IFS Solutions

Hello,I am encountering an issue when trying to invoice a specific supplier in IFS, which triggers the following error message: "You are not allowed to use ledger account. Check account for Row ID 1."Upon investigation, I found that the same ledger account (identified by code_a) is being used for several other suppliers without issue. However, this error occurs only for a particular supplier.While reviewing the system, I discovered that one of the conditions for this error is when the posting_type is set to 'MANUAL'. I would like to know if there is a way to modify the posting_type in order to resolve this issue or I have to configure anything else ?Has anyone encountered a similar problem, or can you advise on how to adjust the posting type or troubleshoot this further?Thank you in advance for your help!

Dear IFS Community,  IFS Support team forwarded me to here with the question: In Germany there will be a mandatory e-invoicing.Please see the below link:https://www.bdo.global/en-gb/insights/tax/indirect-tax/germany-mandatory-e-invoicing-what-you-need-to-know!As this is a mandatory government regulation, my question would be, when, how and which UPD will IFS provide an official solution to handle this requirement?I also found this post: E-invoicing for Germany | IFS Community but this does not contains the tags IFS mentioned, so I raised this topi again.  Kind regards, Balazs

When trying to deploy an event calling a workflow i get the following error :  When looking at the event, i have :  If deploying the event in Validation type i do not have this issue.I think the errorMessage is not compatible with the processEnrichment workflow type. How to deploy a process enrichment with error message to show to user please? Thank’s in advance

Hi Can we assign an absence on a Rest schedule day or NO Schedule day please suggest

Hi, I am doing IFS cloud upgrade from 23R1 to 24R1.KUBERNETES and ingress pods are up but ifs storage pods is not coming up.ifs-storage   csi-smb-node-fvzgf                                     1/3     CrashLoopBackOff   34 (3m14s ago)   72mifs-storage   csi-smb-controller-6c679d7fbf-4zj92                    1/3     CrashLoopBackOff   34 (3m13s ago)   72m

Hi is it possible to block traffic to a particular endpoint in ifs cloud to deactivate in IFS cloud as we had in IFS 10. in ifs we could block the traffic to https://<host>/openid-connect-provider/*Does it exist a similar endpoint in IFS Cloud. Seems like /auth is used to more than just the authetication process for the default IDP. Kjell Åge

Hi, How can i use attributs from custom event in BPA workflow.in my example, it seems that the value of attribut are not available in the workflow. Attribut from the custom Event : NEW:ACTIVITY_SEQ NEW:CONFIGURATION_ID NEW:CONTRACT NEW:ENG_CHG_LEVEL NEW:HANDLING_UNIT_ID NEW:LINE_ITEM_NO NEW:LOCATION_NO NEW:LOT_BATCH_NO NEW:ORDER_NO NEW:PART_NO NEW:PICK_LIST_NO NEW:QTY_ASSIGNED NEW:RELEASE_NO NEW:SEQUENCE_NO NEW:SERIAL_NO NEW:WAIV_DEV_REJ_NO ISSUETOLOC (This is a custom attribut) In the Workflow debugger, i have these attributs visible ActivitySeq ConditionCode ConfigurationID Contract EngChgLevel HandlingUnitId LastActivityDate LineItemNumber LocationNo LotBatchNo OrderNo OrigQtyAssigned PartNo PickListNo QtyAssigned ReleaseNo SequenceNumber SerialNo WaivDevRejNo Contract (second time in the list) OrderNo (second time in the list) PickListNo (second time in the list) ReleaseNo (second time in the list) SequenceNo (second time in the list) I

Hi all In the Shop orders operation menu, I have my selection of production orders for which I want to see the overall load.I select production orders by departmentIn my printout I have a global workload of 594h for W46 (including planned, requested etc etc production orders).When I remove the requested production orders, the graph falls back to 294h (this is normal).My problem is: I'd like to distinguish each load source in the graph (e.g. solid line for firm orders and dotted line for requested orders).How can I do this? I have this=> I want to do this to symbolise the load of the requisitioned shop orders 

One of our App10 customers has a requirement to track user logins. This is part of an exercise, where they are looking to find out inactive accounts. Is there a way that we can fulfil their requirement through a SQL query (eg:- fnd_Sessions,Fnd_Client_Logon_Tab) without enabling DB auditing?

Found attachments disappear after saving a posting proposal line when entering supplier invoices. It allows me to save a new attachment but when I click save after entering the voucher information the attachment is gone.

Hi ,We are in IFS cloud 24R1. Our requirement is to put a customer on hold and stop all orders – regardless of the stage they are in – from going out shipment/delivery.  Once the payment issue is resolved, we will hopefully be able to resume business with them and we would need to remove the hold. I am aware we have the option to “Manually block the order” but it should be done manually one by one. Is there a one time , temporary hold option?Many ThanksLK 

Hi ,In cloud 24R1 , we are trying to get IPR working. The DP server is running, but we seem to have an issue with the IPR server. Please refer the screenshots below Can someone please explain how to get the IPR server running ?  Kind RegardsYashodha

Hi everyone,I’m unable to use a migration job to input a non-inventory sales parts with JUST a tax class.  If I try, I get the following error… I can however, create one with JUST a tax code.The odd thing is that if you debug the sales_part_api call when using IFS, both tax class AND tax code are supplied i.e. from the debug attr'TAX_CODE'||chr(31)||''||chr(30)||'TAX_CLASS_ID'||chr(31)||'1'||chr(30)|| Can anyone share any light on why this is? 

Hello!We are working on some integration with Boomi and have run into a roadblock with a custom integration projection. We were under the impression that when you add two Entities to a custom projection that it would combine the data from those two entities into a single API. We need to pull the full address and the address type, unfortunately that information is in two different places. Here’s our Custom Projections - the Categories has disappeared, it was Integration, not sure why it’s not showing. We have out two entities, CustomerInfoAddress, CustomerInfoAddressType and we’ve done our Associations and Key Mappings.  It’s published and when we go to API Explorer and look at the API Doc, we have API’s for each entitiy but not them combined. Neither one of these have all the information we need. Are we misunderstanding how the custom projections work or is there something wrong with how the API’s are being generated. I did a case to IFS asking this exact question and they told me to c

Could anyone with IFS Cloud please verify if the same is popping up as at my place (I've checked two environments that are not connected, both IFS24R1)I want to see only the rows that have factor = 1. The above is the result. Makes no sense to me at all. Does this happen in your environment as well.First time in my career 😁that I could use Advanced search option:This gave me the desired result.

Hello experts,I have created a SQL quick report with a parameter that is called via a page command created in page designer. It is working as intended and I successfully pass the parameter and the report executes correctly with the right data. Super, happy camper! But how do I make the following 2 improvements to the parameter box that is displayed below when the Quick Report is started:1.Make the Parameter box ‘read only’ - so the value passed from the Page is non changeable2.Apply a ‘pretty’ description rather than the technical field name for the parameter that is currently displayed Thanks!

Balance reconciliation databse scheduled task going in error state with below error details, quite unsure why this error is occurring Please advise. 

We are having an issue with getting the new revision of a document to to MWO client.What we do isCreate a Work task and attach a document to a Work TaskTransfer the work task to MWOWhen the technician open the task, the document is visibleThe coordinator create a new revision of the document, now the new revision gets attached to the task in cloud, instead of the old one. However in MWO app, it is the old version still visible to the technician.We have setup the document class as a Mobile Document Class and Push to Mobile has been set to Yes.We are running Cloud 24R1 SU2.Thanks.@kathlk 

Hi All, I have created a custom page using 1)Entity configurations - with some custom attributes2)Projection Configuration- created new projection3)Created a Page from page configurations I am able to navigate to the  page only through the Page configurations screen, how doo i add my newly created custom page to NAVIGATOR??? Please do let me know on this guys @damith @Navinth Bakmeedeniya @Charana Udugama @HumbertoFloresD , Can you please check and suggest me on this? Thanks & Regards,Rakesh   

Dear all, does anyone know which table stores lobby element statement?We need this information to make impact analysis on all lobbies when we modify the usage of data (ex: adding a new employee category). Thanks a lot for your help KR

Hello, my customer wants to use the standard form of the purchase order, and is using the Milestone/Stage Payment. The problem is that in standard, I cannot display the table of the milestone/stage payment. Is there a way to display it in standard ?  Thanks a lot, Paul

Question, is it possible to use a Custom Enumeration (or other created LOV) and add it to a standard IFS attribute in the page configurator?We would like to have a stricter regime on an IFS standard attribute which is just a string column with no functionality. I.e. Document Title – ISO Classification. For this one case we already have created an “idea” which is accepted, ISO classification of Documents, which is good. But in general (for other cases) we would have liked to just create a Custom Enumeration and then connect it to the already existing IFS standard attribute (not a CF$ custom field) using the Page Configurator. Is this possible, and we have just missed it? Or is this not possible without creating a new Custom Attribute and hide the IFS standard column? If not possible, is there a reason, or is it something for the Idea board?

I have a few questions about the On Save - Release on the Document Revision screen. I was trying to create a new document revision and I selected the On-Save Release button.  When I entered a Document Class and Title, I tried to save the Document Revision and got this error:  How do we get the Security Checkpoints to support the On-Save Release Operation?  Since I cannot test the On-Save Release, how do you check in a Document if the Revision is already Released?Thanks,Gregg

I watched the you tube video and studied what I think is the extend of the information in our help documentation.  In the old days, we needed to have a certificate registered for the person who is doing the signing.  I don’t see references to needing a certificate in the help documents but I do see a Signing Certificates section within the Solution Manager.  Is that what I’m thinking about?How does all the work?  Do I need to have a person who is signing a document have to be registered as having a signing certificate.  How about for Internal vs External Users?Is there a place when I can see the whole story behind the use and setup of this functionality? Patrick

Hello,I’ve tried multiple times to input the parameters, but each attempt has resulted in quotation errors or other issues. Here’s what I’m aiming for:Input:ifsapf:tbwJtTask_Ext?external_search=source_ref1={&PM_NO}%20AND%20STATE%20IN%28%27Cancelled%27%2C%27Finished%27%2C%27WorkDone%27%29%20ORDER%20BY%20created_date%20DESC%20FETCH%20first%2010%20rows%20onlyExpected Result:WHERE source_ref1 = {&PM_NO}AND state IN ('Canceled', 'WorkDone', 'Finished')ORDER BY t.created_date DESC FETCH first 10 rows onlyActual Output:where (SOURCE_REF1 = '234' AND STATE IN(''Cancelled'',''Finished'',''WorkDone'') ORDER BY created_date DESC FETCH first 10 rows only');Could you help me understand how to adjust this so the query runs as intended? Thank you very much for your guidance.