IFS Solutions

Hi Team, How would be the order of deployment while installation in 25R2 version  As it says cds are not supported so now we move the contents of .cre to ddlsource?so in place of cdbs, the ddlsource files will be executed first in installation process? Regards,Rakesh

When approving a Purchase Requistion - can I view if different payment terms have been entered?  I.e checking that someone has updated from 45 days to immediate for specific POs/purchases?

Hello All,We have a lot of Migration Jobs, and we want to migrate all of them in a new IFS Cloud environment.Are there any ways to accomplish this at once? Can we make a Migration Job for this task? Thank you for your help.

Is there any step by step guide for amending salary in 25R1?

Hi,I am unable to login to the IFS MWO Service App. After entering the server URL, its redirected to the login page, but after entering my username and password, its throwing error :- An error has occurred("error":""code":"ODATA_PROVIDER_ERROR""message":"Aninternal server error occurred,Contact administrator.","details":[("code":"PROJECTION_IMPL_EXCEPTION","message":"")])),  

Hello procurement and supply chain experts!(Note: I posted this same question in the procurement area earlier this week but no response so my apologies if you see this in both places.  I’m not clear where this question best belongs)We have a situation where we want to be able to create a blanket PO or similar with one-time approval, with one supplier for just a few select parts, and then request a drawdown against that as when site inventory is consumed or running low.  We are struggling with how to  implement this, even though it seems like it should be straightforward.Initially we looked at creating a PO for e.g. 6 months of supply quantity, with many lines in the PO for the quantity of a min delivery (e.g. qty 16 for 1 pallet to be delivered).  The PO would be approved once, and then each time the total qty at the site fell below a defined threshold the buyers would release one or more lines from that ‘blanket’ PO as needed.  Unfortunately when the PO is approved it seems it always

We have a shipment with a reservation for a serialized part that is correctly tied to a Customer Order. What is the process to cancel or delete the shipment?

Hello everyone,I have a customer who wants an aide to help them determine whether or not all of an items on customer that MUST ship in full will be available to ship as planned.The customer has restrictions that an order must ship complete and that there is often a “must not arrive by date” that applies to the entire order.Has anyone ever developed what I used to refer to as a go/no go report that checks customer order lines and the available inventory for them starting at the customer order available quantity and then , if unavailable, begin checking the open shop orders and/or purchase orders and their availability all the way through an item’s entire product structure to see whether or not the original order can be shipped. Think or it as a capability check on demand even for orders that have been released.  Thoughts?

There are a number of screens where we can Copy Object and Paste Object (or paste from Excel) but this is not available in Cloud.  What other option is there or will it be developed.  Specifically for (but not limited to):Chart of AccountsAccountsTax Codes

Hi all,I have an issue with a part revision in IFS Cloud.There is only 1 part revision The Phase In date is 01-01-2025 (in the past) The product structure has the status buildable The status still remains “Not In Effect”When releasing a shop order, I also receive the warning:“The default structure revision [1] for shop order [...] is not effective on the start date 20-05-2026 16:03. Do you want to continue?”Questions:Why does the revision not automatically switch to “In Effect”? What conditions could block this, even when there is only one revision and the Phase In date is in the past?Thanks in advance!Kind regards, Willem

A. What is your idea? 1) ClassificationOpportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionWe request an enhancement that enables : Definition of different permit types (verbal, hot work, full permits) AI-powered suggestions for applicable permit types based on work scope complexity Business Value: This would streamline the permit-to-work process during work order preparation B. Context and scope 1) Who is affected?Customer : Total Energies2) Frequency​​FrequentlyC. Value and impact1) What is the business outcome?Improves productivity or efficiency Reduces cost or manual effort Enhances user experience Enables new capability2) Impact scale4 — Company-wide3) Workaround- D. Evidence and examples-E. Additional details1) Enter support ticket ID reference (If applicable)-2) Would you like to participate in validation or early testing?Yes 

Hi. First, I’m no t a financial consultant, but I have a question: I have a Spanish client that have another company in Mexico. Now, we are going to implement IFS Cloud in Mexico and my client wants to have the accounts in Mexico and in Spain connected. How is possible to configure IFS for that?To be honest, I'm not sure if the question is phrased correctly. Thank you in advance.Best regardsSergio

Hi,I have a customer with 25.2.4 and for customer invoices only date/number formatting is not picking up automatically when the report is ordered. Behaviour is same for the reports ordered from the customer invoice window as well as report archive.I have already verified User language is correctly set in the application Used languages en-US enabled by default Report Locales has the languages set Report Print Task Template has the default language set for both tasks And If I manually select any language and set it back to en date /number field is correctly updating and report can be previewed 

On Work Task > Allocate Resource there is a field “Adjust to Schedule”My team is asking if this can be defaulted to be checked.Is there an easy way to do this? 

Can someone explain how to give access to the IFS Call Center Module so that external customers can report their issues directly to IFS. They should only see the cases/tasks from their organization only. I believe this can be achieved using Case Access Groups and B2B customer and user setups as explained in below posts.  However, case access group with ‘Restriction Type’ defined as customer does not work even if the user has access to the B2B Customer. User cant see the cases from customers which they are connected to. Therefore, I would like to know whether there is anything else that should be setup for this to work.Below post also gives some insights. However, I’m unable to figure it out yet.  

 WIP Tracking and Labeling Across Operations in IFSWe have a manufacturing process consisting of multiple operations: Milling, Drilling, and Welding.The material transformation flow is as follows:Raw Material: Steel After Milling → Milled Steel (WIP) After Drilling → Milled & Drilled Steel (WIP) After Welding → Finished ProductWe would like to understand how to effectively trace and manage Work-in-Progress (WIP) at each stage of this process within IFS.Specifically, we are looking for guidance on:How to track WIP quantities and status after each operation (Milling, Drilling, Welding) Whether it is possible to physically identify and differentiate WIP items at each stage How to print barcode labels or stickers for WIP items after each operation How to associate WIP items with locations or work centers to reflect their physical position on the shop floor Recommended best practices in IFS to demarcate and control WIP between operationsOur goal is to achieve clear visibility, traceabil

Could you please share any documentaion on best practices for Segregation of  duties (SOD)  in cloud and the features IFS have in this area

Is it possible to have a sample to-be document for any module? 

Business RequirementsThere is a business requirement to automatically allocate inventory in the order of "date of manufacture".The "date of receipt" is different from the "date of manufacture" to some extent, although the "date of receipt" is supposed to be received in the order of manufacture.We considered specifying "date of manufacture" for "expiration date," but since "date of manufacture" is basically a past date, it would result in inventory that cannot be used for allocation.I would like to know if there is any feasible way to do this.

Hi, I am working in IFS Cloud 25R2. What I want to be able to do is set a resources start and end location for scheduling. I can create a visit address on a person record and it appears but only if the person is not protected.In previous versions of IFS it was possible to have the person as protected but only addresses flagged against the “Home” address type were protected. Is this no longer the case or is there a bug in the system?Has anybody been able to configure a visit address for scheduling whilst maintaining non visibility of a personal home address in the person record? Thanks 

Hi All, I’m trying to make a workflow that changes values on an new shop order. Currently shoporder has defaults of * for Release and Sequence numbers and I want to make those something else, for example, lets say X. I set up the workflow, with call in the projection actions:  and then set the workflow design in the same way as the IFS example:    Then I deployed it, and switched on the action. However, I get no change on the new shop order - defaults are still *I have tried changing the timing: before, after, async, nothing helps. I do see this in the network → response in devtools:                "origin": "MT",                "time": "1764932228185",                "category": "WORKFLOW",                "level": "TRACE",                "type": "Workflow",                "text": " ProcessKey: SetShopOrderDefaults, ProcessType: PROCESS_AUGMENT, ProcessTiming: AFTER, Action Type: CALL, Projection Name: ShopOrderHandling, CALL: ShopOrd_Default():ShopOrd",                "statistic": "Tr

Hello,Do you know the URL to access the IFS Cloud print dialog configuration?The aim is to make a few small adjustments...Thanks 

We have identified a limitation in IFS Applications related to overtime registration via the Work Task page, where the recorded overtime does not reflect under attendance hours in the Time Registration.Steps to ReproduceNavigate to the Work Task page. Add time reports by registering overtime hours (e.g., 12 hours).>Authorize the Time Work Task Time Reports Navigate to Time Registration-Grid View.Time Registration-Grid ViewObserved BehaviourThe overtime recorded through the Work Task page is not reflected under attendance hours in the Time Registration Grid View. However, when the same overtime is manually added directly in the Time Registration Grid View, the attendance hours are updated correctly.Expected BehaviorOvertime recorded via the Work Task page should automatically appear under attendance hours in the Time Registration Grid View. Users should not need to manually re-enter overtime in the grid view.Business RequirementIf the Work Task page allows to enter the Job Hours, it

Hi, Looking for recommendations if any customers are using Azure Databricks to analyze data from IFS. How are you connecting to IFS and getting data from IFS?

Hello,In the PO line, why does Promised delivery date gets updated automatically when planned receipt date is changed and vise versa.Regards,Kruthika