IFS Solutions

Getting below license violation after deploying UPD29 in Apps10License State: INVALID - IFS Applications has been inaccessible for [4] hoursExpiration Date: 2030-03-26Full User Limit: 65Current usage: 62Limited Task User:   Permission Set: FND_WEBENDUSER_B2B   LTU User Limit: 15   Current Usage: 15Additional Task User:   Permission Set: FNDMIG_EXCEL_ADDIN   ATU User Limit: 1   Current Usage: 1 LICENCE VIOLATIONSThe content of licensed LTU role [FND_WEBENDUSER_B2B] has been modified  

Hello,We are migrating from IFSv8 to IFS Cloud 25R1SU05.In IFSv8, the user ID matches the Oracle user and is used as  Directory ID.By default, identity brokering in IFS Cloud uses the email address as the Directory ID.Currently, Entra transmits the email as the Directory ID, which does not match the existing user IDs.Question:How can we update all users so that the Directory ID is set to the value stored in each user's Email field?Any guidance or recommended approach would be greatly appreciated.Thank you in advance for your help.  

Hi all,we plan to use FIFO valuation method for some companies/sites.While doing some testing on top of FIFO we see some challenges like:Intra-company transfers between sites when doing transfer from site using STD to site using FIFO with internal CO/PO, the FIFO bucket in receiving site is valuated by STD cost from the sending site to avoid any artificial profit/loss to be created during the transfer and ignoring any freight charges on the internal PO connected to the transfer      Not possible to cancel internal receipts system is not allowing to cancel internal receipt when FIFO is used Recalculation of FIFO bucket cost history in case of a mistake I’m actually note sure if this is a pain (but I can imagine under some circumstances it could be), ​​​but ​​​​it seems there is no system support to recalculate FIFO bucket cost history in case of a

Hello Community.I have a question about 'Validity Period for Analysis' for Competency.When a period is set , what can be analyzed ?Please tell me which screen displays the analysis results.Thanks & Best Regards.

Hello,We are manufacturing continuously a mesh.To produce this I am using a wire (part set up with kg), from which I am cutting it into pieces and further welding those pieces together to obtain a final product.Current BOM:Wire [kg] → assigned to cutting operation   At this level we are providing at the custom field number of pieces that shall be cutted from the wire Current Routing:Cutting WeldingWe would like to display on the Shop Order Work Instruction Report an assignment of the materials to the operation so the operators know how many pieces of the wire go into the welding operation. So ideally:Cutting - display of wire  Welding - display of wire (but no consumption and no costs, as the same wire was already processed in the operation above).As currently wire is assigned to the cutting operation, I am not able to reassign

Hi, Im trying to setup a migration job to update our supplier statistic groups. I cannot figure out why I get the error - ORA-20114: SupplierInfo.FND_MODIFIED: The Supplier Info record has already been changed. Please refresh the record and reenter your changes.I received the error in both INSERT_OR_UPDATE and also EXCELThe view Im using is - SUPPLIER_PURCH_SRM_INFO_CFV  

Hello, We are currently on 22R2 for IFS Cloud and we have encountered an error. I created a quick report to pull some values via SQL and we want to schedule this report to attach an excel file of the output onto an email and send it to our users.We scheduled the report and have the emailing set up properly, but we never received any emails. The only thing we received was this error on the print manager logs. Thanks,Bryan “Exception while generating Plugin Output Caused by: Error while rendering the report. 11 retries were made. The last error message is Server returned a status other than OK: 500 Message: Internal Server Error”

Dear Community Team, As the Taiwan KEYUSERS are not satisfied by the given translation in simplified Chinese it would be helpful to have a separate translation for TWN.Does IFS support this ?If yes how we can proceed with the request. Thank you and Best regards,Kalhari.

Hi There, I am looking for a solution to perform the revaluation of fixed assets as a bulk. In the real customer scenario they want to revalue 20,000 fixed assets, which is not possible to do manually one by one. Is there a possible way to perform it using external files?

Environment: Cloud 25R2Background: A overhaul of a truck is performed and the engine (Inventory part / serial object) is removed for repair. Time and Material is consumed to repair the engine.  The cost of the repair should sit with repaired engine.How can this be achieved automatically?Currently when a Work Order is performed, it is possible to “Return to Inventory” and the “Inventory Value” has to be set manually. It does not use the time and material cost incurred on the work order.Is there any setting that can automate this.Regards, Malik

Hi, I’m trying to add a technical drawing to a released part. Im in Master part > Part and trying to add a previously created technical drawing. When i try to save i get the following error “Not allowed to change an obsolete part revision”. im unable to determine why this is occurring. The part is no obsolete and is marked as released. There is a previous revision that IS obsolete.   

I have watch a couple of videos and read some articles of how IFS ECO-foot print can be used to perform analysis on the presence of substances in a product bill of materials, but i have not come across reporting on this. Can anyone share an example of a report for REACH / RoHS etc? 

Hi all,I came across a statement in the documentation for the Catch Unit feature which says that enabling “Negative On-Hand Allowed” on the inventory part is mandatory.However, in my testing:I enabled Catch Unit on the part Did not enable “Negative On-Hand Allowed” Completed the full Order-to-Cash flow (Customer order→ Shop Order  → CO delivery → invoicing)I did not receive any validation or error, and the process worked fine.Is the “Negative On-Hand Allowed” setting truly mandatory? Or is it only required for specific scenarios (e.g., shortages, partial picking, or certain transactions)? Has anyone experienced a situation where not enabling it causes issues?Would appreciate any clarification or real-use examples.Thanks in advance!

Enabling “Negative On-Hand Allowed” on the inventory part is a mandatory prerequisite for using the Catch Unit feature.However, during testing:configured an inventory part with Catch Unit enabled  The “Negative On-Hand Allowed” option was not enabled  I successfully completed the full Order-to-Cash process (CO → Shop Order → CO Delivery → Invoicing)No validation, warning, or error was triggered at any stage of the process.

Hello,In MWO service classic application, when we click on the main menu as shown below, it adjusts the layout of the dashboard screens to the right and displays the main menu list. It also had the ability to display the icons for the users to view the list without clicking on the menu.In the new MWO service application, the icons are not displayed directly in the screen and can be viewed only when the main menu is clicked. Also, the dashboard screen is not adjusted but the main menu overlaps with the screen as shown below. Please let me know if we will have the same layout features from the classic application mentioned above in the new MWO service application in the future updates.

Hi,When using expressorders (order code 5) - Is there in IFS Cloud (25R1) a way to ensure that all lines on a purchase requisition are converted to PO lines before the order is printed / sent out, even if the PR lines are authorized at different points of time?We have got this to work in IFS 10, but in IFS Cloud the first line is printed / sent out as soon as it has been converted.Thanks in advance!JohanNB! We have some customized functionality in this area that may interfere.

We are encountering major issues with our upgrade from 24R2 to 25R1. This is our 3rd Cloud upgrade. The first two painful upgrades we considered these may be teething problems and related to upgrading to the latest version (as IFS recommends by the way). Now we decided to be conservative and go for 25R1, just one release up and 9 Service Updates rich. IFS also confirmed they have improved supporting these upgrades. Finally, we have customizations but very little (as compared to other clients according to IFS and our implementation partner).We are now 4 days in the upgrade process and do not even have the build place working with help of IFS. One issue pops up after the other is solved. Did any of you experience similar issues? What else? What more can we expect? Should we go for 25R2? Not upgrade at all? What can you advise?

Community,How to fix below error?I am trying to connect a Repair Work Order to a superior work order which is connected to a project, i got below error message. Same error message is also prompted when I am trying to connect the same Repair Work Order to the project using Project Connections. see below error. 

We have a part which is usually purchased, but occasionally has to be manufactured. How do we set the Cost Template so it picks up both manufacturing and purchase order info. 

We are currently implementing a workflow that allows us to create customer sales orders. Tests on a small scale are okay and we are happy.However, as soon as we move to a larger scale, the workflow crashes without an error.The dataset is composed of the same order that we create X times, so we know that we have no functional problems because iterating 30 creations, for example, is okay, but not 100.We have already limited the return of the projection as much as possible by using $select to retrieve only the desired columns.We have not exceeded the line reading limit per projection (10.000) (at most we read 5000 lines) and we don't think we have a problem with CASCADE_LIMIT because we set it to 250,000 for testing.We are more inclined towards a memory/CPU/space limit for the one of the pods.Do you

Hi, We are looking at an integration with Boomi on Apps10. Using both the IFS and Generic REST connector we have an issue on the first Patch after it has not been used for between 6-10 hours, where it errors, but then retries and the transaction still happns.Does any one have experience of the ‘wake up’ process of the connector. It only happens on one specific process, which is fine at all other times.

Hello all, My client asked for the possibilities to :Visualize in supplier B2B portal attached audit or NCR to a purchase order. Share supplier evaluation with him on supplier B2B portalDo you have an idea if it is possible to do it please?Thanks for your help. Omar  

Hi All, We can see associated Workflow Configuration of an assignment from MWO. However, this information is not visible in IFS cloud. I think that the ideal place to appear this is the Assignment tab of a Request Task.Further, “Surveys and Answers” are only visible once technician answer to specific surveys. Did  anyone try to make this information visible in IFS cloud at certain place? Any work around other than configuration/customization?Customer Need: Dispatcher/Planner needs to see what are the triggered configurations and survey from the Backoffice.TIA.

Hi All,Please let us know what the meaning of Invalid Task Group, we are getting this multiple services 

When using the 23R2 Dispatch Console for manual resource assignment for a customer who does not use PSO and has 4000 resources, is it advisable to use multiple datasets?  What advantage would the use of multiple datasets bring without PSO?  Is there is a concern that so many resources under one dataset would cause performance issues in the Dispatch Console even without using PSO?  Couldn’t filters on Resource Group and Region sufficiently limit the number or resources hitting the Dispatch Console even with all 4000 resources in one dataset?