IFS Solutions

Hi, I am trying to figure out how to show multiple decimals in Aurena. I updated Currency Formatting Options in the settings screen to enable more decimals but the UI only shows 2 decimals unless a user activates the cost fields (on the PO line for example) Is there a way to always show more than 2 decimals without having to select the field?

We’ve created a Customer Order that includes both regular order lines and rental lines, all of which are linked to the corresponding project and activity sequence. However, in the Project, the planned revenue is being updated only for the normal order lines, not for the rental lines.Am I missing any specific setup for this?Any guidance on this would be greatly appreciated.

 HiI have more than 300 commission recipients. To calculate this, I need to enter the supplier. I have to do this 300 times a month. The "Commission Receiver *" field is required. How can I execute this without specifying the commissioner's ID?Regards.  

Hello All,Anyone has idea or knowledge how to create external file migration or migration job for Instant invoice upload in Apps9? Is it possible to create through file migration or not? ThanksRaj

Hi All, Thank you for taking the time to review this post and hopefully provide a solution. As the title indicates, we’re looking for a way to migrate users from one environment (e.g., UAT) to another (e.g., Production). We’re currently implementing IFS Cloud, and manually creating accounts in each environment has proven to be very cumbersome. If there’s an “easy button” or a streamlined approach to handle this, it would be greatly appreciated!

Hello,In IFS Cloud 25R1, there is no direct link (i.e., baseline fields as reference) to copy attachments from a recurring service program to the generated request and work task using Object Connection Transformation in the Service Management module. Is there any other way out of the box we can achieve this functionality? If not, is this part of any of the planned releases? Please let me know.We currently have this feature in PM Actions that it copies the attachments to the generated work order and work task.

When making changes to the Invoice Posting Authorizer Groups, is there an automatic update task that can be run to update existing invoice posting proposals to display the new authorizer and update the Invoices to Authorize page?I start by updating the Authorizer Group: Then navigating to an existing posting proposal with pending authorization that is assigned to the same group: When I view Authorizer Group Members, the changes do not seem to have been carried over: The system will still let me authorize the posting proposal, however this invoice does not appear on Invoices to Authorize page: The only way I can resolve this is by manually changing the authorizer on the posting proposal and pointing it back to the same Authorizer Group, but due to the volume of invoices that are processed, this is not really a feasible solution. Whilst I appreciate that new invoices will reflect the updated authorizer group, we still need existing invoices to be updated when a user has left the business

Hi,I have facing issue while fetching records of Part No through online search in MWO while creating Transport task from MWO.When I do online search, I do not find records being fetched in the MWO. While I have some parts in Inventory part in stock.Can someone let me know what am I missing here?Screenshots:    

hello, I have a request to define an absence type using calendar days for absence limit calculation. The client need to count their weekends when they book an absence request. So for this I setup the absence calculation & duration to calendar days. I have an issue on half days, the system calculate as 0.8 or 0.2 and not 0.5. Because of this the number of limits is not calculated correctly. Did someone  faced this use case already, do you have any clue on how to setup to make sure half a day is 0.5, weekend is counted and limits are correctly calculated. here is the standard calculation of IFS for calendar days & number of hours per day is 9.6h.thank you,Cristina 

The access to expense sheets is controlled by “Position – Access Setup” in IFS. This way, a project manager will be able or not to visualize the expense sheets connected to his/her project depending on the position of the employees. Customer would like that a project manager could have access to all the expense sheets that belonged to his/her own project. The only way knows to achieve this target is enabling all the project managers the access to all the positions. But, if define this way, all the project managers could be able to visualize every expense sheet of any employee in any project, even if they had not access to the project. Customer have tried to define a new “access attribute” adding as a column name a custom field, but it is not included in the value list. Also have tried to define as the “old value” in the “access attribute” a select sentence, but it is considered as an invalid value when try to save it.cannot use an event either because all want is to visualize, not to m

The problem arises when engineering part revisions need to be controlled across multiple sites, alongside Inventory Part Revisions….. Example revisions below. The flow involves several locations, where one site supplies products to another. The Planning Network MRP triggers the generation of a Distribution Order to facilitate the shipment of products between sites. The receiving site treats the incoming manufactured items as purchased raw materials. Therefore, upon release of MRP Planned Distribution Orders, a corresponding PO is created for the receiving site and customer order created at the sending site. A PO release from the receiving site, intended to receive today (11/3) will be created with Revision 3, Engineering Rev C referenced. However, the Customer Order does not reflect any requirement for revision control. The manufacturing site has quantity on hand from prior production of Revision 2, Engineering Rev B and will ship this inventory against the Customer Order. When attempt

It appears that the Public Holiday Compensation requirements have changed somewhat recently in App10 Aurena.The original setup that was working was that a PCH Day Type was created with an Absence Wage Code, Fixed and Value of 8. A PCH Schedule was created with a date and the PCH Day Type connected. The PCH Schedule was connected to an Employee’s Schedule and Rules Assignment. A Substitute Schedule was not required. On a day defined in the PCH Schedule, 8 hours of the Absence Code would automatically be inserted into the Employee Results for that day.The above setup has stopped working. Page Help  indicates that now a Substitute Schedule for Public Holidays has to be created and connected to the Cycle Schedule. Page Help also indicates that PHC Day Types also have to be created with Increment Wage Types instead of Absence Wage Types. When I follow the Page Help the Attendance now indicates the day is a Public Holiday, but Results are not generated for the day. I have manually run the Da

Hello.By adding a new line in the purchase requisition screen in the no part requisition lines, we have the following error message when we mention the supplier :A Tax Code is required when supplier tax validation has Transaction Level selected on Company, Tax Control tabI noticed that the tax code is not automatically filled and even if we fill it, the error keeps poping.Other information, the status is set to planned.Any idea to fix this?IFS APPS 10 UPD 5

We’re part way through IFS Cloud technical upgrade (IFS10 to 25R1). We have an inhouse team who did front end CRIM work in 10 and we decided that we’d do the CRIM uplift inhouse and into Build Place, rather than the front end.It’s been a very steep learning curve for the team to get up to speed and navigate through all the complexities of Build Place, the tools around it and the Branch, Sanity & Delivery builds. I’m just wondering how many customers have gone down this route in a technical upgrade, or either: Continued with customisations in the front end? or Outsourced the Build Place activities? It’s a hindsight question as we are progressing with the Build Place, but interested what others have done and the pro’s and con’s of itThanks Dave

Hello, My client uses both DOP and MRP for his manufacturing.Configured parts are managed with DOP. Not configured manufactured parts & purchased parts are handled by MRP. Example :TOP PART - Configured - DOP→ COMPONENT1 - Purchased - MRP→ SUBPART - Manufactured/Not configured - MRP     → COMPONENT2 - Purchased - MRP With this, DOP will create a Shop order for TOP PART at DOP Release, and MRP will handle the creation of Purchase requisitions / Shop order requisitions should there be shortages. However, we discovered that when we create a DOP structure (DOP header in  status “Unreleased”), and then run the MRP at this moment, purchase requisitions will be created for shortages.This is dangerous because the structure of an unreleased DOP header can still evolve before being released is case of customizations of a product for example.→ Is there a way to make unreleased Dop orders not visible by the MRP ?Thank you,PL

i’m probably missing something. Trying to make a simple call to CustomerOrderHandling to creat the customer order Header.tried it with simple quotes and without ‘ Always having error  When trying the same this with postman my order is createdany Idea please?  

Hi everyone, When I create a New Request in MWO, it correctly appears in PSO, but the date/time is incorrect.In IFS Cloud, I noticed that the Planned Start value is not transferred. So far, I haven’t been able to identify the root cause.Has anyone experienced a similar issue or have any ideas what could be causing this?Thank you in advance! 

Hello together, at the moment the “attributes”/”technical classes” are so to say available when clicking on an service object and then to scheduling information and from there clicking on the attachment tab and from there clicking on attributes. Please see attached the screenshot. Could we please bring these information up on a higher level, so we have a generalistic view about all possabilities for fields/functionalities? ThanksMarc

Hi All, Is there a way to track or log failed login attempts in IFS Cloud 25 R1. Regards,Sahil Gupta

Hi!Given the recent change in Peppol Business Rule PEPPOL-T76-R008 (An order response with code AP (Accepted) should NOT provide order lines) I am wondering how others relate to this change? Because IFS Apps 10 require all Order Lines in the Order Response to be able to Confirm the Purchase Order. After the change in the Peppol business Rules the order lines is no longer included in a order response with code AP (Accepted). Hence we are not able to Confirm the Purchase Order.Anyone that has faced the same problem? Any input would be much appreciated.

Hello All, I am trying to add all the columns from the column chooser , so i am taking all the columns from left to right side and click Okay than all the columns are visible in list in table format but after that when i am refreshing the screen than columns are not visible and its went back to the left side again in a column chooser. I am trying to add again than again same issue . When i am taking 241 columns total and refresh the screen than its visible but for more than 241 this issue is coming. Same for the Purchase Order Lines tab also here i am able to add 234 fields only if I’ll add more than 234 than this issue is coming.I wanted to know there is some limitation from the IFS side or what. Thanks,Pallavi

Hi all,We have built a custom API that changes a field (IFS Cloud).I built the Custom event so that whenever this field is changed with “value,” the workflow is triggered. This works fine if I run the custom API from Postman or the value is changed using IFS Cloud. But for some reason, when it is sent via IFS Connect (Using Projection as Routing Rule), the workflow is not triggered.Do you have any idea why this is a different behavior? Thanks,

Dear all,  I get a problem on 22R2 when I try to register arrivals of some purchase orders. I get the following error “The update could not be performed since the purchase order record is currently locked. Please retry the operation.”Did you already have this problem and have a solution ? Best regards, Laura

An Object was moved from CIP to Equipment and then we received a credit from the vendor.  The credit is sitting in CIP as a negative.  How do I get this out of CIP and applied to the original asset?  I have tried to add value to the object along with adding a child to the object and the message is “the value can’t be a negative number.”  What is the best way to accomplish this?

Question:Has anyone run into this issue where the Payment Advice PDF does not get attached to the application message/email, even though the report exists in the archive and can be printed?Do I need to do something additional in Report Designer?Could this be related to how Attachments are linked in Event Actions?Any guidance or examples would be much appreciated!Created a new Empty_ADV payment formatSet the ‘Generate Payment Advice’ = TrueCreated a new payment method for Wire_ADV using the Empty_ADV Payment format Report Definition – Uniform_Payment_Advice***If we use the same rdl file for two companies, both companies will receive the remittances for each other.These are the steps that were done but not sure if something needs to be done in Report Designer.Exported the ACG_Suriname_Advice.rdl save to downloads folderRename to Saudi_Advice.rdlIn Report Definition –> Layout DefinitionsCreate New LayoutLayout Name = Saudi_Advice.rdlLayout Title = Saudi_AdvicePaper Format = Dynamic A4/