Products (Manufacturing, Products, Engineering)

Hi All,Navigate to “Engineering Part Revision” window.Query for a part number -> Go to Approval process tab.The system doesn’t allow the user to modify the note field.Is this a bug or do I have to configure any settings to enable that?

Hello All, I am curious if it is possible to script a cost value update from one site to another? Currently we have a production site and an estimating site. The estimating site has a copy of our component parts, which we use to create customer quotations. The issue we face is that part 12345 in the production site may change from $5 to $7, but the PN 12345 in the estimating site is not updated, unless the user manually updates the cost. Is it possible to create a scheduled task to routinely perform an update from the production to estimating to keep the costs identical? Thank you!

Can some one please advise on the difference between the 2 screens Regards,Urvakshh

Copy sub project function will fetch data but it will not copy the report code details.Is there any specific reason for that?  

Hi, in our customer’s TEST environment;1. Create a CRO line with minimum 2 quantities and release it for disposition shop order. Part should be condition code enabled. CO should be created with CRO at the beginning.2. Create two DSO lines where one is for internal repair order and other one is for external service order.3. Complete the internal repair order.4. Internal repair order is received with condition code ‘USED’ as illustrated below. Serial No = E1.5. Serial E1 is now reserved in CRO’s customer order.6. Now process the 2nd DSO line for external repair order.7. As illustrated below, Serial E2 is received in inventory with condition code OVH.8. But, customer order failed to reserve the 2nd serial, since it has different condition code.Check the reserved qty field of the CO. Only a qty of 1 is reserved. Is there a fix available for the issue?

Hello all, I have noticed a clocking issue with regard to Labor and Machine clocking. We have often times where a user is clocked on to a Shop Order. They will forget to clock out of the SO and simply clock out of Time Clock. This will result in their labor being stopped for the SO, but not the machine time. This is leading to very large Shop Order variances, as the machine will remain clocked in for potentially days at a time.  I have been looking through Site and Work Center settings hoping to find a way to for machine time to stop when labor time is stopped, but I have not found anything. Is there a way to set this? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Dear all,does anyone have an idea of what 'alternate work center' in routings stands for?It looks like something the system could consider if the ‘primary’ is overloaded but I couldn’t find anything in the online help… Thanks for your support :)

Question on project safety stock in APP8.  We had the project safety stock requirement checked for a project activity and safety stock quantities entered for some purchased project parts on the inventory part. The buyers noticed that they were getting PMRP action proposals for the project in production that said “late order” even though the POs for the parts were coming in well ahead of their shop order demands

Hello community, I need help with the following topic, Our client has the need to execute in the Purchasing Control Plan the following: They use the ISO tables which define according to the level they choose the number of products to control, example, if 2000 nuts are received they are asked to control 20 nuts and if 10,000 are received they are asked to control 40 nuts. The analyst who controls has to record what the table asks for, how could he execute this control?

Hello,if I want to add a new part number in the tab “Consists Of” I get the following error message: Does anyone have an idea? Kind regards

We are receiving customer-owned inventory from a customer.  We cannot figure out how to set everything up in IFS Apps 10.  This is inventory that was not supplied by us.  It was supplied by other suppliers of our customer.  We have worked on this for almost two days and cannot get it figured out.  We keep getting asked about a customer and customer order.  When we finally think we have it we get an error message saying we cannot receive the quantity in because we didn’t supply that quantity.

Time is typically reported on project in Project Time Registration IFS10 EE window. But in some cases time will be registered on mobile devices in Aurena (Time registration window). A customer found out differences in user access to time reporting between EE and Aurena. Explanation- The TEAMACCESS property in Company Details is set to ‘TRUE’. When time is reported in EE Project Time Registration window, the list of available Employees depends on Project access configuration (this is expected behavior).In case when time is reported through Time registration window in Aurena, a list is different, looks like it depends on org structure settings in HR.Can this be aligned through basic data setup? Or is this a bug or intended system behavior?

Community, We set the a manufactured part Scrap Factor in Manufacturing Tab, Structure Default (please refer to attached screenshot), but this value does not bring forward to its component, i.e. in the shop order material line, we cannot see this value is brought forward to material line ‘Scrap Factor (%)’ column.Wondering why?Thank you.

Hi, Does someone know why the MS Level 1 calculation is automatically run, when the MRP is run, and MRP process is completed.I have checked in 3 App10 environments and I got the same results. Please see below in the progress text details in the background job. And, I have checked this by running MRP for a site in App9 environment, and it stops after finishing the MRP job. Nothing related to MS Level 1 calculation. Is this a difference introduced in App10 version, or is there some setting to control the behavior ? Thanks 

Hi, I’m trying to create a custom tab on shop floor workbench. It appears that I can do this in Apps 10. However, I can’t seem to enter data in these new fields. Here is an example, if I have a shop order and operation opened on the screen, I want to be able to check these boxes and have additional text fields. Is this possible? What am I missing? Thanks,Mike  

Is it possible to limit/change access for users for the pop-up window fields? Example for Approve Operation pop-up window in Shop Floor Workbench in Manufacturing.Can we set “Machine Time”, “Labor Time” and “Qty to Receive” tick box read only.  

Hi All,I have designed a report and add two parameters using business reporter.Project ActivitiesOnce I select a project in Parameter 01, I need to load activities only for the selected project. But in my case, application load all activities irrelevant to the selected project. It is working properly in Business Reporter. In application, it is not working. Any configuration for this?  

HiWe cannot set BOMs and work plans, Type "Prototype", to the "Released" status.  Why does this not work? Because of this, among other things, it is not possible for us to compare Target costs and Actual costs via the cost table 5.RegardsUrs

Hi,I am working on Apps10 Customization and when i run Visual Studio for Checking Customization effect into Application then it’s raise error 500.

In reading the help on two-stage picking, if the checkbox on the site is not checked, IFS should allow single stage picking, which it is not.  Our users are still getting a pop up when it’s not checked for our Shipment Types. However, when using one of our shipment types (210) it doesn’t popup at time of picking and I think it’s due to the Source Ref 1, which our other shipment types don’t have. There isn’t much documentation on this field, but I am trying to figure out if other application settings are hindering the ability of this field. Has anyone had experience with this field?  If so, can you provide details on why we still get a “two-stage” picking pop up when it’s not checked. Application Base Setup > Enterprise > Site > Site (Sales & Procurement Tab) 

In Shop Floor Workbench, is it correct that a Shop Floor Team can start production for an operation that requires a qualification profile when one or more of the Team members do not have the required competencies and/or Certificates? If said employee(s) start production outside of the team they are blocked (as you would expect). This seems to be a contradiction.Is there any setting to stop the team starting production when one or more team member do not have the required competencies and/or Certificates?

Apps 10 Update 8 EE. Part is serialized and set to Cost per Serial. Site/Company is configured to use Employee Salary Information for the Labor Rate and the Labor Overhead is using the OH Rate (150%) defined on the Cost Source.One shop floor employee working on one operation on one shop order.When setup time is clocked via the SFWB, Labor Overhead cost is incurred. When run time is clocked via the SFWB, Labor Overhead cost is not incurred.Any quick ideas why no overhead is incurred on run time?

Hello All, I am trying to test the reporting of operations with a barcode. I have not been able to find anything in the IFS help that covers how to use the function:Any guidance on how to setup the system (IFS Apps 10) would be greatly appreciated. 

Hello,Go to global settings and change the number of decimal places to 2. Go to Engineering Part Revision -> Additional tab-> Material Cost field. Update the field with 0.12032133 -> save. Again, change the number of decimal places to 8 and check the field.You will now see the value 0.12000000 instead of 0.12032133.Is this a bug or something that can be corrected from settings?

Hi all,Apps10We have a master part record with a netweight measured in kg.We have a US site which requires measurements in lb’s.We need to keep the master part record in kg and not duplicate in different UOM’s So. Turned on the site defaults for imperial and changed the inventory part/ purchase part to qty calc rounding to 4.On every customer order you end up with this and i cannot see any way of resolving this yet other than changing the master part record to imperial.any ideas?