Finance (Financials)

Dear Experts,We are currently evaluating the impact of IFRS 18 on our IFS setup.One requirement is to classify foreign exchange differences into the categories Operating, Investing and Financing, based on the underlying transaction or balance. This means that FX revaluations on trade receivables/payables should be presented differently from FX revaluations on loans or investments. But there are edge cases, for instance when a supplier might be used for operating as well as investing activities.I am interested to understand how others have approached this in IFS.Our challenge is that the standard currency revaluation process posts unrealised FX gains/losses without an obvious distinction between the underlying business nature of the balance. Questions:How have you differentiated FX revaluations between Operating, Investing and Financing? Did you solve this through separate accounts, posting control, code parts, account groups, reporting logic, or another approach? Are you able to derive

Hi IFS ExpertWe would like to improve the Group data by default to all the user of the GL Balance Analysis. This is our default settings and we would like to change themI have already prepared some basic changes in the Selection Criteria or the colomn order but I cannot find where I can configure the Group Data setup in the Page Designer. If anyone can help me in this matter that will be helpful.Best Regard

The bank confirms that new MTMX / ISO 20022 requirements will become effective as of 1 October 2026.The key requirement is that postal addresses must be provided in a structured format going forward.The unstructured address field PstlAdr/AdrLine will be ignored by the bank’s system.The following fields will become mandatory:PstlAdr/TwnNm (Town Name) PstlAdr/Ctry (Country) PstlAdr/CtrySubDvsn (only mandatory for payments to Canada)According to the bank’s feedback, this requirement is limited to the Creditor section. For both suppliers and employee payments (since this is handled in the same way for the bank). Issue:The default Employee Payments API file does not have detailed postal sections (in comparison to the supplier payment file) and the default transformer cannot put a detailed Postal Address in the Creditor Section. Why does the employee payment file not have creditor detailed postal address data as default in structured way (town and country)? And what is the solution for the n

Hello community,We are currently facing a functional issue regarding the processing of supplier credit invoices for Purchase Orders managed with payment milestones.Our customer has paid several supplier invoices linked to a Purchase Order that includes payment milestones. The supplier invoices linked to the PO lines have been fully processed, matched, and paid.Later, the supplier issued two partial credit invoices related to those invoices.Under normal circumstances (standard receipt flow), credit invoices are processed using the usual matching/correction process. However, in this case, that approach does not work.We have already tried:the standard credit invoice process which is unsuccessful; creating a negative PO line, rejected by the system because negative values are not allowed; using Price Adjustment Purchase , no data (no PO line is available for adjustment).From our investigation, this seems to be standard IFS behavior:Payment milestone invoices are amount-based only, not quan

Hello Everyone, I open this thread, I believe this is a know issue but I did not find the answer for now. I’m in the context of E-invoicing AR invoice from IFS to middleware Azure Platform. We are configuring 25R2 SU5 environment for that matter and we have to use an API logic. So far I struggle with that issue : ExecutionException from Sender thread Caused by: ifs.fnd.connect.senders.ConnectSender$PermanentFailureException: OAuth2 token request failed (HTTP 400): Bad request error: 400 ({"error":"invalid_request","error_description":"AADSTS90014: The required field 'scope' is missing from the credential. Ensure that you have all the necessary parameters for the login request. Trace ID: f2a6f0a9-8e24-4f1d-a51a-c8fba05e5700 Correlation ID: 302cae6a-7094-4804-af2c-5dbdd6b8f2a0 Timestamp: 2026-06-30 11:30:04Z","error_codes":[90014],"timestamp":"2026-06-30 11:30:04Z","trace_id":"f2a6f0a9-8e24-4f1d-a51a-c8fba05e5700","correlation_id":"302cae6a-7094-4804-af2c-5dbdd6b8f2a0","error_uri":"https

Hi everyone,We are encountering an issue while closing a project and would appreciate any insights.During our investigation, we found that the system did not generate the capitalization voucher for a project cost transaction. The cost voucher is from 2019 and is related to a supplier invoice that is currently in PaidPosted status. The financial year is already closed.When we attempt to close the project, the process fails with the following error.“Voucher is not in balance”After debugging, we confirmed that the expected capitalization voucher was never created by the system. Since the capitalization transaction is missing, the project closure cannot be completed.Has anyone experienced a similar issue? Is there a supported way to regenerate the missing capitalization voucher or any recommended workaround for closing the project when the original accounting year is already closed?Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. ​@Furkan Zengin ​@Abdul 

Hi Guys, I need help on getting this up and running - I have my first problem as the routing of the application message - getting an error. The text of the message intended to send to the credit card interface below in the xml. Is there information on how this can be setup in IFS Cloud.  What did you use during testing for the Routing Address and Routing Rule to test with the Paypal Test Account? Test Steps:Create Customer Order for Client set to Credit Card PaymentFor a manual authorization the following error is displayed - “Field [TRANS_DATE] is mandatory for Credit Card Transactions and requires a value.”The Release of the Customer Order should trigger the Credit Card approval - but returns the error [“APPLICATION_MESSAGE” doesn’t match any routing rule]. Your help on this would be appreciated. We do not have IFS Help Screen information related to the added module. Thx

Hi, Trying to use diluted labor rate for project time transactions. As per my understanding the system is supposed to adjust the internal labour rate according to overtime reported. Reading the IFS documentation is appears incomplete, or might be subject for bugs in 25r2 or 26r1. Cause I certainly can not make it work. Anyone in the community done this? Looking for the requirements, prerequisites and last how it’s triggered and where the adjustments can see on what stage in the time filing process..  Any input is of high value!  Thx & rgds, Eirik Horjen 

Is there any way to cancel a Customer Interest Invoice in a Preliminary Status.  We have not found any RMB options on any of the screens we have looked at.Customer Interest Invoices/NotesCustomer Interest Invoice/Note AnalysisCustomer Invoices AnalysisCustomer Invoice Details

We use labor rate dilution for one of our companies.  The process only works when the week ends on a Saturday because I have to run by process for an entire week.  I was wondering if anyone out there uses labor rate dilution and what do you do when the month does not end on a Saturday.  Thanks everyone!

Could anyone offer any suggestions as to why the CUPOA and second CR transactions don’t appear to be included in the Customer Analysis ageing?  I’ve tried re-calculating Credit Analysis but it didn’t make any difference.   Any suggestions gratefully received! ThanksLinda24.1.16

Totals (like Invoice ID Total, Planned Date Total and Supplier Total) and Grand Total are missing when creating the pdf for Payment Proposals in Cloud 25R2. In Cloud 24R2 the totals are shown as below. Have we missed any parameters settings or other basic data?From 24R2:From 25R2:Best regardsLotta Taxén

How do I delete failed self-billing attempts that will never be completed?Let me explain: when a self-billing invoice does not go all the way, i.e. up to the automatic creation of the supplier invoice, we find this aborted "pre-invoice" in the "Self-Billing Invoices Analysis"  filled in. For example, supplier invoice with error “All purchase order receipts connected to this invoice are cancelled.” will never succeed, but will remain in this screen indefinitely.Each time we go back to this screen we will ask ourselves the same question: the invoice has not been generated, is this normal?You can't tell the difference between erroneous self-billing attempts that need to be resolved and carried through to the end, and those that can no longer be done.There is no delete button in this screen.  How do I do this in IFS Cloud? I find it hard to imagine that it doesn't exist.On another screen? With special rights?

All the permissions regarding the report is set up correctly.But only for a specific user - when running the report, the details are displayed for a second and then goes blank.Tried to generate the output excel but the generated excel file contains no data.It is working for the user in test environment but not in PROD.  

Good morning. I have heard (but never experienced myself) that some french IFS users are not able to generate the FEC file required by french tax administration due to size issues, as if a size limit would be exceeded.(FEC = “Fichier des Ecritures Comptables” = full list of accounting vouchers for one year) Could someone tell me the truth about this issue in recent IFS Releases, 24R1 or newer ?(Is there a limit in size or number of rows for the FEC ? Or do the users face technical issues like a timeout when generating the FEC ? Are there possible IFS settings to optimize FEC generation ? other workaround possibilities ?)  Best regards.

A customer in USA is trying to use ACH payment with Citi Bank. ISO20022 method is used in IFS Cloud 24R2.this is supported as per below post  When testing payment files bank has informed that both the 'Local Instrument-code' and 'Local Instrument- Proprietary' must be present in the xml file. However, in IFS Application only one value can be used at a given time.  See the below tags required. Tag 1. Local Instrument-code'<PmtTpInf>                    <LclInstrm>                        <Cd>CCD</Cd>                    </LclInstrm> </PmtTpInf> Tag 2 Local Instrument- Proprietary'<PmtTpInf>                <SvcLvl>                    <Cd>NURG</Cd>                </SvcLvl>                <LclInstrm>                    <Prtry>CITI996</Prtry>                </LclInstrm></PmtTpInf> Is it a known limitation or is there any other basic data that I have missed?

Hi all,Users are required to send E-Invoices including invoices images based on their custom layouts but when processing an e-invoice it always picks the default/standard print layout and generates the xml.There are layouts made based on different country requirements and need to set it up against each company print and currently when trying to send e-invoice there is no option to select it. Is there a way to achieve this or any alternative solutions?Appreciate your answers and suggestions.Thank you.

Need to offset one supplier invoice against a credit note. there was a value difference, where the supplier invoice value was higher by 40 than the credit invoice. Therefore, I raised another credit invoice to tally amounts. but still the system generated “ORA-20110: InstallmentUtility.PAYINSTAL30: Amount paid (33605.00) for installment 1 of Invoice 406 is bigger than open installment amount (33605.00)” error message.To test a different way, I lowered the invoice amount by doing a mix payment to tally amounts with the credit invoice, but the system generates the same error message.Any suggestions to sort out this issue?

Hi Experts,After executing Transfer Inventory Transaction , there are multiple records inSupply Chain and Manufacturing Posting Analysis that remain in status"1 (Created)" and are not transferred. Common Characteristics of the Records:The affected records share the following attributes:Accounting ID: Negative value Posting Type: M1 (Inventory) Posting Event: ARRIVAL (Purchase Order Receipt) Posting and Transaction Source: DUMMYBased on our internal investigation, we were informed that these records may berelated to posting simulation.  Q1.Could someone clarify what it means functionally when Posting IDs are negativeand used for postiong simulation in IFS? Q2.Under what conditions are such records created? Q3.Are these records expected to remain in status "Created (1)",or should they eventually be processed/cleaned up?Regards,

Hello,  In the UBL, for a customer e-invoice BtoG, do you have the BT related to the service code ? We have done all the setup for BtoG but the BT service code does not appear ?Do you have the same issue ? Thanks

Hi, folks, Have anyone ever raised to IFS annoying limitations in functionality of external suplier invoice window?e.g. lack of calculation of tax amounts when tax code is changed (especially from deductible to non-deductible)? Or installment refresh when payment method is selected? In my opinion, such limitation were acceptable when this widow was used for migration purpose or for intercompany (MHS) case. But once world is switching to e-invoices, external invoice becomes main process, and such restrictions are really painful.Do you have any news about improvements planned in this area?

We are in Apps 10.  I am not certain if this is a basic data or process issue.  When we do a Mixed Payment from a check, the Payment Method sometimes (not always) shows as 001, 002, 003, or 004.  Those payment methods are different Credit Card types.  So I am not sure why it sometimes pulls that info verses chk Payment Method.  

Hi, I create a tax code N with the tax type “No Tax”. When I use this tax code in an Instant Invoice, the transaction is not showing in the tax ledger.However, I can see other transaction with the tax code “N”. Does anyone know if this is the expected behaviour? I was expecting to see all transactions with a tax code in the subledger, despite of the tax type.  Thanks 

Hello, community,Can you tell us where and how to set up multiple billing addresses for a customer account in IFS Cloud (23R1) without creating multiple customers, since we’ll be billing multiple business units that share the same SIRET number?Thank you in advance for your feedback.

ScenarioMentioned below are the details of Lease Accounting ContractStart date – 8th May 2026End date – 30th June 2028Payment start date – 31st May 2026When the contract date falls in the middle of the month, they need the interest calculation to be based only on the number of days from the lease inception date up to the end of that month. Interest expense for the first period seems to be calculated for the whole month, regardless of the lease inception date.For the first month, the system is calculating interest expenses for the full month.We are currently reviewing this matter with our R&D team. During our discussions, it was noted that IFRS 16 recommends the use of the effective interest method to ensure a faithful representation of the time value of money. Based on this, it may be more accurate to consider the lease commencement date and prorate interest for the first month.However, as this behavior has not been previously reported by other customers, we would like to better un