Finance (Financials)

Hello,Our customer order line has an associated charge: Line price: 150 Additional charge: 100  When the customer order line is delivered, a new line is created on the Outstanding Sales page. However, this new line does not include the charge in its price.  As a result, when creating interim sales voucher, the system takes only the base line price (excluding the charge). 

Is there a way to get information from tag <AddtlNtryInf> in the external payment transactions? This tag often contains additional information that can be useful to the users.The external payment transactions contain attributes Bank Transaction Info 1, Bank Transaction Info 2 and Bank Transaction Info 3 but these are (in my test cases) left empy.

Hello All,When attempting to change the country to Netherlands for a company in IFS Cloud, I get the following error message: Thinking the ISO basic data needed to be configured, I went to the following window:I made sure the “Used in Application” toggle was on, yet I still get the error.  What am I missing? Thanks,

Is there a scheduled task which we can set to calculate customer credit information analysis once a month or once a week?  

Hi all,As in Italy, outgoing SEPA payment files  must meet the new xml schema version , the current one in IFS is no more relevant at the bank.Current xml schema version : 00.04.00, expected new version : 00.04.01Has some of the IFS  community users already faced this issue ?Attached technical documentation in Italian.Thank to all for your feedbackKind regardsJulien BOUDEAUIT Finance PM Beneteau Group

Hello everyone, I would like to import an external file automatically by “External File Assistant” (Batch process) exactly like on this topic (Import external files automatically | IFS Community).Unfortunately, i’ve got a few problems with the solution. The first one was to define a value for the parameter “SERVER_DIRECTORY” in “System Parameters For Accounting Rules” but I do not have this parameter in the list.List of all parametersThe second solution was to setup a Routing Rule with FTP Reader. There was supposed to be a template named “Example_External_File_Import” but I can’t find it.Should I create it myself or maybe it’s a permission probl

A new version of Perfidia v4.50.226f has been released. The actual version can be downloaded here:https://www.perfidia.de/downloads/psa/psasetup.exePerfidia Forum can also be accessed with GuestAccess (Gastzugang)https://www.perfidia.de/Perfidia?action=forum

We have set up Swiss QR code invoicing successfully on Instant Invoice, however when we create a project invoice (for the same customer in the same company) no QR code layout is produced.Does anyone know why this might be? Is there additional set up required to enable this on project invoices?

We have a Purchase Order receipt which is not showing in the posting proposals screen.There is another purchase order receipt with the same number but it was cancelled and a closed date has been entered.When selecting ‘Match PO Receipts’ in the Posting Proposal screen, it is not showing as available for matching.  Is there a reason that this is occurring or somewhere I could look to check the information?  

I have 90 different customer records for the same company with different billing addresses, because each customer record needs unique customer agreement and price lists. However, all 90 customer records could roll up into one “master” account. Is there a way to setup this up in IFS? If so, what is the best way to do this? I want to be able to see sales be each individual customer record but also rolled up into the “master” account with a sum of all sales from all 90.  Is there a video, documentation, or IFS Academy course to explain this? 

We get this error setting up IFS Connect in our IFS Cloud solutiuon, running 24R1.3 ExecutionException from Sender threadCaused by: ifs.fnd.connect.senders.ConnectSender$TemporaryFailureException: Error while sending data to fileCaused by: jcifs.smb.SmbException: Failed to connect: 0.0.0.0<00>/10.12.0.128Caused by: jcifs.util.transport.TransportException: jcifs.smb.SmbException: This client is not compatible with the server.Caused by: jcifs.smb.SmbException: This client is not compatible with the server. The  fileshare specified is on a Windows 2025 server. Are there limitations to IFS connect on SMB versions supported by IFS Cloud?/JE

Hi,I wonder if anyone has met a requirement where outbound (Direction - ) transactions should be tracked based on Serial Number.My current understanding is that if a part is lot tracked, the CoO is taken from the Lot, else from inventory part.Meaning that if the same inventory part use Serial tracking, and parts come from different origins we are not able to track the serials origin.This would of course require CoO on serial, and then to follow-up it on outbound transactions consequently.

 We recently updated to 24R1 and noticed that a function that is used frequently by us for manually posted invoices was removed. The ability to copy and paste posting information. This is used due to our authorization combination rules that many within the company fail to recognize. After filling in the posting information authorizers and acknowledgers are removed leaving the invoice in status “Balance”. The easiest way to sole is by copying posting information, deleting and pasting to trigger the rule.  I can not find a reason to why it was removed anywhere and if it will return in future updates.   

Looking for adviceWe’re starting to see rounding discrepancies on invoices where the line total does not match the displayed unit price × quantity, which is beginning to create issues with customs documentation.Example:Stored unit price: 3.46343412Qty: 50IFS calculates:3.46343412 × 50 = 173.171706 → 173.17However the invoice displays the unit price as 3.46, so a manual calculation shows:3.46 × 50 = 173.00Our client is encountering issues when very large quantities are involved, as small rounding differences become magnified in the final totals.Is this the expected behavior in IFS Cloud for invoice calculations?Has anyone found a configuration or best practice to avoid these mismatches, especially where customs documentation expects totals to match the displayed unit price?

When I try to create and save my invoice I get the error message “Payment address object does not exist for DTACHCU”. I have done the below setup for payment method DTACHCU.  It is not allowed to define electronic payment address for payment method DTACHCU.

Hi Colleagues,In connection with testing the integration to Pagero,  encountered issues related to missing fields required for outbound invoices to Romania. Specifically, the fields “Seller Legal Information,” “Seller Country Code,” and “VAT Accounting Currency Code” do not appear to be included in the IFS_EINVOICE_TO_FINANCE transformer.Is IFS fully complies with the ANAF requirements for Romanian outbound e‑invoicing. Comparison of the transformers in IFS 10 and IFS Cloud does not indicate that these mandatory fields are being generated in either version. We received following error from Pagero sideThe document does not satisfy requirements for recipients format Romania EN16931 CIUS. The following errors were identified: [BR-RO-030]-Daca Codul monedei facturii (BT-5) este altul decat RON, atunci Codul monedei de contabilizare a TVA (BT-6) trebuie sa fie RON.

Hi Experts Is it possible to define a planning rule and use the assumption driver as an output? Best RegardsSophal

The application allows defining future valid‑from dates for tax codes only if the tax code is not a duplicate. While this behavior is understandable as the standard application logic, it becomes a limitation in scenarios where tax rates are expected to change in the future. In such cases, users are unable to maintain multiple future tax rates for the same tax code.Currently, the only possible workaround is to create a new tax code with a different ID, even though it represents the same tax code with a revised rate. This results in multiple tax codes being created in the application, as the system does not allow maintaining the same tax code with different rates across different validity periods.If the application could filter and identify valid tax codes based on their validity period dates in the tax codes window, it would be possible to define multiple tax codes with the same ID but different tax rates.For example, the tax code ST may have a rate of

Today we use external voucher assistant, but our users find this to be a bit troublesome due to creation of excel, convert to .txt and then upload. I got a question about using a migration job instead, but before starting to build such file I want to know if someone else done this and if so, was it successful?  Thanks in advance./Tobias  

Hello,is there a way to include the copy of report codes when creating a new company form the template company? We think  this is arranged in the component registration but how can see whether it's activated? below we see it is activated however report codes are not copied from template company to new company: 

In IFS Cloud, we receive most supplier invoices electronically and they are processed automatically and created as preliminary invoices (I-voucher). Since suppliers only provide PO numbers, these are without a Project ID. We then manually enter the project ID on the invoice by adding the Project ID in the Posting Proposal Head or on the Posting Lines.When we then try to create a Supplier Payment Proposal and using the "Project ID" selection parameter, the system fails to find these invoices. It seems the payment proposal filter is only looking at the initial invoice state and is completely ignoring the project data we added during the posting stage. This makes us unable to create Supplier Payment Proposals for a single project. Often we want to be able to create a Supplier Payment Proposal for a single project, so we can track the payments and have all payments for a project on a single payment order.

Good Afternoon,I am looking for some guidance on project cost behaviour in an engineer-to-order environment.We manage our builds in Project Navigator, with most demand originating from customer orders and driving inventory supply. Our BoMs are multi-level and complex, often containing thousands of components. It is common for standard planned items to be allocated to project-specific demand as part of the MRP process.We have observed significant differences between:• Planned Committed cost (post-MRP)• Committed (released) cost• Completed / Used costOn investigation, it appears that standard planned components are not included in Planned Committed, only once  unless they are converted into a supply order (e.g. PO or released shop order) and connected or reserved to the project.In our forecast process, ETC is currently set based on Planned Committed. This is leading to material under-forecasting, as large portions of standard plann

HiI would like to consult with you all, in case customer have group company with company A, company B and company C with Equity Majority and ownership 100% for allI have defined the consolidation structure as the pictures below, I run consolidate balance with successfully, but it didn’t generate intercompany elimination for intercompany transactions.Could you please advise the structure or any basic data should be revise? Thank you in advance.Supaporn . 

I am setting up e-invoice process monitoring in Mexico in Cloud version 2023R2 with MX country package.I want the invoices to remain in prel state until a succesful response message has arrived. Today the invoices are processed to Posted automatically, even with a failed response message. This makes impossible to adjust the wrong values (causing the failed response message). What does Process after Response mean? Automatically Process Accepted Invoice?I have them unchecked, but invoices are still posted automatically after the Send is done 

Hi,We have just installed the latest SU9 service pack for IFS Cloud 25R1. This service pack introduces functionality to support the new JPK‑V7M3 structure. However, I have not been able to find support for the replacement tags (BFK, DI, and OFF) within this structure, which are required when an invoice does not have a KSeF number.Am I missing something, or is this functionality not yet supported? If so, this would mean that the current structure is not fully compliant with the legal requirements.