Finance (Financials)

A. What is your idea?1) ClassificationOpportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionIn IFS Cloud , on the Invoices to Authorize page, users are unable to add additional posting lines and can only modify existing posting lines.<<Image1>>However, this functionality was available in IFS Applications 10 through Posting Proposal > Instant Authorization.<<Image2>>Due to the current behavior in IFS Cloud, users must be granted access to the Posting Proposal page to add additional posting lines. However, granting access to this page also enables users to perform broader related activities, such as posting invoices and purchasing etc. As a result, additional manual controls are required to ensure proper governance and compliance.<<Image3>>During the support case investigation, it was confirmed that this is the standard system behavior in IFS Cloud. The “Invoices to Authorize” page is architecturally designed as a review/approval-only view. It intentionall

We want to make a complaint for functionality removed from the super access role. We have had 2 authorizers (at least) per supplier invoice for years, and uptil 24R2, our accounting-department have had the opportunity to remove authorizations, make correction for example for VAT, and then authorize again, without sending the already approved invoiced on a second round to our endusers.The change made in this role, has made the control function for our accounting department, AND for our end users, much worse, since the invoices is now sent out TWICE!. I hope that IFS will reconsider the functionality in the super access role.

In collection process the customer is reminded for invoices based on a reminder template. When invoices are included to the reminder handling the Min Days to Next Reminder  is considered - and an invoice is NOT included to the reminder if the Min Days is  not met.This is good - when the system is escalating the invoices (raising the level to next level).I call the period Min Days to Next Reminder  as response period, here.But from the customer communication point of view, it would be good, if the invoices on response period could be included to the reminder - with their current reminder level. The motivation is that this way the next reminder would always have complete picture (information) to the customer - including all the invoices that are NOT YET paid, so that customer does not need to wonder - why is an invoice now missing from the reminder, though it was last time there.I suggest that a parameter is added to the template Include invoices on response period and if that is NOT mar

A. What is your idea?1) ClassificationChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.Opportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionWhat happened, what is missing, or what could be better? Focus on the problem or opportunity (not the solution).Write here:The cusotmer receives e-invoice file from their suppliers containing a prepaid amount without any advance invoice connected.One scenario is that the employee uses an app to order a new phone. They want to upgrade it and pays the difference with their own credit card. The supplier send the e-invoice for the full amount and deducts the prepaid amount in a separate tag. B. Context and scope1) Who is affected?Choose ONE or MORE: keep the applicable options and delete the rest.Customers2) FrequencyChoose ONE: keep the applicable option and delete the rest.FrequentlyC. Value and impact1) What is the business outcome?Choose ONE or MORE: keep the applicable options and delete the rest.Improves productivity or efficiency Reduces cos

Hi IFS Community,I have a question regarding the Authorization Parameters for Posting Proposal in the Supplier Invoice Workflow.Configuration in our company: Authorization Routing : Use Consecutive Authorization Two Authorizers Required : Enabled (Checked) Amount that requires two authorizers : 50,000.00 EXlude Posting Authorization : Not checked  Scenario:I am processing a supplier invoice with the following details: Invoice Amount: 12,000 Purchase Order Amount: 11,000 Difference (Variance): 1,000 The Issue:Since the invoice amount (15,000.00) is below the defined threshold of 50,000.00, I expected the system to require only one authorizer (following the consecutive sequence). However, the system is still forcing two authorizers to approve the posting proposal sequentially (the first authorizer approves, but the workflow does not finish and continues to request a second authorizer).Are there any other parameters missing to get the expected behavior ? Any insights or troubles

We’ve had 1 or 2 issues with invoice nos. being copied and pasted from PDF, but occasionally this has resulted in a blank space at beginning, leaving the possibility of processing an invoice twiceIs there anything can be set up to stop blank spaces at beginning of supplier invoice number?

Is there a way to incorporate customer id /supplier id into external file template  for mixed payment . 

Is IFS working on the new version 1.4 of the Norwegian SAF-T report required from Skatteetaten required from 01.01.2027? We need this for IFS APP10 update 27.

Hi,In IFS 25R1 SU13, we are importing external supplier payment and if we have several invoices with the same invoice no, it does not match the correct invoice.How can a payment be matched to the correct invoice when there are several invoices with the same no?Has anybody in the community encountered this problem ?We have created a case with IFS and we are waiting for a response from R&D.Thanks and Regards,Anne-Sophie

A new version of Perfidia v4.50.229 has been released. The actual version can be downloaded here:https://www.perfidia.de/downloads/psa/psasetup.exePerfidia Forum can also be accessed with GuestAccess (Gastzugang)https://www.perfidia.de/Perfidia?action=forumAdd as many details as possible, by providing details you’ll make it easier for others to reply

Hello We have an advanced debit invoice for 68K. An advanced credit invoice was created out of it for 52K in error. The advanced credit invoice is posted authorized. Is there a way to cancel the advanced credit invoice? Would appreciate help/advice on this.

Hello Everybody, We have a use case similar to : Orhttps://community.ifs.com/finance%2Dfinancials%2D42/duty%2Dcharges%2Don%2Dimports%2D5085 We are currently unsure how to proceed. For example, in Italy or Spain, there is a plastic tax that is calculated based on specific criteria related to the product. Our suppliers will include this plastic tax as an additional charge on their invoices. When creating the purchase order, however, the exact tax amount is not yet known. Therefore, we assume that we would need to create a purchase charge on the purchase order line with an initial amount of zero. The issue arises when the supplier invoice is received: the invoice total will be higher than the purchase order amount because of the plastic tax.Consequently, when matching the supplier invoice against the purchase order receipt, the amounts will not match exactly. Could you please confirm whether there are any new functionalities in IFS Cloud 25R2 or 26 that would allow us to automatically app

A. What is your idea?1) ClassificationOpportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionFor MT940-based ExtMixedPayment bank statement imports, the standard MT940 processing logic derives Message Code values from predefined MT940 parsing rules and overrides values configured through External File Template Detail Functions. This works for supported MT940 variants, but many banks provide MT940 files with bank-specific transaction codes and structures that are not recognized by the standard parsing logic.As a result, customers using bank-specific MT940 formats have no supported mechanism to read and utilize transaction codes such as FTRF and other bank-defined values for transaction classification purposes. When these codes cannot be retrieved and mapped, imported transactions default to Direct Cash Transactions and cannot be automatically classified into Supplier Payments, Customer Payments, Transfers, or other transaction types.The missing capability creates a gap for organizations process

Hi, Trying to use diluted labor rate for project time transactions. As per my understanding the system is supposed to adjust the internal labour rate according to overtime reported. Reading the IFS documentation is appears incomplete, or might be subject for bugs in 25r2 or 26r1. Cause I certainly can not make it work. Anyone in the community done this? Looking for the requirements, prerequisites and last how it’s triggered and where the adjustments can see on what stage in the time filing process..  Any input is of high value!  Thx & rgds, Eirik Horjen 

Looking a PCA? Does anyone know if it is possible to do this on Inter-Company basis? Thanks, Ma

Dear experts,we want to import salaries (csv file) to IFS cloud as expense.Can I do that with the external file assistant? 

Hello everybody, in IFS APPS10 we had a field “Input File Directory”. It is no loger available in IFS Cloud.How can I define the server directory on this screen? Thank you.

Are there any specific steps to follow when using fixed assets object in business reporter to fetch values?

Hello. When we financially complete a project, costs are being booked to the original expense accounts instead of COGS. This is causing an account mismatch against the reversal of revenue recognition, which is booking to COGS.  For example, assume account 7000 is supplies and account 5000 is COGS.  If we purchased supplies worth $10 and tagged it to a project, then that $10 initially hits account 7000 then eventually hits WIP. Then when revenue recognition is run, it hits account 5000 COGS. The following period, the rev rec reverses and it hits WIP And COGS. But when the project is financially completed, the posting hits WIP and account 7000 instead of COGS. So there would be a credit in account 5000 but a debit in account 7000, so there is a mismatch. Is there a way to route cost postings from financial project completion to COGS instead of the original expense account? I would appreciate any thoughts or suggestions.

Does anyone know what the message “There are some items which will be connected to an existing acknowledge payment object, which is Unacknowlegded, continue?” meansIt shows up when creating a new supplier payment proposal

I’m trying to set up Segregation of Duties in Cloud.  One of the things Finance wants controlled is who can add new Code Part Values.  Read Only access is OK, but Full access should be controlled.  There are no Projection Actions or Entity Actions associated with this projection.Is there a way to build this functional area such that Read Only access is ignored, but Full access is flagged?

We have a Code Part defined as a project code part - it is been suggested to repurpose it as a ‘normal’ code part. Obviously as it has been set up and active and used (sparingly) it is not letting me change it to ‘No Function.’I know using it as a normal code part will not be good - but would anyone be able to give me a list of limitations / issues we'll face? Thanks,MAtthew

I need to fetch the Calculated Revenue Recognized Accumulated value and display it at the Sub Project level. Is there any way to get the breakdown?  

Good afternoon!Guys, I need to use the functionality (Code Part Attibute Connection) does anyone have documentation or could explain the concept?  

Hi,Anyone knows how to clear send error messages? This customer has been setup as internal customer to send e-invoices but company AS has a default Document Address with zip code and city. The vouchers of these invoices have already been posted to GL but still these errors do not clear.But error says:1) Company Document Address must have a value.2) Company Document Address Zip Code must have a value.3) Company Document Address City must have a value. Appreciate if anyone can advise? Thank you in advance!RegardsNimesh