Supply Chain

Hello For “External transportation lead time” in matrix, where it can be impacted on? please help to clarify as when I change this value no impact on purchase order’s planned delivery date or planned arrival date.  For “transport lead time”, in Help mention that it is counted in working days of external transport calendar, where this calendar to set up, if not set up, which date it will be counted. Please help to clarify. ThanksSusan   

When you do a delivery using the feature regarding confirmation it is removing the inventory from your books as it should remained somehoe until the delivery would be confirmed. Currently, when you deliver the shipment it triggers the following event : DELCONFOU which remove the inventory out, and put it in a tranfer status. At the same time, it seems to trigger the DELCONFIN that puts it back in inventory, however that has no impact on the quantity. Therefore when you look in the screen “Inventory Part Stock In Reservations”, you don’t see this inventory.  At the time of confirmation, it reverse (again with no quantity impact) the inventory to Cost of goods sold. From an accounting stand point, it seems like it is working but if your inventory has not been confirmed at month end, you inventory will be out of balance? In our spectific case, our clients wants to see the inventory in transit at any point of time. Thanks

One of my customers looking for an App to fulfill for below requirement. The customer is a luxury dairy product (clotted cream) manufacturer. They distribute products locally via a fleet of small vans.Their requirement is for an app which the van drivers used to process their daily deliveries. The orders would be downloaded to the app each day and deliveries would be made as if we were using a mobile live device. As the vans would go in an out of internet range, the app would need to be able to buffer data and download when contact was re-established.Customer would like to know if there are any known apps or customers who have already developed something along these lines. It’s hard to imagine that this requirement is unique as there are thous

Dear all,when creating a PO and its PO lines, purchase charges are automatically fetched according to the setup. However, if we decide to remove one of the charge, this one is automatically re-applied when updating the quantity and delivery dates (same if we set the charged qty to 0). Do you know if there is a way to freeze the charges on a PO?Thanks for your replies 😀

Hello Community,We are using IFS APPS 8 . where it is defined that when we release the customer order shipment will be created or not created.  

Hello all, I am trying to set up a purchase order authorization rule and/or ewith 2 steps : First step has an authorization type based on an authorization group Second step has an authorization type based on a role projectHowever, when I set it up, it does not work if there are 2 steps with a different authorization type. Please find my tests below for better understanding :TEST 1 : my authorization rule has only one step based on an authorization group --> it works as it generates one authorization line for the people belonging to the authorization group TEST 2 : my authorization rule has only one step based on a project role--> it works as it generates one authorization line for the user with this project role TEST 3 : my authorization rule has two steps, one based on an authorization rule and one based on a project role--> it does not work, it only generates the step with the authorization gr

environment: Cloud 22R1Scenario: when I register a return for credit in the receipt window and create a Replacement Order I cannot see the link between the receipt and the new purchase order created for this return for credit. There is a way to see this link? Thanks in advance

Hi,  When we get Over supply message, what action will planner need to take to meet what criterial level?  ThanksSusan 

Hello Dear Community, Configured materials cannot be added to the package material.But we want to show the 3 rows in the sales order as a one row in the invoice.Anyone have an idea about this? Regards

Hello communityOne issue we have. Decimals are rounded wrong on our delivery note. Example:XML contains the number 3,4485In IFS and in our other systems we use 3 decimals, and its correctly rounded to 3,449. But however our report in PDF has a rounding to 3,448.  If i do recall my days at school, this is wrong. Rounding of .5 has to go up and not down. How can this be, and is it possble to change? 

Hi All,I need to remove all shop orders and clocking’s up to specific date, in IFS 08th.I tried to do it by using “Mass delete closed shop orders and clocking” function.But after running the function, still the shop order details are Visible in “Shop order window”Could you please advise me the correct way to remove those Closed shop orders?Thanks,Ishani 

Hello,We can create sales orders for all sales parts and configurable parts in package materials.When we create a Supply Chain (inter-site) by adding Configurable Parts to the Package Part, we get an error when creating a customer order on the supply site(works flawlessly on non-configurable parts). The Supplier Site customer order does not have a Configuration ID. The Incoming Customer Order Message is below, you can review it.Sales Part in Package Customer Order Supply Chain Customer Order Non-Configurable Sales Parts ✓

Hi, Is it possible to trigger a mandatory analysis each x receipts, and if the analysis is not triggered you can receive into inventory? In the current set-up, the Receive Case is set on ‘receive into Arrival, inspect at arrival’. We do standard register arrival, the part goes into arrival zone. If the trigger is activated, we need to confirm the analysis first before moving it into stock. If the trigger is not activated, we can move into stock right away. Standard IFS, all good. However, we would like to set the receive case to “Move into inventory”. So if the trigger is not activated, we can move into inventory right away. If it is activated, we get an error and we need to confirm the analysis first. Is that possible?Currently, we get an error when trying to receive into inventory on arrival, saying the part needs to be inspected. Even if the trigger is not creating the analysis. Thanks!

Are you aware of any config/system parameter which could trigger Consignment Stock consumption when transport task line is executed?There is functional gap or ...lack of consistency in IFS.  When stock (ownership = Consignment) is moved from original location to new location by ‘Move Inventory Part’ functionality, pop-up window appears with information “Do you want to consume consignment stock when moving to location [location_no]”. The same action could be set for WADACO version of Move inventory Part process - MOVE_PART and Data Item ID CONSUME_CONSIGMENT.Although, when part is moved by a transport task such possibility doesn’t exist.looking fwd any comments/ideas.

 Hello Community,While registering the direct delivery of purchase order we are getting below error message.  

Hello,  I am looking for the business case/reason why IFS only allows the Inventory Valuation Method of Standard Cost for Consignment Stock?  Many Thanks 

Which transaction types that are used in the report Accrued – Not Yet Invoiced (more detailed answer)? Accrued - Not Yet Invoiced report is showing the all the rentals you didn’t invoice. In the rental transactions window if you query by the state "Not Invoiiced" you will receive a set of rental transactions that are not invoiced. Once you create invoices for those transactions, they will be disappeared from accrued-not yet invoiced report.   List of posting types that are handled in the report «Accrued – Not Yet Invoiced 

In a material return authorization, when the goods returned by the customer are received, we get this error message: “The validity end date is earlier than the validity start date”.So we don't know what validity it is or are there any missing parameters.Thanks. 

IFS allow to reject PO authorization after PO released. Is this is a standard process or bug. 

Dear community,I am using use Customer orders with line supply code Purch Order Trans.What I would like to do is to connect the customer order with an existing purchase order.This can be achieved with regular functionality, however, despite I can connect customer order with an existing Purchase order Header, the result of the opération is always the creation of a new purchase order line inside the purchase order.Is there a way to connect directly the customer order with the existing Purchase order header an Purchase order line? Best RegardsRémi Lheure 

Hi Team,I was wondering when the following message appears in the APPS10+UPD9 Testenvironment of IFS appears: But the same order and same charges will be updating without this message in the APPS10 + UPD 14Before change Pos 1:After changing Quantity of Line 1 from 12 to 10:So the charges with a connection to the Line No are updating automatically without Info message. Since which update does this behavior work? Thank you for your help. BR Marina

 We can have several delivery terms for one supplier depending on which company is using this supplierand 1 supplier which can have several delivery adresses depending on the company which is using this supplier.what can be the impact of Po’s with the supplier Adress?

We are a Food Manufacturer with a multi-level structure. Product flows through this multi-level structure in minutes and hours - therefore shop orders at each structure level need to arrive on time within the day to satisfy the next level in the structure. I have used Intraday Planning to address this challenge - however I also need to sequence products at work centers based on characteristics and this can undo what has been achieved in Intra-Day Planning. I’m looking for others with similar challenges that may be able to help.Thank you.

how to handle moving parts in the Warehouse which has been reserved to work orders

Hello,When I have a released purchase requisition created from MRP that needs authorization, but the authorization step is not executed before MRP run again, the released requisition is getting blowen away and a new planned requisition is created.  Is some set up missing that the released requisition requiring authorization is getting deleted and a new planned requisition created or is this the expected results?Best, Dolly