IFS Solutions

Hi All,I am currently working on an uplift to IFS cloud from APPS10, and having a requirement to uplift a functionality where additional field were added to the ‘ORDERS’ type incoming XML, in APPS10 I could see that this modification is done in a server package called ‘DistributionTransactionManagement’ in the ‘its’ module.However, in IFS cloud, the ‘its’ module is empty and I would like to know the technical details such asWith which API’s this functionality was replaced, How incoming XML payload is captured (from which API) How the connectivity inbox is populated.any lead is much Appreciated :). TIA

HiI’m interested to have an understanding of the everyday life after the move to Cloud version and how you keep up with the IFS releases and upgrades.Many customers seems to go the “update once a year” route to get to the latest release. Much depends of course of the scope you are using the platform for and how are the borders of each customer’s ICT systems set and integrated with each other.Our IFS scope is pretty basic, mostly finance/ERP with purchasing and project related activities and HR master system, adn we have just moved from Apps9 to 10.I’m interested of you who have already moved from different Apps-versions to Cloud or even you who have moved directly from other system to IFS Cloud, and your views about the adaptation to the new everyday life.What has changed in areas of the amount of IFS/partner support needed, the amount of your own work needed to keep up with the releases and even the spend changes for doing all of this.I’m having doubts we can keep it running efficient

In the FSM you had the ability to update the Customer Information on a Work Task or Work Order. Does Service Management have the same capability? testing this out it seems if I update the Customer Order Type (SEO) and add a Customer Order No it will still create a new Customer Order from the Invoice Preview.We are on IFS Cloud 25.1.8

Hi everybody, when a user wants to re-print a customer invoice was originally ordered by another user. He receives the following error "the invoice has been printed by another user. He doesn't have access to this report (key report 9799)". I read two post on the community that said it’s a bug, is it true ? https://community.ifs.com/framework-experience-infrastructure-cloud-integration-dev-tools-50/re-print-original-from-archive-5034 or https://community.ifs.com/framework-and-experience-101/error-the-invoice-has-been-printed-by-another-user-you-do-not-have-access-to-this-report-6200.If you have a solution, I take.

Customer would like to know if UK GAAP could be included as  an option in Accounting standard drop down .(see the image attached)Customer had informed a new regulations around UK GAAP come into place for Lease accounting, which is being used in place of IFRS, there are some differences between the two. We would like to know what are the differences are and if IFRS can support them in IFS or if we need to account for the differences in the system/whether IFS will be updating this in any of their releases. 

I am looking for a better explanation of the settings for ‘Editable’ in Object Connection Transformations than what is provided in the F1 Help for Service Name = DocReferenceObject. Some examples would be beneficial also.Scenario: I have a Source LU ‘A’ and a Target LU ‘B’. I connect a document revision to source LU ‘A’.For each of the three possible values for ‘Editable’ (Source, Target, None):What am I able to do with documents at the Source, i.e., connect additional documents, detach documents, etc., and what effect does this have at the Target? What am I not able to do with documents at the Source? What am I able to do with documents at the Target, and what effect does this have at the Source? What am I not able to do with documents at the Target?My reason for asking this is the documentation provided on this attribute is provided below, with my additions entered in parentheses.None - This indicates that the inherited object connection is read only and no new connections can be mad

A. What is your idea?1) ClassificationChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.Opportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionWhat happened, what is missing, or what could be better? Focus on the problem or opportunity (not the solution).Write here:When working in Project Transactions Review the user is missing a filter on Project Manager. If project manager is added the Project manager can easily search all his/her projects and create project invoice from thereB. Context and scope1) Who is affected?Choose ONE or MORE: keep the applicable options and delete the rest.Customers2) FrequencyChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.FrequentlyC. Value and impact1) What is the business outcome?Choose ONE or MORE: keep the applicable options and delete the rest.Improves productivity or efficiency Reduces cost or manual effort Enhances user experience2) Impact scaleChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.3 — Cross-functional 4 — Company-wid

Hi everyone,I am currently configuring Absence Management in IFS Cloud and I would like to understand whether the following scenario is supported by standard functionality.Configuration:Absence Type 01 = Annual Leave Annual entitlement = 26 working days Absence Type 05 = Carry Over Annual Leave is configured with: Limit Defined = Yes Carry Forward = Yes Carry Forward Absence Type = 05 (Carry Over) Business requirement:At the end of each year, any remaining Annual Leave balance should be transferred to the Carry Over absence type.The Carry Over balance should accumulate indefinitely over multiple years.Example:2026:Annual Leave entitlement = 26 days Employee uses 21 days Remaining balance = 5 daysBeginning of 2027:Carry Over balance = 5 days New Annual Leave entitlement = 26 days2027:Employee does not use any Annual Leave Remaining Annual Leave balance at year end = 26 daysBeginning of 2028:Expected Carry Over balance = 31 days (5 days carried over from 2026 + 26 days carried over fro

A. What is your Idear?1) ClassificationChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.Opportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionWhat happened, what is missing, or what could be better? Focus on the problem or opportunity (not the solution).Write here:When Reporting time as a Secondment Resource on Work Tasks you are limited to only report time directly on the work task itself, while MCPR time in Projects can be reported via My Time Registration.  In construction and energy companies a secondment resource will quite often be reporting time on both projects and work tasks. Due to the limitation of secondment work a worker will need to report time in two ways rather than just reporting all time via My Time Registration.B. Context and scope1) Who is affected?Choose ONE or MORE: keep the applicable options and delete the rest.Customers2) FrequencyChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.Daily or weeklyC. Value and impact1) What is the business outcome?Choo

Hello,  The format of the e-reporting for the B2Bi and B2C invoices is not valid. Do you have any information about this e-reporting ?  Thanks

Can anyone help us?Complete error message:Error: UPGRADE FAILED: resource mapping not found for name: "ifsapp-am-datapump" namespace: "XXXXX" from "": no matches for kind "ScaledJob" in version "keda.sh/v1alpha1"ensure CRDs are installed firstHelmPod FailedWe’re upgrading grom 25R2 (SU 5)It seems to me that something is missing from our installation, but if that’s the case, IFS should mention somewhere that a new functionality is needed… :( 

In our IFS environment (version 25R1), I’ve created a custom field on a custom entity through Entity Configuration. The field is numeric and defined as a currency type.However, in Page Designer, the value does not display with currency formatting—whether I use the new computed field with currency formatting or the direct currency attribute. Standard currency fields appear correctly formatted, but this custom one does not.Has anyone encountered this issue or found a solution? Any insights or best practices would be greatly appreciated.

Hi IFS ExpertWe would like to improve the Group data by default to all the user of the GL Balance Analysis. This is our default settings and we would like to change themI have already prepared some basic changes in the Selection Criteria or the colomn order but I cannot find where I can configure the Group Data setup in the Page Designer. If anyone can help me in this matter that will be helpful.Best Regard

Issue Description: An issue occurs when creating an MRB case from the Shop Floor Workbench (Dispatch List). Although the MRB case is created successfully, the application becomes stuck on the "Enter and View Results" screen within the Control Plan, preventing users from continuing or interacting further with the page.Due to this behavior, users are unable to proceed with workshop activities and demonstrate the expected business process flow, which is impacting ongoing project validations and progress.Environment: IFS CLOUD 25R2Test Plan:Step 1: Create a Shop Order with an Active Control Plan status, enter the required Need Date, and release the Shop Order after assigning an operation number to a material line.Example: Shop Order 213204, Site X.Step 2: Open Shop Floor Workbench, filter by Shop Order 213204, select the operation line with quality controls defined (Operation 30), and create an analysis from the Control Plan menu.Step 3: Open Enter Inspection Results, enter a valid result

Hello,Our customer has a modification to Identify Serials with Serial Scan, but the scan performance is limited due to the single processing of each scanned barcode.In 26R1 there is a new functionality to improve the performance by deferring serial validation until the entire list is saved.The customer is eager to see the performance with the new functionality and if the new functionality is working with the already implemented modification (or at least with slight changes, without having to redesign the whole modification).As it seems to be impossible to test this process on a reference environment as we are not able to connect scanners, we are searching for other options.So what came in our mind is to start the Release Update Studio and process until we can create at least a topic environment to then be able to test the functionality's performance and how it interacts with the existing modification.But if the performance is not that better as customer expects it to be, or if the inte

Hello,Just wanted to take the opportunity to highlight the new MRP Parts page in 26R1. I am  pretty sure all MRP lovers “out there” will appreciate this entry into MRP result :-) It has a lot of good useful columns and it is a good starting point for drilling down to other material planning pages.And if you are not afraid of writing advanced queries you can for example find parts that has Late Order(s) OR Early Order(s) OR Remove Order(s) message like belowGood Luck with MRP planning-Mats

The bank confirms that new MTMX / ISO 20022 requirements will become effective as of 1 October 2026.The key requirement is that postal addresses must be provided in a structured format going forward.The unstructured address field PstlAdr/AdrLine will be ignored by the bank’s system.The following fields will become mandatory:PstlAdr/TwnNm (Town Name) PstlAdr/Ctry (Country) PstlAdr/CtrySubDvsn (only mandatory for payments to Canada)According to the bank’s feedback, this requirement is limited to the Creditor section. For both suppliers and employee payments (since this is handled in the same way for the bank). Issue:The default Employee Payments API file does not have detailed postal sections (in comparison to the supplier payment file) and the default transformer cannot put a detailed Postal Address in the Creditor Section. Why does the employee payment file not have creditor detailed postal address data as default in structured way (town and country)? And what is the solution for the n

Dear All,It seems that ‘Performed Work’ field on Bundle Task page is missing. Same is available in MWo - Service App. Please correct me, if wrong.Version - Application service update: 25.1.7Framework service update: 25.1.13IFS Cloud Web version: 25.1.13.20260611111206.0IFS Client Services version: 25.1.13.20260604045716.0IFS Client Notification version: 25.1.13.20260604052620.0IFS Chat version:IFS OData provider version: 25.1.13.20260604225133.0Regards,Srinivas

We used PM Group and Merge in one site and now want to do same on another site, however as the PM Group ID is not showing in the new site, if I try to set it up, I get an error message that the PM Group already exist for the old site and cannot be used in the new site. I thought two different sites can use the same PM Group ID. I will be glad to hear from anyone who has previously experienced this type of issue.  

Hello, I created some exel report via IFS Business Reporter. I created some UDF function via Microsoft Visual Basic Editor. I used my function in report and it works fine, but problem is, that it works only when I run it. When some other user open this Business Report or is sent via Execution server, UDF function is not in the exel sheet. Could somebody help me how to save macro or UDF correctly in IFS Business Reporter to be globally available? Thank you Romana

Hi Team, How can we add a command to execute operational report ?Command should be enabled for multiple records and the report should execute with 3 parameters(when selected multiple records it should generate the report for the selected records ) Is this possible? Regards,Rakesh

Hello, We are receiving an error ‘All created Analysis must be confirmed or cancelled before the operation no 10 is closed’ when trying to approve an operation on the shop floor workbench in IFS Cloud 25R2. This was the confirmed analysis associated with the operation. Why would this error be happening? Thank you.  Thanks,Jay

The requirement is to create purchase orders based on the delivery address, which means, when converting purchase requisition lines (Originated from an internal customer order) to purchase orders, the orders should be created based on the addresses of the order lines. The following toggle “Group By delivery address” should be enabled before the conversion.  Test PlanCreate the external customer order with four order lines on the Demand site Line 1 & 2 have two different delivery addresses of the same customer (Single Occurrence) Line 3 & 4 have the same delivery address Once you release the order, it will create the internal purchase order in the demand site and also the internal customer order in the supply site. The supply site will be purchasing from an external supplier. The two single occurrence lines will be directly delivered using “Purch Order Direct” and the other two lines will be “Purch Order Trans” where the goods are delivered through the supply site. This is the

Business Reporter has an 32 bit client released. However the customers in large organizations have quite often office 365 64 bit client on company level. This cause an great problem as it requires an standalone computer with an local Office installation outside the company standard.  This require a extra resources for customer IT department and takes resorces from the parter technichians. When will an 64 bit client be available? Please vote if you struggle with the same problem.

Hello community,We are currently facing a functional issue regarding the processing of supplier credit invoices for Purchase Orders managed with payment milestones.Our customer has paid several supplier invoices linked to a Purchase Order that includes payment milestones. The supplier invoices linked to the PO lines have been fully processed, matched, and paid.Later, the supplier issued two partial credit invoices related to those invoices.Under normal circumstances (standard receipt flow), credit invoices are processed using the usual matching/correction process. However, in this case, that approach does not work.We have already tried:the standard credit invoice process which is unsuccessful; creating a negative PO line, rejected by the system because negative values are not allowed; using Price Adjustment Purchase , no data (no PO line is available for adjustment).From our investigation, this seems to be standard IFS behavior:Payment milestone invoices are amount-based only, not quan