Finance (Financials)

Hello,I’m looking for a support to clarify why Inventory Unit Cost does not change if tolerance applied for MSI Posting line for PO chargers. Please advise is there any data setup to be completed also. Our requirement is to absorb tolerance to the Inventory Cost. The scenario is the company uses “Transaction Based” Supplier Invoice consideration for all Inventory Parts. The PO lines and PO Chargers Lines are getting absorbs to Inventory Part through M189.But issue is when tolerance option enables from Company and Supplier level, if a tolerance applied to MSI the tolerance posting does not apply to the Inventory Unit Cost. Here is an example; PO Chargers is 50. When creating MSI used 60 for Invoice line (this is the amount needs to pay). Since tolerance is unable for this Supplier, two Posting Lines created as 50 and 10 for tolerance. But 10 was not absorb to the Unit Cost. reference 1: Inventory Part for Supplier Invoice Consideration Inventory Part SS for Supplier Invoice Consideratio

I am using deliver/receive shipment within same site for parts connected to project. The scenario is that shipments are prepared onshore and shipped offshore. There is a certain delay in the process. While delivering these shipments the M3 posting is without project connection. This means that value of the part is temporary taken out of the project until it is received offshore where it is brought back to the project with M1. The setup of the posting control is like all inventory parts are expensed on arrival, meaning that M1 is connected to P&L accounts. It does not seem right that the projects for a while looses connection with inventory/cost values during shipments within warehouses on same site. Anyone with reflections on this? Inputs are highly appreciated. 

Hi all,We are trying to send supplier payment output file to HSBC SFTP server folder. For this we are using SSH method to connect SFTP folder.We have developed one transformer as per HSBC payment file specification. Supplier payment file produced by customised transformer is already validated by HSBC Bank We are getting following error message while sending file from IFS to HSBC Error:ExecutionException from Sender thread Caused by: ifs.fnd.connect.senders.ConnectSender$TemporaryFailureException: Error during file sending Caused by: com.jcraft.jsch.SftpException: User CT000027985_28244 is not allowed to execute this SFTP command because of policy  HSBC_SFTP_IBOB_CMD_LIMITING  Steps we have followed to establish SSH connection with HSBC server : We have generated Private & Public key from IFS Shared IFS Public key with HSBC HSBC confirmed that they have installed IFS public key HSBC shared their, HOST NAME / USER NAME / PORT NUMBER to connect SFTP folder We have generated KNOWNHOST

A new version of Perfidia v4.50.222 has been released. The actual version can be downloaded here:https://www.perfidia.de/downloads/psa/psasetup.exePerfidia Forum can also be accessed with GuestAccess (Gastzugang)https://www.perfidia.de/Perfidia?action=forum 

Should ‘Tzx Reduction at Discount’, on ‘Company’ /’Payment’ tab, be enabled for a Swiss Company?

Hi AllI have a strange behaviour. in one of our customer IFS Cloud environemnts. the following buttons are deactivated by default. in all other environments within the same 25R1 SU4 it is always activated. I also checked in the company payment settings. There is no parameter to set for these toggles.does anyone has an idea where to switch them ON by default? 

I have setup the voucher approval workflow in our environment and I have it setup with the approval combination rule to allow all combinations. I have the Voucher Approvers setup as below, with the approvers being setup here along with and Approver Group.And lastly I have the Approver Assigning Rule setup as below. I think I have setup all this correctly the thing that I am having a problem with is the fact that as soon as different user than the ones setup here creates a new voucher the Voucher Approval is blank and they have to manually add the Approver Group or Approver. I would think this would automatically pull in the Voucher Approval, but it isn’t by any chance is anyone having any issues with this we are on Apps 10 Update 12

Hi everyone,I’m importing supplier invoices into IFS using STDSIN1 (file type ExtSuppInv).I entered the PO number in the header field “PO Reference”, but after the import it does not appear on the supplier invoice in IFS (and it doesn’t seem to link to the PO for matching either). Is “PO Reference” in the header the correct STDSIN1 field to populate the PO number? Are there any prerequisites (company, supplier, matching setup) or other fields that must be provided for the PO reference to be stored/displayed? Should the PO reference instead be provided at line level (e.g., PO item/line reference) for it to work? Any tips on where to check during import (error log, message log, staging tables) to see why the value is ignored? Thanks in advance!

Is it possible to have the delivery and invoice address visible without click on the pin by the address id on customer orders?

Currently, it is only possible to define a single email address for all supplier and customer emails - statements, invoices, payment advices (remittances), CIS deduction statements, orders etc. However, in reality this varies on a supplier/customer basis and very often multiple email addresses are used for a single type of document.It is possible to define this through configurations, but this is done in all implementations and all new prospects ask for this. Hence, more flexibility should be allowed in the Comm Method tabs or in report rules to select multiple types of comm method lines. It is very typical for different customers and suppliers have different setup requirements. E.g. for some suppliers/customers, the statements will be sent to a single email address, but for others it will go to multiple email addresses.  The solution could be to introduce multiple generic checkboxes for “Report Type X” against the comm method tab:This allows for flexibility, because these can be renam

We are on IFS Cloud.IFS calculates Withholding Tax as a % of the NET supplier invoice amount (exclusive of ‘deductible’ VAT/Taxes).However, Irish Revenue calculates the Withholding Tax on the GROSS supplier invoice amount (inclusive of ‘deductible’ VAT/Taxes).e.g. supplier invoice = €100 + VAT (sales taxes) €13.5 = gross €113.50 to be paid.  The Withholding tax rate is 20%.  Irish Revenue calculate withholding tax amount of €113.50 x 20% = €22.70, i.e. pay the supplier €113.50 less €22.70 = €90.80 but IFS calculates €100 x 20% = €20 i.e. pay the supplier €113.50 less €20 = €93.50.I do not appear to have any option/feature in IFS to change the withholding tax amount to automatically calculate based on the Gross amount.I know that it is possible to manually modify the withholding tax amount in IFS when creating the payment proposal but ideally I want the system to calculate as required first time.Any thoughts or similar experience in the Community?

Hi,When I try to order a report via ‘Order Report’ I get the following Security Error. Does anybody know how to fix this error? We are on Apps10, update 29.   

Is there a standard standard template/format to use if auto extracting info from PDFs and uploading into IFS for Supplier/Purchase invoices?

Hello, When posting a number of invoices, we receive the error message below. This occurs when posting invoices from contractors. Strangely enough, it does not occur with all invoices from contractors. I have checked the suppliers, projects and parts. All of them have been ruled out because other invoices from contractors contain the supplier, projects and/or parts and are posted without an error message.I don't understand what triggers the error message, because all the currencies we use are valid in the Currency Rates screen. Are you familiar with this message and do you have a solution for it?The error occurs when we do Purchasing > Match PO Receipts in the menu Posting Proposal. We are on Apps10 Update 29. 

For documents generated by IFS, you can assign certain Phrases per Document Type and that works very well. Now, there is also a new module 'procurement clause types' in which you can assign clauses per supplier, project, part, activity, ... So, I suspect that with this functionality, instead of determining a few clauses per document type, you can do this more specifically for all documents relating to a particular supplier/project/part, for example. Steps to take are:Create a procurement clause type. Create phrases linked to this clause type. Create clause connection rules, to determine when the clause should appear on a document.After trying all these steps, I don’t seem to manage to view the clause on the documents.Are there certain extra steps to undertake/settings to change for this module to work?

Community,On work task line, you can see the current pre posting for cost center is set. if I changed the object ID, i would like the cost center in Pre Posting being changed automatically by a designated cost center value. my question would be, how to connect the cost center to object ID? Thank you. 

Hi, The automatic tolerance posting creation on the Posting Proposal when a PO is matched against an invoice with a different price doesn’t seem to work in Cloud 25.1. Or may be we are missing something. Could someone assist to verify what is missing? I have tested this for POs with an Inventory Part line, Non Inventory part line and a No part line as well. Non of the scenarios created automatic tolerance posting lines on the Posting Proposal. Here is an example from a No Part Line PO matched against an Invoice with a different price:The Tolerance is enabled on the Supplier for PO Matching on the Invoice tab:  On the company level too, the following setup is done:A PO with a no part line exists for 20000 sek in Closed status:The Invoice is Created for 20009 sek which is within the allowed tolerance amount. The Match PO Receipts per line is performed and the PO Receipt is matched. The Remaining amount is shown as 9 as below: However, no automatic tolerance posting is created using M93 e

We created a group payment for the ISO20022 payment method with multiple external payments and two intercompany transactions. The payment file and the return file from the bank has the two intercompany transactions in the xml file. After matching, the two IC transaction amount is booked against an external supplier as Supplier payment on account (SUPOA). What might be the issue ? Are we allowed to group external and intercompany payments?

Hi,We are getting an Authentication Failure when we try to do a Test Transfer for the CIS Verification (from our Test IFS Cloud Database)We have double checked that the Tax Report details agree to the details we see if when we log onto the Government Gateway with the User Name and Password.Any ideas? WE are using our live HMRC Governemnt Gateway User Name and Password. Should we have a test User Name? There is no mention of that in the UK Country Solution Document 23R1.pdfCheers,Graham

Hi Experts,I was wondering if there is a way to add my user group ‘AC’ to all voucher types in an easy way (a  command or database task) per year/company ?. I am in below page, and I could add my group manually to each voucher type.Thank you in advance for your response!/Roshan

Hi,If we enable ‘Inherit Authorizer(s) From Purchase’ in the Company master, will posting proposals for advance supplier invoices be authorized automatically?

Are you able to change the Valid until date for period 1(Jan), if you have had transactions and postings already.? 

Hi All.We have received an inquiry from a customer and would like to know how to implement this in IFS Cloud.1. For example, when sales reach ¥1 billion, grant ¥100 million worth of service credits (similar to point management systems used by electronics retailers or Amazon).2. Subsequently, when receiving orders from that customer, offset the order amount using the service credits. If any balance remains after the offset, we want to generate an invoice for that remaining amount.3. It should also be possible to combine and use multiple service credits together.4. Service credits should have an expiration date and become unusable once expired.This functionality corresponds to the rules in IFRS 15.70 - 72. Regards.

Receiving the above error, but User group AC is connected to voucher type = I, function type = I for 2026:    What am I missing?Thanks.

Hi everyone,I have created a Custom Field in the 'Supplier Payment Order' screen that concatenates multiple Purchase Order numbers into a semicolon-separated string (e.g., '00001;00002;00003') using LISTAGG.Local Supp Pay Order - OverviewI am now trying to create a Custom Menu to navigate to the 'Purchase Order' window using this field as a parameter. When the field contains a single value, the navigation works perfectly. When the field contains multiple values, the target screen opens empty because it tries to find an exact match for the entire string. Is there a way to pass these values so the target screen interprets them as an 'OR' or 'IN' filter? Custom MenuThanks in advance!IFSAPP10