IFS Solutions

Crystal layouts (barcode labels) when printed to a logical printer (mapped in IFS .net PA to Zebra printers) comes out small and misaligned. Preview and direct print to the same printer (not going via IFS PA) they come out fine.Any idea where to look please?

Hi Report experts,I would like to set the Report Title dynamically depending on a condition in the report.How could I achieve this?Currently , it is static as defined in the model.codegenproperties {   TitleText                     " Test Report";}  

Hello,Is there any hardware sizing for IFS Assyst which we can refer to,Kindly advise  regardsPankaj

Hi all, Has anyone got any documentation of using Crystal Report to amend / customise the Service Report from MWO once a Work Assignment has been complete. I know that the document can be configured. I would just like some additional documentation as proof of concept.  Thanks, Chiedza 

CE6 maintains close alignment with the release schedule of IFS Cloud, incorporating both monthly Service Updates (SU) and bi-annual Major Releases.Each customer's CE Tenant is updated based on the configuration settings defined during onboarding. These settings can vary by environment and may be adjusted post-deployment.If you're unsure of your current configuration, please contact Unified Support, who will be happy to assist. Updated CE6 Release Timeline (2025)To reflect the current deployment model, the CE6 release process follows the below timeline: Third Thursday of Each Month R&D-approved release packages are made available to the responsible Cloud Centre of Excellence (CCoE) SME. ⏱ Target handover window: 08:30 – 16:00 GMT/BST Any required infrastructure or global updates are managed by CCoE prior to customer deployment. Before End of the Same Week ​​​​​​​The release is deployed to Pre-Production environments. If issues are identified, CCoE initiates a

Hi,I am aiming to show message in alert box like this:  I have tried to use code like this: var resultTasks = getDBValues('C_GET_OPEN_PROD_PM_SCHED_TASK', [productId, productPmId]); if (size(resultTasks)>0) { // NR > 0 -- message to close/cancel the open task message = message + getMessage('cPleaseCloseTask' , 'Information'); message = message + "\n"; message = message + getMessage('cBeforeChangeVCF', 'Information'); message = message + "\n" + "\n"; message = message + getMessage('RequestId' , 'Label'); message = message + "\t" ; message = message + getMessage('TaskId' , 'Label'); message = message + "\t" ; message = message + getMessage('TaskStatus' , 'Label'); message = message + "\n"; for (i = 0; i<size(resultTasks); ++i) { var resultTask = resultTasks[i]; line = line + resultTask.request_id; line = line + "\t"; line = line + resultTask.task_id; line = line + "\t"; line = line + resultTask.task_status;

Hi experts,We have a requirement to determine the user's current PC or browser time zone in order to calculate and set an entity attribute value via a backend PL/SQL function.Is there a way to retrieve the user's local time or time zone from their PC or browser and pass it to the PL/SQL function to support this functionality?

We have an issue where Parts are being reserved to a Customer Order (via scheduled Create Customer Order Reservations job) 24 hours before the parts were produced on the Shop Order for the same Parts. I have a copy Pick List referencing the lot batch from the Shop Order, and the final step of the Shop Order wasn’t reported and the Parts received into stock until more than 24 hours after the reservation took place. As far as I can tell there was no partial Shop Order Reporting and the full quantity on the Shop Order was received into stock at the same time, but 24 hours after the goods were reserved. There did not seem to be any pegging of Customer Order to Shop Order and the CO Supply Code was Invent Order.  Is there any way that a batch can be reserved and appear on a pick list, prior to being reported on a Shop Order?

helllo, ihave a serious problem,when we move inventory fron one location of store to another location of store the unit cost become zero,as show in a shared picture,

Hi All I have observed this on previous IFS versions as well. This is 24.1.9 The validity period has passed, but the agreement remains active. Isn't this fundamentally wrong?  Thanks,Asela 

Hello,After IFS Cloud update to 24R1 version there is no possibility to use Document Repository with Repository Type “Shared”.Client used Repository Type “Shared” and all document files were kept there. After upgrade client cannot access document files from Document Revision. Receives error: Error in downloading file: one or more errors occurred.First question: How to reach the document files after upgrade to 24R1 version if they are uploaded to repository with type „Shared“?***We tried to create new repository with file type „File Storage“, in the field „Path“ (in the form „Repositories“). When uploading the document file to Document Revision, document file is put to the docman place, but not into the certain catalog for the certain Document Class:And document file uploaded to repository is not named by „Repository File Name“.Second question: How should be created new repositories with repository type „File Storage“ that document files could be uploaded to the exact folder of the cert

Dear all,In manual supplier invoice window when I attach a document for document class INVOICE ,I can see there is an attachment been attached and I can view it as well.Whereas in the same window I cannot see documents attached by other users in the same document class.Other users can’t see the documents attached by me in the same window.What can be causing this issue please.ThanksUdanee 

Hi Experts,We did a database export and import to perform a Oracle upgrade from 12C to 19C. After the database import we execute Batch.ins fetching from original build home to create the database processes, but the does not create the database processes for Freight interface. How can we recreate the database processes associated with Freight interface? Thank you.

Community,I have 2 kanban for 2 parts using Kanban Auto ROP. The transport task is created as expected.but, I am running the replenish job again, and again, then you will see the quantity is incremented by kanban quantity every time.Is it a bug?

We recently started to implement “drop-off” locations for Kanban-driven Transport Tasks.  Ever since beginning to use these we are seeing problems with too many Transport Tasks being created, but only for parts/circuits that use these drop-off locations for staging.Transport Tasks are being created as expected, and look correct, however we are seeing multiple Transport Tasks being created instead of just one.  It appears that one TT is being created every 5 minutes, which is the frequency that the Kanbans are being run at, which seems to indicate that something is signaling a new TT to be created even though one has already been created but just not yet fulfilled.Is this normal?  Is there some way to prevent this from happening, so that it will only create a new TT if one has not already been created?Presumably we could shift to e.g. 30 mins on the kanban generation, which would allow more time for the parts to be delivered from the warehouse, through the drop-off location and then to

I am trying to change the account of an object and add a missing department. In the Move Object screen, it let me save the changes. It did give me this pop-up message “The new values entered in the accounting tab differs from the values in preposting. Do you wish to save anyway?”. I selected yes and everything seemed fine. When I pulled the same asset up it had the old information in the “New Values” table of move object. I tried to change them again and got the following error message “Cannot proceed with transaction. There are existing transactions being processed for object XXXXXX”Where can I see the transaction being processed and move it through? I checked background jobs and did not see it there.   Thank you

A new version of Perfidia v4.50.215 has been released. The actual version can be downloaded here:https://www.perfidia.de/downloads/psa/psasetup.exe

We came up with following error when uploading the files.PERFIDIA version- v4.50.211Issue- Getting below error when they trying to upload this file to the tool.   Could anyone advice on how to resolve this issue. Many thanks 

Hi everyone, We’re encountering a persistent issue with how Private Activities (PAs) are handled in PSO, and we’d appreciate any insights or suggestions.Use Case:Like most, we use Private Activities to indicate when a technician is unavailable. Up until the day of the appointment, everything looks fine—tasks are scheduled around the PA within their respective SLA windows.The Problem:On the day of service, when PSO assigns work early in the morning, it appears to ignore the SLA windows. Instead, it schedules all tasks to begin after the Private Activity ends, leaving the earlier part of the day empty—even if the tasks were originally meant to occur before the PA.I believe we see the same issue with fixed assignments as well under certain scenarios. Example Scenario:A technician has jobs from 8:00 AM to 1:00 PM (let say 4 one hour tasks), and a PA from 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM with his work day ending at 5pm Instead of correctly scheduling the tasks before 2:00 PM, PSO stacks them all after 4:

In IFS Cloud, we are building new lobbies and want to steer the users to sets of data in the same screen, using 3 different links. These are all in Project Procurement.These 2 URL addresses  work: page/ProjectProcurement/ActivityLevel;$filter=Objstate%20eq%20IfsApp.ProjectProcurementHandling.ActivityState'Released';page/ProjectProcurement/ActivityLevel;$filter=Objstate%20eq%20IfsApp.ProjectProcurementHandling.ActivityState'Completed'; but, when we want to add a date range of the last 20 days, we cannot get it to work:page/ProjectProcurement/ActivityLevel;$filter=%28Objstate%20eq%20IfsApp.ProjectProcurementHandling.ActivityState'Released'%29%20and%20ReleasedDate%20ge%'#TODAY#-20'; Anyone know how to do this? Thanks in advance

Hi Community,I'm currently configuring workflows in the Technician Portal and have noticed that the Service filter in the Workflow Configuration doesn't seem to be applied. Even when I set the filter to apply to specific services, the workflow is  triggered  for all the servicesIs this expected behavior, or am I missing something in the configuration?Would appreciate any insights or guidance on how the Service filter is supposed to work in this context.Thanks in advance!

When we are working with customers on their data migrations, it sure would be nice to have a NON-TECHNICAL list of all system defined mandatory fields and required tabs for the setting up a customer, supplier, purchase order, customer order, etc.For years we have always had to tell the customers to do a search for these fields by attempting to enter something and noting what fields are mandatory.  I think it would be far more efficient to have a published list of these things for the ENTIRE system categorized by application and table within the application.

Hi!  Is there any documentation how to set up Pagero integration for IFS Cloud? I found the answer in below post but I could not access the link as I am not IFS employee?   Supplier E - Invoice with Pagero Integration (Cloud) | IFS Community  Could anyone provide me via attachment in this post? Thanks and regards, 

Hello, I have a custom field that I had created for two different entities that have the same exact logic; the difference being that one loads on a list view while the other one never does unless you filter down to one instance. I have tried simplifying the logic as much as possible, but no matter what I am faced with the same issue. Custom Field Logic: Arguments: CUSTOMER_NOSELECT EMAIL FROM CUSTOMER_INFO_CONTACT_BASIC WHERE CUSTOMER_ID=:CUSTOMER_NOFETCH FIRST 1 ROWS ONLYEntities:CustomerOrder and OrderQuotationCustomer Orders Page:Will load this way until it times outSales Quotation Page:Loads almost immediately Thanks, Daniel SummaERP DeveloperBurt Process Equipment

Hello, I have a custom field that I had created for two different entities that have the same exact logic; the difference being that one loads on a list view while the other one never does unless you filter down to one instance. I have tried simplifying the logic as much as possible, but no matter what I am faced with the same issue. Custom Field Logic: Arguments: CUSTOMER_NOSELECT EMAIL FROM CUSTOMER_INFO_CONTACT_BASIC WHERE CUSTOMER_ID=:CUSTOMER_NOFETCH FIRST 1 ROWS ONLYEntities:CustomerOrder and OrderQuotationCustomer Orders Page:Will load this way until it times outSales Quotation Page:Loads almost immediately Thanks, Daniel SummaERP DeveloperBurt Process Equipment