApp.ExternalCustomerInvoiceLoadInformationHandling.ExtOutInvLoadState'Created' It works upto here.I need to show the  no of load ids per company.the group by condition I need to use is: ((Company),aggregate($count as LoadIdCount)) URL would be:.../main/ifsapplications/projection/v1/ExternalCustomerInvoiceLoadInformationHandling.svc/ExtOutInvLoadInfoSet?$apply=filter((LoadDate%20gt%202026-08-31)%20and%20ExtOutInvLoadState%20ne%20IfsApp.ExternalCustomerInvoiceLoadInformationHandling.ExtOutInvLoadState%27Created%27)/groupby((Company),aggregate($count%20as%20LoadIdCount)) URL is giving correct results but the datasource designer gives an error with the aggregate. It seems like the aggregate is not supp

The standard functionality in IFS Cloud supports inverted currency rates only for EUR, which is configured as inverted by default. For other currencies, the "Inverted Quotation When Reference Currency" field on the Currency Codes page is not editable. However, some customers have business requirements to maintain inverted currency rates for specific currencies. Therefore, clarification is required on the recommended approach and available configuration options to support such scenarios within IFS Cloud.The R&D team has provided a more convenient method for making a Currency Code Inverted by using Company Templates.Steps to FollowOpen the Company Templates page, filter for the STD template, and use the Copy Company Template command to create a new template based on STD. Open the newly created Company Template and select Company Template Component. Select the Accrul component and then open Company Template LU. Select the Currency Code LU and open Company Template Detail. Navigate to

We are working to implement the India GET Functionality. To enable the new functionality we need to create a new Company/Site. We will be migrating from our current India site into the new site. As we work through all transactions, we have an issue regarding our open inter-site Purchase Orders > Customer Orders.Specifically:We have Inter site Purchase Orders (our India site 1300) to one of our internal Supplier: 10 where the connected Customer Order is on Site 10.When we migrate the Purchase Orders (from site 1300 to the new site with India Get: 1301) we are looking for a way/best practice to reconnect them to the existing Customer Orders in Site 10.Product Version: Cloud 24.2.6We have close to 4,000 open Inter-Site PO Lines that will need to be migrated to the new site. And are looking for the best way to update all of them in mass.

The Announcement section on the home page of AssystNet does not show the announcements by default.The workaround is to remove and re-add the announcement section on the home page for the announcements to be visible. And this should be done by each end user individually, which is not feasible. So, this bug should be corrected in successive versions.AssystNet Announcement Visibility IssueAlso, seems the announcements are not visible on the top banned in AssystNet as in AssystWeb. One would guess these would be more useful for the end user business community (AssystNet) than the IT Support people (AssystWeb). So, this feature should be included in AssystNet so that users can see the announcements clearly upfront on the home page rather than going to the ‘Announcement’ section, which hardly anyone does.AssystNet Announcement Visibility Proposal 

A. Brief descriptionSome manufacturing processes require additional finished units to be produced for destructive or non-destructive testing. These units are manufactured together with the quantity required by the original demand, but they are not part of that demand and may be destroyed, damaged, or released as usable products depending on the test result.IFS Cloud does not currently provide a clear and traceable way to distinguish the quantity required by the original demand from the additional finished quantity required for testing. This can lead to manual adjustments, incorrect MRP quantities, unclear supply availability, and limited traceability between production planning and quality assessment.B. Context and scope1) Who is affected?Customers Partners2) FrequencyFrequentlyC. Value and impact1) What is the business outcome?Improves productivity or efficiency Reduces cost or manual effort Enables new capability Supports compliance or reduces risk 2) WorkaroundThe current workaround

Hi,Few weeks back I was able to insert the Dataset in the Delivery unit in Service Org screen but when I am trying to use the same job and same input file, the dataset are not importing.What I Investigated is, table Service_Organization is not storing the datasets field now, but earlier it was there.Not sure if IFS has made some changes, can anyone confirm what needs to be checked?thanks in advance.

Due to a storage space issue, our customer recently moved their files from the database (DB) to File System Storage (FSS).Since then, users have been receiving the information message shown below when accessing documents, and it is causing delays when viewing them.After researching the IFS Community, we found that this behavior may be related to the "Enable File Scan to Detect Malware" parameter in the System Parameters window. The suggested workaround is to disable this setting. However, due to security considerations, we do not want to disable malware scanning at this stage.We have also attempted refreshing the system caches, but the issue persists.Current version :25.1.5Any guidance or recommendations on how to resolve this issue while keeping malware scanning enabled would be greatly appreciated. 

Hi Everyone,We need to know latest tools that we have for Data migration within the IFS except the DMM , Ex: SAP to IFS Cloud Ex: noted this Article as well but not sure , what are the latest approaches (https://www.ifs.com/en/insights/news/ifs-launches-accelerator-to-help-sap-customers)Best Regards,Hashan

Hello, I am attempting to create an arrival to receive a Purchase Order line via REST API. I am inspecting the endpoint calls that Aurena makes during the process, but i’m unable to figure out which call is actually performing the receipt. I see calls to CreateReceiptSet but the payload doesnt include the information from the arrival line (PO #, Line, Etc). I also see CreateArrivalReceipt, but it only uses what i assume is the OBJKEY that is returned from CreateReceiptSet. I know this is a little tricky because an assistant is involved, but I cant seem to make sense of the calls that are happening. Any tips for figuring out how this assistant works? 

A. What is your idea?1) ClassificationOpportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionIn an Int Purch Direct flow, when the Planned Delivery Date is changed on the demand site, the supply site internal customer order is updated accordingly. Since the Target Date follows the received Wanted Delivery Date, the original customer requested delivery date is no longer visible on the supply site order.The original customer Wanted Delivery Date is an important reference point for planning. Even when internal planning dates change, visibility of the customer's original requested date helps the planning team understand the customer's expectation and work towards delivering as close to that date as possible. This also supports delivery performance analysis.B. Context and scope1) Who is affected?Internal users Customers2) FrequencyChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.DailyC. Value and impact1) What is the business outcome?Improves productivity or efficiency Reduces cost or man

All, As a manufacturing business we produce parts that are batch and revision controlled.This data must be physically seen on the parts produced as they are manufactured via shop orders. If there is only one operation this is simple as a label can be produced at the final operation and the part is booked into stock.How do other identify track product that has more than one operation as it moves through production from one work centre to another?Currently we rely on hand written cards and the business wants to move away from this but I can not see a standard way in IFS to produce a label once you report an operation quantity on the shop order. Is this something that IFS can't do as standard or is it a setting that we have not turned on.Any help is very much appreciated, Sarah

Hello everyone,I’m completely lost.I’m using IFS Cloud 25R2 and I’m desperately trying to generate a UBL invoice in the French format.First of all, I’ve correctly configured a customer for an E-INVOICE output.Next, I created an OUT routing rule (first with a message_type = E-INVOICE_FR, then SEND_UBL_EINVOICE_LIFE_CYCLE_EVENT), an IFS_FINVOICE_TO_IFS_EINVOICE transformer, a routing address (functional, FinvoiceUBL_%TAG=INVOICE_ID%_%TAG=C06%.xml) and, finally, a sender).When I send an invoice to this customer, an XML file containing the customer’s invoice data is indeed written to disk, but it does not conform to the template required by the French government.Does anyone have a document setting out all the configuration steps required to successfully generate an invoice in the French UBL format? I’ve been searching through the documentation, but nothing I’ve tried has worked.Thank you for your help.

We have upgrade two customers to 26r1 and it seem like the ifsapp-connect pod has issues. It crash loops (OOMKILLED) using 2,5 core of cpu and over 4/5GB of memory even if now messages is in state processing.We have also observer that execute in order queue dosn’t work as expected (don’t stop processing on failed messages and runns multiple messages in parallel) and on the in sequence queue you can’t control the amount of threads… It just ends up with a lot’s of messages in processingHas anybody seen similar issues on ifsapp-connect in 26r1 or do we need ro report it as an bug to IFS Support?