IFS Solutions

Hello.My understanding isthat the Promised Delivery Date on a Customer Order Line should stay as is if the order/line is confirmed.I have created this order and confirmed.I then change the target date to 08/06/2026, I expected the Planned Delivery Date and the Planned Ship Date to align, however expected the Promised Delivery Date to be kept. Is my understanding wrong?

We are using MRO in IFS Apps 10, mainly for Component Repair Orders and Complex Assembly.We are facing an issue where costs for Component Repair Orders (Customer-Owned parts) are correctly accumulated in WIP, but are not transferred to COGS when the related Customer Order is invoiced. As a result, our finance team has to manually move WIP to COGS.Current ProcessOur standard process is: Create Component Repair Order (Customer-Owned part). Book material and labor → costs are posted to WIP (working correctly). Create Sales Line manually in Component Repair Order. From CRO, use RMB option “Create Customer Order” and transfer sales lines. System automatically creates Customer Order and Customer Order Line. Invoice is posted and paid. Observed IssueWhen the Customer Order Line is created automatically, the ownership is always set to Company-Owned, even when the Component Repair Order is Customer-Owned.We have verified: Demand Code = Component Repair Order Ref1 = Component Repair

Hello,In earlier versions of IFS, it would prevent you from cancelling or incompleting work assignments in IFS, IF they existed on the engineers device (IFS MWO). This logic has been changed in IFS Cloud, and the functionality is now possible. However this then creates more issues in that we receive lots of failed transactions on a daily basis due to back office cancelling assignments when they are still on the IFS MWO app. Since IFS are unlikely to reverse the logic to enforce the validation again, I was wondering if anyone can provide guidance on the logic required to create our own custom event to prevent cancellation/incomplete in IFS Cloud, IF the assignment is still transferred to the engineer? ThanksShaun

 Hello,I am in production at my client's site. He upgraded yesterday to version 25R1, and I am getting this error message when receiving an OF. Have you ever seen this message before?  ORA-01400: impossible d'insérer NULL dans (\"IFSAPP\".\"SO_COST_DISTRIBUTION_TMP\".\"COST_BUCKET_PUBLIC_TYPE\")"}]

What are the challenges in 25R1?

Hello,I have the following requirement for a customer, and need some help! If a Non-Inv Purchase Part is entered in the PR line, the Part Description field should cleared out or left empty so that the user can enter a new description and then be able to save the line. There’s a condition to consider, if Inventory Part = true, nothing should happen, the line must save as normal. If Inventory Part = false, the Part Description should be cleared out as previously mentioned. I created the following BPA workflow. I added a API Read task to read the Description, followed by a Script task to set the Description field as null, finally an API task to update the field. However, it’s not working. When deployed, I added a PR line, entered a Non-Inv PP and it shows an error saying the Description can’t be null, but the Description field isn’t cleared out. It shows the original value. Has anyone managed to clear or leave a mandatory field empty? 

Have succesfully cloned an instance to a new server.Reconfigure with creating self signed certificate work fine.Reconfiguring with my real certificate failes with errors below.Have tried reconfiguring both with NO_PROXY and SSL_PASSTHROUGH. How can I get around this problem?  (instance_configuration.log)        Reported error is: The following error occurred while executing this line:        ...\repository\server\install_fndmws.xml:316: Failed to reconfigure middleware server. Error is: Error when reconfiguring IFS Middleware Domain.        Failed to import certificate: (mws_log.0)[Thu Jan 29 10:36:51 CET 2026] - SEVERE : Severe error when running target: -ohs-create-wallet[Thu Jan 29 10:36:51 CET 2026] - SEVERE : BuildException                                          ...\tmp\as\resources6428797520151348984\install_fndmws.xml:799: Failed to import certificate:                                              at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Exit.execute(Exit.java:162)                     

We observed, in Cloud 24R2, that in GL Voucher Rows Analysis, the code part fields are all clustered together and it would not be possible to insert a different column between them and have the columns exported to Excel that way. We can, for example, use Column Chooser to put Amount after Cost Center, but when exporting the results to Excel, this column ordering is not enforced, instead all code string columns are in order together. Furthermore, we could not place fields in between the code string fields within page designer, as code string is it’s own group. Are we missing something, or is not possible to export results from here with columns in between the code string columns?  

How can I set up a purchased part to only drive purchase req’s from created shop orders?

Hi,I would like to replace the ordinary attachment panel for uploading files, with a drag n drop zone in a screen.How can I do that?

Hello All, Is it possible to limit the list of locations to only the contract customer?  When the connection type of Location is chosen Cloud return all locations in the system.  Can we make the LOV list filter only to the contract CustomerId + any Additional CustomerIds?    Thanks to all in advance

I have several top level assemblies that consist of a few sub-assemblies. I am getting the components of each sub-asseb,ly when I print the Work Instructions but I am not getting the routing for them. Is there a way that I can :A: Have the routings for each sub-assembly show with the top level shop order. orB: Have the system link all the routings together 9Meybe with the sequesce?

I have a customer that has a requirement to send detailed cost information of their parts manufactured in Mexico to the Mexican Government.  To do this, they use an excel spreadsheet that is used to load into a customs broker system called Aranxel. The standard report, “Cost Build-Up Report - High Detail”, contains all the necessary information but it is meant to be printed; not into Excel.  The “Structure Multi-Level” display shows all the breakdowns but it does not include the cost bucket breakdowns. The “Part Routing Costs per Cost Bucket” display does not explode through the product structure. Does anyone know of a standard query that can exreact multilevel cost information by bucket?  Alternatively, has anyone developed such a query?   Here is the format used currently: 

Hi together,I got a question.Is there a specific reason why a direct transfer of eng parts is not allowed in standard for multiple positions?(mask: Engineering Revision Transfer Status)all positions are in status assigned and single position direct transfer is possible all for positionsKinds regards 

All of the sudden this week we have lost the ability to authorize shop floor reporting. Has anyone seen this before.

Hi,We have recently cloned the PROD to UAT. Now I am using the Aurena Agent for Excel attachments in UAT. Attachment, Creation of file work correctly however, When I refresh the file, I get the data from PROD rather than UAT, How should I fix this, I believe there is something to change in UAT

Hi, I’m getting an error when trying to execute a pickup task from MWO. The error is; I have set up default warehouse for the user and addresses in relevant places. What can be the cause for this issue? TIA:

Hi Experts,When an Engineer created a new Material line in the mobile, we can find the same in work task material tab. There is a requirement that we need to identify who created this material line as there is no column there in te material tab about the user.One task can have severeal Assignment for different users that they will create material requitements, there is no way to identify who created it.Appreciate for your help. No User information in Material tab?  Thanks,KM

Hello,When working in a team on the shop floor workbench and an operation is started there is the option to select team members. With this option I would expect the shop floor clockings would only be created for those team members. But when Im checking the shop floor clockings after stopping the production, the clockings are created for all team members. Am Im missing a setting or can this be a bug? Kind regards, Willem

A new version of Perfidia v4.50.225 has been released. The actual version can be downloaded here:https://www.perfidia.de/downloads/psa/psasetup.exePerfidia Forum can also be accessed with GuestAccess (Gastzugang)https://www.perfidia.de/Perfidia?action=forum

A new version of Perfidia v4.50.224a has been released. The actual version can be downloaded here:https://www.perfidia.de/downloads/psa/psasetup.exePerfidia Forum can also be accessed with GuestAccess (Gastzugang)https://www.perfidia.de/Perfidia?action=forum

Hi,We are using IFS Cloud notify me application, we found one issue regarding data synchorization. In IFS Cloud we don’t have open purchase requisiton lines to be approved, but in Notify me some authorized purchase order lines are still being showed. I reinstalled Notify me application and refresh the cache but both didn’t work.Anyone has the same experience and how can I fix the issue?Thanks.

In IFS9 , we used a custom field when creating Business Activity. Sales reps could choose from a drop down list one or several labels (e.g. different product groups or important trends such as COVID). This helped management and R&D to easily find relevant information from the Business Activities withouth manually going through hundreds of activities. In IFS9 this custom field was searchable with filter function. In CLOUD, the filter function have been removed for custom fields in Business Activities. Was this itentional? Is the function returning?

We are using IFS Applications 10 with Approval Templates for Purchase Orders. I would like to understand how an approval decision can be revoked once an approver has already taken a decision.In our approval setup, there are multiple approval steps. When one of the approvers rejects the Purchase Order, we correct the issue or query in the PO and attempt to resend the approval. Although the system allows us to add another approval step, the previously rejected step remains locked, and the same approver is not allowed to take a new decision.Could you please clarify whether it is possible to fully restart the approval process after a rejection so that all approvers, including the one who rejected earlier, can approve again? If this is not possible, please confirm the standard and recommended approach in IFS Applications 10 for handling such scenarios.

​ Hello,I have two problems I cannot lay my finger on at my customers NEW cfg env.1. Why does mwo only shows my first created sales part in the offline db of mwo?  “Item 5000”.I made a duplicate sales part from item “5000” named “7000” and that part is only online available. Same for item “6000” that I created NEW instead of duplicate.(not mentioned in the screenshots)2. when I quick issue stock on item 5000 there is no problem at all everything works fine, but when I try to issue item 7000 which I only can find when I press the button search online it gives me an error message that I don’t understand.(See screenshots) Both items in stock in Bus2Tried so far:More sales parts with the same settings as item 5000 spret over a couple of daysSecurity Groups granted to revoke and add all service-related setsClear server cacheDisconnect mwo app and initialize every stepSync now a couple of times for all sync rules Service appDisable and enable the Service app.Enabled and disable the workflow