IFS Solutions

Morning Heros, I am a bit confuse. Accord to IFS sizing documentation for 25R1, for our configuration, we should have in general 2 replicas for each pod. I resize them and for some (like you can see below), I have 6 replicas and they are completely full. My users are noticing some slowness on navigation. What should I do? Any idea? Did anybody have this problem?   Thanks, Gianni Neves

Since the IFS debug console is discontinued in 24R1 and replaced with the IFS Cloud Web DevTools browser extension we (our company) is interested to know some more details about the “product” IFS Cloud Web DevTools browser extension since we know need to “open up” the Developer Tools function in the browser, which is locked for our ordinary users, to be able to view debug information.For example: Are there any whitepaper/documents about the product? How often is the IFS Cloud DevTools extension updated with security patches? Will it be certified against the latest versions of Edge Browser

Hi all,Faced with error creating a work task from template: jtTask.insert: field [APPOINTMENT_REQUIRED] in Work Task may not be specified for new objects.Are there ideas how to fix it?I tested the same action on the Demo environment - no errors.IFS 25R1. 

Hi everyone,Does anyone know how the cost elements are mapped to a project? As shown in the attached image, there are two cost elements linked to this project, and I would like to understand how this mapping works.Thank you in advance for your support.

Hi all,anyone has an idea how to setup table relationships for PART_NEED.PLACE_ID_FROM lookup in DebriefPartNeeds. The lookup should show:place.place_idplace.namelocation.locationlocation.description the filter should be:PERSON_PLACE.place_relationship like 'C_ORDER_FROM%' How to setup the connection of PERSON_PLACE to PERSON AND LOCATION? The lookup in PART_NEED.PLACE_ID_FROM should show these 2 places/locations (in the box)  This is the setup I have done.  

I have a requirement to insert an Task Event when TASK.PLAN_START_DATE is changed in mobile DebriefOverview screen.   I have tried to achieve it by:Create a custom.old_plan_start_date field.In DebriefOverview Refresh event, I set a client script which will also set this:  // 405789 STARTvar planStartDttm = getControlValue("task", "plan_start_dttm");setControlValue("custom", "old_plan_start_dttm", planStartDttm);// 405789 FINISH In task.plan_start_date, on “Value Changed” event I set a client script which look like this: var taskId = getCurrentKeys("task", "task_id");var oldPlanStartDttm = getControlValue("custom","old_plan_start_dttm");var newPlanStartDttm = getControlValue

Hello IFS Community,  When we regenerate the calendars with the addition of new exceptions to already generated calendar, scheduling/Planning of all the DOP connected Shop Orders and PRs become inaccurate. The only option seems available to correct them to reply on the function “Propagate Date Upstream “. However, this is not practical when there many open DOP orders. I already created a ticket to IFS support, and they wanted me to create a community post . Kindly enhance this in a future release ?  

After creating a custom attribute for an entity, it is required to enable History Log for that. For that following steps were followed. Test Plan:Create a “Custom Attribute” in the "PurchaseOrder" entity and publish it. Open the "History Log Configuration" page and search for Lu Name "=PurchaseOrder". Observe that only one entry is shown with Table Name "PURCHASE_ORDER_TAB". Expectation:Expects another entry - "PURCHASE_ORDER_CFT", so can enable logging on custom attribute. This used to work in IFSAPP10. See following attachment.  But in IFS Cloud, it doesn’t seem like above. See following attachment. 

Hi, We have a customer that needs to sequence manufacturing of multiple parts in for packing and installation. For example:  They need a total 30 x Part P1 and 7 x Part P2 For packing and installation they might to make the parts in the follow quantities. 5 x P1 2 x P2 10 x P1 1 x P2 3 x P1 2 x P2 5 x P1 2 x P2 7 x P1 The finished goods have multiple parts that are both purchased and subassemblies made other shop orders. They aren’t using DOP. The demands for the shop orders are generated by PMRP.The preference is not to split this into multiple shop orders for the sequencing (ie just one shop order for 30 x P1 and one shop order 7 x P2).Another option is that if we do split the final parts into multiple shop orders for sequencing, after the initial run of PMRP, the shop orders for underlying assem

We have a supplier with whom we have a contract to keep a qty of their product on hand (consigned) and upon consumption we notify them for replenishment.  They then Invoice us for the consumed product.  This all works great in IFS, as the consumption decreases from the receipt (original shipment of their consigned product) upon invoicing. However, we would like the ability to actually see the consumption (number/id?) that is decreasing the receipt.  This will be helpful to see this when linking to the invoice.  IFS is decreasing the receipt, so it is using the consumption transaction.  I’m hoping it is there somewhere, but we just do not know where it is located.  Thank you

Hello together,  with 24R1/R2… so to say service apis with the possability to update its childs is possible from an external system to ifs cloud. When will this be not only possible with a post but also to retrieve information from cloud to a third party application with a GET? Thank you Marc Ringwelski

I have created a singlestep and there is a requirement to autorestart the assistant after executing the Ok command.But there is an issue with the autorestart functionality.I do the following in my Ok command, where I execute function and get the output assigned to a structure.As long as I don’t use the structure variable to assign attributes, as in above, the autorestart is working as expected.But as soon as I put below highlighted code to assign the output value to my desired attribute, the autorestart does not work anymore. I tried to avoid structures as a variable and directly call functions and assign the relevant attributes with the output. But when there are multiple call stateme

Hello,I have a question regarding the addition of lookup/reference columns in list pages via Page Designer.Specifically, I want to add a column, for example "Shop Order", which should display a clickable link to the referenced shop order record (e.g., linking to ShopOrder/Form:$filter?OrderNo eq 123456).Some columns have this functionality out-of-the-box, such as Part No in the image below.Is it possible to achieve this functionality? In my experience with Page Designer, attempting to fully replicate an out-of-the-box navigation link (such as the "Part No" example above) results in the field being displayed as plain text rather than as a clickable link. This leads me to believe that enabling true navigation links may require changes in IFS Developer Studio. Implementing

Hi everyone,I’m hoping someone with experience in the Data Anonymisation functionality of IFS Cloud can help.We’re trying to implement Data Anonymisation Policies within our IFS installation. The goal is straightforward: configure rules so that, for example, data is anonymised and/or removed five years after an employee leaves the organisation.I can set up personal data attributes and define anonymisation actions, but I’m struggling to figure out how to apply a policy like this to make it work end-to-end.Any guidance or examples would be greatly appreciated!

Does anybody know how to log acknowledgement of a payment proposals? Our auditor raised the absence of it as a finding. Switching on history logging is the obvious answer but if this is needed for compliance it would have to be in the standard. Are we missing something?

Dear allWe experience large amount of trace logs since upgrading Oracle from 19.26 to 19.29.Within 24 hours we used to have something around 200 to 300MB. Now we are at 5 - 6 GB per day.IFS / Oracle case so far recommended to add this parameter:Disable these warnings entirely by setting parameter _kgl_large_heap_warning_threshold to 0.alter system set "_kgl_large_heap_warning_threshold"=0 scope=spfile ;alter system set "_kgl_large_heap_assert_threshold"=0 scope=spfile ;this has decreased it to roughly 1 GB per day, which is still rather large.Anybody experiencing the same issue?

Hi All,When requesting for slots getting the response as below: {    "@odata.context": "https://elex-fsm-tst.ifs.cloud/OData/$metadata#Edm.String",    "value": "Error occurred when retrieving Appointment Offers from the PSO Gateway. Please press the \"Get Offers\" button to try again. If this continues to fail, please go to the Schedule Workbench and look at the Events table found within the System tab of the Administration Workspace for more information.\r\n"}Any idea on this.Thanks,Lavanya

Hi All, Normally the resource costs are defined in resource groups as standard hourly costs. But there is another place where cost details are entered. That is scheduling resource types.  Are the costs entered here are only for scheduling purposes? Or are these costs override resource group costs? TIA.

Dear All,How can you match a customer payment that's give in a CAMT.053 file when no Bank account is given? A customer of mine received a CAMT.053 that contains a customer payment See below. This paymetn doesn't contain a Bank Account. how can the matching be done? In the Tag AddtlNtryInf is a Customer invoice number given but it's not picked up when the file is processed  Anyone an idea?Regards Raymond <Ntry>                <Amt Ccy="EUR">968.72</Amt>                <CdtDbtInd>CRDT</CdtDbtInd>                <Sts>BOOK</Sts>                <BookgDt>                    <Dt>2022-04-19</Dt>                </BookgDt>                <ValDt>                    <Dt>2022-04-19</Dt>                </ValDt>                <AcctSvcrRef>TG1904003102911</AcctSvcrRef>

Hello,I would like to explain the issue step by step. I created a Work Order and a Work Task, assigned and reported personnel, and issued the required materials. On the Sales tab, I configured the lines as Invoiceable or Not Invoiceable. I created a new Invoice Preview and it was approved. After approval, the lines were transferred to a Customer Order. The Customer Order was delivered, and the line status changed to “Delivered”. Everything works correctly up to this point. The issue occurs when I want to add one more part as an “Invoiceable” line on the Work Task and include all Invoiceable lines in a single invoice: When I try to revoke the order from the Invoice Preview, the background job returns an error because the Customer Order lines are already in Delivered state. Error: “The operation ‘SetLineCancelled’ is not allowed for Customer Order o

We went live with IFS in October 2025. in Consolidation, we are running the Balance Transfer Assistant to roll the internal reporting entities into consolidation. We are using Business Reporter to get a P&L. We noticed that for November the consolidation is combining October and November together when we run the Balance Transfer Assistant. We just want it to transfer November, since October has already been transferred that month. Is there a reason it is doing this?

Report Filter for Structure Nodes using “BETWEEN” Operator for IFS Business Reporter adds extra data. “IN” Operator works fine. “BETWEEN” Operator works fine only for the Integer Data

Hi All,I am trying to create a lobby link element which navigates to the Document folder navigator folder, in the expanded mode.I have tried the items suggested in the links above without any luck.While “tree” works as a substitute in the browser address bar, I cant substitute this from “page” when within the lobby element “tree” looks like it should work but it is not a live link. this link works and opens the d

Our security grants in Mobile Applications are for MainEngApp 24 . Many of our users mobile clients have been updated to v25, but not all of them. What impact does this have on performance of the mobile application? Do we need to create a new application within IFS for v25 and grant security to it? 

We are encountering a situation where a specific Customer Order Type (COM) seems to be forcing all associated Purchase Order Lines to 100% discount. When the discount is set back to 0%, it automatically updates in the background back to 100%. At first, i assumed this was custom functionality in our instance, but i’ve been unable to find any custom events or workflows that are triggered on PurchaseOrderLine or PurchaseOrderLinePart. While in theory this makes sense (Commission orders having 0 cost), I can’t seem to find any place in IFS where we would have set up this functionality. Does anyone know if this is native? When i check in the PO Line History, i can see my entries for setting discount to 0%, but there doesnt appear to be anything setting it back to 100% in the history, so it is happening in the background somewhere. Any ideas on how i can track this down? For reference, we are currently on IFS Cloud 25R1.3