IFS Solutions

Hi ALl, Doing a project in 24R1 where I see some strange behaviour and wondering if we are dealing with a bug. Situation:I have a Work Task where I need to assign a person to the Work Task using a Resource group (Resource Type = ‘Person). Standard allocation against the Resource demand works as expected, but I am also trying to use ‘Direct Allocation’. And I noticed that not all of my Resources are showing in the drop down list. Initially I didn’t even see any. So I’ve been trying to debug and investigate and I’ve found the cause of the issue but now I am wondering if this is a bug or ‘functionality as intended’. And if it is ‘functionality as intended’ - what would be the idea behind that way of working because I can’t imagine why this would work like this. So what I have found out is:Direct Allocation does not take into account persons belonging to the top Resource Group, only from subgroups

Hello, I’ve created a few distribution orders to move some parts from Site A to Site B. The multiple parts were all added to the same PO/CO and all looks good. On Site B, I can see the released PO and the lines are available on the register arrivals page. Of course, I cannot receive the lines until the customer order on Site A is delivered. That’s all fine, but when I try to peg material lines on a shop order at Site B, the corresponding lines from the released PO are not displayed. Is this intended behavior or am I missing a step somewhere? Thanks for your help,Dylan

I have created templates for safety inspections and i am struggling to share the templates with other usersI thought i would copy the entry in the profile but when i look i cannot find the entry in my personal profile. like it was in apps 8Has anyone got a work instruction please?

Hello,My customer has this error message when he tries to issue a reserved material line : “ The quantity reserved for part XXX on site XXX at location XXX should not be negative.” Thanks for your help. 

Inventory cost not match with RM cost in inventory transactions history. Since this part is a semi finish good there are no charges included. Transaction Code Transaction Description Part No Location No Cost Quantity UoM Order Ref 1 Order Type Inventory Cost

Hello, We are looking to improve manufacturing cost estimates and cost reporting through IFS. We primarily design and fabricate custom systems with job-unique BOMs. We are not using DOP at the moment, but have it on the radar in the future. On the shop order costs page, we can see estimated and actual material, labor, machine, etc. costs. Until items are issued or operations are reported, the actual cost is $0. Thus, the estimated cost can be useful. An issue with the estimated cost is that it is $0.00 for new items that don’t have a history in the system. Even once these new items are received into inventory and there is an inventory unit cost, the estimated material cost field on the Inventory Part Unit Cost page still shows $0. Thus, other than our interconnecting piping, fittings, etc. that are used on every job, our estimated cost is completely missing. We can add a CRIM to update the estimated material cost field after material rece

I just created a new site in our IFS 10 environment.When checking the basic data in costing, I found, that UPD 21 has several new Costing parameters . Unforturneately, IFS documentation Define Cost Parameters https://server/documentation/en/Costing/ActivityDefineCostParameters.htm only describes some of the parameters.I had a look in the latest doc of 24R2 (https://docs.ifs.com/ifsclouddocs/24r2/Costing/ActivityDefineCostParameters.htm  which is lacking a description of most of the parameters as well.These are new parameters in IFS 10, or in some of IFS 10 Updates.Parameter CodeCAPTURE_COST_SOURCESCOPY_APPROVED_PARTSCOPY_SUBCONTRACT

Hey all !  Just wondering if there is a way to restrict Force wrap up on certain agents ? 

Hoping some one can help, when I run the following code in PL/SQL developer it runs without an issue - however when I put the same code into an IAL no records are created.  Why would that be please ? With Rowsnum As (Select to_char(dt,'dd/mm/yyyy') dt, row_number() Over( Order by dt) rnFrom (  SELECT ifsapp.cd_user_util_api.get_previous_period_end_date(sysdate) -366+ level dt  from   dual connect by level <= ifsapp.cd_user_util_api.get_previous_period_end_date(sysdate)       - (ifsapp.cd_user_util_api.get_previous_period_end_date(sysdate)-366)) rws where  to_char ( dt, 'fmday', 'nls_date_language = English'  ) = 'monday'),RqdParts As (select part_no, ifsapp.Inventory_Part_API.Get_Description(CONTRACT,PART_NO) part_description, ContractFROM ifsapp.Inventory_Partwhere contract Not In ('CPH','CTM','VMS','CGP') --and part_no In ('WMPI10067','500086536','WSBB10501

 In Part Master Data > Revisions and Attributes>Part RevisionWas there a change in IFS at some point that auto-populates the Revision No into the Revision Text field? We use revision text occasionally for a different piece of part master meta data and now seeing a system generated value in this field is causing issues and confusion.   

Different customers ordering same Part No - but needing handling unit quantities to be different Is there a way to accomplish with SAME Part No? 

Hi, I’m trying to get the warehouse inventory list using a bearer token, I’m using ‘IFS Database’ as an identity provider. I got my access token like this : Then I used it like this :   But I’m getting a 401 error, I tried to use the id_token instead of the access_token but I get the same thing. Am I missing something? Thanks.

Hello, Our client is working with PSO integrated with Cloud. They have this scenario: An task is cancelled, but must be in some cases opened again. They don’t want to create a new task instead of the old one, since it takes too much time and they have many requirements in a day.Did anyone have a similar requirement or do you have any ideas? As far as I know and have tested, a cancelled task cannot be reponed. Thank you very much,Iulia 

When a user who has the access to this screen tries to open it, it fails to load with this error. I have tested this with another user account with the same permissions, etc and I can access the screen and do a search. I have tried going to this screen with debug console on with the user account that fails to load it, and nothing is output to the console.IFS 10 update 21, hosted internally.Any ideas what could be wrong please for this one user? Thanks  

Hi,In Trust Center - IFS under the section “Customer Security in the Cloud”, there the following document is available, dated 30/08/2023.https://www.ifs.com/-/media10/Project/IFS/IFS/Assets/Trust%20Center/IFS%20Cloud%20Services%20Controls.pdfUnfortuneately, Screenshot on page 5 (IFS Cloud Architecture Diagramm) is of unreadable quality.Is it possible to update this or provide it directly? Kind regards Johannes

Hi there, Can anyone please point me to the permission that controls access to this option in the Automatic Tax Proposal screen?I've looked all over and can't seem to pinpoint the permission responsible! Thanks!  

Hi,At the moment there is the capability to trigger a workflow from an external system using the following endpoint -https://xxxxx.ifs.cloud/main/ifsapplications/projection/engine-rest/process-definition/key/zTestonly/startBut the payload for such requests seems to have the need to follow the following standard -{    "variables": {        "MyDate": {            "value": "xxxxxx",            "type": "String"        },        "MyTaskNum": {            "value": "xxxxxxx",            "type": "String"        }    }}My questions are as follows:Do we have

Hi All,Is there any validation in IFS Cloud not to allow employee to report time more that scheduled hours. I need that validation when the employees are reporting time in below screen but not the employees confirm the time registration. Regards,MalinG

Dear All;Reverse Invoice against a supplier invoice must be required, such as Credit custmer invoice function.Cancel Invoice function on Manual supplier Invoice delete an original one, but it is NOT fix against my customer rule. Please provice any of your ideas. IFS Cloud  24.1.3 Regards;Yasuda

We are having issued with Microsoft New Outlook - when there is more than one attachment in an email and the user want to save them, the new Outlook automatically Zips the file when they save attachments.  When a user then adds one of these attachments e.g. in PDF format to IFS, it cannot be viewed.     Is anyone else having this type of issue?

I rebooted Application VM from working TEST environment.After reboot, I checked status of unix mws-svr.sh and here I see all components in status RUNNING, but starting IFS EE gives time-out after entering logon info.Database VM has no problems, since I can query using PLSQL.IFS System Monitoring shows normalIFS Middleware Server Admin Console opens, but shows no running serversWhen you ask details, you need to wait some time and get an errorDoes anyone has a solution for this behavior? 

Hello I prepared simple test of user creation which does not work as expected in my opinion. If we have system parameter “Password for new users” set as Username I though each created user during this time should has password as identity. Am I right? But it does not work after changing system parameter to Ask immediate after user creation. Is it a bug?Why am I asking for this? Because I have to migrate houndred of users from previous ERP application using standard API and there is a big problem because the users can’t login to application. And parametr needs to be changed.Simple test plan:Change parametr to Username Create user Change parametr to Ask Try to log on to application using previosuly created user account May I ask You for Your comment? Thank You

Hi All,I could not add document in Employee File Rows. Why is reason?

Hello,Do you think the following approach will be effective in replacing EDI messages from IFS8 in IFS Cloud?For outbound EDI messages from IFS8, convert JSON to XML using a transformer (perhaps the standard one IFS_JSON_TO_XML_GENERIC?) and apply customized transformers to map fields from EDI messages to IFS Cloud projection fields.The same logic for inbound, but in a different direction and with the assumption that BizAPIs that were used are no longer available in the Cloud.If yes then mappings between EDI and Cloud projection for different types of messages are required, do you have something like that?Or perhaps you have any other ideas to fulfill the requirements?Best regardsBart

Hi, When I try to register the Purchase Order, I’m taking this error.Would you help me please?