Finance (Financials)

1) ClassificationOpportunity for improvement2) Brief descriptionIntroduce a standard Unit of Production (UOP) depreciation method within IFS Cloud Fixed Assets.Currently, customers who require depreciation based on actual asset consumption (e.g., units produced, machine hours, operating hours, kilometres travelled, tonnes mined) must implement custom solutions because IFS does not provide a native UOP depreciation method. This requirement has already resulted in customer-specific customizations and development efforts.The proposed enhancement would provide a standard depreciation method that:Maintains expected lifetime production/usage units. Captures actual units consumed for each depreciation period. Calculates depreciation based on actual asset usage rather than time. Supports manual entry, file uploads, and integrations. Provides standard validations and reporting.This enhancement would improve support for industries such as Mining, Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Transportation, Con

Can someone kindly  share some light on the purpose of the above page in ifs cloud  .I cannot obtain any data in this page ,even when the advance invoice(AD) is paid posted  (created from a customer order and paid from a mixed payment) and not matched with the final . Once paid it is Converted to CUPIA .Is it the reason ?Thank you Udanee

In IFS cloud what data is the Acquisition Date in fixed assets populated with?  

Hi We just received the message from a customer that certain Payment Institutes dont accept payment files with the Pain.001.001.003 anymore. will there be a new format available soon for Pain.001.001.009.?I know that Camt054 version 4 was released with update 15 app10 

Hi Community, Does anyone have experience setting up calculated tax in the Travel Expense module? As far as I understand, it is only possible to set up the posting control TX2 – Travel Expense Tax. Unlike the INVOIC module, there do not seem to be equivalent posting controls for calculated tax such as IP9 – Tax Received, Calculated and IP10 – Tax Disbursed, Calculated. I have assigned a tax code for calculated tax to an expense code in the Expense Rule view. However, when I create and post an expense sheet using that expense code, no tax voucher lines are generated, and no transactions are created in the Tax Transactions view. This seems like a significant limitation for EU customers planning to use the Travel Expense module, as no tax voucher lines or tax transactions are created for VAT reporting purposes. Any insights or workarounds would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

Hi,I simulated a test case in a test environment to investigate the difference between Shop Order Costs and Project Monitoring costs in IFS Cloud. The test case was as follows: Part A was added to project demand using request type Project MRP. A parent Shop Order was created for Part A, requiring 3 pcs of Part B. A child Shop Order was created for Part B to produce 3 pcs as project inventory. For the purpose of this test, I modified S of Part B by adding a high-cost component. This was done intentionally to make the cost flow and any differences between the child and parent Shop Orders clearly visible. There was no DOP connection between Part A and Part B. The child Shop Order was completed, and the 3 pcs were received into inventory. I then issued these 3 pcs directly from inventory to the parent Shop Order. Both Shop Orders were connected to the same project activity. The parent Shop Order was then completed. The costs shown in Shop Order Costs are: Child Shop Order B a

Hello everybody,what could the problem be if I can’t find the cost center in the manual supplier invoice?The cost center is valid. Thank you in advance.

After uploading an Invoice when we try to view it the image is distorted. The Text is running vertically instead of horizontally. Naturally the text gets cutoff because there is only space for it to run horizontally. We made a release around the time it started happening. Any help would be appreciated!

Hi,I have a customer that would like to decrease their revenue at month end for RMA’s that are created/invoices related to orders that where delivered the previous month.I don’t see how to do this search in outstanding sale.Anyone knows how to get this information from IFS Cloud?

A. What is your idea? 1) Classification New concept or idea 2) Brief descriptionBackground:In IFS Cloud Tracks, revenues and costs that are excluded from capitalization (by excluding the relevant account from Periodical Capitalization) are incorrectly included in revenue recognition calculations for POC Method: Manual.Note that this issue is not there in POC Method: Actual. This is since “Include Cost Excluded from Capitalization for POC” has been auto disabled (set as “No”) from Project Group level for POC Method: Actual. But this option has been auto enabled (set as “Yes”) for POC Method: Manual.This was reported through Case: CS0532547.Issue:It is not possible to change the value in “Include Cost Excluded from Capitalization for POC” to ‘No’ for POC Method: Manual. Therefore this causes a situation where the excluded revenues and costs are always included in the revenue recognition calculations which is not right for the customers which are used to use Manual POC Method without reve

Hello ,As part of the France e-invoicing requirements, invoices may be received with the Billing Framework (BT-23) set to one of the following values:B2 – Goods Invoice Already Paid S2 – Services Invoice Already Paid M2 – Mixed Invoice Already PaidWhen any of these values are used for BT-23, the PrepaidAmount must be equal to the total invoice amount, and the Open Amount on the invoice in IFS should be 0, based on the following requirements:BT-112 (Invoice Total Amount Including VAT) = Total Invoice Amount (TaxInclusiveAmount) BT-113 (Amount Already Paid) = Total Invoice Amount (PrepaidAmount) BT-115 (Net Amount Due) = 0 (PayableAmount)Currently, when the Billing Framework is received as B2, S2, or M2, the PrepaidAmount tag is populated with the invoice amount. However, during processing in IFS External Supplier Invoices, invoice validation fails with the error:"Net amount is not equal to the installment open amount."As a result, invoices that have already been paid cannot be successfu

Hello Everyone,We have identified a potential issue with generation for Project e-invoices.According to Polish VAT/KSeF requirements, the exchange rate reported in the XML should be the VAT Exchange Rate (stored as Tax Currency Rate in IFS). However, the current XML generation process appears to populate the Currency Rate from the invoice rather than the Tax Currency Rate.Observed Behavior:XML generated for Project Invoices contains the standard Currency Rate. The Tax Currency Rate is available in IFS but is not being used in the XML. This may result in KSeF submissions that do not align with Polish VAT reporting requirements.Expected Behavior:The KSeF XML should report the Tax Currency Rate (VAT Exchange Rate) instead of the standard Currency Rate.Has anyone encountered a similar situation when generating KSeF XML for Project Invoices? If so:Is the current behavior expected? Are there any known fixes, localizations, or configuration settings available? Has anyone implemented a workaro

Hello Everyone,We're experiencing an issue related to split payments and recalculation for supplier e-invoice creationWhen a split payment is created manually and a recalculation is subsequently triggered, the system automatically overrides the manually defined payment terms. As a result, the invoice due dates are recalculated and no longer align with the expected payment terms from either the supplier master data or the purchase order.Has anyone encountered a similar scenario? Is this the expected system behavior, or could it be a product limitation/defect?We would appreciate insights on:How other customers are handling split payments in such cases. Any recommended configuration or workaround. Whether there are known fixes or best practices to prevent payment terms from being overwritten during recalculation.Thank you in advance for your feedback and experiences.

Hello,We have identified a scenario related to supplier invoices created through the E-Invoicing process.When an invoice is created from an external supplier invoice for e-invoicing, there is currently no possibility to enter or maintain the Payment Method and Payment Address on the resulting invoice.In addition, we have observed that one-time supplier information entered during the e-invoicing process is not carried over to the corresponding Manual Supplier Invoice created in the system.As a result:One-time supplier details entered in the incoming supplier invoice are not populated in the Manual Supplier Invoice. The one-time payment information is not reflected in the Installment Plan or Discount information. There is no option to enter or update the Payment Method and Payment Address after the invoice is created.This creates a business issue as the supplier invoice cannot be processed for payment using the required payment details.Do we have any experience with other customers proce

Hello,As per France e-invoicing requirements, a credit invoice must include a reference to the original invoice being credited.For project-related customer orders, creating a credit invoice directly from the original invoice correctly populates the original invoice reference and updates the Actual Revenue on the project. However, this approach does not impact the Planned Revenue.As the system does not allow the creation of customer order lines with negative quantities or amounts, the current process is to create a charge with a negative amount and associate it with a project-linked order line having a zero amount. This allows the Planned Revenue on the project to be adjusted correctly.When a credit invoice is generated using this approach, the credit invoice does not automatically retrieve the reference to the original invoice being credited. In addition, there is currently available field which is not getting updated automatically or fields are not non editable for manual action.From

Hello,As part of France e-invoicing requirements, a credit invoice must contain a reference to the original invoice being credited.We have identified a scenario with AFP-based invoicing (Sales Contract) where the original invoice reference is not always carried over to the generated credit invoice.Project invoices created from AFPs are based on the certified values entered in the AFP. We have observed that when a credit invoice is created directly against the most recent AFP invoice, the original invoice reference is correctly populated on the credit invoice.However, if a line has already been invoiced through a previous AFP and a new AFP is later created to generate a credit invoice for that same line, the generated credit invoice does not retrieve the reference of the original invoice being credited.Additionally, we could not find any field or functionality that allows users to manually enter or update the original invoice reference on the credit invoice.From a France e-invoicing com

Hello, As part of the France e-invoicing requirements, when payment has already been received and the invoice is issued subsequently, the Billing Framework (BT-23) must be set to one of the following values: B2 – Goods Invoice Already Paid S2 – Services Invoice Already Paid M2 – Mixed Invoice Already Paid  When any of these values are used for BT-23, the PrepaidAmount must be equal to the total invoice amount. Consequently: BT-112 (Invoice Total Amount Including VAT) = Total Invoice Amount BT-113 (Amount Already Paid) = Total Invoice Amount BT-115 (Net Amount Due) = 0  Currently, when the Billing Framework is set to B2, S2, or M2, the PrepaidAmount tag is not populated and is transmitted as empty in the generated invoice XML.As a result, the invoice validation fails and the document is rejected by “e-invoice solution platform” with the following validation rule:If the billing framework (BT-23) is B2, S2, or M2, then the amount already paid (BT-113) must be equal to the total amount inc

Hello,The Lifecycle Status field is expected to display value in the format <Status Code>-<Status Code Description>, while any additional comments should be captured separately in the Lifecycle Comment field.However, the current behavior is different. The status code is not displayed, and the Lifecycle Status field instead shows <Status Code Description>-<Comments>.For example, the current output is:Lifecycle Status: Accepted - TEST CommentThe expected output is:Lifecycle Status: 205-AcceptedLifecycle Comment: TEST CommentThis behavior is observed for all invoice types, including Instant Invoice, Project Invoice, and Customer Order Invoice on IFS Cloud 25.2.5.The current behavior does not align with the intended functionality of the Lifecycle Status field, as the status code is not displayed and comments are merged into the status value instead of being stored in the dedicated Lifecycle Comment field. Any insights, recommendations, or experiences from clients wh

Bankgiro SEK payments in payment format ISO20022 CORE 001.001.009We are currently on IFS10 update 28. SEB requires a change in payment format from ISO20022 pain 001.001.003 to ISO20022 CORE 001.001.009 for outgoing payment files.It seems that we don’t have the full code installed in IFS for Bankgiro payments in SEK for this payment type. Has anybody else encountered the same problem? Did you need to develop and install in any transformer or was it solved by adding bank details differently under the actual supplier?

Hi Community.We are trying to change the acquisition account on an Active Fixed Asset by using the “Move Object” function. However, it does not succeed and the account will just go back to the original account. Can anybody help?

Hi everyone, We are producing and selling large configurable parts. Depending to the configuration of the product, the Customs Statistic No is not everytime the same. We didn’t found any way to set up this correctly (the Customs Statistic No is fixed for a defined invetory part, on a specific site). Did anyone faced this kind of issue already ? Do you have any advice to deal with this kind of problem ? 

Hi Guys,Have any of you been able to upload an invoice as XML with a tax code where the non-deductible portion is not 100, without using the overwriting value at company level?I receive the following error: ‘Tax amount adjustment for tax code cannot be greater than the maximum overwriting level on tax’. From my side, both the tax and non-deductible portions appear to be correct in both invoice and tax line.Would it be possible to share a working XML file, or provide any guidance on the validations applied by IFS?Tax calculation method: Tax Amount and Non-deductible Tax Amount

Dear IFS Community,  IFS Support team forwarded me to here with the question: In Germany there will be a mandatory e-invoicing.Please see the below link:https://www.bdo.global/en-gb/insights/tax/indirect-tax/germany-mandatory-e-invoicing-what-you-need-to-know!As this is a mandatory government regulation, my question would be, when, how and which UPD will IFS provide an official solution to handle this requirement?I also found this post: E-invoicing for Germany | IFS Community but this does not contains the tags IFS mentioned, so I raised this topi again.  Kind regards, Balazs

Hi,My client is going to adhere for B2B E-invoicing from Jan 2025 and I found that is not in localization centre when the company created from Germany Template. When would it available in IFS 24R2?Kind regards,Sandy

Hello,I'm getting an error when entering a supplier invoice.whereas on my supplier I have another currency rate type.  and on the company  I don't understand how it's possible to have two default currency rate types on the same company.Could anyone explain how this works, or how to resolve this error?Thanks in advance for your help