IFS Maintenix

Southwest Airlines is curious how other operators manage tracking of locked-out/tagged-out (LOTO) within Maintenix. Specifically, do you have a method to track which circuit breakers have been locked out during a check, including who locked it out and for what task, or do you handle that externally? Sincerely, Shon Creese

Southwest is currently working through demoting of parts. We are wondering if any other carries have any feedback on demoting parts when any of following apply: Managing demotion of a part when in multiple part groups and/or TRK slots Updating open ROs after performing a part demotion Active task definition Open Borrow orders

Southwest Airlines is interested in understanding how other operators setup tool kits in Maintenix and provide visibility to batch tools that are included in these kits. We set up Tool kits as assemblies since Maintenix does not have tool kitting capability, and an assembly approach was the best choice provided by IFS at the time. Tool kits WILL show serialized tools as children of kits, however batched “TOOLS” i.e. sockets, extensions, etc. are NOT showing in kits because they are issued out of stock to be put into the kit. Batched inventory is never shown as installed on assemblies. The issue we are having is that Technicians do not have visibility to inventory that is contained in these kits. We often have to AOG parts, when in reality the inventory was in kits that were in stock. Southwest Airlines is curious how other operators are managing this gap in functionality. We are at creating an external database to track the batch parts contained in a tool kit, but this is not ideal sol

Curious to get feedback from other Operators who are using the Flight Disruption functionality in Maintenix. Southwest uses other sources and means to record and track delays and cancels but we are exploring doing this within Maintenix and I was interested in getting feedback from those currently using this functionality. Best Regards, Shon Creese

Southwest had a ship-or-shelf (SOS) program where they examine the part (quarantine) then decide if the part needs to be shipped for repair. Southwest would like the system to auto quarantine certain parts (and also have removal reason be one of the drivers for the automation). There is a ship-or-shelf checkmark available in Maintenix, but it is for information purposes only, doesn't have any logic built into it. Curious how/if other Operators have a ship-or-shelf (SOS) program and if so how are they managing that in Maintenix, if at all.

In an old Maintenix Fundamentals Guide(8.1) there are a lot of references to SAS Use Case XXX, are those available somewhere on Your site?

Dears, Greetings, My company Ethiopian airlines using Maintenix, later called IFS Maintenix, starting from 2011 GC. I would appreciate on hereinafter issue, how and why component usage data in particular mentioned at the title become negative, zero. Accordingly, the other positive figure also not real. kind regards;

SWA has noted that you cannot find BATCH part-number based tasks while using the Task Search function. We see that if a task has been completed that you should be able to find it via the Task Search. We were able to see the task completions while reviewing the parent Requirement and Inventory details history. Do any other operators have a better way to search for BATCH, P/N based requirement tasks?

Hi All, Wondering if there is a way we can hide the assigned tasks tab of a work package from specific user groups. Reason: we are seeing an organisational impact with maintenance exection teams attempting to justify deferring maintenance as they can see the remaining compliance limits. This control is not in their jurisdiction to interrogate.Wondering if other Airlines have seen/heard similar. Thanks,

Increased use of FD get more frequent FD need to be removed.A FD cannot be obsoleted or deleted from the CS it was created.Today the FD are renamed starting by "OBSOLETED" which is not correct for end user in the GUI. Potential solution identified are : RSTAT2 the FD? Move the FD into an unused organisation? Any other solution?

Hi - We would like to keep using MXI v 8.1 sp3 until the end of 2027. The plan is to request new license keys yearly in Jan 2024, Jan 2025 and Jan 2026. Is there any issue with continuing to use version 8.1 sp3 until then? Would there be any additional fees that we would be charged to keep using this version and get yearly license keys?

Why does Maintenix use use terms that are not industry standard? Two examples come immediately to mind: The term “record oil uptake” should be “record oil service” and using the term “inventory” when ATA codes are the industry standard. Granted both are minor issues but it illustrates a point. That point is there seeming no consulting the people that actually use Maintenix. The people that use Maintenix in high stress environments such as turning aircraft under time constraints.

I remember there was some talk at one time about an analysis module for Maintenix. Is there any recent information or documentation for it?

Good Day, Looking for guidance on implementing IFS Maintenix for Line Maintenance. Any support or guidance would be appreciated. Thanks,EC

When engineering users flag N/A more than 20 A/C at same time on INITIALIZE REF DOC page generates "error message", which is in fact a "message built by IFS due to technical limitations "URL exeeded the maximum lenght". Please see attached doc Does other airlines have the same experience? If Yes, an IDEA could be raised to support a system improvement for Large fleet administration.

Hello, We have the possibility to go to a Barcode with an hyperlink with the following format: http://mtx.afklmdomain.com/maintenix/servlet/ScanBarcode?aBarcodeScan= TRFX123456789&aReturnToPage=/ Do you have similar hyperlink definition to go directly to a document in the baseline? like a Refdoc, a Requirement code…? by definition the baseline documents do not have Barcodes. Thanks

The Repair Order Price Type field needs to retain the type selected by the Component Repair Analyst and not change to “Confirmed” when the order is received. Once the CRA validates the service with the vendor that matches the price paid these should remain on the order and not automatically be changed by the system. The field currently changes to confirmed on receipt. Need to validate the Price Type field is a text field Need to expand the Price Type field to include all services: Test, Inspect, Calibration, Minor Repair, Std Repair, Major Repair, Overhaul, Modification, RAI

I was trying to find the Release Schedule for IFS Maintenix but couldn’t find it. I found the master article for release schedule that is tagged as a related topic. However, this article didn’t contain any information regarding when SP6 and SP7 is planned to be released.

Can someone please inform us how they are providing access to their Maintenix system to third parties i.e. MRO / Line stations ? Do you use citrix, vpn, or some other technology, or are your servers on the internet? We are trying to plan our configuration and are looking to find out how others have theirs configured.

My understanding is that IFS Maintenix 8.3 SP6 was planned to be released at 07-APR-2022 (GA). I have searched the product bulletins on the community and did not find one for making SP6 GA. My conclusion is that SP6 has been delayed. Is there a new release date for IFS Maintenix 8.3 SP6?

We would like to know end of life and end of support for Maintenix 8.1-SP3, but are unable to locate lifecycle dates for this version. Is there a resource that states EOL/Support dates for Maintenix v8.1?

Hi Maintenix allow user to move Workpackage (WP) from one TRACK to another when there is only one WP with status IN-WORK. But if there are more then one WP with status IN-WORK then the system doesn’t allow it, why not ? This happen quite often for us when C-check is coming to an end that the aircraft is moved between Hangar (track) slots.

Hi Are there a Maintenix Reference Guide available for download for an IFS customer? Best Regards Magnus Fredriksson

Hi, Would like to get ideas on how Maintenix users in Organisations handle inventory with calendar based on-wing tasks that go overdue whilst on shelf. I believe this would affect any organisation using Maintenix for components with/without a supply solution. When inventory has an overdue task, a Maintenix job changes the status REPREQ. The supply department would suspect the inventory requires repair, (in our business requires back-office review for each part to consider) The inventory cannot be issued or electronically fitted by the maintenance repair organisation without this back office support to clear or overrun the task. The maintenance repair organisation maybe now subject extra work without notification, this is depending on how your business handles overdue tasks. In our business we need to have the units RFI. Therefore back-office support is always required. Explored options such as; Baseline Create on Install, suits a limited range of tasks due to complaince. DANI - Do at n

Hi, When creating new users using the HR API, the ADMIN organization is assigned to the users by default, however in restricted mode. You must then manually assign a Primary Organization through the GUI. How do other IFS Maintenix users handle this when loading multiple users using the HR API?